| Literature DB >> 35458892 |
Umesh Kumar Lilhore1, Agbotiname Lucky Imoize2,3, Chun-Ta Li4, Sarita Simaiya5, Subhendu Kumar Pani6, Nitin Goyal7, Arun Kumar8, Cheng-Chi Lee9,10.
Abstract
The rapid growth in the number of vehicles has led to traffic congestion, pollution, and delays in logistic transportation in metropolitan areas. IoT has been an emerging innovation, moving the universe towards automated processes and intelligent management systems. This is a critical contribution to automation and smart civilizations. Effective and reliable congestion management and traffic control help save many precious resources. An IoT-based ITM system set of sensors is embedded in automatic vehicles and intelligent devices to recognize, obtain, and transmit data. Machine learning (ML) is another technique to improve the transport system. The existing transport-management solutions encounter several challenges resulting in traffic congestion, delay, and a high fatality rate. This research work presents the design and implementation of an Adaptive Traffic-management system (ATM) based on ML and IoT. The design of the proposed system is based on three essential entities: vehicle, infrastructure, and events. The design utilizes various scenarios to cover all the possible issues of the transport system. The proposed ATM system also utilizes the machine-learning-based DBSCAN clustering method to detect any accidental anomaly. The proposed ATM model constantly updates traffic signal schedules depending on traffic volume and estimated movements from nearby crossings. It significantly lowers traveling time by gradually moving automobiles across green signals and decreases traffic congestion by generating a better transition. The experiment outcomes reveal that the proposed ATM system significantly outperformed the conventional traffic-management strategy and will be a frontrunner for transportation planning in smart-city-based transport systems. The proposed ATM solution minimizes vehicle waiting times and congestion, reduces road accidents, and improves the overall journey experience.Entities:
Keywords: DBSCAN method; adaptive traffic management system; intelligent traffic management; intelligent transport system; internet of things; machine learning; smart road
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458892 PMCID: PMC9024789 DOI: 10.3390/s22082908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Review of various research in IoT and ML-based intelligent transport systems.
| Ref. No. | Key Technique | Methods/Algorithm | Traffic Congestion | Smart Parking/Road | Merits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Traffic congestion detection | Machine learning, IoT | Yes | No | Automatic vehicle detection method and automatic route-transfer method |
| [ | Collision avoidance | IoT, Big data | Yes | Yes | Design collision-free protocol for transportation |
| [ | Intelligent transport | Machine learning, IoT | Yes | Yes | No collision |
| [ | Congestion and pollution control in transportation | Deep learning, IoT | Yes | Yes | Improved pollution control |
| [ | Sustainable and safety in transportation | IoT and Machine learning | Yes | No | Effectively managed road safety, minor collision |
| [ | Collision and pollution in traffic management | IoT and Neural Network | Yes | Yes | Consumed less energy |
| [ | Intelligent, sustainable transport | Machine learning, Cloud, and IoT | Yes | Yes | Smart route discovery |
| [ | Green transportation | Neural Network, IoT | Yes | No | Pollution control method |
| [ | Pollution control and avoidance in transportation | IoT and Big data | Yes | Yes | Smart traffic lights and road pollution control |
| [ | Smart transportation design | IoT, Machine learning | No | Yes | Smart city and parking system model |
| [ | Safety issues in transportation | Big data, IoT | No | No | Road safety model |
| [ | Smart parking | IoT, Machine learning | No | Yes | Smart city model |
| [ | IoT Industry 4.0 | IoT, Machine learning | Yes | Yes | Smart logistics and supply chain and automation in the industry |
| [ | Pollution and smart transport | Cloud computing, IoT | Yes | No | Congestion control method and pollution control |
| [ | Intelligent transport system | IoT and cloud computing | Yes | Yes | No collision |
| [ | Automation in transportation | IoT and Machine learning | Yes | No | Improved pollution control |
Figure 1The layered architecture of IoT.
Figure 2IoT application in ITM.
Figure 3Layered architecture of the proposed ATM model.
Figure 4Vehicle Location Tracking in ITM.
Figure 5Vehicle location tracking process in ITM (using DBSCAN Clustering method).
Figure 6Traffic flow space vs. time (incoming and outgoing vehicles).
Entities utilized in the proposed ATM system.
| Entity | Subunit | Property | Functionalities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicles | Automobiles (2, 3, and 4 wheelers) | Vehicle ID, speed, vehicle type, lane | To recognize a vehicle |
| Vehicle control unit | Manual and automatic | To determine the vehicle control type | |
| Infrastructure | Road unit | Lane ID, Lane name, length, one way, two way | To determine the road unit |
| Traffic light control unit, | ID, installation status, delay duration | To determine the traffic light control unit | |
| Street light unit | ID, installation status | To determine the street light unit | |
| Events | Vehicle to Vehicle Communication | Vehicle speed, vehicle turn information, | To determine the V2V communication |
| Vehicle to infrastructure communication | Signboard, pedestrian crossing, traffic light, speed indicator | To determine the V2I communication |
Figure 7System Design of proposed ITM.
Figure 8Vehicles moving on the freeway where fuel less fuel consumption, and average less travel time is generated by the travel report.
Figure 9Vehicle moving on the freeway (multilane), connected/linked and automated vehicle, and signals in 3 categories (red, green, and yellow).
Figure 10Vehicle moving on forward and backward over multiple lanes (traffic congestion).
Figure 11Vehicle movement based on signals received from RSUs.
Figure 12Simulation results for scenario 1 only with LAVs (From Figure 12a–h). (a) Traffic congestion; (b) space utilization; (c) traffic jam ratio; (d) time mean speed; (e) harmonic mean; (f) time means speed vs. space means speed; (g) scenario 1 results for average speed vs. traffic flow. (h) Scenario 1 results for average speed vs. traffic density.
Figure 13Simulations results for scenario 2, no-LAVs vehicles (from Figure 13a–h). (a) Traffic congestion; (b) space utilization; (c) traffic jam ratio; (d) time mean speed; (e) harmonic mean; (f) simulation results for TMS vs. SMS during the whole time; (g) simulation results for scenario 2 average speed vs. traffic density; (h) simulation results for scenario 2 average speed vs. traffic flow.
Figure 14Scenario 3: Hybrid simulation (LAVs and no-LAVs) vehicles results. (a) Traffic congestion; (b) space utilization; (c) traffic jam ratio; (d) average speed vs. traffic flow results; (e) average speed vs. traffic density results.
Clustering Outcomes of DBSCAN and ML methods for accident detection.
| Simulation Duration in Seconds | Vehicle Count(in Each Road Segment) | Cluster Type (Normal) | Cluster Type (Anomaly) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | 75 | 70 | 1 |
| 70 | 77 | 72 | 1 |
| 80 | 80 | 75 | 1 |
| 90 | 82 | 76 | 2 |
| 100 | 85 | 78 | 2 |
| 110 | 87 | 79 | 3 |
| 120 | 88 | 81 | 3 |
| 130 | 90 | 82 | 3 |