| Literature DB >> 35457526 |
Yaling Luo1, Xiling Wu1, Liao Liao2, Hongmei Zou3, Lulu Zhang4.
Abstract
Along with the aging of the population and miniaturization of family structure, the problem of the left-behind elderly has become more and more prominent in China. According to the Report on the family development in China (2015) released by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China, left-behind elderly people account for half of the total number of the elderly, of whom 10% live alone. The left-behind elderly not only suffer physiological obstacles such as body function decline, but also face a lack of support at the material level and loneliness at the spiritual level, which greatly affects their quality of life, accounting for their lower life satisfaction than that of the ordinary elderly. The rural areas of Sichuan Province are relatively backwards in terms of economic level and have limited pension security. Therefore, the left-behind elderly in rural areas are confronted with more complicated and severe pension problems compared with those in urban areas. Meanwhile, limited by economic and regional factors, a large number of rural labor forces in Sichuan Province have transferred to cities. These long-time migrant workers cannot provide material, spiritual and life care support for their left-behind parents in rural areas in a timely fashion, which changes their filial piety behaviors, and this affects the life satisfaction of the rural left-behind elderly. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the living conditions of empty-nest elderly and their children's filial piety in rural areas of Sichuan province in order to verify the influence mechanism of filial piety on the life satisfaction of the elderly, and to explore how to improve the rural empty-nest elderly's life satisfaction, enabling the elderly to live a healthy and happy life.Entities:
Keywords: China; elderly; filial piety; life satisfaction; rural areas
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457526 PMCID: PMC9027202 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Descriptive statistics of main variables.
| Total | Female | Male | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Life satisfaction | 3.85 | 0.88 | 3.78 | 0.89 | 3.89 | 0.87 |
| Age | 71.63 | 7.10 | 71.18 | 7.07 | 71.88 | 7.12 |
| Log (annual income) | 8.42 | 1.05 | 8.30 | 1.04 | 8.49 | 1.05 |
| Log (annual expenditure) | 8.71 | 0.77 | 8.62 | 0.76 | 8.75 | 0.77 |
| Education level (primary school = 1) | 0.85 | 0.36 | 0.94 | 0.24 | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Marital status (with a spouse = 1) | 0.71 | 0.46 | 0.64 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.44 |
| Number of sons | 1.31 | 0.91 | 1.37 | 0.95 | 1.27 | 0.88 |
| Number of daughters | 1.20 | 1.05 | 1.23 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.04 |
| Self-rated health (score) | 3.04 | 1.16 | 3.13 | 1.10 | 2.99 | 1.19 |
| Filial piety expectation (score) | 21.40 | 5.05 | 21.68 | 4.96 | 21.24 | 5.10 |
| Filial piety income (score) | 16.18 | 4.22 | 15.94 | 4.40 | 16.32 | 4.12 |
| Differences in filial piety (score) | −5.21 | 5.79 | −5.74 | 5.84 | −4.9 | 5.75 |
Note. Variable order.
Filial piety expectation, filial piety income and differences in filial piety among rural empty-nest elderly.
| Total | Range | Female | Male | Coefficient/ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall filial piety expectation, mean (SD) | 21.40 (5.05) | (6, 30) | 21.68 (4.96) | 21.24 (5.10) | 3.87 *** |
| Care expectation | 3.68 (1.23) | (1, 5) | 3.81 (1.19) | 3.62 (1.25) | −0.01 |
| Expectation of respect | 3.67 (0.95) | (1, 5) | 3.66 (0.96) | 3.68 (0.94) | 0.13 * |
| Greeting expectation | 3.72 (0.97) | (1, 5) | 3.74 (0.98) | 3.71 (0.97) | −0.04 |
| Pleasure expectation | 3.62 (0.98) | (1, 5) | 3.66 (0.96) | 3.61 (0.99) | 0.07 |
| Expectation of obedience | 3.25 (1.08) | (1, 5) | 3.29 (1.03) | 3.23 (1.11) | −0.07 |
| Financial expectation | 3.44 (1.21) | (1, 5) | 3.53 (1.16) | 3.39 (1.23) | −0.09 ** |
| Filial piety expectation levels, N (%) | |||||
| High expectation | 244 (24.04) | (6, 18) | 84 (23.01) | 160 (40.00) | 0.27 |
| Medium expectation | 557 (54.88) | (19, 24) | 214 (58.63) | 343 (52.77) | 0.12 |
| Low expectation | 214 (21.08) | (25, 30) | 67 (18.36) | 147 (22.62) | Control group |
| Overall filial piety income, mean (SD) | 16.18 (4.22) | (6, 30) | 15.94 (4.39) | 16.32 (4.12) | 2.95 *** |
| Care income | 2.32 (1.03) | (1, 5) | 2.32 (1.02) | 2.32 (1.03) | 0.02 |
