Literature DB >> 35463720

The Epidemiological, Clinical, Mycological, and Pathological Features of Rhino-cerebral Mucormycosis: A Systematic Review.

Mohammadreza Salehi1, Shahram Mahmoudi2, Omid Rezahosseini3, Seyed Jamal Hashemi4, Kazem Ahmadikia4, Farzad Aala5, Nasim Khajavirad6, Neda Alijani7, Alireza Izadi4, Muhammad Ibrahim Getso4,8, Alireza Abdollahi9, Arezoo Salami1, Seyedeh Rana Khatami1, Alireza Adibimehr1, Mojtaba Hedayat Yaghoobi10, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi11, Behshad Pazooki6, Farhad Yazdi12, Jayran Zebardast13, Arash Saifi1, Malihe Hasan Nezhad1, Masoud Mardani14, Sadegh Khodavaisy4.   

Abstract

Cerebral mucormycosis (CM) is a life-threatening manifestation of mucormycosis, an angioinvasive fungal infection caused by Mucorales. We sought to systematically review all available case reports to describe epidemiologic features, clinical manifestations, predisposing factors, and diagnostic and treatment strategies of CM. A systematic search was conducted using a combination of the following keywords: "Mucor", "Zygomycetes", "mucormycosis", "cereb*", "brain", "central nervous system", and "intracranial", separately and in combination until December 31st 2018. Data sources included PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Proquest without limiting the time of publication. We included 287 articles corresponding to 345 cases of CM. Out of the 345 cases, 206 (60%) were male with a median age of 44 years; 130 (38%) were reported from North America; 87 (25%) from Asia; and 84 (24%) from Europe. The median time from onset of symptoms to presentation was 3-7 days (65/345, 65%). The highest mortality was observed among patients with diabetes mellitus (P=0.003). Debridement of infected brain tissue was associated with improved survival in CM cases (OR 1.5; 95% CI 01.3-1.8; P<0.0001). The use of liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) was significantly associated with patients' recovery (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.2-3.4; P=0.003). The combination of L-AMB and posaconazole (12.5%) was more effective than the monotherapy treatment of CM cases (P=0.009). Clinicians should consider DM as an important risk factor for CM. Moreover, surgical debridement and antifungal combination therapy could be an effective approach in the management of CM patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral mucormycosis; Diabetes mellitus; Invasive fungal infections

Year:  2022        PMID: 35463720      PMCID: PMC9013876          DOI: 10.30699/IJP.2022.538690.2721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Pathol        ISSN: 1735-5303


Introduction

Mucormycosis is a devastatingly angioinvasive fungal infection caused by filamentous fungi belonging to the order Mucorales (1). Mucormycosis is being sporadically reported; however, its aggressive nature, the increasing number of susceptible individuals, the challenge in diagnosis, and associated high mortality would be possible reasons of great concern to the epidemiologists and clinicians (2-5). Some of the classically described predisposing factors for developing mucormycosis are diabetes mellitus (DM), hematological malignancies (HM), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, those receiving deferoxamine therapy, malnourished indivi-duals, and injection drug users (IDUs) (4, 6, 7). Mucor-mycosis invades various tissues and can present as rhino-orbito-cerebral, pulmonary, cutaneous, gastrointestinal, and disseminated infection (4). In contrast, rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) is the most common presentation among diabetic patients; the HM patients and HSCT recipients usually present with pulmonary symptoms (4, 8). Cerebral mucormycosis (CM), especially in patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or profound neutropenia, can develop both via direct invasion from sino-orbital infection or hematogenously from an infected organ such as lungs (9, 10). Currently, a paucity of information regarding clinical manifestations and predisposing factors affect the diagnosis and treatment of CM (9). We systematically reviewed previously reported cases of mucormycosis to provide a more clear perspective on epidemiologic features, clinical manifestations, radiographic features, predisposing factors, diagnosis, treatment modalities, and outcome of CM.

