| Literature DB >> 35458350 |
Fan Wang1, Ronghan Wang1, Yingjie Pan1,2,3, Ming Du4, Yong Zhao1,2,3, Haiquan Liu1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) is a new type of non-thermal sterilization technology that combines visible light with photosensitizers to generate a bioactive effect against foodborne pathogenic bacteria. In the present investigation, gelatin (GEL)/chitosan (CS)-based functional films with PDI potency were prepared by incorporating curcumin (Cur) as a photosensitizer. The properties of GEL/CS/Cur (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mmol/L) films were investigated by evaluating the surface morphology, chemical structure, light transmittance, and mechanical properties, as well as the photochemical and thermal stability. The results showed a strong interaction and good compatibility between the molecules present in the GEL/CS/Cur films. The addition of Cur improved different film characteristics, including thickness, mechanical properties, and solubility. More importantly, when Cur was present at a concentration of 0.1 mM, the curcumin-mediated PDI inactivated >4.5 Log CFU/mL (>99.99%) of Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Shewanella putrefaciens after 70 min (15.96 J/cm2) of irradiation with blue LED (455 ± 5) nm. Moreover, Listeria monocytogenes and Shewanella putrefaciens were completely inactivated after 70 min of light exposure when the Cur concentration was 0.2 mM. In contrast, the highest inactivation effect was observed in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. This study showed that the inclusion of Cur in the biopolymer-based film transport system in combination with photodynamic activation represents a promising option for the preparation of food packaging films.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; chitosan; curcumin; gelatin; photodynamic inactivation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458350 PMCID: PMC9032248 DOI: 10.3390/polym14081600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Film nomenclature and final formulation of film-forming dispersions.
| Film Nomenclature | Gelatin (%, | Chitosan (%, | Ratio (%, | Glycerol (%, | Curcumin (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEL/CS | 1.5 | 1 | 4:6 | 0.3 | - |
| GEL/CS /Cur0.025 | 1.5 | 1 | 4:6 | 0.3 | 0.025 |
| GEL/CS /Cur0.05 | 1.5 | 1 | 4:6 | 0.3 | 0.05 |
| GEL/CS /Cur0.1 | 1.5 | 1 | 4:6 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| GEL/CS /Cur 0.2 | 1.5 | 1 | 4:6 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
Figure 1Film-forming solutions (FFSs) with different concentrations of Cur (prepared with a 4:6 mixture of GEL and CS).
Color parameter (L*, a*, b*, and ΔE*; n = 10), opacity (n = 3) values and digital images of the composite films.
| Film Samples | L * | a * | b * | ∆E | Opacity | Image |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEL/CS | 93.38 ± 0.07 a | 0.04 ± 0.03 d | 3.23 ± 0.82 c | 4.13 ± 0.46 c | 1.22 ± 0.04 e |
|
| GEL/CS /Cur0.025 | 90.73 ± 0.47 b | 1.23 ± 0.26 c | 15.00 ± 2.12 b | 15.64 ± 1.95 b | 1.73 ± 0.06 d |
|
| GEL/CS /Cur0.05 | 89.91 ± 0.20 bc | 1.69 ± 0.10 bc | 16.63 ± 0.39 b | 17.47 ± 0.43 b | 2.09 ± 0.07 c |
|
| GEL/CS /Cur0.1 | 89.45 ± 0.41 c | 2.22 ± 0.43 b | 17.80 ± 2.03 b | 18.79 ± 2.07 b | 2.83 ± 0.07 b |
|
| GEL/CS /Cur 0.2 | 86.09 ± 0.85 d | 6.47 ± 0.63 a | 30.76 ± 3.03 a | 32.65 ± 3.17 a | 4.69 ± 0.06 a |
|
a,b,c,d,e Different superscript letters between columns indicate significant difference between the results (p < 0.05) (ANOVA).
Figure 2UV–Vis transmittance spectra of GEL/CS and GEL/CS/Cur composite films.
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the surface (A-1–E-1) and cross section (A-2–E-2) of composite films. (A-1,A-2) GEL/CS films; (B-1–E-1) and (B-2–E-2) GEL/CS/Cur films with Cur contents of 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2, respectively.
Thickness, tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EB), moisture content (MC), water solubility (WS), and water vapor permeability (WVP) of the GEL/CS films and those GEL/CS/Cur films with different concentrations of Cur.
| Thickness (μm) | TS (MPa) | EB (%) | MC (%) | WS (%) | WVP (g·mm/m2·h·kPa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEL/CS | 0.33 ± 0.06 b | 14.12 ± 0.57 e | 53.19 ± 1.27 e | 21.96 ± 0.42 a | 20.46 ± 1.53 d | 0.304 ± 0.029 ab |
| GEL/CS/Cur0.025 | 0.34 ± 0.05 b | 14.74 ± 0.44 d | 56.01 ± 3.15 d | 21.29 ± 0.56 b | 22.06 ± 0.57 c | 0.296 ± 0.013 ab |
| GEL/CS/Cur0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.01 a | 15.43 ± 0.66 c | 59.08 ± 1.40 c | 20.04 ± 0.11 c | 22.33 ± 1.16 c | 0.289 ± 0.008 b |
| GEL/CS/Cur0.1 | 0.37 ± 0.02 a | 16.85 ± 0.45 b | 60.72 ± 1.59 b | 19.38 ± 0.73 d | 23.42 ± 0.63 b | 0.319 ± 0.026 ab |
| GEL/CS/Cur0.2 | 0.38 ± 0.02 a | 18.12 ± 0.31 a | 65.26 ± 0.62 a | 18.54 ± 1.12 e | 24.75 ± 0.73 a | 0.325 ± 0.014 a |
Reported values for each film are means ± standard deviation (n = 10 for thickness; n = 3 for TS, EB, MC, WS, and WVP). a,b,c,d,e Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant differences between samples (p < 0.05), according to ANOVA.
Figure 4Fourier–transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of GEL/CS and GEL/CS/Cur composite films.
Figure 5X-ray diffraction patterns of GEL/CS and GEL/CS/Cur composite films.
Figure 6Thermogravimetric (TG) (A) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) (B) thermograms of Cur powder, GEL/CS, and GEL/CS/Cur composite films.
Figure 7Antibacterial effect of the PDI-treated composite films against E. coli, L. monocytogenes, S. putrefaciens, and V. parahaemolyticus at different illumination times (A) and Cur concentrations (B). * Indicates absence of growth.
Figure 8Effects of the curcumin-medicated PDI on the outer membranes of the four bacterial cells. (A–D) E. coli, L. monocytogenes, S. putrefaciens, and V. parahaemolyticus, respectively. (A-1–D-1) L−C−; (A-2–D-2) 15.96 J/cm2 and 0.1 mM Cur.