Literature DB >> 35460438

Impacts of inorganic nutrients on the physiology of a mixoplanktonic ciliate and its cryptophyte prey.

Maira Maselli1,2, Dedmer B Van de Waal3, Per Juel Hansen4.   

Abstract

Many marine planktonic ciliates retain functional chloroplasts from their photosynthetic prey and use them to incorporate inorganic carbon via photosynthesis. While this strategy provides the ciliates with carbon, little is known about their ability to incorporate major dissolved inorganic nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus. Here, we studied how ciliates respond to different concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus. Specifically, we tested the direct and indirect effects of nutrient availability on the ciliate Strombidium cf. basimorphum fed the cryptophyte prey Teleaulax amphioxeia. We assessed responses in the rates of growth, ingestion, photosynthesis, inorganic nutrient uptake, and excretion. Our results show that the prey changed its carbon content depending on the nutrient concentrations. Low inorganic nutrient concentrations increased S. cf. basimorphum growth and prey ingestion. The higher carbon content of the prey under these low nutrient conditions likely supported the growth of the ciliate, while the higher carbon:nutrient stoichiometry of the prey led to the higher ingestion rates. The low carbon content of the prey at high nutrient concentrations resulted in reduced growth of S. cf. basimorphum, which indicates that carbon acquired via photosynthesis in the ciliate cannot compensate for the ingestion of prey with low carbon content. In conclusion, our findings show S. cf. basimorphum is not able to utilize dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus for growth, and this species seems to be well adapted to exploit its prey when grown at low nutrient conditions.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ciliates; Cryptophytes; Inorganic nutrients; Mixotrophy; Plankton; Prey quality; Protist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35460438     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05162-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Retention of transcriptionally active cryptophyte nuclei by the ciliate Myrionecta rubra.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; David Oldach; Charles F Delwiche; Diane K Stoecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Are tintinnids picky grazers: Feeding experiments on a mixture of mixotrophic dinoflagellates and implications for red tide dynamics.

Authors:  Jinpeng Yang; Martin Günter Joachim Löder; Yong Jiang; Karen Helen Wiltshire
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Identifying protist consumers of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in the surface ocean using stable isotope probing.

Authors:  William D Orsi; Susanne Wilken; Javier Del Campo; Thierry Heger; Erick James; Thomas A Richards; Patrick J Keeling; Alexandra Z Worden; Alyson E Santoro
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.491

5.  Differential effects of nutrient-limited primary production on primary, secondary or tertiary consumers.

Authors:  Arne M Malzahn; Florian Hantzsche; Katherina L Schoo; Maarten Boersma; Nicole Aberle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Light dependence in the phototrophy-phagotrophy balance of constitutive and non-constitutive mixotrophic protists.

Authors:  Luca Schenone; Esteban Balseiro; Beatriz Modenutti
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.