Material and Methods

In this study, we followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (10). We designed the clinical question according to the PICO process and selected keywords to cover the question. Figure 1 depicts a flow diagram describing the different phases of this systematic review. To find related articles, a compre-hensive literature review was conducted in global databases such as PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), Science Direct, and Proquest without limiting the publication time until 31st December 2018. The search process was accomplished using the following keywords: (((((mucor) OR mucor*) OR zygomycosis) OR zygomyc*)) AND (((((cerebral) OR brain) OR central nervous system) OR intracranial) OR cereb*) both separately and in combination. We also did a manual search in google using the mentioned keywords and selected any additional relevant studies.
Fig 1

The flow diagram for the included studies

Two researchers (M.S and S.K) independently searched the mentioned databases and screened articles. Only case reports or case series in the English literature were included. CM was defined as an invasive mold infection with histopathological or mycological evidence plus the presence of radiological features of brain involvement. Review articles, conference proceedings, and other studies that did not fulfill the inclusion criteria were not included. The quality of the included articles was assessed using strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) checklist; accor-dingly, low quality and irrelevant papers (<10.5) were excluded (11). The quality assessment of the studies was performed independently by two reviewers (S.K and S.M), and disagreements were resolved by the third researcher (M.S). The rticles by their titles were screened and the full text of relevant articles were reviewed. Afterward, the data containing the name of the first author, year of the publication, country, age, gender, comorbidities, background diseases, clinical symptoms, sources of infection, duration of symptoms, prescribed drugs, surgical procedures, follow up duration, samples types, diagnosis methods, CNS imaging results, antifungal treatment drugs, and outcome were extracted. A meta-analysis using the STATA software ver. 11 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was performed. Proportions were presented as percentages and continuous data as means with standard deviations (SD). A multiple logistic regression was done, and the results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). P-value≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

In the initial search, 1462 articles were retrieved; 1175 articles were excluded according to the exclusion criteria; 287 articles containing 345 cases of CM were included in the meta-review (Figure 1). Epidemiological Features Two-hundred and six (60%) out of 345 reported CM cases were males with a median age of 44 years (range, 2 months-89 years). Cases were reported from 47 countries, with 130 (38%) from North America, 87 (25%) from Asia, and 84 (24%) from Europe (Figure 2). Epidemiological features and underlying conditions plus results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following CM are shown in Table 1. Seventy-nine (23%) reported cases were immunocompetent and did not receive immunosupp-ressive agents. DM and HMs were reported in 176 (51%) and 93 (26.9%) of the reviewed cases, respectively (Table 1). Among HMs, acute lympho-blastic leukemia (ALL) was reported in 25 (7.2%) cases (P<0.001). We divided the published articles according to the publication year (before and after 2000); as such 56% and 47% had DM (P=0. 132), while 16% and 30% had HMs (P=0.04) before and after the year 2000, respectively. Hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and injection drug use (IDU) were reported in 34 (9.8%), 18 (7.5%), and 18 (5.2%) cases, respectively.
Fig. 2

Distribution of 345 reported cases of cerebral mucormycosis according to the age group and geographic region

Table 1

Epidemiological features and underlying conditions plus the results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following cerebral mucormycosis

