| Literature DB >> 35464974 |
Peipei Zhang1,2, Kunyu Zhang1,2, Yayu Liu2, Jiafang Fu1,2, Gongli Zong1,2, Xin Ma2, Guangxiang Cao1,2.
Abstract
PhoPR is an important two-component signal transduction system (TCS) for microorganisms to sense and respond to phosphate limitation. Although the response regulator PhoP controls morphological development and secondary metabolism in various Streptomyces species, the function of PhoP in Actinosynnema pretiosum remains unclear. In this study, we showed that PhoP significantly represses the morphological development of the A. pretiosum X47 strain. Production of aerial mycelium and spore formation occurred much earlier in the ΔphoP strain than in X47 during growth on ISP2 medium. Transcription analysis indicated that 222 genes were differentially expressed in ∆phoP compared to strain X47. Chemotaxis genes (cheA, cheW, cheX, and cheY); flagellum biosynthesis and motility genes (flgBCDGKLN, flaD, fliD-R, motA, and swrD); and differentiation genes (whiB and ssgB) were significantly upregulated in ∆phoP. Gel-shift analysis indicated that PhoP binds to the promoters of flgB, flaD, and ssgB genes, and PHO box-like motif with the 8-bp conserved sequence GTTCACGC was identified. The transcription of phoP/phoR of X47 strain was induced at low phosphate concentration. Our results demonstrate that PhoP is a negative regulator that controls the morphological development of A. pretiosum X47 by repressing the transcription of differentiation genes.Entities:
Keywords: Actinosynnema pretiosum; PHO box; PhoP; TCS; morphological development
Year: 2022 PMID: 35464974 PMCID: PMC9019756 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.845620
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Amino acid alignment of PhoP and PhoR in Actinosynnema pretiosum X47. Sequence comparison of PhoP (A) and PhoR (B) of A. pretiosum X47 and their counterparts in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Identical amino acid residues are highlighted in black, and similar residues are shown in gray.
Figure 2Deletion of phoP accelerates morphological differentiation in A. pretiosum X47. (A) Schematic design showing replacement of a 674-bp internal sequence of phoP with an apramycin resistance cassette. (B) Confirmation of the phoP mutation by PCR analysis with primers flanking the deleted region. PCR products were electrophoresed on an agarose gel. (C) Phenotypes of the wild-type A. pretiosum strain X47, phoP mutant strain ∆phoP, and complemented strain C-∆phoP grown at 30°C on ISP2 medium for 48 and 72 h.
Figure 3PhoP influences the formation of aerial hyphae and spores in A. pretiosum. (A–D) SEM images of strain X47 after growth on ISP2 medium for 48 h (A) and 72 h (C), and ∆phoP strain for 48 h (B) and 72 h (D). The scale bar is 5 μM. (E,F) SEM images of X47 (E) and ∆phoP (F) strains after growth on ISP2 medium for 72 h. The scale bar is 1 μM.
PhoP deletion alters the expression of developmental and chemotaxis-related genes in A. pretiosum.
