Literature DB >> 3546611

Conventional versus cytokinetic polychemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized cooperative trial.

P F Conte, P Pronzato, A Rubagotti, A Alama, D Amadori, R Demicheli, G Gardin, P Gentilini, A Jacomuzzi, R Lionetto.   

Abstract

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) can induce a recruitment into the proliferative pool of previously resting breast cancer cells in vivo. In order to verify if estrogenic recruitment could result in a larger tumor cell killing by chemotherapy, 117 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2; and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 on day 1); DES-CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 on day 1; DES, 1 mg orally on days 5, 6, and 7; and epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, on day 8) every 21 days. No significant difference in objective response rates, survival, or progression-free survival was seen between the two regimens. Patients in the DES-CEF arm experienced a higher complete response (CR) rate (24.1% v 16.1%), which reached statistical significance in the case of soft-tissue metastasis (48% v 27.3%; P less than .05) and estrogen receptor-negative tumors (35.7% v 11.1%; P less than .025). Survival and progression-free survival of patients refractory to treatment were not worsened by estrogenic recruitment. In the subset of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy, DES-CEF unexpectedly induced a significantly longer survival (greater than 802 days v 375 days; P = .029) and progression-free survival (239 days v 192 days; P = .041) than CEF. The DES-CEF regimen was more myelotoxic, and 43.3% of the DES-CEF cycles had to be delayed because of leukopenia in comparison with 11.8% of the CEF cycles (P less than .0001). In conclusion, chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment was able to induce more CRs in certain subsets of patients and a significant prolongation in survival and progression-free survival of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy. These results have been achieved despite a significantly lower dose intensity of chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3546611     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.3.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  9 in total

1.  Kinetic and morphometric responses of heterogeneous populations of NMU-induced rat mammary tumor cells to hormone and antipolyamine therapy in vivo.

Authors:  A Manni; S Lancaster; H English; B Badger; J Lynch; L Demers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  In vitro sensitivity testing of human breast cancer cells to hormones and chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  J T Emerman; A W Tolcher; P M Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca A Miksad; Vera Zietemann; Raffaella Gothe; Ruth Schwarzer; Annette Conrads-Frank; Petra Schnell-Inderst; Björn Stollenwerk; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Timed sequential chemotherapy following ifosfamide-induced kinetic recruitment in refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  R Rosso; A Alama; L Repetto; P F Conte
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Kinetic resistance to anticancer agents.

Authors:  M T Dimanche-Boitrel; C Garrido; B Chauffert
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Effect of hormonal manipulation and doxorubicin administration on cell cycle kinetics of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  M Bontenbal; A M Sieuwerts; J G Klijn; H A Peters; H L Krijnen; P Sonneveld; J A Foekens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Characterisation of VP-16-induced DNA cleavage in oestrogen-stimulated human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  R J Epstein; P J Smith; J V Watson; N M Bleehen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) allows acceleration and dose intensity increase of CEF chemotherapy: a randomised study in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  A Ardizzoni; M Venturini; M R Sertoli; P G Giannessi; F Brema; M Danova; F Testore; G L Mariani; M C Pennucci; P Queirolo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.