| Literature DB >> 35460225 |
Abdourahamane Yacouba1,2,3, Sibiri Sissoko1,2, Ornella La Fortune Tchoupou Saha1,2, Gabriel Haddad1,2, Grégory Dubourg1,2, Frédérique Gouriet1,2, Maryam Tidjani Alou1,2, Stéphane Alibar1,2, Matthieu Million1,2, Jean-Christophe Lagier1,2, Didier Raoult1,2,4, Florence Fenollar2,4, Pierre-Edouard Fournier2,4, Cheikh Ibrahima Lo2,4.
Abstract
Blood is precious tissue that is normally sterile. With the aim of diagnosing the cause of bacteremia, three bacterial strains were isolated from three different individuals. Strains Marseille-P7157T and Marseille-Q2854T are Gram-stain positive, non-spore-forming rod-shaped bacteria, while strain Marseille-P8049T is a Gram-stain negative, motile, non-spore-forming and rod-shaped bacterium. The major fatty acids found (>30%) were hexadecanoic acid for strain Marseille-P8049T and 12-methyl tetradecanoic acid for both strains Marseille-P7157T and Marseille-P2854T. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis shows that strains Marseille-P8049 and Marseille-Q2854T have sequence similarity of 96.8%, 99.04%, and 98.3% with Acinetobacter ursingii strain LUH3792 (NR_025392.1), Gulosibacter faecalis strain B187 (NR_041812.1), and Schaalia canis strain CCUG 41706 (NR_025366.1), respectively. In addition, strains Marseille-Q2854T, Marseille-P8049T and Marseille-P7157T shared with their closely related species cited above the following DDH values: 19.5%, 24.4%, and 20.2%, respectively. Based on these phenotypic and genomic findings, we consider that strains Marseille-P8049T (= CSUR P8049 = CECT 30350), Marseille-P2854T ( = CSUR Q2854 = CECT 30120) and Marseille-P7157T ( = CSUR P7157 = CECT 30048) are new bacterial species, for which the names Acinetobacter ihumii sp. nov., Microbacterium ihumii sp. nov., and Gulosibacter massiliensis sp. nov., are proposed.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Acinetobacter ihumii; Microbacterium ihumii; Gulosibacter massiliensis; bacteria; human blood; new species
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35460225 PMCID: PMC9126734 DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnac038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Lett ISSN: 0378-1097 Impact factor: 2.820
Figure 1.Phylogenetic tree showing the position of the strains Marseille-Q2854T, Marseille-P8049T, and Marseille-P7157T relative to other phylogenetic neighbors, based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences. The respective GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA genes are indicated in parenthesis. Sequences were aligned using Muscle v3.8.31 with default parameters and phylogenetic inferences obtained using the maximum likelihood method within MEGA 7 software (Kumar et al. 2008). Numbers at the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating the analysis 500 times to generate a majority consensus tree.
Figure 2.Electron micrographs of the strains captured using the SU5000® scanning electron microscope. (A) Strain Marseille-P7157T; (B) Strain Marseille-P8049T; (C) Strain Marseille-Q2854T.
Different characteristics of Acinetobacter ihumii sp. nov., strain Marseille-P8049T, Gulosibacter massiliensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-P7157T and Microbacterium ihumii sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2854T with their phylogenetically closest related species.
| Acinetobacter species | Gulosibacter species | Microbacterium species | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | 1 | 2 | 3 | a | b | c | i | ii | iii |
| Cell size (µm) | 1.1–0.5 | NR | NR | 1.3–0.5 | 0.3–1.1 | 0.3–1.1 | 1.0–0.3 | 0.5–1.9 | NR |
| Optimum pH | 7.5 | NR | NR | 7.5 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.5 | NR | NR |
| Optimum temperature | 37°C | 37°C | 37°C | 37°C | 30°C | 30°C | 37°C | 37°C | 25°C |
| D-arabitol | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | NR | - |
| Arbutin | - | NR | NR | - | - | - | - | - | + |
| D-glucose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| D-lactose | - | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| D-mannose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| D-melezitose | - | NR | NR | - | - | - | - | NR | + |
| D-melibiose | - | NR | NR | - | - | - | - | NR | + |
| N-acetylglucosamine | - | - | - | - | NR | NR | - | NR | + |
| D-raffinose | NR | - | - | - | - | - | - | NR | + |
| L-rhamnose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| Sucrose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| D-trehalose | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | + |
| D-xylose | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - |
| DNA G + C content (mol %) | 40.5 | 40.1 | 38.2 | 67.2 | 67.0 | 62.0 | 68.5 | 69.3 | 64.0 |
+: positive reaction; -: negative reaction; NR: Not reported; 1: Acinetobacter ihumii Marseille-P8049T; 2: Acinetobacter ursingii; 3: Acinetobacter septicus; a: Gulosibacter massiliensis Marseille-P7157T; b: Gulosibacter faecalis; c:Gulosibacter bifidus; i:Microbacterium ihumii Marseille-Q2854T; ii: Microbacterium aerolatum; iii: Microbacterium phyllosphaerae.
