Literature DB >> 35459969

Survival benefit of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe COVID-19: "perceived futility" and potential underestimation of ECMO's effect.

Atsuyuki Watanabe1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35459969      PMCID: PMC9028904          DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06711-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   41.787


× No keyword cloud information.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been widely used to treat refractory respiratory failure, although there are arguments on ethical considerations and end-of-life decision-making [1]. Since coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often causes severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, researchers have sought to examine the clinical benefit of ECMO worldwide [2-4]. Whebell et al. compared COVID-19 patients who received ECMO therapy with those who did not, using propensity score matching, and exhibited lower mortality in patients undergoing ECMO [5]. Not only do their statistical analyses seem robust with multiple sensitivity analyses, but the effect sizes were also intriguing with 0.47 of odds ratio and 16.3% of absolute risk reduction for mortality. The results of this study suggest that critically ill COVID-19 patients should be referred to specialized centers and treated with ECMO. Herein, I would like to point out the selection bias, possibly underestimating the survival benefit brought by ECMO. The authors excluded 430 patients from matching analyses because of “perceived futility,” meaning too severe patients could confound and preclude fair comparison between the ECMO and conventional arms. Indeed, the result stated that these patients with “perceived futility” were older, ventilated longer, and more likely to die (73 vs. 43.2%, p < 0.001). However, looking closer at Table 1 included in Whebell’s manuscript, the mortality of patients with “perceived futility” was lower than those included for matching (34.5 vs. 52.7%, p < 0.001). Assuming that not the main text but Table 1 is correct, patients judged as “too severe” received ECMO more frequently and died less frequently. In principle, prespecified protocols do not let us conduct arbitrary analyses after data collection. For this study, however, further analyses including the “too severe” patients will add remarkable value and meaning to the demonstrated results; ECMO could actually have more potential to save patients with severe COVID-19 than it was measured. The clinical benefit of ECMO initiation to severe COVID-19 patients, including those “too severe,” will be of significant interest to frontline providers.
  5 in total

1.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure.

Authors:  Michael Quintel; Robert H Bartlett; Michael P W Grocott; Alain Combes; Marco V Ranieri; Massimo Baiocchi; Stefano Nava; Daniel Brodie; Luigi Camporota; Francesco Vasques; Mattia Busana; John J Marini; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation network organisation and clinical outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greater Paris, France: a multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Guillaume Lebreton; Matthieu Schmidt; Maharajah Ponnaiah; Thierry Folliguet; Marylou Para; Julien Guihaire; Emmanuel Lansac; Edouard Sage; Bernard Cholley; Bruno Mégarbane; Pierrick Cronier; Jonathan Zarka; Daniel Da Silva; Sebastien Besset; Igor Lacombat; Nicolas Mongardon; Christian Richard; Jacques Duranteau; Charles Cerf; Gabriel Saiydoun; Romain Sonneville; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Patrick Nataf; Dan Longrois; Alain Combes; Pascal Leprince
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 30.700

3.  Survival benefit of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe COVID-19: a multi-centre-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Stephen Whebell; Joe Zhang; Rebecca Lewis; Michael Berry; Stephane Ledot; Andrew Retter; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 41.787

4.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kollengode Ramanathan; Kiran Shekar; Ryan Ruiyang Ling; Ryan P Barbaro; Suei Nee Wong; Chuen Seng Tan; Bram Rochwerg; Shannon M Fernando; Shinhiro Takeda; Graeme MacLaren; Eddy Fan; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; David Hajage; Guillaume Lebreton; Antoine Monsel; Guillaume Voiriot; David Levy; Elodie Baron; Alexandra Beurton; Juliette Chommeloux; Paris Meng; Safaa Nemlaghi; Pierre Bay; Pascal Leprince; Alexandre Demoule; Bertrand Guidet; Jean Michel Constantin; Muriel Fartoukh; Martin Dres; Alain Combes
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 30.700

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  The need to define "who" rather than "if" for ECMO in COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephen Whebell; Joe Zhang; Rebecca Lewis; Michael Berry; Stephane Ledot; Andrew Retter; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 41.787

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.