CharacteristicsTotaln (%)N=345Survivedn (%)N=209Deadn (%)N=136OR (95% Cl)P-value
Underlying conditions
South America 3 (0.9) 2 (1.5) 1 (0.5)
Alcohol use10 (2.9)4 (1.9)6 (4.4)1.02 (0.2 -3.7) 0.970
Burn1 (0.3)0 (0.0)1 (0.7)1.65 (1.5-1.8) 0.419
Chronic heart disease11 (3.1)3 (2.2)8 (3.8)0.5 (0.1-2.1) 0.537
Chronic kidney disease32 (9.2)5 (3.7)27 (12.9)0.257 (0.09-.686) 0.004
Chronic liver failure18 (5.2)3 (2.2)15 (7.2)0.2 (0.08-0.1) 0.04
Chronic lung disease15 (4.3)4 (2.9)11 (5.3)0.5 (0.1-1.7) 0.420
Concomitant infection9 (2.6)2 (1.5)7 (3.3)0.43 (0.08-20.1) 0.492
Corticosteroid use37 (10.7)22 (16.2)15 (7.2)2.4 (1.2-5) 0.008
Diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis14 (23.8)6 (4.4)8 (3.8)1.16 (.393-3.419) 0.78
Diabetes mellitus without ketoacidosis176 (51)83 (61)93 (44.5)1.9 (1.2-3.0) 0.003
Hematological malignancy or Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)80 (23.2)25 (18.4)55 (26.3)0.6 (0.3-1.07) 0.088
Solid organ transplantation (SOT)16 (4.6)7 (5.1)9 (4.3)1.2 (0.4-3.3) 0.717
Hypertension34 (9.8)13 (9.6)21 (10.0)0.9 (0.4-1.9) 0.88
Graft versus host disease (GVHD)11 (3.1)3 (2.2)8 (3.8)0.5 (0.1-2.1) 0.537
Injection drug use18 (5.2)7 (5.1)11 (5.3)0.9 (0.3-2.5) 0.962
Other underlying conditions29 (8.4)7 (5.1)22 (10.5)1.6 (1.5-1.8) 0.07
Solid Tumor6 (1.7)2 (1.5)4 (1.9)0.7 (0.1-4.2) 0.758
Trauma4 (1.2)3 (2.2)1 (0.5)4.6 (0.4-45.5) 0.304
Vasculitis12 (3.4)2 (1.5)10 (4.8)0.297 (0.6-1.37) 0.135
Geographical distribution
Africa4 (1.2)1 (0.7)3 (1.4)- 0.694
Asia87 (25.2)30 (22.1)57 (27.3)
European Union84 (24.3)35 (25.7)49 (23.4)
Middle East32 (9.3)16 (11.8)16 (7.7)
North America130 (37.7)50 (36.8)80 (38.3)
Oceania5 (1.4)2 (1.5)3 (1.4)
The flow diagram for the included studies Epidemiological features and underlying conditions plus the results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following cerebral mucormycosis Clinical Manifestations The time interval between the appearance of clinical signs and symptoms and the first medical visit was reported in 141 cases. The interval was 3-7 days and 8-15 days, respectively, in 65 (46%), and 42 (30%) of the 141 cases. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) ≤10 (coma), 11-14 (lethargy), and 15 (normal) were repor-ted in 13 (3.7%), 40 (11%), and 123 (35%) of the CM cases, respectively. Orbital and neurological signs were reported as the first presentation in 160 (46%) and 142 (41%) of 345 reported cases. Headache, facial signs and symptoms (including swelling, paresthesia, and pain), and fever were reported in 124 (36%), 123 (36%), and 74 (21%) cases, respectively (Table 2). The ethmoid and maxillary sinuses were the most probable primary site of infection reported in 110 (32%) and 107 (31%) of 345 cases. Twenty-four cases (7%) had concurrent lung and brain involvement, among which 5 patients (20.8%) had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), another five (20.8%) had ALL, and 3 patients (12.5%) had DM. Fungemia that was significantly associated with HMs (P=0.05) was reported in 5 (1.4%) of the CM cases.
Table 2

Clinical manifestations, site of involvement on imaging, duration of symptoms, and imaging reports plus the results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following cerebral mucormycosis

