| Literature DB >> 35463685 |
Bo Duan1, Zhengmin Xu1, Lili Pan2, Wenxia Chen1, Zhongwei Qiao2.
Abstract
In order to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) in the stable hearing loss (HL) group and the fluctuating HL group, this paper provides reference for clinicians' early intervention. From January 2001 to January 2016, patients with hearing impairment diagnosed as LVAS in infancy in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Hospital of Fudan University were collected and divided into the stable HL group (n = 29) and the fluctuating HL group (n = 30). MRI images at initial diagnosis were collected, and various deep learning neural network training models were established based on PyTorch to classify and predict the two series. Vgg16_bn, vgg19_bn, and ResNet18, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with fewer layers, had favorable effects for model building, with accs of 0.9, 0.8, and 0.85, respectively. ResNet50, a CNN with multiple layers and an acc of 0.54, had relatively poor effects. The GoogLeNet-trained model performed best, with an acc of 0.98. We conclude that deep learning-based radiomics can assist doctors in accurately predicting LVAS patients to classify them into either fluctuating or stable HL types and adopt differentiated treatment methods.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35463685 PMCID: PMC9020928 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4814577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 3.822
Figure 1The red arrows indicate the bilateral inner ear and the endolymphatic sac, in which the endolymphatic sac includes high- and low-signal intensity areas.
The accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of VGG16, VGG19, ResNet18, and ResNet50.
| vgg16_bn | vgg19_bn | ResNet18 | ResNet50 | GoogLeNet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85 | 8 | 66 | 27 | 78 | 15 | 22 | 71 | 91 | 2 |
| 9 | 84 | 9 | 84 | 12 | 81 | 14 | 79 | 4 | 89 |
The accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score of different models.
| acc | Recall | Precision | f1_score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vgg16_bn | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
| vgg19_bn | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.75 | 0.82 |
| ResNet18 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.85 |
| ResNet50 | 0.54 | 0.85 | 0.52 | 0.65 |
| GoogLeNet | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.97 |
Figure 2Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.