| Respect income | 3.02 (0.82) | (1, 5) | 2.95 (0.82) | 3.06 (0.81) | 0.13 * |
| Greeting income | 2.88 (0.91) | (1, 5) | 2.84 (0.93) | 2.91 (0.89) | 0.06 |
| Pleasure income | 2.83 (0.85) | (1, 5) | 2.77 (0.87) | 2.86 (0.83) | −0.56 |
| Obedience income | 2.76 (0.81) | (1, 5) | 2.73 (0.82) | 2.78 (0.80) | 0.02 |
| Financial income | 2.37 (1.01) | (1, 5) | 2.33 (1.00) | 2.39 (1.02) | 0.16 *** |
| Filial piety income levels, N (%) | |||||
| High income | 21 (2.07) | (6, 20) | 10 (2.74) | 11 (1.69) | 0.38 * |
| Medium income | 128 (12.61) | (21, 24) | 37 (10.14) | 91 (14.00) | 0.23 ** |
| Low income | 866 (85.32) | (25, 30) | 318 (87.12) | 548 (84.31) | Control group |
| Overall differences in filial piety, mean (SD) | −5.21 (5.79) | (−24, 19) | −5.74 (5.84) | −4.91 (5.75) | 4.01 *** |
| Care difference | −1.36 (1.56) | (−4, 4) | −1.48 (1.51) | −1.29 (1.58) | 0.01 |
| Respect difference | −0.65 (1.15) | (−4, 4) | −0.71 (1.16) | −0.62 (1.14) | −0.02 |
| Greeting difference | −0.84 (1.19) | (−4, 4) | −0.90 (1.21) | −0.81 (1.18) | 0.05 |
| Pleasure difference | −0.80 (1.13) | (−4, 4) | −0.89 (1.17) | −0.74 (1.10) | −0.04 |
| Obedience difference | −0.49 (1.06) | (−4, 3) | −0.56 (1.07) | −0.45 (1.05) | 0.07 * |
| Financial difference | −1.07 (1.53) | (−4, 4) | −1.20 (1.49) | −1.0 (1.55) | 0.12 *** |
| Differences in filial piety levels, N (%) | |||||
| High expectation–high income | 297 (29.26) | (21, 30), (16, 30) | 109 (29.86) | 188 (28.92) | 0.28 *** |
| High expectation–low income | 279 (27.49) | (21, 30), (6, 16) | 121 (33.15) | 158 (24.31) | 0.01 |
| Low expectation–high income | 174 (17.14) | (6, 21), (16, 30) | 47 (12.88) | 127 (19.54) | 0.49 *** |
| Low expectation–low income | 265 (26.11) | (6, 21), (6, 16) | 88 (24.11) | 177 (27.23) | Control group |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 1Current life satisfaction of empty-nest elderly in rural areas.
Relationship between filial piety expectation, filial piety income, and life satisfaction of empty-nest elderly in rural areas.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | −0.10 ** | −0.11 ** | −0.10 ** | −0.11 ** | −0.07 | −0.12 ** |
| Gender (male = 1) | 0.11 * | 0.11 * | 0.09 | 0.07 | ||
| Marital status (with a spouse = 1) | 0.14 * | 0.14 * | 0.12 * | 0.21 * | 0.07 | |
| Number of sons | 0.10 ** | 0.09 ** | 0.11 *** | 0.12 * | 0.09 * | |
| Number of daughters | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.06 | −0.01 | |
| Education level (primary school = 1) | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.27 | 0.11 | ||
| Log (annual income) | 0.13 *** | 0.08 ** | 0.07 | 0.09 * | ||
| Log (annual expenditure) | 0.06 | 0.08 * | 0.05 | 0.09 | ||
| Physical condition | 0.23 *** | 0.23 *** | 0.23 *** | |||
| Filial piety expectation | −0.01 ** | −0.02 ** | −0.01 * | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 * |
| Filial piety income | 0.06 *** | 0.06 *** | 0.05 *** | 0.04 *** | 0.05 *** | 0.04 *** |
| R2 | 8.53% | 9.83% | 12.92% | 20.84% | 25.17% | 19.20% |
| df | 4 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 10 |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Relationship between filial piety expectation level, filial piety income level, and life satisfaction.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | −0.05 | −0.07 * | −0.06 | −0.07 * | −0.03 | −0.09 * |
| Gender (male = 1) | 0.13 * | 0.13 * | 0.09 | 0.07 | ||
| Marital status (with a spouse = 1) | 0.18 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.14 * | 0.25 ** | 0.07 | |
| Number of sons | 0.10 ** | 0.09 ** | 0.11 *** | 0.14 ** | 0.08 * | |
| Number of daughters | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.11 * | 0.01 | |
| Education level (primary school = 1) | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.08 | ||
| Log (annual income) | 0.16 *** | 0.11 *** | 0.11 * | 0.11 ** | ||
| Log (annual expenditure) | 0.07 | 0.10 ** | 0.07 | 0.11 * | ||
| Physical condition | 0.24 *** | 0.24 *** | 0.24 *** | |||
| Low expectation (reference group) | ||||||
| Medium expectation | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.14 * | 0.12 | 0.30 * | 0.04 |
| High expectation | −0.12 | −0.13 | −0.08 | −0.03 | 0.16 | −0.12 |
| Low income (reference group) | ||||||
| Medium income | 0.26 ** | 0.25 ** | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| High income | 0.47 * | 0.46 * | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.12 |
| R2 | 2.93% | 4.65% | 9.52% | 17.98% | 21.40% | 17.01% |
| df | 6 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Main sources of financial income.
