| Literature DB >> 35463946 |
Linmin Zhu1,2, Qianyang Huang3, Xiao Li4,5, Bo Jin4, Yun Ding3, C James Chou3, Kuo-Jung Su3, Yani Zhang4, Xingguo Chen2, Kuo Yuan Hwa3, Sheeno Thyparambil3, Weili Liao3, Zhi Han3, Richard Mortensen3, Yi Jin4, Zhen Li4,5, James Schilling3,5, Zhen Li4,5, Karl G Sylvester7, Xuguo Sun1, Xuefeng B Ling7.
Abstract
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a multifaceted disorder affecting epidemic proportion at global scope. Defective insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells and the inability of insulin-sensitive tissues to respond effectively to insulin are the underlying biology of T2DM. However, circulating biomarkers indicative of early diabetic onset at the asymptomatic stage have not been well described. We hypothesized that global and targeted mass spectrometry (MS) based metabolomic discovery can identify novel serological metabolic biomarkers specifically associated with T2DM. We further hypothesized that these markers can have a unique pattern associated with latent or early asymptomatic stage, promising an effective liquid biopsy approach for population T2DM risk stratification and screening.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; early detection; metabolomics; serum; type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35463946 PMCID: PMC9024215 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.841209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
FIGURE 1Schematic study design.
Demographic table.
| Characteristic | Diabetic Cohort | Pre-diabetic Cohort | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training | Testing | Training | Testing | |||||||||
| Non-Diabetes (n = 25) | Diabetes (n = 25) |
| Non-Diabetes (n = 15) | Diabetes (n = 15) |
| Non-Diabetes (n = 62) | Pre-Diabetes (n = 76) |
| Non-Diabetes (n = 27) | Pre-Diabetes (n = 35) |
| |
| Age (year) | 45.9 (1.1) | 52.2 (4.7) | 0.045 | 69.5 (3.2) | 67.2 (5.9) | 0.192 | 54.5 (5.2) | 53.8 (6.2) | 0.441 | 54.3 (4.2) | 55.5 (6.8) | 0.404 |
| Gender | ||||||||||||
| Male | 10 (40.0%) | 15 (60.0%) | 5 (33.3%) | 10 (66.7%) | 29 (46.8) | 53 (69.7) | 7 (25.9) | 21 (60) | ||||
| Female | 15 (60.0%) | 10 (40.0%) | 10 (66.7%) | 5 (33.3%) | 33 (53.2) | 23 (30.3) | 20 (74.1) | 14 (40) | ||||
| FPG (mM) | 5.1 (1.8) | 8.9 (3.0)*** | 7.1 × 10−10 | 5.1 (0.3) | 9.6 (2.2)*** | 1.7 × 10−6 | 5.2 (0.3) | 6 (0.3)*** | 3.7 × 10−5 | 5.2 (0.6) | 6.1 (0.4)*** | 2.9 × 10−6 |
| TC (mM) | 4.9 (0.8) | 5.1 (1.2) | 0.72 | 9.6 (2.2) | 4.7 (1.1) | 0.426 | 4.7 (0.9) | 4.8 (1) | 0.319 | 5.2 (0.9) | 4.9 (1) | 0.231 |
| Creatinine (mM) | 65.9 (13.7) | 66.8 (19.9) | 0.98 | 68.2 (11.0) | 68 (14.1) | 0.485 | 68 (14.1) | 71.2 (13.5) | 0.175 | 64.1 (10.8) | 69.9 (13.1) | 0.069 |
| TG (mM) | 1.3 (0.6) | 2.3 (1.0)*** | 4.5 × 10−4 | 1.4 (0.5) | 1.4 (0.6) | 8.4 × 10−5 | 1.4 (0.6) | 1.8 (1.1)** | 0.03 | 1.3 (0.5) | 1.8 (0.9)** | 0.009 |
| HDL-C (mM) | 1.4 (0.6) | 1.1 (0.4) | 0.049 | 1.4 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.4) | 0.0236 | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.2 (0.4)*** | 0.249 | 1.5 (0.4) | 1.1 (0.3)*** | 2.8 × 10−4 |
| LDL-C (mM) | 3.2 (0.8) | 3.1 (1.1) | 0.791 | 3.0 (0.7) | 3.0 (1.0) | 0.86 | 3 (0.8) | 3 (1) | 0.93 | 3.4 (0.9) | 3.2 (1) | 0.299 |
All values are presented as mean (SD) except for gender where percentage is applied. The p values were determined by Mann-Whitney U test and classified into several categories based on following criteria by comparing against the control group: *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001. FPG, fast plasma glucose; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.
FIGURE 2Structural identification of the biomarker compounds discovered from global metabolomics analysis: Hexose, 2-ketobutyric acid, 3-methylglutaconic acid, 1,5-anhydroglucitol, Galactitol, Sucrose, and Feruloylquinic acid. Measured MS/MS spectral fragmentation profiles (top, in black) matching procured chemical standards (bottom, in red) profiled with the same LCMS protocol.
FIGURE 3Volcano plot analysis of the biomarker compounds revealed in our discovery analysis with the T2DM training cohort. Filled circles representing compounds discovered from the targeted metabolomics analysis. (A): Glucose ([M + Na]+), (B): 2-Ketobutyric acid, (C): 3-Methylglutaconic acid, (D): 1,5-anhydroglucitol, (E): Glucose ([M-H]-), (F): Galactitol, (G): Sucrose, (H): Feruloylquinic acid. Open circles representing compounds discovered from the global metabolomics analysis, 1: Pyroglutamic acid, 2: Ornithine, 3: Hexose, 4: Valine, 5: Leucine/Isoleucine, 6: Tyrosine, 7: Phenylalanine, 8: Tryptophan, 9: C16-Carnitine, 10: C14-Carnitine, 11: C5DC-Carnitine/C6OH-Carnitine, 12: C5OH-Carnitine, 13: Tritriacontanoic Acid (33:0) Butyl Ester, and 14: Dotriacontanoic Acid (32:0) Butyl Ester.
FIGURE 4Unsupervised clustering (heatmap analysis) of 22 classifying metabolites (8 from global metabolomics and 14 from targeted metabolomics) reveals distinct metablic patterns separating diabetic, pre-diabetic samples from healthy controls. Abbreviations are as follows: 1,5-AG, 1,5-anhydroglucitol; FQA, Feruloylquinic acid; Glu, Glucose; 3-MGA, 3-methylglutaconic acid; 2-KBA, 2-ketobutyric acid and Suc, Sucrose.
FIGURE 5Development of T2DM and Pre-T2DM models with different machine learning approaches.
FIGURE 6Prevalence-corrected positive predictive values (PPV) was plotted as a function of Pre-T2DM predictor score for the Pre-T2DM cohort samples. Horizontal dashed lines identify the average population risk of 34.8%, and relative risks of 1.5X (52.2%) and 2X (69.6%). Vertical dashed lines identify corresponding predictor scores. The confidence interval about the PPV curve (gray shaded area) was estimated using all Pre-T2DM subjects. Confidence intervals about the PPV were calculated with the normal approximation of the error for binomial proportions. Box plots at the foot of the figure correspond to the distributions of predictor scores for prediabetic and control subjects. The PPV curve and the box plots share the same predictor score axis.