| Literature DB >> 35463152 |
Matteo Martinoni1, Giovanni Miccoli2, Luca Albini Riccioli3, Francesca Santoro4, Giacomo Bertolini1, Corrado Zenesini5, Diego Mazzatenta1, Alfredo Conti1, Luigi Maria Cavallo2, Giorgio Palandri1.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the present study is to evaluate a neurocognitive outcome in patients affected by late-onset idiopathic aqueductal stenosis (LIAS) who underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). Materials andEntities:
Keywords: LIAS; aqueductal stenosis; chronic adult hydrocephalus; endoscopic third ventriculostomy; hydrocephalus; late onset hydrocephalus
Year: 2022 PMID: 35463152 PMCID: PMC9021920 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.806885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Pre- and post-operative clinical evaluation—iNPH grading score (21) and Fukuhara (6) classification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | N | N | III |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Y | N | III |
| 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | NA | 0 | 3 | 0 | N | N | III |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | N | N | NA |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | N | N | III |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Y | N | II |
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | N | N | III |
| 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | N | N | III |
| 9 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | N | N | III |
| 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | N | N | III |
PT, Patient; iNPH, idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus score.
Pre- and postoperative neuroradiological evaluation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 22 | 17 | 8.4 | 9.1 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9.6 | 10.5 |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 3.7 | 7.7 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 7.4 | 9.7 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 7.4 | 9.9 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 11 | 5.9 | 7.7 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5.02 | 7.24 |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 20 | 3.9 | 6.2 |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 22 | 19 | 5.6 | 6.9 |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 4.5 | 5.2 |
PT, Patient; Fazekas DWM, Fazekas score for white matter lesions; ARWMC, age-related white matter changes.
Figure 1Sagittal T2-w 3D-FIESTA acquisition of a 38-year-old male before (a) and after (b) third ventriculostomy. (a) The third ventricle and the lamina terminalis are concave (a, blue arrow), the sella turcica is empty (a, red arrow), and there is an evident compressive effect exerted on the brain stem and the ambiens cistern (a, yellow arrow). The corpus callosum appears thinned (black sequential arrows), and subarachnoid spaces have a low representation. After the third ventriculostomy (b), there are evident flow artifacts at the floor of the III ventricle (a, red arrow). All previous neuroradiological findings clearly improved.
Figure 2(a) Axial T2-w showing a clear enlargement of the temporal horns (red arrows). (b) Sagittal 3D MPRAGE T1-w was used to measure the height of the interpeduncular cistern, which represents the shortest distance between the floor of the third ventricle and the midbrain (a red line). After identifying the AC-PC plane, the callosal angle (c) is measured in the coronal plane through the posterior commissure perpendicular to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (AC-PC) plane. Neuroradiological features of LIAS mimic iNPH also for CA amplitude that usually measures <90°. (d) Evan's index (EI) is a direct linear measurement of the ventricular size. It is calculated from the ratio between the maximum transverse diameter of the frontal horns and the maximum internal diameter of the skull. (e) The FLAIR sequence shows an elevated periventricular signal ascribable to interstitial edema or reactive gliosis. Hyperintense white matter lesions attributed to chronic ischemia of the small vessels are indicated by the arrows. (f) Narrowed sulci at the high cerebral convexities (blue arrows).
neuropsychological status of patients after ETV, herein in green are signaled the neuropsychological domains improved with statistical significance.
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Attentional and executive functions | 6 | 3 |
| Logical-abstract reasoning | 1 | 2 |
| Visuo-perceptive and visuo-constructive abilities | 1 | 1 |
| Visuo-spatial memory | 7 | 2 |
| Verbal memory | 5 | 4 |
| Language and verbal executive functions | 5 | 1 |
| Functional scales | 3 | 2 |
| Affective and behavioral scales | 6 | 1 |
Comparison of neuropsychological status before and after ETV.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMSE | 27.8 (27.5–28.9) | 28.2 (26.8–28.8) | 5 +, 5 =, 0 - | 0.644 |
| Matrices test | 3.5 (2–4) | 4 (4–4) | 5 +, 4 =, 1 - | 0.087 |
| Trail making A | 4 (2–4) | 4 (4–4) | 3 +, 6 =, 1 - | 0.292 |
| Trail making B | 3 (1–4) | 4 (4–4) | 7 +, 3 =, 0 - | 0.010* |
| Trail making B-A | 3 (1–4) | 4 (4–4) | 7 +, 3 =, 0 - | 0.010* |
| Stroop test error | 4 (4–4) | 4 (4–4) | 2 +, 7 =, 1 - | 0.565 |
