| Literature DB >> 35457989 |
Verjesh Kumar Magotra1, Seung Joo Lee1, Tae Won Kang1, Akbar I Inamdar2, Deuk Young Kim2, Hyunsik Im2, Hee Chang Jeon1.
Abstract
Ammonium toxicity is a significant source of pollution from industrial civilization that is disrupting the balance of natural systems, adversely affecting soil and water quality, and causing several environmental problems that affect aquatic and human life, including the strong promotion of eutrophication and increased dissolved oxygen consumption. Thus, a cheap catalyst is required for power generation and detoxification. Herein, compost soil is employed as a novel electrocatalyst for ammonium degradation and high-power generation. Moreover, its effect on catalytic activity and material performances is systematically optimized and compared by treating it with various reducing agents, including potassium ferricyanide, ferrocyanide, and manganese dioxide. Ammonium fuel was supplied to the compost soil ammonium fuel cell (CS-AFC) at concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 g/mL. The overall results show that ferricyanide affords a maximum power density of 1785.20 mW/m2 at 0.2 g/mL fuel concentration. This study focuses on high-power generation for CS-AFC. CS-AFCs are sustainable for many hours without any catalyst deactivation; however, they need to be refueled at regular intervals (every 12 h). Moreover, CS-AFCs afford the best performance when ferricyanide is used as the electron acceptor at the cathode. This study proposes a cheap electrocatalyst and possible solutions to the more serious energy generation problems. This study will help in recycling ammonium-rich wastewaters as free fuel for running CS-AFC devices to yield high-power generation with reducing agents for ammonium fuel cell power applications.Entities:
Keywords: ammonium fuel; compost soil; electrocatalysis; ferricyanide; fuel cell
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457989 PMCID: PMC9029104 DOI: 10.3390/nano12081281
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Bipolar C-V studies showing the comparison of varying fuel concentrations in CS-AFCs using reductions: (a) without membrane, (b) with membrane, (c) ferricyanide, (d) ferrocyanide, and (e) manganese dioxide; (f) comparison of the redox potential performance with different reducing agents.
Figure 2(a) EIS study showing the effect of different reducing agents using 0.2 g/mL fuel on different compost samples. (b) Enlarged view of the EIS curves.
Figure 3Effect of temperature on the electrochemical properties of CS-AFC with 0.2 g/mL NH4Cl fuel concentration with ferricyanide. (a) Scan rate variation of the CS-AFC; (b) C–Vs recorded at different temperatures. (c) EIS data of the temperature dependence of the CS-AFCs. (d) Enlarged view of the Nyquist plots.
Figure 4Electrochemical cyclic stability measurements of CS-AFCs with ferricyanide and a single shot of fuel (0.2 g/mL). (a) Cyclic stability recorded for 500 cycles. (b) EIS study before and after the stability of 500 cycles; (c) current density vs. cycle number. (d) Chronoamperometry stability for 12 h.
Figure 5I–V measurement data for the CS-AFC with ferricyanide and 0.2 g/mL fuel concentration. (a) Catalytic activity in coin cell with a surface area of 3.14 cm2 (1–12 h) cycle. (b) Polarization curve of the coin cell. (c) Catalytic activity for large-sized CS-AFC. (d) Polarization curve of the large-sized CS-AFC. (e) Sustainability study of the large-sized CS-AFC. (f) Stable performance of the CS-AFC.
Figure 6Bacterial study for the CS-AFC samples. (a) Growth of the bacterial colonies is present. (b) Growth of the colonies is not observed. (c) I–V study showing the effect of the bacteria on the power performance.