Literature DB >> 35462651

Development of a Low-cost NGS Test for the Evaluation of Thyroid Nodules.

Divya Vishwanath1, Ashwini Shanmugam1, Mahima Sundaresh1, Arun Hariharan1, Shradha Saraf1, Urvashi Bahadur1, Vamsi Veeramachaneni1, Naveen Chandrasekhar2, Vijay Pillai V2, Vidhya Bushan2, Vivek Shetty2, Narayana Subramaniam2, Moni Abraham Kuriakose2, K S Shivaprasad2, Kranti Khadilkar2, Amritha Suresh3, Sum Sum3, Akhila Lakhsmikantha4, Pobbisetty Radhakrishnagupta Rekha4, Shaesta Naseem Zaidi4, Vaijayanti Gupta1, Subramanian Kannan5.   

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the preferred method of identifying malignancy in palpable thyroid nodules using the Bethesda reporting system. However, in around 30-40% of FNACs (Bethesda categories III, IV, and V), the results are indeterminate and surgery is required to confirm malignancy. Out of those who undergo surgery, only 10-40% of patients in these categories are found to have malignancies, thus proving surgery to be unnecessary for some patients or to be incomplete in others. While molecular testing on thyroid FNAC material is part of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in evaluating thyroid nodules, it is currently unavailable in India due to cost constraints. In this study, we prospectively collected FNAC samples from sixty-nine patients who presented with palpable thyroid nodules. We designed a cost-effective next-generation sequencing (NGS) test to query multiple variants in the DNA and RNA isolated from the fine needle aspirate. The identification of oncogenic variants was considered to be indicative of malignancy, and confirmed by surgical histopathology. The panel showed an overall sensitivity of 81.25% and a specificity of 100%, while in the case of Bethesda categories III, IV, and V, the sensitivity was higher (87.5%) and the specificity was established at 100%. The panel could thereby serve as a rule-in test for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer and therefore help identify patients who require surgery, especially in the indeterminate Bethesda categories III, IV, and V. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinoma; Next-generation sequencing; Thyroid

Year:  2019        PMID: 35462651      PMCID: PMC8986928          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-01000-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  12 in total

1.  BRAF(V600E) mutation and outcome of patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a 15-year median follow-up study.

Authors:  Rossella Elisei; Clara Ugolini; David Viola; Cristiana Lupi; Agnese Biagini; Riccardo Giannini; Cristina Romei; Paolo Miccoli; Aldo Pinchera; Fulvio Basolo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

Authors:  Edmund S Cibas; Syed Z Ali
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Complications and risk factors related to the extent of surgery in thyroidectomy. Results from 2,043 procedures.

Authors:  Stavros N Karamanakos; Kostas B Markou; Konstantinos Panagopoulos; Dionisios Karavias; Constantinos E Vagianos; Chrisoula D Scopa; Vassiliki Fotopoulou; Anna Liava; Konstantinos Vagenas
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Molecular profiles of thyroid cancer subtypes: Classification based on features of tissue revealed by mass spectrometry imaging.

Authors:  Monika Pietrowska; Hanna C Diehl; Grzegorz Mrukwa; Magdalena Kalinowska-Herok; Marta Gawin; Mykola Chekan; Julian Elm; Grzegorz Drazek; Anna Krawczyk; Dariusz Lange; Helmut E Meyer; Joanna Polanska; Corinna Henkel; Piotr Widlak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Survey of 548 oncogenic fusion transcripts in thyroid tumors supports the importance of the already established thyroid fusions genes.

Authors:  Ricardo Celestino; Eva Sigstad; Marthe Løvf; Gard O S Thomassen; Krystyna K Grøholt; Lars H Jørgensen; Aasmund Berner; Patrícia Castro; Ragnhild A Lothe; Trine Bjøro; Manuel Sobrinho-Simões; Paula Soares; Rolf I Skotheim
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 6.  RAS mutations in thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Gina M Howell; Steven P Hodak; Linwah Yip
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-19

Review 7.  Molecular approaches to thyroid cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Susan J Hsiao; Yuri E Nikiforov
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.678

8.  Improving Bethesda Reporting in Thyroid Cytology: A Team Effort Goes a Long Way and Still Miles to Go….

Authors:  Subramanian Kannan; Nalini Raju; Vikram Kekatpure; Naveen Hedne Chandrasekhar; Vijay Pillai; A Renuka Keshavamurthy; Moni Abraham Kuriakose; Pobbisetty Radhakrishnagupta Rekha; Nisheena Raghavan; Akhila Lakhsmikantha; Srinivas Ramaiah; Brijal Dave
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

9.  StrandAdvantage test for early-line and advanced-stage treatment decisions in solid tumors.

Authors:  Manimala Sen; Shanmukh Katragadda; Aarthi Ravichandran; Gouri Deshpande; Minothi Parulekar; Swetha Nayanala; Vikram Vittal; Weiming Shen; Melanie Phooi Nee Yong; Jemima Jacob; Sravanthi Parchuru; Kalpana Dhanuskodi; Kenneth Eyring; Pooja Agrawal; Smita Agarwal; Ashwini Shanmugam; Satish Gupta; Divya Vishwanath; Kiran Kumari; Arun K Hariharan; Sai A Balaji; Qiaoling Liang; Belen Robolledo; Vijayashree Gauribidanur Raghavendrachar; Mohammed Oomer Farooque; Cary J Buresh; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Urvashi Bahadur; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian; Ramesh Hariharan; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Satish Sankaran; Vaijayanti Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Worldwide increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: update on epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Gabriella Pellegriti; Francesco Frasca; Concetto Regalbuto; Sebastiano Squatrito; Riccardo Vigneri
Journal:  J Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.