| Literature DB >> 35461910 |
Lu He1, Wanzhou Xu2, Cheng Zeng3, Ying Li1, Ren Lin1, Xiaojie Xie1, Hongmiao Xia1, Shiqi Tang1, Lijuan Xu4, Changzheng Chen5.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35461910 PMCID: PMC9021032 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.04.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect ISSN: 0163-4453 Impact factor: 38.637
Levels of serum antibodies at different times.
| 1–30 (d) | 31–60 (d) | 61–120 (d) | 296–368 (d) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgM antibodies | 22.79 (6.45, 150.97) | 17.61 (3.65, 57.05) | 31.58 (11.38, 125.22) | 2.66 (1.16, 8.22) |
| IgG antibodies | 86.67 (46.88, 208.04) | 123.67 (56.22, 191.01) | 158.94 (115.69, 232.16) | 36.32 (14.68, 78.68) |
| Neutralization antibodies | 35.32 (12.16, 160.60) | 54.43 (23.98, 145.74) | 80.13 (56.98, 202.36) | 14.30 (7.77, 27.9) |
Fig. 1Dynamic changes in antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. (A–C) Dynamic changes in IgM antibody (A), IgG antibody (B) and neutralization antibodies (C) in representative patients over the monitoring period. P-values were calculated by Kruskal Wallis test. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant with *, **, and *** indicate p < 0.05, <0.01, and <0.001, respectively.
Fig. 2Serum antibody positive rates at different times. The positive rates of IgM, IgG and neutralization antibodies reached the peak in 61–120 days and decreased significantly in 297–368 days.