CharacteristicsTotaln (%)N= 345Survivedn (%)N=209Deadn (%)N=136OR (95% Cl)P-value
Clinical manifestations
Single 98 (28.4) 48 (35.1) 50 (23.9) 1.7 (1.1-2.7) 0.028
Auricular symptoms7 (2)3 (2.2)4 (1.9)1.1 (0.2-5.2) 0.852
Facial symptoms (including swelling, paresthesia, and pain)123 (35.6)45 (33.1)78 (37.3)0.8 (0.5-1.3) 0.422
Fever74 (21.4)26 (19.1)48 (23)0.4 (0.4-1.3) 0.395
Headache124 (35.9)49 (36.0)75 (35.9)1 (0.6-1.57) 0.978
Meningismus2 (0.5)0 (0)2 (1)1.6 (1.5-1.8) 0.156
Neurological symptoms142 (41)44 (32.4)98 (46.9)0.5 (0.3-0.8) 0.007
Nasal and oral cavities60 (17.3)26 (19.1)34 (16.3)1.2 (0.6-2.1) 0.495
Orbital symptom160 (46.3)69 (50.7)91 (43.5)1.3 (0.8-2) 0.190
Other clinical manifestations15 (4.3)7 (5.1)8 (3.8)1.3 (0.4-3.8) 0.751
Respiratory symptom20 (5.7)6 (4.4)14 (6.7)0.634 (0.2-1.7) 0.366
Seizure3 (0.8)2 (1.5)1 (0.5)3.1 (0.2-34.5) 0.564
Sites of involvement in radiographic imaging
Basal gangelia36 (10.4)13 (9.6)23 (11)0.8 (0.4-1.7) 0.668
Bilateral6 (1.7)2 (1.5)4 (1.9)0.7 (0.81-4.2) 0.758
Cavernous Sinus20 (5.7)11 (8.1)9 (4.3)1.9 (0.7-4.8) 0.142
Cranial artery9 (2.6)1 (0.7)8 (3.8)0.1 (0.02-1.5) 0.090
Intra cranial artery11 (3.1)6 (4.4)5 (2.4)1.8 (0.5-6.2) 0.297
Mid brain and pons18 (5.2)3 (2.2)16 (7.7)0.2 (0.07-0.9) 0.03
Multiple cerebral lobes100 (28.9)40 (19.1)59 (13.3)1.7 (0.7-2.6) 0.227
Occipital17 (4.9)4 (1.9)13 (6.2)0.4 (0.1-1.4) 0.209
Parietal33 (9.5)11 (8.1)22 (10.5)0.7 (0.3-1.5) 0.452
Periventricular11 (3.1)6 (4.4)5 (2.4)1.8 (0.5-6.2) 0.297
Temporal54 (15.6)21 (15.4)32 (15.3)1.0 (0.5-1.8) 0.974
Others5 (1.4)3 (2.2)2 (1)2.3 (0.3-14.1) 0.38
Duration of symptoms
˂3 days27 (7.8)9 (6.6)18 (8.6)0.7 (0.3-1.7) 0.545
3-7 days65 (18.8)21 (15.4)44 (21.1)0.6 (0.3-1.2) 0.208
8-15 days42 (12.2)22 (16.2)20 (9.6)1.8 (0.9-3.4) 0.09
16-30 days39 (11.3)17 (12.5)22 (10.5)1.2 (0.6-2.3) 0.572
˃3031 (9)12 (8.8)19 (9.1)0.6 (0.4-2) 0.932
Imaging report
Abscess72 (20.9)38 (27.9)34 (16.3)1.9 (1.2-3.3) 0.009
Bleeding25 (7.2)0 (0)25 (12)1.7 (1.5-1.9) 0.000
Cerebritis3 (0.9)1 (0.7)2 (1)0.7 (0.06-8.5) 0.827
Enhancement without abcsess66 (19.1)31 (22.8)35 (16.7)1.4 (0.8-2.5) 0.165
Meningitis5 (1.4)2 (1.5)3 (1.4)1 (0.1-6.2) 0.979
Multiple53 (15.4)14 (10.3)39 (18.7)0.5 (0.2-0.9) 0.04
Necrosis53 (15.4)8 (5.9)45 (21.5)0.2 (0.1-0.5) 0.000
Nodule8 (2.3)5 (3.7)3 (1.4)2.6 (0.6-11.1) 0.272
Radiographic Features In brain CT scans or MRIs, a single space-occupying lesion was reported in 98 (28%), brain abscess in 72 (21%), a non-enhancing lesion in 66 (19%), and necrosis in 53 (15%) of reported cases (Table 2). Laboratory Variables From blood samples, the white blood cell (WBC) count was reported in 144 (42%) of 345 reported cases. WBC count was <3.5x103 microL in 31 (74%) and >12x103 microL in 72 (20%) of 144 cases. Information about cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) variables was not reported in all reported cases. WBC count in CSF was higher than 3 cells/microL in 37 (95%) out of 39 cases, low glucose (lower than 40 mg/dl) was reported in 5 (13%) out