| Literature DB >> 35458191 |
Qianling Zhou1, Mingyuan Jiao2, Na Han2, Wangxing Yang1, Heling Bao1, Zhenghong Ren1.
Abstract
Vitamin E can protect pregnant women from oxidative stress and further affect pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to investigate maternal vitamin E concentration in each trimester and its associations with gestational diabetes (GDM) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA). The data were derived from Peking University Retrospective Birth Cohort in Tongzhou, collected from 2015 to 2018 (n = 19,647). Maternal serum vitamin E were measured from blood samples collected in each trimester. Logistic regressions were performed to analyze the association between maternal vitamin E levels and outcomes. The median levels of maternal vitamin E increased from the first (10.00 mg/L) to the third (16.00 mg/L) trimester. Among mothers who had inadequate vitamin E levels, most of them had excessive amounts. Excessive vitamin E level in the second trimester was a risk factor for GDM (aOR = 1.640, 95% CI: 1.316-2.044) and LGA (aOR = 1.334, 95% CI: 1.022-1.742). Maternal vitamin E concentrations in the first and second trimesters were positively associated with GDM (first: aOR = 1.056, 95% CI: 1.038-1.073; second: aOR = 1.062, 95% CI: 1.043-1.082) and LGA (first: aOR = 1.030, 95% CI: 1.009-1.051; second: aOR = 1.040, 95% CI: 1.017-1.064). Avoiding an excess of vitamin E during pregnancy might be an effective measure to reduce GDM and LGA. Studies to explore the potential mechanisms are warranted.Entities:
Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); large-for-gestational-age (LGA); vitamin E
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458191 PMCID: PMC9032640 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Maternal characteristics and birth outcomes (n = 19,647).
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Maternal age | ||
| ≤20 | 137 | 0.7 |
| 21–30 | 12,752 | 64.9 |
| >30 | 6758 | 34.4 |
| Parity | ||
| Primiparous | 11,851 | 60.3 |
| Multiparous | 7796 | 39.7 |
| Maternal ethnicity | ||
| Han | 18,472 | 94.0 |
| Ethnic minorities | 1174 | 6.0 |
| Maternal education | ||
| Below high school | 4114 | 21.4 |
| High school or college | 7651 | 39.8 |
| University or higher | 7475 | 38.9 |
| Maternal pre-pregnancy BMI | ||
| <18.50 | 2123 | 11.0 |
| 18.5–23.99 | 12,144 | 63.1 |
| 24.00–27.99 | 3753 | 19.5 |
| ≥28.00 | 1236 | 6.4 |
| Folic acid usage | ||
| Yes | 17,911 | 91.2 |
| No | 1736 | 8.8 |
| Preterm birth | ||
| Yes | 771 | 3.9 |
| No | 18,827 | 96.1 |
Vitamin E levels during pregnancy.
| 1st Trimester | 2nd Trimester | 3rd Trimester | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) or N (%) | Median (IQR) or N (%) | Median (IQR) or N (%) | |
| Vitamin E | n = 16,705 | n = 5520 | n = 2190 |
| Median, mg/L | 10.00 | 14.60 | 16.00 |
| Q1, Q3, mg/L | 8.70, 11.50 | 12.30, 17.20 | 14.10, 18.40 |
| Deficient | 14 (0.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Adequate | 16,650 (99.7) | 5028 (91.1) | 1892 (86.4) |
| Excessive | 41 (0.2) | 492 (8.9) | 298 (13.6) |
The association between vitamin E status and GDM and large for gestational age (LGA), by univariate analyses.
| Vitamin E Status | GDM | Non-GDM | LGA | Non LGA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | ||||||
| First trimester | Not excessive | 4026 (29.6) | 9595 (70.4) | 0.898 | 2814 (17.7) | 13,100 (82.3) | 0.333 |
| Excessive | 10 (28.6) | 25 (71.4) | 9 (23.7) | 29 (76.3) | |||
| Second trimester | Not excessive | 1095 (26.8) | 2987 (73.2) | <0.001 | 887 (18.5) | 3906 (81.5) | 0.004 |
| Excessive | 156 (39.5) | 239 (60.5) | 114 (23.9) | 362 (76.1) | |||
| Third trimester | Not excessive | 330 (22.2) | 1154 (77.8) | 0.060 | 258 (14.7) | 1494 (85.3) | 0.415 |
| Excessive | 66 (28.2) | 168 (71.8) | 46(16.6) | 231 (83.4) | |||
a The p value is reported from Chi-square test; b The p value is reported from Fisher’s exact test.
The association between vitamin E concentration (continuous variable) and GDM and large for gestational age (LGA), by univariate analyses.
| GDM | Non-GDM | LGA | Non LGA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | |||||
| First trimester | 10.20 (8.90, 11.80) | 9.90 (8.60, 11.30) | <0.001 | 10.30 (8.90, 11.80) | 9.90 (8.70, 11.40) | <0.001 |
| Second trimester | 15.20 (13.00, 17.90) | 14.30 (11.90, 16.80) | <0.001 | 15.20 (12.90, 17.70) | 14.60 (12.30, 17.10) | <0.001 |
| Third trimester | 16.50 (14.50, 18.90) | 15.95 (13.90, 18.20) | 0.002 | 16.55 (14.45, 18.70) | 16.00 (14.10, 18.40) | 0.046 |
a The p value is reported from Mann–Whitney U-test.
The association between vitamin E status and GDM and large for gestational age (LGA), by multivariate logistic regressions.
| GDM a | LGA b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| First trimester vitamin E status (excessive) | 0.691 (0.325–1.469) | 0.336 | 1.312 (0.573–3.008) | 0.521 |
| Second trimester vitamin E status (excessive) | 1.640 (1.316–2.044) | <0.001 | 1.334 (1.022–1.742) | 0.034 |
| Third trimester vitamin E status (excessive) | - | - | 1.160 (0.773–1.742) | 0.473 |
a Maternal age, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, and folic acid usage were adjusted; b Maternal age, parity, maternal education, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain were adjusted.
The association between vitamin E concentration (continuous variable) and GDM and large for gestational age (LGA), by multivariate logistic regressions.
| GDM a | LGA b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| First trimester vitamin E concentration | 1.056 (1.038–1.073) | <0.001 | 1.030 (1.009–1.051) | 0.005 |
| Second trimester vitamin E concentration | 1.062 (1.043–1.082) | <0.001 | 1.040 (1.017–1.064) | 0.001 |
| Third trimester vitamin E concentration | - | - | 1.026 (0.983–1.071) | 0.233 |
a Maternal age, parity, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, and folic acid usage were adjusted; b Maternal age, parity, maternal education, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI and gestational weight gain were adjusted.