Aaron W P Maxwell1, Humberto G Mendoza2, Matthew J Sellitti3, Juan C Camacho4, Amy R Deipolyi4, Etay Ziv4, Constantinos T Sofocleous4, Hooman Yarmohammadi4, Majid Maybody4, John L Humm5, Jazmin Schwartz5, Krishna Juluru6, Mark P Dunphy2, F Edward Boas7,8. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. 2. Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Radiology Informatics, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. fboas@coh.org. 8. Department of Radiology, City of Hope Medical Center, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. fboas@coh.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine how particle density affects dose distribution and outcomes after lobar radioembolization. METHODS: Matched pairs of patients, treated with glass versus resin microspheres, were selected by propensity score matching (114 patients), in this single-institution retrospective study. For each patient, tumor and liver particle density (particles/cm3) and dose (Gy) were determined. Tumor-to-normal ratio was measured on both 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and post-90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT. Microdosimetry simulations were used to calculate first percentile dose, which is the dose in the cold spots between microspheres. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: As more particles were delivered, doses on 90Y SPECT/CT became more uniform throughout the treatment volume: tumor and liver doses became more similar (p = 0.04), and microscopic cold spots between particles disappeared. For hypervascular tumors (tumor-to-normal ratio ≥ 2.6 on MAA scan), delivering fewer particles (< 6000 particles/cm3 treatment volume) was associated with better LPFS (p = 0.03). For less vascular tumors (tumor-to-normal ratio < 2.6), delivering more particles (≥ 6000 particles/cm3) was associated with better LPFS (p = 0.02). In matched pairs of patients, using the optimal particle density resulted in improved overall survival (11.5 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.047), compared to using suboptimal particle density. Microdosimetry resulted in better predictions of LPFS (p = 0.03), and overall survival (p = 0.02), compared to conventional dosimetry. CONCLUSION: The number of particles delivered can be chosen to maximize the tumor dose and minimize the liver dose, based on tumor vascularity. Optimizing the particle density resulted in improved LPFS and overall survival.
PURPOSE: To determine how particle density affects dose distribution and outcomes after lobar radioembolization. METHODS: Matched pairs of patients, treated with glass versus resin microspheres, were selected by propensity score matching (114 patients), in this single-institution retrospective study. For each patient, tumor and liver particle density (particles/cm3) and dose (Gy) were determined. Tumor-to-normal ratio was measured on both 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and post-90Y bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT. Microdosimetry simulations were used to calculate first percentile dose, which is the dose in the cold spots between microspheres. Local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: As more particles were delivered, doses on 90Y SPECT/CT became more uniform throughout the treatment volume: tumor and liver doses became more similar (p = 0.04), and microscopic cold spots between particles disappeared. For hypervascular tumors (tumor-to-normal ratio ≥ 2.6 on MAA scan), delivering fewer particles (< 6000 particles/cm3 treatment volume) was associated with better LPFS (p = 0.03). For less vascular tumors (tumor-to-normal ratio < 2.6), delivering more particles (≥ 6000 particles/cm3) was associated with better LPFS (p = 0.02). In matched pairs of patients, using the optimal particle density resulted in improved overall survival (11.5 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.047), compared to using suboptimal particle density. Microdosimetry resulted in better predictions of LPFS (p = 0.03), and overall survival (p = 0.02), compared to conventional dosimetry. CONCLUSION: The number of particles delivered can be chosen to maximize the tumor dose and minimize the liver dose, based on tumor vascularity. Optimizing the particle density resulted in improved LPFS and overall survival.