| Literature DB >> 35458100 |
Meng-Tao Yang1,2, Qiu-Ye Lan1,2, Xue Liang3, Ying-Yi Mao4, Xiao-Kun Cai4, Fang Tian4, Zhao-Yan Liu1,2, Xiang Li4, Yan-Rong Zhao4, Hui-Lian Zhu1,2.
Abstract
Phospholipids are pivotal polar lipids in human milk and essential for infants' growth and development, especially in the brain and cognitive development. Its content and composition are affected by multiple factors and there exist discrepancies in different studies. In this study, we determined five major phospholipids classes (phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylcholine, and sphingomyelin) in 2270 human milk samples collected from 0 to 400 days postpartum in six regions of China. The high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with an evaporative light scattering detector (HPLC-ELSD) was performed to quantify the phospholipids. Total phospholipid median (IQR) content was in a range between 170.38 ± 96.52 mg/L to 195.69 ± 81.80 mg/L during lactation and was higher concentrated in colostrum milk and later stage of lactation (after 200 days postpartum) compared with that in the samples collected between 10 to 45 days postpartum. Variations in five major sub-class phospholipids content were also observed across lactation stages (phosphatidylethanolamine: 52.61 ± 29.05 to 59.95 ± 41.74 mg/L; phosphatidylinositol: 17.65 ± 10.68 to 20.38 ± 8.55 mg/L; phosphatidylserine: 15.98 ± 9.02 to 22.77 ± 11.17 mg/L; phosphatidylcholine: 34.13 ± 25.33 to 48.64 ± 19.73 mg/L; sphingomyelin: 41.35 ± 20.31 to 54.79 ± 35.26 mg/L). Phosphatidylethanolamine (29.18-32.52%), phosphatidylcholine (19.90-25.04%) and sphingomyelin (22.39-29.17%) were the dominant sub-class phospholipids in Chinese breast milk during the whole lactation period. These results updated phospholipids data in Chinese human milk and could provide evidence for better development of secure and effective human milk surrogates for infants without access to breast milk.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese breast milk; HPLC-ELSD; MUAI; lactational stages; phospholipids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458100 PMCID: PMC9030290 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of lactating women and corresponding infants.
| Characteristics | 0–5 Days | 10–15 Days | 40–45 Days | 200–240 Days | 300–400 Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mothers | |||||
| Age (years) | 29.18 ± 3.47 | 29.06 ± 3.27 | 29.60 ± 3.29 | 29.96 ± 3.43 | 30.26 ± 3.43 |
| Pre-pregnancy BMI (kg/m2) | 21.66 ± 3.13 | 21.50 ± 2.99 | 21.42 ± 2.97 | 20.80 ± 2.56 | 21.01 ± 2.77 |
| Gestationalweight gain (kg) | 14.60 ± 4.58 | 14.85 ± 4.68 | 14.72 ± 4.92 | 14.52 ± 5.41 | 14.21 ± 5.35 |
| Delivery mode | |||||
| Vaginaldelivery | 155 (61.5%) | 151 (60.6%) | 352 (56.3%) | 361 (63.1%) | 332 (60.8%) |
| Caesarean | 97 (38.5%) | 98 (39.4%) | 273 (43.7%) | 211 (36.9%) | 214 (39.2%) |
| Infants | |||||
| Birth weight (kg) | 3.38 ± 0.41 | 3.39 ± 0.41 | 3.35 ± 0.40 | 3.52 ± 0.67 | 3.65 ± 0.82 |
| Birth length (cm) | 49.84 ± 1.49 | 49.97 ± 1.36 | 49.84 ± 1.49 | 53.41 ± 7.76 | 54.42 ± 9.59 |
| Infant gender | |||||
| Female | 125 (49.6%) | 125 (50.2%) | 312 (49.9%) | 282 (49.3%) | 264 (49.4%) |
| Male | 127 (50.4%) | 124 (49.8%) | 313 (50.1%) | 290 (50.7%) | 282 (50.6%) |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables.
Figure 1The percentile values of TPL concentration (a), PE concentration (b), PI concentration (c), PS concentration (d), PC concentration (e) and SM concentration (f) over lactation are shown. PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PS, phosphatidylserine; SM, sphingomyelin; TPL, total phospholipid.
Differences of TPL and sub-class PLs concentration in human milk over lactation (mg/L).
| PLs | 0–5 Days | 10–15 Days | 40–45 Days | 200–240 Days | 300–400 Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | |||||
| PE | 61.85 ± 1.78 ab | 61.46 ± 1.79 ab | 56.26 ± 1.13 b | 62.67 ± 1.18 a | 65.25 ± 1.22 a |
| PI | 21.91 ± 0.49 a | 19.12 ± 0.49 b | 18.48 ± 0.31 b | 19.34 ± 0.32 b | 19.75 ± 0.33 b |
| PS | 26.61 ± 0.67 a | 17.49 ± 0.67 d | 18.88 ± 0.42 cd | 20.28 ± 0.44 c | 22.09 ± 0.45 b |
| PC | 52.28 ± 1.20 a | 44.82 ± 1.21 b | 41.45 ± 0.76 bc | 39.40 ± 0.80 c | 42.83 ± 0.82 b |
| SM | 46.30 ± 1.33 c | 43.26 ± 1.33 c | 47.41 ± 0.84 c | 53.33 ± 0.88 b | 60.58 ± 0.90 a |
| TPL | 208.95 ± 5.03 ab | 186.15 ± 5.06 bc | 182.47 ± 3.19 c | 195.02 ± 3.34 b | 210.50 ± 3.43 a |
| Model 2 | |||||
| PE | 61.23 ± 1.77 ab | 60.85 ± 1.78 ab | 56.39 ± 1.12 b | 62.78 ± 1.17 a | 65.53 ± 1.20 a |
| PI | 21.74 ± 0.48 a | 18.95 ± 0.48 bc | 18.52 ± 0.31 c | 19.37 ± 0.32 bc | 19.83 ± 0.33 b |
| PS | 26.55 ± 0.67 a | 17.44 ± 0.67 d | 18.89 ± 0.42 cd | 20.86 ± 0.44 c | 22.12 ± 0.45 b |
| PC | 52.14 ± 1.20 a | 44.68 ± 1.21 b | 41.48 ± 0.76 bc | 39.43 ± 0.80 c | 42.90 ± 0.82 b |
| SM | 46.54 ± 1.32 c | 43.49 ± 1.33 c | 47.36 ± 0.84 c | 53.28 ± 0.88 b | 60.47 ± 0.90 a |
| TPL | 208.20 ± 5.03 ab | 185.41 ± 5.05 c | 182.64 ± 3.19 c | 195.15 ± 3.33 bc | 210.85 ± 3.42 a |
Values were least square means in ANCOVA, different superscript letters (a–d) indicated significant differences (p < 0.005 with Bonferroni correction); Model 1: adjusted for mother’s age (continuous), pre-pregnancy BMI (continuous), gestational weight gain (continuous), delivery mode (natural delivery or cesarean), infant gender (female or male), birth weight (continuous) and birth length (continuous); Model 2: adjusted for all variables in Model 1, and participants areas (Chengdu, Guangzhou, Changchun, Lanzhou, Shanghai or Tianjin) additionally; Abbreviations: PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PLs, phospholipids; PS, phosphatidylserine; SM, sphingomyelin; TPL, total phospholipid.
Figure 2Proportion of components in total phospholipid at different lactation stage (%). PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PS, phosphatidylserine; SM, sphingomyelin.