Cellular fatty acid composition (%) of 1, Acinetobacter ihumii sp. nov., strain Marseille-P8049T, 2, Gulosibacter massiliensis sp. nov., strain Marseille-P7157T and 3, Microbacterium ihumii sp. nov., strain Marseille-Q2854T.
| Mean relative % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acids | Name | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| C16:0 | Hexadecanoic acid | 30.6 | TR | 1.8 |
| C12:0 | Dodecanoic acid | 18.2 | - | - |
| C12:03-OH | 3-Hydroxydodecanoicacid | 4.6 | - | - |
| C14:03-OH | 3-hydroxy-Tetradecanoicacid | 3.8 | - | - |
| C15:0 anteiso | 12-methyl-tetradecanoicacid | - | 55.5 | 43.7 |
| C15:0 iso | 13-methyl-tetradecanoicacid | - | TR | 4.8 |
| C16:0 iso | 14-methyl-Pentadecanoicacid | - | 9.8 | 18.9 |
| C16:1n7 | 9-hexadecenoic acid | 16.1 | - | - |
| C17:0 anteiso | 14-methyl-Hexadecanoicacid | - | 32.7 | 27.7 |
| C17:0 iso | 15-methyl-Hexadecanoicacid | - | TR | 1.8 |
| C18:1n9 | 9-Octadecenoic acid | 25.8 | TR | TR |
Mean peak area percentage; TR = trace amounts < 1%.
Figure 3.Circular map of the genome of strains Marseille-P7157T(A) Marseille-P8049T(B), and Marseille-Q2854T(C) using the CGView server (Grin and Linke 2011). Different components were highlighted with colored bands.
dDDH and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values obtained by comparison of strains Marseille-Q2854T, Marseille-P8049T, Marseille-P7157T and the closest species. The table is filled diagonally. The upper right part for dDDH values and the lower part represent ANI values. 100%, assumed to be in the middle, is removed to show a better separation between the two calculations.
| Acinetobacter species | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 21.2 ± 4.7% | 21.2 ± 4.7% | 21.4 ± 4.7% | 21.5 ± 4.7% | |
|
| 77.5% | 20.2 ± 4.6% | 26.6 ± 4.9% | 27.0 ± 4.9% | |
|
| 75.3% | 75.2% | 20.2 ± 4.7% | 20.5 ± 4.7% | |
|
| 77.5% | 83.1% | 75.5% | 73.0 ± 5.8% | |
|
| 77.7% | 83.5% | 75.4% | 96.8% | |
| Gulosibacter species | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 20.8 ± 4.7 | 20.5 ± 4.6% | 20.2 ± 4.6% | 18.6 ± 4.5% | |
|
| 73.8% | 24.4 ± 4.8% | 19.2 ± 4.6% | 19.0 ± 4.5% | |
|
| 74.0% | 82.0% | 19.7 ± 4.6% | 18.9 ± 4.5% | |
|
| 70.3% | 72.0% | 71.9% | 30.9 ± 4.9% | |
|
| 70.3% | 72.1% | 72.1% | 86.1% | |
| Microbacterium species | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 26.9 ± 4.8 | 25.6 ± 4.9% | 22.0 ± 4.7% | 21.8 ± 4.7% | |
|
| 78.6% | 28.8 ± 4.9% | 22.1 ± 4.7% | 21.2 ± 4.7% | |
|
| 82.4% | 78.0% | 25.2 ± 4.8% | 21.2 ± 4.7% | |
|
| 83.7% | 78.8% | 82.3% | 21.9 ± 4.7% | |
|
| 78.7% | 85.1% | 78.1% | 78.8% | |