| Literature DB >> 35458299 |
Bengui Zhang1,2, Xueting Zhang1, Qian Liu2, Yanshi Fu1, Zhirong Yang1, Enlei Zhang1, Kangjun Wang1, Guosheng Wang1, Zhigang Zhang1, Shouhai Zhang2.
Abstract
Membranes with high conductivity, high selectivity, and high stability are urgently needed for high-power-density vanadium flow batteries (VFBs). Enhancing membrane conductivity presents many challenges, often resulting in sacrificing membrane selectivity and mechanical strength. To overcome this, new robust adamantane-based membranes with enhanced conductivity are constructed for VFB. Low-content basic piperazine (IEC = 0.78 mmol g-1) and hydrophilic hydroxyl groups are introduced into highly rigid, hydrophobic adamantane containing poly(aryl ether ketone) backbone (PAPEK) and then selectively swelled to induce microphase separation and form ion transport pathways. The highly rigid and hydrophobic PAPEK exhibits high swelling resistance and provides the membranes with slight swelling, high selectivity, and high mechanical strength. The selective swelling temperature has a significant influence on the areal resistance of the resulting membrane, e.g., the PAPEK-130 membrane, when selectively swelled at 130 °C, has low areal resistance (0.22 Ω∙cm2), which is approximately two-fifths that of the PAEKK-60 membrane (treated at 60 °C, 0.57 Ω∙cm2). Consequently, the resulting PAPEK membranes exhibit low swelling, high selectivity, and low areal resistance, with the VFB constructed with a PAPEK-90 membrane exhibiting excellent energy efficiency (91.7%, at 80 mA∙cm-2, and 80.0% at 240 mA∙cm-2) and stable cycling performance for 2000 cycles.Entities:
Keywords: adamantane-based; area resistance; ion conductivity; selective swelling; vanadium redox flow battery
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458299 PMCID: PMC9029318 DOI: 10.3390/polym14081552
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Chemical structure of PAPEK membrane (a), photographs of PAPEK-virgin and resulting PAPEK-90 membranes (b), and fabrication process of the PAPEK membrane (c).
Solubility of APEK, CAPEK polymer and PAPEK-virgin membrane in some solvents (Ca. 0.1 g in 2 mL of various solvents at room temperature for 24 h).
| Solvents | APEK | CAPEK | PAPEK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | + | + | − |
| + | + | + | |
| Dichloromethane | + | + | − |
| Dimethyl sulfoxide | − | − | − |
| + | + | − | |
| Toluene | − | − | − |
| Ethanol | − | − | − |
Figure 1(a) 1H NMR of APEK and CAPEK; (b) FT-IR spectra of CAPEK, PAPEK-virgin, and PAPEK-130 membranes.
Figure 2TGA of PAPEK-virgin and PAPEK-90 membrane (H3PO4 form).
Figure 3ADL (a), swelling ratio (b), SAXS (c), and areal resistance (d) of PAPEK membranes.
Figure 4SEM images of PAPEK-virgin membranes (a–c) and PAPEK-130 membranes (d–f).
Figure 5VO2+ permeability (a) and mechanical strength (b) of PAPEK membranes.
Young’s modulus of PAPEK membranes.
| Membrane | Young’s Modulus (GPa) |
|---|---|
| PAPEK-virgin | 1.55 |
| PAPEK-60 | 1.48 |
| PAPEK-90 | 1.40 |
| PAPEK-130 | 1.32 |
Figure 6Battery performance of VFB with PAPEK and Nafion 212 membranes. Coulombic efficiency (a), voltage efficiency (b), energy efficiency (c), and energy efficiency (d) of PAPEK and other reported membranes.
Figure 7Cycling performance of VFB with PAPEK-90 membrane (a), the discharge capacity of the VFB with PAPEK-90 membrane (b).
Figure 8VO2+ concentration versus soaking time for PAPEK membranes in 0.15 M VO2+ in 3 M H2SO4.