| Literature DB >> 35457840 |
Xu Wang1, Hang Gao2, Qianfa Deng1, Jinhu Wang1, Hongyu Chen1, Julong Yuan1.
Abstract
KDP crystals constitute the only laser-frequency conversion and electro-optical switches that can be used in laser systems for inertial confinement fusion. However, KDP crystals are difficult to produce because of their inherent softness, brittleness, water-solubility, and temperature sensitivity. The authors' group developed a water-dissolution polishing method in previous studies to obtain near-damage-free KDP surfaces. In this article, the effect of the wetting characteristics of the water dissolution polishing fluid on the crystal surface-a factor rarely considered in the usual process optimization-on the polished surface quality was comprehensively studied. The mean radius of micro water droplets at 5 wt.% and 7.5 wt.% water content was approximately 0.6 nm and 1.2 nm, respectively. Theoretically, the smaller micro water droplet size is beneficial to the polished surface quality. When the water content was 5 wt.%, due to the poor wetting characteristics of the polishing fluid, surface scratches appeared on the polished surface; when the water content was 7.5 wt.%, the effects of the wetting characteristics and the radius of the micro water droplets reached a balance, and the polished surface quality was the best (Ra 1.260 nm). These results confirm that the wetting characteristics of the polishing fluid constitute one of the key factors that must be considered. This study proves that the wetting characteristics of the polishing fluid should be improved during the optimization process of polishing fluid composition when using oil-based polishing fluids for ultra-precision polishing.Entities:
Keywords: KDP crystals; surface quality; water-dissolution polishing; wetting characteristics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457840 PMCID: PMC9024437 DOI: 10.3390/mi13040535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 3.523
Figure 1Illustration of the selective removal of material from a KDP crystal.
Figure 2Radius distribution curve of micro water droplets in different polishing fluids.
Figure 3Variations in surface roughness with water content of polishing fluid (the data used to plot this curve are from [21]).
Figure 4Variations in the viscosity of polishing fluid with water content.
Figure 5Illustration of micro gaps between polishing pad and KDP crystal.
Figure 6Illustration of the contact angle.
Figure 7Contact angles of polishing fluid with different water contents on the KDP surface.
Surface tension of polishing fluids with different water contents.
| Water Content | Measuring Results | Density (g/cm3) | Surface Tension (mN/m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 wt.% |
| 0.820 | 24.78 |
| 5 wt.% |
| 0.842 | 24.90 |
| 7.5 wt.% |
| 0.849 | 25.02 |
| 10 wt.% |
| 0.856 | 25.29 |
| 15 wt.% |
| 0.867 | 25.58 |
| 20 wt.% |
| 0.887 | 25.73 |
Wetting work of polishing fluids with different water contents.
| Water Content | Contact Angle (°) | Surface Tension (mN/m) | Wetting Work (mN/m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 wt.% | 52.6 | 24.78 | 39.83 |
| 5 wt.% | 46.2 | 24.90 | 42.13 |
| 7.5 wt.% | 42.8 | 25.02 | 43.38 |
| 10 wt.% | 40.3 | 25.29 | 44.58 |
| 15 wt.% | 29.1 | 25.58 | 47.93 |
| 20 wt.% | 19.1 | 25.73 | 50.04 |
Figure 8Schematic showing the five observing points on the KDP crystal.
KDP surface after polishing with different water contents of polishing fluid.
| 5 wt.% | 7.5 wt.% | |
|---|---|---|
| Point 1 |
|
|
| Point 2 |
|
|
| Point 3 |
|
|
| Point 4 |
|
|
| Point 5 |
|
|
Figure 9Surface roughness of KDP crystal after polishing with different water contents of polishing fluid: (a) 5 wt.%, (b) 7.5 wt.%, (c) 10 wt.%, and (d) 15 wt.%.