| Gene ID | Gene | Function | Fold change (ΔphoP/X47) | Q-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNX65_RS10075 | SsgA family sporulation/cell division regulator | 3.60 | <0.001 | |
| CNX65_RS11775 |
| FHIPEP family type III secretion protein | 7.78 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11785 |
| Response regulator | 16.62 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11790 |
| Chemotaxis protein CheX | 15.52 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11795 |
| Response regulator | 13.40 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11800 |
| Protein-glutamate O-methyltransferase CheR | 11.04 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11805 |
| Chemotaxis response regulator protein-glutamate methylesterase | 8.82 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11815 |
| Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein | 9.46 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11820 |
| Chemotaxis protein CheW | 11.10 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11825 |
| Chemotaxis protein CheA/chemotaxis protein CheW | 9.84 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11855 |
| EscU/YscU/HrcU family type III secretion system export apparatus switch protein | 6.43 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11860 |
| Flagellar biosynthetic protein FliR | 5.96 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11865 |
| Flagellar biosynthesis protein FliQ | 6.20 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11870 |
| Flagellar type III secretion system pore protein FliP | 5.84 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11875 |
| FliO/MopB family protein | 5.97 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11880 |
| Flagellar motor switch protein FliN | 5.24 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11885 |
| Flagellar motor switch protein FliM | 4.84 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11890 |
| Flagellar basal body-associated FliL family protein | 18.90 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11895 |
| OmpA family protein | 16.37 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11900 |
| Motility protein A | 16.13 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11905 | Flagellar FlbD family protein | 13.73 | <0.001 | |
| CNX65_RS11910 |
| Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgG | 16.40 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11915 |
| Flagellar hook capping protein | 15.07 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11920 |
| Flagellar hook-length control protein FliK | 10.93 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11925 |
| Transglycosylase SLT domain-containing protein | 9.81 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11930 |
| Cell envelope biogenesis protein TolA | 8.57 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11935 |
| FliI/YscN family ATPase | 8.52 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11940 |
| Flagellar assembly protein | 11.69 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11945 |
| Flagellar motor switch protein FliG | 11.69 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11950 |
| Flagellar M-ring protein FliF | 8.72 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11955 |
| Flagellar hook-basal-body complex protein FliE | 7.07 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11960 |
| Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgC | 8.09 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11965 | Flagellar basal-body rod protein FlgB | 8.07 | <0.001 | |
| CNX65_RS11975 |
| Flagellar export chaperone FliS | 9.06 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11980 |
| Flagellar filament capping protein FliD | 9.76 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11985 | Flagellin | 15.58 | <0.001 | |
| CNX65_RS11990 |
| Sigma-70 family RNA polymerase sigma factor | 12.82 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS11995 |
| Flagellar export chaperone FlgN | 8.94 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS12000 |
| Flagellar hook-associated protein FlgK | 8.62 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS12005 |
| Flagellar hook-associated protein 3 | 5.93 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS12010 |
| Flagellar assembly protein FliW | 4.37 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS12015 |
| Carbon storage regulator CsrA | 5.57 | <0.001 |
| CNX65_RS32100 |
| WhiB family transcriptional regulator | 5.62 | <0.001 |
One or more putative PHO boxes in the promoter.
Figure 4EMSAs with PhoP protein of A. pretiosum X47. (A–C) Binding of PhoP with the upstream sequences of flgB (A), flaD (B), and ssgB (C). The probes were incubated with no protein (lane 1), 1.0 μg protein (lane 2), 1.0 μg protein (lanes 3–5), 50-fold excess of unlabeled specific probe (lane 3), 200-fold excess of unlabeled specific probe (lane 4), and 200-fold excess of unlabeled unspecific probe (lane 5). (D) Binding of PhoP with the upstream sequences of cheA, fliM, swrD, and whiB. The probes were incubated with no protein (−) or 4 μg protein (+).
Figure 5Consensus binding sequence for PhoP in A. pretiosum and mutational analysis of predicted PHO box-like motif in the promoters of flgB, ssgB, and flaD. (A) Alignment of putative PHO boxes box-like motif in the promoters of flgB, ssgB, and flaD. Conserved nucleotides are indicated by a dark background. (B) Consensus binding sequence for PhoP comprising eight nucleotides, based on the alignment in panel (A). (C) Mutation analyses of putative PHO box-like motif in the promoters of flgB, ssgB, and flaD. Putative PHO box-like motifs are shown in green and mutagenized nucleotides are in red. The orientation of consensus sequences is indicated by arrow. (D) EMSAs with mutant probes. The probes were incubated with no protein (−) or 4 μg protein (+).
Figure 6Transcriptional analysis of phop and phoR in X47 strain was analyzed by real-time PCR. X47 strain was cultured on ISP2 with 0 mM (dark gray bars) and 5 mM (light gray bars) K2HPO4 for 72 h. Expression of major sigma factor gene hrdB was used as an internal control. Results are the means of triplet experiments.