| Literature DB >> 35464973 |
Pablo Almela1, David Velázquez1, Eugenio Rico2,3, Ana Justel4,5, Antonio Quesada1,3.
Abstract
The biological activity of marine vertebrates represents an input of nutrients for Antarctic terrestrial biota, with relevant consequences for the entire ecosystem. Even though microbial mats assemble most of the biological diversity of the non-marine Antarctica, the effects of the local macrofauna on these microecosystems remain understudied. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, 13C and 15N stable isotopes, and by characterizing the P and N-derived nutrient levels, we evaluated the effects of penguins and other marine vertebrates on four microbial mats located along the Antarctic Peninsula. Our results show that P concentrations, C/N and N/P ratios, and δ15N values of "penguin-impacted" microbial mats were significantly higher than values obtained for "macrofauna-free" sample. Nutrients derived from penguin colonies and other marine vertebrates altered the trophic interactions of communities within microbial mats, as well as the relative abundance and trophic position of meiofaunal groups. Twenty-nine bacterial families from eight different phyla significantly changed with the presence of penguins, with inorganic nitrogen (NH4 + and NO3 -) and δ15N appearing as key factors in driving bacterial community composition. An apparent change in richness, diversity, and dominance of prokaryotes was also related to penguin-derived nutrients, affecting N utilization strategies of microbial mats and relating oligotrophic systems to communities with a higher metabolic versatility. The interdisciplinary approach of this study makes these results advance our understanding of interactions and composition of communities inhabiting microbial mats from Antarctica, revealing how they are deeply associated with marine animals.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctica; bacterial community; microbial mat; nitrogen; penguins; phosphorus; trophic relationships
Year: 2022 PMID: 35464973 PMCID: PMC9023888 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.841175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1Map indicating the location of the sampling areas along the Antarctic Peninsula. (A) Distribution of the sampled microbial mats along the Antarctic Peninsula. Red stars indicate the sampling areas with penguin colonies in their surroundings, whereas the red dot indicates the sampling area isolated from marine vertebrates. (B) Detailed picture of microbial mats from Byers Peninsula Plateau (BP), Caleta Primavera (CP), Avian Island (AI), and Lagotellerie Island (LI). Images of penguins represent the population (number of nests) of penguin colonies from CP, AI, and LI sampling areas (data from MAPPPD; Humphries et al., 2017).
Mean (standard deviation in parentheses) values of the physicochemical characteristics of the four microbial mats included in this study.
| Lagotellerie Island (LI) | Avian Island (AI) | Cierva Point (CP) | Byers Plateau (BP) | |
| 67°53′16″S | 67°46′15″S | 64°09′00″S | 62°65′49″S | |
|
| ||||
| TAF (days per year) | 83 | 83 | 13 | 190 |
| C (mg⋅g–1) | 115.6 (12.2) | 285.9 (0.6) | 190.3 (12.8) | 212.9 (20.8) |
| N (mg⋅g–1) | 21.3 (2.4) | 44.9 (0.4) | 26.3 (1.8) | 21.1 (2.4) |
| P (mg⋅g–1) | 33.7 (0.9) | 57.2 (2.5) | 11.0 (0.6) | 1.8 (0.1) |
| δ15N (‰) | 22.3 (0.2) | 12.4 (0.1) | 8.8 (0.1) | −3.9 (0.3) |
| C/N | 5.4 (0.0) | 6.4 (0.1) | 7.2 (0.2) | 10.1 (0.2) |
| N/P | 0.6 (0.1) | 0.8 (0.0) | 2.4 (0.3) | 12.0 (2.2) |
| NH3-NH4 + (mg⋅kg–1) | 255 | 513 | 459 | 28 |
| NO3 (mg⋅kg–1) | 130 | 41 | 88 | 24 |
| TOC (mg⋅cm–2) | 3.9 (0.2) | 4.9 (0.5) | 3.4 (0.7) | 5.8 (1.9) |
| Chla (μg⋅cm–2) | 26.8 (0.3) | 8.1 (1.0) | 5.2 (1.1) | 11.6 (1.7) |
| Fungal biomass (μg⋅cm–2) | 109 (31.1) | 61 (27.2) | 37 (18.2) | 9 (3.6) |
|
| ||||
| Nematodes (ind⋅cm–2)/% | 1.7 (3) / 0 | 22.9 (13) / 6 | 48.9 (34) / 52 | 96.7 (55) / 50 |
| Tardigrades (ind⋅cm–2)/% | 644.9 (588) / 88 | 169.3 (69) / 45 | 7.6 (11) / 8 | 70.3 (32) / 37 |
| Rotifers (ind⋅cm–2)/% | 106.9 (122) / 12 | 184.6 (29) / 49 | 37.7 (25) / 40 | 28.5 (15) / 13 |
|
| ||||
| Richness | 447 (73) | 573 (49) | 512 (58) | 601 (47) |
| Shannon | 7.3 (0.3) | 7.8 (0.2) | 7.2 (0.3) | 7.8 (0.1) |
| Margalef | 43.3 (6.5) | 55.8 (4.3) | 49.3 (5.3) | 58.7 (4.1) |
Meiofaunal relative abundances estimations (per surface), richness (defined by the number of ASVs), Shannon and Margalef indices of the bacterial community were included.
FIGURE 2(A) Enrichment in δ15N of rotifers, nematodes, and Hypsibiidae tardigrade. For estimating the differences between “primary consumers” and “secondary consumers,” an enrichment of 2–4‰ was considered. (B) Simmr credibility interval plot of the contribution of potential food sources of the studied microbial mats (boxes enclose the 50% credibility interval; lines within boxes represent median values).
FIGURE 3(A) Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of the bacterial community composition of Lagotellerie Island (LI), Avian Island (AI), Caleta Primavera (CP), and Byers Peninsula Plateau (BP) microbial mats. The multivariate analysis is based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrices between the microbiome profiles at an ASV level. Distances between symbols on the ordination plot reflect relative dissimilarities in community structures. Ellipses indicate 95% confidence intervals fitted into the spatial ordination. (B) UPGMA cluster dendrogram of the bacterial community within the microbial mats included in this study. The relative abundances were used to evaluate the relationships between bacterial communities, using weighted pair clustering based on Bray–Curtis measurements.
FIGURE 4Relative abundance of 16S rRNA genes at different taxonomic resolution (phyla vs. order) from microbial mats included in this study.