| Literature DB >> 35457995 |
Hongrui Yang1, Chen Wang1, Wenjuan Zhu1, Xia Zhang1, Tiemei Li1, Jing Fan1.
Abstract
Deep eutectic solvents are a new generation of green solvents composed of hydrogen bond acceptors and donors. However, when used as extractants in liquid-liquid separation, they are difficult to recycle and easy to lose. In order to solve these problems, herein, immobilized hydrogen bond acceptor adsorbent material was prepared for the separation and enrichment of antiviral drug arbidol from seven kinds of environmental water samples by in situ formation of hydrophobic deep eutectic solvents. The structure, morphology and thermal stability of the adsorbents were characterized, the separation and enrichment conditions for the targeted analyte were optimized, and the adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics were investigated. It was found that the adsorbent material could effectively enrich trace arbidol with the recovery more than 95% at the concentration above 7.5 ng/mL, and the enrichment factor was as high as 634.7. Coexisting substances, such as NaCl, KCl, CaCl2 and MgCl2, did not interfere with the adsorption of arbidol, even if their concentration was high, up to 1.0 mol/L, and the relative recovery for real samples was in the range from 92.5% to 100.3%. Furthermore, the immobilized hydrogen bond acceptor could be recycled and reused, and the recovery of arbidol was still above 95% after 12 adsorption-desorption cycles. The mechanism study demonstrates that the synergistic effect of hydrogen bonding and π-π stacking is the primary factor for the high adsorption efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: arbidol; environmental waters; immobilized hydrogen bond acceptor; separation and enrichment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457995 PMCID: PMC9027420 DOI: 10.3390/nano12081287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Scheme 1Preparation procedure of the immobilized-HBA.
Figure 1SEM images and the corresponding EDS mapping of PS-CH2Cl (a) and the elements of carbon and chlorine directly below (a) and the immobilized-HBA (b) and the elements of carbon, chlorine, nitrogen and oxygen directly below (b).
Figure 2Influence of the pH on the extraction efficiency of arbidol. Conditions: Carbidol = 25 mg/L, t = 30 min, T = 20 °C.
Figure 3The adsorption kinetic curve of arbidol by the immobilized-HBA and PS-CH2Cl. Conditions: Carbidol = 300 mg/L, T = 20 °C, pH = 5.5.
The adsorption performance of arbidol at different concentrations.
| Varbidol/mL | Ci (μg/mL) | Recovery % | Cf (μg/mL) | Enrichment Factor | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.0 | 0.3 | 99.1 | 4.96 | 16.5 | 1.0 |
| 100.0 | 0.15 | 98.6 | 4.93 | 32.9 | 0.9 |
| 250.0 | 0.06 | 98.5 | 4.93 | 82.2 | 0.9 |
| 500.0 | 0.03 | 97.9 | 4.90 | 163.3 | 1.1 |
| 1000.0 | 0.015 | 97.5 | 4.88 | 325.3 | 1.5 |
| 2000.0 | 0.0075 | 95.2 | 4.76 | 634.7 | 1.8 |
Experimental conditions: mimmobilized-HBA = 100 mg, T = 20 °C, pH = 5.5.
The permissible interference ratio of common inorganic ions and organics.
| Coexisting Ion | Permit Ratio | Concentration (mol/L) | R/% | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K+ | 50,000 | 1 | 96.9 | 1.8 |
| Na+ | 50,000 | 1 | 97.2 | 2.1 |
| Mg2+ | 50,000 | 1 | 100.2 | 1.5 |
| Ca2+ | 50,000 | 1 | 100.4 | 0.7 |
| Cl− | 50,000 | 1 | 97.2 | 1.9 |
| CO32− | 400 |
| 94.3 | 1.0 |
| SO42− | 400 |
| 95.7 | 1.8 |
| PO43− | 150 |
| 94.2 | 1.5 |
| Soluble starch | 750 |
| 92.8 | 1.4 |
| glucose | 50,000 | 1 | 98.4 | 2.7 |
Experimental conditions: mimmobilized-HBA = 100 mg, T = 20 °C, pH = 5.5, Carbidol = 2
The elution recovery of arbidol in different eluents.
| Eluent | R% | Eluent | R% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH | 22.1 | 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (5:5) | 54.3 |
| C2H5OH | 93.6 | 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (6:4) | 42.7 |
| 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (1:9) | 91.7 | 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (7:3) | 39.8 |
| 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (2:8) | 89.6 | 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (8:2) | 31.2 |
| 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (3:7) | 84.5 | 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (9:1) | 27.9 |
| 0.1 mol/L CH3COOH: C2H5OH (4:6) | 76.7 |
Experimental conditions: mimmobilized-HBA = 100 mg, V eluent = 3 mL, eluent flow speed = 0.2 mL/min.
The recovery of arbidol from real water samples.
| Sample | Measurement Value (μg/mL) | Arbidol Add (μg/mL) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water | Not detected | 0.05 | 97.6 | 2.7 |
| Rain water | Not detected | 0.05 | 96.2 | 1.4 |
| River water | Not detected | 0.05 | 100.3 | 2.7 |
| Lake water | Not detected | 0.05 | 96.5 | 2.1 |
| The yellow river water | Not detected | 0.05 | 96.3 | 2.4 |
| Sewage effluents | Not detected | 0.05 | 94.3 | 2.8 |
| Domestic sewage | Not detected | 0.05 | 92.5 | 3.3 |
Experimental conditions: mimmobilized-HBA = 100 mg, T = 20 °C, pH = 5.5.
Figure 4Uv-vis spectra of target analyte (0.05 μg/mL) before (a) and after (b) enrichment.
Figure 5Mid−IR spectra (a) and Far−IR spectra (b) of the immobilized−HBA (1), immobilized−HBA-arbidol (2), and arbidol (3).
Figure 6The adsorption mechanism of arbidol by immobilized-HBA.