of 39 cases, and high CSF protein (higher than 50 mg/dL) was reported in 25 (57%) out of 44 reported cases. Clinical manifestations, site of involvement on imaging, duration of symptoms, and imaging reports plus the results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following cerebral mucormycosis Distribution of 345 reported cases of cerebral mucormycosis according to the age group and geographic region Histopathologic Features and Culture Histopathologic examination or culture was performed in 298 (86%) out of 345 reported cases. In comparison, both histopathologic examination and culture were reported in 111 (32%) of 345 cases. Mucorales detection from the histopathological examination was positive in 140 (47%), 87 (29%), 54 (18%), and 17 (5.7%) of 298 cases among the samples stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Grocott methenamine silver (GMS), periodic acid Schiff (PAS), and other staining methods. The diagnosis was largely reliant on conventional phenotypic techniques after 2000 (P=0.04). The culture was performed in 138 (46%) out of 298 cases, with 5 (3.8%) out of 138 cultures being negative. Both histopathology and culture were the diagnostic evidence in 111 (32.2%) of CM cases, while diagnosis using histopathology or culture alone was observed in 298 (86.4%) and 138 (40%), respectively. The use of molecular techniques for CM diagnosis (22/345, 6.3%) was increasingly observed after the year 2000 (P<0.001). In all the studied cases, 133 Mucorales fungi were identified. Whereas Rhizopus spp., Lichtemia spp., Rhizomucor spp., and Mucor spp. were respectively cultured in 87 (65%), 11 (8.3%), 10 (7.5%), and 8 (6%) of 133 culture-positive cases. Among the 87 cases diagnosed with Rhizopus infection, 31 (36%) were Rhizopus arrhizus, and 4 (4.6%) were Rhizopus microspores being the species identified. Outcome and Treatment Death was reported in 209 (60.9%) patients, of which 93 (52.8%, P=0.003) was among DM patients and 56 (26.8%) among patients who had HM (P=0.1). Surgical debridement was performed in 199 (58%) of 345 cases. The survival OR was 1.5 in CM cases who underwent debridement (95% CI 1.3-1.8; P<0.0001). The antifungal therapy with amphotericin B-deoxy-cholate (AmB-d), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB), or posaconazole was documented in 186 (54%), 87 (25%), 37 (11%) patients, respectively. The survival OR was 2.09 in patients who received L-AMB (95% CI 1.2-3.4; P=0.003). Combination therapy with L-AMB and posaconazole was reported in 45 (13%) out of the 348 cases. There was a significant relation (P=0.009) between survival and L-AMB-posaconazole combination therapy (12.5% survivors vs. 5.3% dead among cases who had received the combined antifungal regimen; this relationship was not significant for other combined antifungal regimens). Prescribed antifungals in cases of cerebral mucormycosis plus the results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following cerebral mucormycosis