| Stroop test time | 4 (2–4) | 4 (3–4) | 4 +, 4 =, 2 - | 0.423 |
| Raven's matrices | 4 (4–4) | 4 (4–4) | 2 +, 6 =, 2 - | 0.861 |
| Rey–Osterrieth | 4 (3–4) | 4 (3–4) | 2 +, 6 =, 2 - | 0.954 |
| Corsi test | 1.5 (0–4) | 3 (1–4) | 5 +, 4 =, 1 - | 0.123 |
| Corsi Supraspan | 2 (1–4) | 4 (3–4) | 5 +, 3 =, 2 - | 0.131 |
| Delayed Recall | 1.5 (0–3) | 2.5 (1–4) | 4 +, 3 =, 3 - | 0.403 |
| Digit Span test | 3.5 (2–4) | 2.5 (1–4) | 2 +, 3 =, 5 - | 0.129 |
| Words Rey Imm | 2 (0–4) | 2 (1–3) | 5 +, 2 =, 3 - | 0.679 |
| Words Rey Diff | 1 (0–3) | 2 (0–4) | 2 +, 6 =, 2 - | 0.907 |
| Babcock story recall test | 2 (2–2) | 2.5 (2–3) | 5 +, 2 =, 3 - | 0.252 |
| Semantic fluency | 0 (0–3) | 3 (0–4) | 4 +, 5 =, 1 - | 0.151 |
| Phonemic fluency | 2.5 (0–4) | 3.5 (2–4) | 4 +, 6 =, 0 - | 0.047* |
| ADL | 6 (6–6) | 6 (6–6) | 1 +, 9 =, 0 - | 0.317 |
| IADL | 5 (5–8) | 5 (5–8) | 3 +, 5 =, 2 - | 0.659 |
| BDI SA | 70 (50–99) | 55 (20–80) | 7 +, 3 =, 0 - | 0.011* |
| BDI C | 75 (60–85) | 65 (50–70) | 5 +, 3 =, 2 - | 0.232 |
| BDI total | 65 (50–96) | 55 (20–80) | 5 +, 3 =, 2 - | 0.132 |
| STAI Y State | 43.5 (38–46) | 32.5 (29–41) | 9 +, 1 =, 0 - | 0.006* |
| STAI Y Trait | 44.5 (39–52) | 33 (32–42) | 7 +, 0 =, 3 - | 0.041* |
p <0.05: statistical evidence; + improvement, = no differences, - worsening; MMSE, mini-mental state examination; ADL, Activities of Daily Living; IADL, Instrumental activities of daily living; BDI SA, Beck Depression Inventory affective and somatic; BDI C, Beck Depression Inventory cognitive; STAI State/Trait, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory State/State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Trait.
Detailed description of neuropsychological pre- and postoperative evaluation tests used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mini-Mental state examination | 27,49 | 26,49 | 30 | 28,59 | 25,59 | 27,59 | 27,75 | 28,75 | 27,49 | 28,49 | 28,89 | 27,89 | 27,79 | 30 | 25,85 | 25,44 | 28,88 | 30 | 28,73 | 26,8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Attentional matrices | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Trail Making A | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Trail Making B | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Trail Making B-A | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Stroop test—error | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Stroop test—time | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices in Mental Deterioration Battery | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Rey–Osterrieth complex figure test—copy | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Corsi test | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Supra-Span Corsi test | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Montreal cognitive Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test-−10' recall | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Digit span—forward | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Rey 15-word—immediate recall (IR) ability | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Rey 15-word—delayed recall (DR) ability | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Babcock story recall test | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Phonemic word fluency test in Mental Deterioration Battery | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Semantic fluency | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Activities of daily living | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Instrumental activities of daily living | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Beck Depression Inventory—affective and somatic (cut- off > 85°) | 85 | 85 | 99 | 80 | 70 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 99 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 60 | 99 | 90 |
| Beck Depression Inventory—cognitive (cut- off > 85°) | 70 | 70 | 99 | 70 | 70 | 60 | 40 | 40 | 99 | 40 | 60 | 60 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 80 | 99 | 85 | 70 |
| Beck Depression Inventory—total (cut- off > 85°) | 80 | 80 | 99 | 70 | 60 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 99 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 60 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 70 | 90 | 96 | 85 |
| State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y1—state (cut-off >40) | 37 | 36 | 46 | 33 | 36 | 29 | 38 | 31 | 44 | 41 | 39 | 21 | 44 | 27 | 43 | 32 | 48 | 45 | 52 | 52 |
| State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y2—trait (cut-off >40) | 46 | 42 | 57 | 32 | 39 | 33 | 38 | 31 | 61 | 41 | 42 | 32 | 43 | 33 | 27 | 32 | 52 | 56 | 49 | 51 |
We considered a test as improved when the postoperative score showed an increase of at least two units or only one if the initial score was 0 (pathological condition). A worse result was defined by a decrease of two units or only one if it reaches the pathological condition (0). In the same way for BDI and STAI Y tests the cut-off was, respectively, the 85th and 40th percentile and a patient was considered improved if the score was lower than or equal to these percentiles. To make easier the interpretation of this table, the authors put in green the patients that improved their preoperative scores and in red those that did worse.