Relationship between differences in filial piety and life satisfaction of empty-nest elderly in rural areas.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | −0.07 * | −0.09 * | −0.07 * | −0.08 * | −0.04 | −0.10 * |
| Gender (male = 1) | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.06 * | ||
| Marital status (with a spouse = 1) | 0.17 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.14 *** | 0.24 * | 0.08 | |
| Number of sons | 0.11 ** | 0.10 ** | 0.11 | 0.14 ** | 0.09 * | |
| Number of daughters | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.09 * | −0.01 | |
| Education level (primary school = 1) | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.11 | ||
| Log (annual income) | 0.14 *** | 0.09 ** | 0.09 | 0.10 ** | ||
| Log (annual expenditure) | 0.07 | 0.09 * | 0.07 | 0.10 * | ||
| Physical condition | 0.24 *** | 0.24 *** | 0.24 *** | |||
| Differences in filial piety | 0.03 *** | 0.03 *** | 0.03 *** | 0.02 *** | 0.02 * | 0.02 *** |
| R2 | 4.95% | 6.59% | 10.48% | 18.94% | 20.57% | 18.32% |
| df | 3 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Relationship between different types of differences in filial piety and life satisfaction.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | −0.07 | −0.08 * | −0.07 * | −0.08 * | −0.05 | −0.10 * |
| Gender (male = 1) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.05 | ||
| Marital status (with a spouse = 1) | 0.16 * | 0.15 * | 0.13 * | 0.23 * | 0.05 | |
| Number of sons | 0.09 ** | 0.09 ** | 0.10 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.08 * | |
| Number of daughters | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.08 | −0.01 | |
| Education level (primary school = 1) | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.12 | ||
| Log (annual income) | 0.15 *** | 0.10 ** | 0.10 * | 0.10 ** | ||
| Log (annual expenditure) | 0.07 | 0.09 * | 0.07 | 0.10 * | ||
| Physical condition | 0.24 *** | 0.25 *** | 0.24 *** | |||
| Low expectation–low income (reference group) | ||||||
| Low expectation–high income | 0.49 *** | 0.47 *** | 0.40 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.20 | 0.39 *** |
| High expectation–low income | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.12 | −0.02 |
| High expectation–high income | 0.29 *** | 0.27 *** | 0.23 ** | 0.21 ** | 0.27 * | 0.16 |
| R2 | 5.12% | 6.44% | 10.66% | 19.17% | 20.67% | 19.13% |
| df | 5 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 11 |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.
Each dimension of filial piety and life satisfaction.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Care expectation | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 |
| Expectation of respect | 0.14 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.12 * | 0.10 | 0.13 * |
| Greeting expectation | −0.05 | −0.05 | −0.05 | −0.07 | −0.03 | −0.09 |
| Pleasure expectation | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Expectation of obedience | −0.07 | −0.08 * | −0.08 * | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.07 |
| Financial expectation | −0.08 ** | −0.09 ** | −0.06 * | −0.04 | −0.10 * | −0.01 |
|
| ||||||
| Care income | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.02 |
| Respect income | 0.14 ** | 0.14 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.09 | 0.19 * | 0.04 |
| Greeting income | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | −0.08 | 0.12 |
| Pleasure income | −0.06 | −0.05 | −0.05 | −0.02 | 0.11 | −0.10 |
| Obedience income | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Financial income | 0.17 *** | 0.16 *** | 0.12 *** | 0.11 *** | 0.03 | 0.16 *** |
|
| ||||||
| Care difference | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 |
| Respect difference | −0.03 | −0.03 | −0.04 | −0.03 | 0.01 | −0.06 |
| Greeting difference | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | −0.03 | 0.10 * |
| Pleasure difference | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.03 | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.03 |
| Obedience difference | 0.08 * | 0.08 * | 0.08 * | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.08 * |
| Financial difference | 0.12 *** | 0.12 *** | 0.09 *** | 0.07 ** | 0.08 * | 0.07 ** |
* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001. Note: this has the same logic as the model of filial piety expectation and filial piety income affecting life satisfaction. Model 1 adds region and gender; based on Model 1, Model 2 adds marital status, number of sons and daughters; Model 3 is based on Model 2, which adds education level, annual income and annual expenditure; Model 4 adds self-rated health based on Model 3; based on Model 4, Model 5 and Model 6 analyze gender difference through regression.