Lu Liang1, Xin Wang2, Yang Yu1, Yuan Zhang2, Jiamei Liu2, Mulei Chen2, Lin Zhang2, Tao Jiang1. 1. Department of Radiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China. 2. Heart Center and Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension Research, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the capability of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters for distinguishing between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and hypertensive heart disease (HHD). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with HCM, 35 patients with HHD, and 29 healthy controls subjects were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent cardiac MRI to measure T1 values and extracellular volume (ECV), as well as the extent and patterns of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Myocardial segments were categorized as non-hypertrophic, mild-hypertrophic, moderate-hypertrophic, and severe-hypertrophic based on end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT). The differences in native T1 values between all four groups were evaluated. Results: Native T1 values were significantly higher in patients with HCM than in patients with HHD and in healthy controls (both P < 0.001). Moreover, significantly increased ECV was shown in patients with HCM than in patients with HHD and in healthy controls (both P = 0.001). Native T1 values in the basal slice and apex slice were significantly higher in patients with HCM than in patients with HHD (P < 0.01). In patients with HCM, the non-hypertrophic myocardial segments demonstrated significantly elevated T1 values compared with patients with HHD (both P < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of 28.8% for ECV, it could differentiate between HCM and HHD with 85% sensitivity, 62.07% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.772. Conclusion: In patients with HCM, T1 tissue remodeling occurs in the normal-appearing myocardial segments, but not in patients with HHD. Both native T1 values and ECV can support clinically relevant discrimination between HCM and HHD, although ECV had better diagnostic efficacy.
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the capability of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters for distinguishing between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and hypertensive heart disease (HHD). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with HCM, 35 patients with HHD, and 29 healthy controls subjects were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent cardiac MRI to measure T1 values and extracellular volume (ECV), as well as the extent and patterns of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Myocardial segments were categorized as non-hypertrophic, mild-hypertrophic, moderate-hypertrophic, and severe-hypertrophic based on end-diastolic wall thickness (EDWT). The differences in native T1 values between all four groups were evaluated. Results: Native T1 values were significantly higher in patients with HCM than in patients with HHD and in healthy controls (both P < 0.001). Moreover, significantly increased ECV was shown in patients with HCM than in patients with HHD and in healthy controls (both P = 0.001). Native T1 values in the basal slice and apex slice were significantly higher in patients with HCM than in patients with HHD (P < 0.01). In patients with HCM, the non-hypertrophic myocardial segments demonstrated significantly elevated T1 values compared with patients with HHD (both P < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of 28.8% for ECV, it could differentiate between HCM and HHD with 85% sensitivity, 62.07% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.772. Conclusion: In patients with HCM, T1 tissue remodeling occurs in the normal-appearing myocardial segments, but not in patients with HHD. Both native T1 values and ECV can support clinically relevant discrimination between HCM and HHD, although ECV had better diagnostic efficacy.
Authors: Theodoros D Karamitsos; Jane M Francis; Saul Myerson; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Stefan Neubauer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-10-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Timothy C Wong; Kayla Piehler; Christopher G Meier; Stephen M Testa; Amanda M Klock; Ali A Aneizi; Jonathan Shakesprere; Peter Kellman; Sanjeev G Shroff; David S Schwartzman; Suresh R Mulukutla; Marc A Simon; Erik B Schelbert Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Wessel P Brouwer; Emma N Baars; Tjeerd Germans; Karin de Boer; Aernout M Beek; Jolanda van der Velden; Albert C van Rossum; Mark B M Hofman Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-04-25 Impact factor: 5.364