Discussion

Despite the clinical significance of cerebral mucormycosis (12), comprehensive data regarding its epidemiology and clinical manifestations are lacking. Accordingly, the present systematic review was conducted to fill this gap of knowledge. CM is globally distributed, and reports of this infection have been published from 47 countries, with the majority being from North America (130/345, 37.68%). This finding is similar to that of Kerezoudis et al. who reported a meta-analysis on isolated cerebral mucormycosis (13) but different from the results of a recent systematic review of mucormycosis case reports that found the majority of reports from Europe (290/851, 34%) followed by Asia (267/851, 31%) (14). This difference might have emanated from different inclusion criteria used in the studies or due to a higher incidence of CM in North America in comparison to other forms of mucormycosis. Furthermore, because the definitive diagnosis of mucormycosis is challenging and more than 90% of cases might have been confirmed by post-mortem examinations (15, 16), in resource-limited and developing countries, where access to diagnostic methods and devices is limited, diagnosis and reporting of CM cases might be difficult. These limitations, in turn, result in underreporting of CM in some geographical regions. CM can affect humans in all age groups. In the present study, patients' age spanned a wide range: from 2 months to 89 years with a median of 44.2 years. In another systematic review of isolated CM cases, the mean age of 28 years was reported (13). Moreover, similar to the results of other systematic reviews that reported 57% (13), 58% (17), and 63% (14) of patients being males, in the present study, males (57.9%) constituted a larger proportion of CM cases. Future studies need to be done to determine the exact role of the male gender as a potential risk factor for mucormycosis. Mucormycosis is generally known as an infection affecting patients with underlying conditions. Diabetes has been and is still the most common risk factor for mucormycosis in resource-limited countries (16). In the present study, 176 (51%) cases of CM were diabetic and 14 (23.8%) had diabetic ketoacidosis. In recent years, we have witnessed the rise in the number of patients with immunosuppressed conditions such as solid organ/hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients and those under chemotherapy; these patients are known to be highly vulnerable to mucormycosis (16). In agreement with this statement, a large proportion (n=96, 27.8%) of the reported CM cases belong to these groups. In addition to the above-mentioned underlying conditions, a divergent set of other diseases have also been reported among CM patients (Table 1). Surprisingly, in the current study, 22.9% of CM patients were immunocompetent and not receiving any immunosuppressant drugs. A similar finding was reported in another systematic review of mucormycosis cases (14). Accordingly, CM should be taken into account in all patient groups, even among healthy individuals with suspicious signs and symptoms. Orbital (46.4%) and neurological (41.2%) symptoms were the most common presentations in CM patients followed by headache (35.9%). In a review of isolated CM cases (13), altered mental status (54%) and headache (51%) were reported as the common signs and symptoms, which differ from our findings. However, the unspecific signs and symptoms similarly add to the complexity of the diagnosis of CM. Orbital involvement was the most common and interesting symptom reported previously (18), indicating the need to consider cerebral mucormycosis in patients with orbital symptoms. As mentioned previously, neurological symptoms are often associated with other extra-cerebral sym-ptoms (19). Although headache was a common clinical sign, fever was reported in just over one-fifth of cases. However, in some studies, up to 50% of patients had a fever (19). Overall, fever does not appear to be a reliable clinical sign to diagnose or rule out this invasive infection. In Kursun et al. study, cavernous sinus involvement was the most common sign of cerebral imaging in 27 patients followed by brain infarction, while in our study, abscess-like lesions and contrast-enhancing were the most common (18). Rhizopus arrhizus was dominant Rhizopus spp. identified to cause CM in this study. Similarly, other reviews on different patient groups have reported Rhizopus spp. to be the leading etiologic agents of mucormycosis (13, 14, 17, 20). Despite this agreement between various studies, results regarding the second and third-ranked causes of the disease are contro-versial. Although in the present study, Lichtemia spp. and Rhizomucor spp. were respectively the second and third common causes of CM, studies focused on all forms of mucormycosis (14, 17, 20) and even another review of isolated CM (13), have reported Mucor spp. to be the second common cause of the disease. Based on our results, obtained from a large number of cases, it could be hypothesized that Lichtemia spp. have a higher tendency for cerebral invasion in comparison to Mucor spp. These findings need to be confirmed by further investigations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, based on our findings, CM would be associated with global distribution and might present with a variety of orbital and neurological symptoms. Mucormycosis can invade any part of the brain but shows more predilection to the temporal and frontal lobes. DM and HMs are considered as common risk factors. Moreover, surgical debridement and antifungal combination treatment (L-AMB plus Posaconazole) could be an effective approach in management of the CM patients.

