| Literature DB >> 35457703 |
Federica Oselladore1, Valentina Bernarello1, Federica Cacciatore1, Michele Cornello1, Rossella Boscolo Brusà1, Adriano Sfriso2, Andrea Bonometto1.
Abstract
Responses of the macrozoobenthic community to an ecological restoration activity in the northern Venice lagoon were studied, within the scope of the project LIFE SEagrass RESTOration aimed at recreating aquatic phanerogam meadows largely reduced in recent decades. Transplants were successful in almost all project areas. Macrozoobenthos was sampled in eight stations before (2014) and after (2015, 2016, 2017) transplanting activities. An increase in abundance and fluctuations in richness and univariate ecological indices (Shannon's, Margalef's, Pielou's indices) resulted during the years. Comparing non-vegetated and vegetated samples in 2017, every index except Pielou's increased in the latter. Multivariate analysis (hierarchical cluster analysis, MDS, PERMDISP, SIMPER) grouped samples by localization rather than years, with differences between stations due to the abundance of common species. In 2017, results were also grouped by the presence or absence of aquatic plants, with differences in the abundance of grazer and filter-feeding species. Results of ecological index M-AMBI depicted conditions from moderate to good ecological status (sensu Dir.2000/60/EC) with similar fluctuations, as presented by univariate indices from 2014 to 2017. Responses of the macrozoobenthic community were more evident when comparing vegetated and non-vegetated samples, with the vegetated areas sustaining communities with greater abundance and diversity than non-vegetated samples, thus demonstrating the supporting function of aquatic plants to benthic communities.Entities:
Keywords: LIFE programme; M-AMBI; benthos; ecological indicators; phanerogam transplantation; transitional waters
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457703 PMCID: PMC9029909 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Map of the sampling area.
Figure 2(a) Distribution of collected species in the most represented taxa; (b) total abundance and (c) number of species from 2014 ante transplant operations to 2017 post-transplant operations (vegetated –VS- and non-vegetated stations –NVS-).
Figure 3Ecological indices at each station from 2014 ante transplant operations to 2017 post-transplant operations (vegetated –VS- and non-vegetated stations –NVS-).
Figure 4Cluster analysis applied to the abundance data at the eight stations sampled from 2014 ante transplantation to 2017 post-transplantation (vegetated –VS- and non-vegetated stations –NVS).
Figure 5MDS plot applied to the abundance data of the eight samples grouped by year.
Figure 6MDS plot applied to only 2017 samples gathered on vegetated (VS) or non-vegetated (NVS) sediments.
M-AMBI results from 2014 ante transplant operations to 2017 post-transplant operations.
| Years | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stations | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 NVS | 2017 VS |
| 1 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.7 | 0.91 | |
| 5 | 0.69 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.58 | |
| 8 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.8 | 0.59 | 0.59 |
| 10 | 0.54 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 12 | 0.68 | 0.95 | 0.61 | 0.79 | |
| 15 | 0.59 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.88 |
| 16 | 0.62 | 0.46 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.78 |
| 17 | 0.67 | 0.76 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 0.59 |
(NVS = non-vegetated; VS = vegetated. The colors indicate the ecological classifications: green = good; yellow = moderate; orange = poor; red = bad).