Michael K Lorentsen1, Sanah Vohra2, Hyman B Muss3, Emily Damone2, Allison M Deal3, Addison Tucker Brenizer2, Kirsten A Nyrop3. 1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: michael.lorentsen@unchealth.unc.edu. 2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. 3. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Newer adjuvant treatment options for non-metastatic breast cancer have increased survival. There is a need to investigate whether demographic and clinical characteristics of women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative non-metastatic breast cancer (stages I-III) differentially influence treatment decisions in older (age 65 or older) versus younger patients (under age 65). METHODS: In a retrospective electronic medical record review, prevalence ratio with 95% confidence interval for treatment decisions in older vs younger patients was calculated using log binomial regression adjusted for race, stage, and total number of comorbidities. RESULTS: In a sample of 537 patients, 66% were age < 65 and 34% age ≥ 65. Older patients included a higher proportion of White women (85% vs 75%, P = .02), higher number of comorbidities (P ≤0.0001), and lower stage tumors (P = .0004). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 was independently associated with fewer mastectomies (95% CI 0.65-0.96, P = .02), more lumpectomies (95% CI 1.05-1.42, P = .01), and less receipt of radiation treatment (95% CI 0.78-0.97, P = .01) and/or chemotherapy (95% CI 0.73-0.95, P = .006). In multivariate analysis, stage was independently significant for all treatment modalities, except endocrine therapy, and race was not. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that age, in addition to breast cancer stage, is a predictor of treatment modality, independent of race and number of comorbidities. Treatment modality reflects a combination of patient preference and clinician assessment of fitness for current standard of care.
BACKGROUND: Newer adjuvant treatment options for non-metastatic breast cancer have increased survival. There is a need to investigate whether demographic and clinical characteristics of women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative non-metastatic breast cancer (stages I-III) differentially influence treatment decisions in older (age 65 or older) versus younger patients (under age 65). METHODS: In a retrospective electronic medical record review, prevalence ratio with 95% confidence interval for treatment decisions in older vs younger patients was calculated using log binomial regression adjusted for race, stage, and total number of comorbidities. RESULTS: In a sample of 537 patients, 66% were age < 65 and 34% age ≥ 65. Older patients included a higher proportion of White women (85% vs 75%, P = .02), higher number of comorbidities (P ≤0.0001), and lower stage tumors (P = .0004). In multivariable analysis, age ≥ 65 was independently associated with fewer mastectomies (95% CI 0.65-0.96, P = .02), more lumpectomies (95% CI 1.05-1.42, P = .01), and less receipt of radiation treatment (95% CI 0.78-0.97, P = .01) and/or chemotherapy (95% CI 0.73-0.95, P = .006). In multivariate analysis, stage was independently significant for all treatment modalities, except endocrine therapy, and race was not. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that age, in addition to breast cancer stage, is a predictor of treatment modality, independent of race and number of comorbidities. Treatment modality reflects a combination of patient preference and clinician assessment of fitness for current standard of care.
Authors: Loren K Mell; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Michael A Nichols; Blase N Polite; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Steven J Chmura Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marloes G M Derks; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Daniele Giardiello; Caroline Seynaeve; Hein Putter; Johan W R Nortier; Luc Y Dirix; Esther Bastiaannet; Johanneke E A Portielje; Gerrit-Jan Liefers Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-01-03
Authors: Patrick T Bradshaw; June Stevens; Nikhil Khankari; Susan L Teitelbaum; Alfred I Neugut; Marilie D Gammon Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Heidi D Klepin; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Karla V Ballman; Alice B Kornblith; Arti Hurria; Eric P Winer; Clifford Hudis; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss; Gretchen G Kimmick Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 3.840