Authors' Contributions

MS, SK, and OR designed the study. NK, NA, SRK, AA, MHY, MS, FY, SJH, JZ, MIG, and OR performed the initial search and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, KA, SM, SK, FA, and MS cross-checked the referenced articles. SK, SM, and MS summarized the articles. All authors revised and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

OR received a grant from the Research Foundation of Rigshospitalet related, and a grant from A.P. MØLLER FONDEN not related to this work. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Table 3

Prescribed antifungals in cases of cerebral mucormycosis plus the results of the multivariable logistic regression in cases who survived or died following cerebral mucormycosis

P-valueOR (95% Cl)Deadn (%)N=136Survivedn (%)N=209Totaln (%)N=345Antifungals
0. 758 0.7 (0.1-4.2) 2 (1.4) 4 (1.9) 6 (1.7) Voriconazole
0.554 1.4 (0.7-1.7)76 (55.9)110 (52.6)186 (53.9)Amphotericin B-Deoxycholate
0. 900 1.6 (1.5-1.8)-1 (0.4)1 (0.3)Anidulafungin
0. 005 2.5 (2.2-2.9)5 (3.6)-5 (1.4)Caspofungin
0. 553 0.6 (0.1-3.1)2 (1.4)5 (2.3)7 (2)Fluconazole
0.942 1.0 (0.3-2.9)5(3.7%)8(3.8%)13 (3.8)Flucytosine
0.900 1.5 (2.1-11.9)2 (1.4)2 (0.9)4 (1.2)Isavuconazole
0. 037 2.4 (1.2-5)6 (4.4)2 (0.9)8 (2.3)Itraconazole
0.900 1.5 (0.2-11.09)2 (1.4)2 (0.9)4 (1.3)Ketoconazole
0. 003 2.09 (1.2-3.4)46 (33.8)41(19.6)87 (25.2)Liposomal Amphotericin B
0.758 0.7 (0.1-4.2)2 (1.4)4 (1.9)6 (1.7)Micafungin
0. 9 1.6 (1.5-1.8)-1 (0.4)1 (0.3)Nystatin
0. 008 2.49 (1.2-5.00)22 (16.1)15 (7.1)37 (10.7)Posaconazole
  20 in total

Review 1.  Why is mucormycosis more difficult to cure than more common mycoses?

Authors:  A Katragkou; T J Walsh; E Roilides
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 8.067

2.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis.

Authors:  George Petrikkos; Anna Skiada; Olivier Lortholary; Emmanuel Roilides; Thomas J Walsh; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Pediatric Mucormycosis: A 10-Year Systematic Review of Reported Cases and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  William R Otto; Barbara A Pahud; Dwight E Yin
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.164

5.  Zygomycosis in Europe: analysis of 230 cases accrued by the registry of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) Working Group on Zygomycosis between 2005 and 2007.

Authors:  A Skiada; L Pagano; A Groll; S Zimmerli; B Dupont; K Lagrou; C Lass-Florl; E Bouza; N Klimko; P Gaustad; M Richardson; P Hamal; M Akova; J F Meis; J-L Rodriguez-Tudela; E Roilides; A Mitrousia-Ziouva; G Petrikkos
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis.

Authors:  Maria N Gamaletsou; Nikolaos V Sipsas; Emmanuel Roilides; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 7.  Mucormycosis: a new concern in the transplant ward?

Authors:  Christine Robin; Alexandre Alanio; Catherine Cordonnier
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.284

8.  The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports.

Authors:  W Jeong; C Keighley; R Wolfe; W L Lee; M A Slavin; D C M Kong; S C-A Chen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Mucormycosis in Australia: contemporary epidemiology and outcomes.

Authors:  K J Kennedy; K Daveson; M A Slavin; S J van Hal; T C Sorrell; A Lee; D J Marriott; B Chapman; C L Halliday; K Hajkowicz; E Athan; N Bak; E Cheong; C H Heath; C O Morrissey; S Kidd; R Beresford; C Blyth; T M Korman; J O Robinson; W Meyer; S C-A Chen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 8.067

10.  Prospective antifungal therapy (PATH) alliance(®) : focus on mucormycosis.

Authors:  Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Nkechi Azie; Billy Franks; David L Horn
Journal:  Mycoses       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.