| Literature DB >> 35462797 |
Ju-Zhao Liu1, Hong-Chang Lyu2, Yu-Jie Fu3, Qi Cui1.
Abstract
Since the outbreak of COVID-19, this virus has been constantly mutating. The latest mutant Omicron has been identified as VOC by WHO. The main reason for its concern is the mutation of 46 amino acids in spike protein, which has brought the global epidemic prevention into another difficulty. Herbal aromatic plant Amomum tsao-ko was excavated from formula 1 and 2 for the treatment of COVID-19 in China, and its active components were extracted and identified. Molecular dynamics simulation and Fpocket were applied to find the key sites on RBDOmicron, and molecular docking was also used to reveal the interaction between A. tsao-ko essential oil (AEO) and RBDOmicron. The AEO components were analyzed and identified by GC/Q-TOF MS. There were 20 kinds of AEO with a relative area percentage of more than 1%, and they were related to the three active centres of RBDOmicron. In this study, virtual screening was used to mine the essential oil components of medicinal plants, and it was found that the components could interact with the spike protein RBD in aerosol to block the interaction of RBD and hACE2, thus cutting off the transmission route and protecting the host. This study has certain guiding significance in the modernization of Traditional Chinese medicine and the prevention of COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: Amomum tsao-ko essential oil; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics; Omicron; RBD; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2022 PMID: 35462797 PMCID: PMC9014638 DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.103916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arab J Chem ISSN: 1878-5352 Impact factor: 6.212
Fig. 1The structure of spike protein.
Fig. 2Total ion flow diagram of AEO.
Chemical compositions of AEO with relative area percentage > 1%.
| 1 | Linalool | 78-70-6 | C10H18O | 1.24 |
| 2 | α-Terpineol | 10482-56-1 | C10H18O | 4.02 |
| 3 | α-Phellandrene | 99-3-2 | C10H16 | 7.56 |
| 4 | 106-24-1 | C10H18O | 3.29 | |
| 5 | β-Pinene | 2437-95-8 | C10H16 | 3.72 |
| 6 | 106-25-2 | C15H26O | 2.72 | |
| 7 | 141-27-5 | C10H16O | 4.76 | |
| 8 | 1,8-Cineole | 470-82-6 | C10H18O | 36.00 |
| 9 | (−)-4-Terpineol | 562-74-3 | C10H18O | 2.11 |
| 10 | (−)- | 3310-02-9 | C10H16O | 1.11 |
| 11 | 39313-81-3 | C10H18O | 4.45 | |
| 12 | 5392-40-5 | C10H16O | 3.79 | |
| 13 | 2-Isopropylbenzaldehyde | 6502-22-3 | C10H12O | 1.91 |
| 14 | 7212-44-4 | C15H26O | 1.60 | |
| 15 | α-Pinene | 80-56-8 | C10H16 | 1.69 |
| 16 | 3-Carene | 13466-78-9 | C10H16 | 1.60 |
| 17 | Geraniol acetate | 105-87-3 | C10H20O2 | 2.39 |
| 18 | 2-Dodecenal | 20407-84-5 | C10H22O | 1.34 |
| 19 | 4-Propylbenzaldehyde | 28785-06-0 | C10H12O | 5.65 |
| 20 | Indane-4-carboxaldehyde | 51932-70-8 | C10H10O | 1.87 |
Fig. 3Active centres discovered on RBD using molecular dynamics simulation: (A) The active centre on RBD, (B) RMSF values of RBD on wild-type (WT) and Omicron mutant, (C) amino acid sequence of RBD on wild-type (WT) and Omicron.
Molecular weight and isoelectric point changes of mutation sites on RBD.
| N440K | 5.41–9.60 | K417N | 9.60–5.41 | G339D | 6.06–2.85 |
| T478K | 5.60–9.60 | S477N | 5.68–5.41 | G446S | 6.06–5.68 |
| Q493R | 5.65–10.76 | S371L | 5.68–6.01 | G496S | 6.06–5.68 |
| Q498R | 5.65–10.76 | S373P | 5.68–6.30 | N501Y | 5.41–5.64 |
| Y505H | 5.64–7.60 | S375F | 5.68–5.49 | E484A | 3.15–6.11 |
Molecular docking studies of hACE2 with RBDWT, RBDDelta, RBDOmicron.
| HADDOCK score | −49.4 ± 4.5 | −64.3 ± 13.0 | −141.4 ± 5.5 |
| Van der Waals energy (kcal/mol) | −18.1 ± 2.6 | −24.0 ± 6.6 | −55.2 ± 4.9 |
| Electrostatic energy (kcal/mol) | −114.9 ± 16.9 | −213.6 ± 37.8 | −343.6 ± 49.8 |
| Desolvation energy (kcal/mol) | −8.3 ± 1.1 | −0.6 ± 2.7 | −20.1 ± 2.8 |
| Z-Score | −0.2 | −1.8 | −2.0 |
Fig. 4The interactions between RBD-hACE2 of the Omicron variant.
Fig. 5Molecular interactions of AEO components against RBDOmicron (A) and the heatmap of the binding energy of AEO to RBD and NTD (B).
Fig. 6Surface and maps of AEO components docked into binding sites of RBDOmicrion different active centres.