| Literature DB >> 35456760 |
Haiyan Duan1,2,3, Cong Fu1,3, Guilin Du1,2,3, Shiqiu Xie1,3, Min Liu1,2,3, Baoguo Zhang1,3, Jiping Shi1,2,3, Junsong Sun1,2,3.
Abstract
The effects of Lysinibacillus sp. LF-N1 and Penicillium oxalicum DH-1 inoculants (LFPO group) on compost succession and the microbial dynamic structure of co-composting wheat straw and cow manure composting were investigated. The inoculants contributed to longer thermophilic stages, higher temperatures (62.8 °C) and lower microbial diversity in the LFPO treatment compared to the control group (CK). Moreover, LFPO inoculation increased the germination index and accelerated organic matter and lignocellulose degradation in the compost. Microbial analysis confirmed that the inoculants effectively altered the microbial communities. The predominant biomarkers for bacteria and fungi in inoculated compost were members of Lysinibacillus and Penicillium, respectively. Functional prediction showed greater lignocellulose degradation and less pathogen accumulation in the LFPO group. The cooccurrence network analysis showed that the network structure in LFPO compost was greatly simplified compared to that in CK. Bacterial cluster A was dominated by Lysinibacillus, and fungal cluster B was represented by Penicillium, which were significantly correlated with temperature and lignocellulose degradation, respectively (p < 0.05). These results demonstrated that the LF-N1 and DH-1 inoculants drove the bacterial and fungal assemblies to induce physicochemical property changes during cocomposting.Entities:
Keywords: Lysinibacillus; Penicillium; compost; functional prediction; microbial community
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456760 PMCID: PMC9028265 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Chemical constituents of the agricultural wastes.
| Materials | Cow Manure | Wheat Straw |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 61.6 ± 1.9 | 8.7 ± 1.7 |
| pH | 7.92 ± 0.07 | 6.63 ± 0.05 |
| OM (Organic matter, g·kg−1)) | 785.4 ± 2.3 | 653 ± 2.3 |
| TOC (Total organic carbon, g·kg−1) | 312 ± 1.5 | 443 ± 2.3 |
| TKN (Total Kjeldahl nitrogen, g·kg−1) | 14.7 ± 0.02 | 7.9 ± 0.01 |
| C/N (Carbon: nitrogen ratio) | 29.1 ± 0.3 | 24.2 ± 0.5 |
| Cellulose (%) | 33.9 ± 1.3 | 39.4 ± 1.8 |
| Hemicellulose (%) | 26.5 ± 1.6 | 28.4 ± 1.2 |
| Lignin (%) | 13.5 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.03 |
The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates.
Figure 1The temperature profile throughout composting.
Variations in physico-chemical properties during composting.
| Items | Time (Day) | SEM | Significance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 20 | 40 | TR | TI | TR × TI | ||
| pH | |||||||||
| CK | 7.67 ± 0.01 Ea | 8.36 ± 0.01 Aa | 8.21 ± 0.01 Ba | 7.89 ± 0.01 Db | 8.04 ± 0.06 Ca | 0.004 | * | *** | *** |
| LFPO | 7.68 ± 0.02 Ea | 8.31 ± 0.03 Aa | 8.18 ± 0.01 Ba | 8.03 ± 0.01 Ca | 7.87 ± 0.01 Db | ||||
| TOC (g·kg−1) | |||||||||
| CK | 374.6 ± 10.59 Aa | 349.3 ± 4.16 ABa | 336.0 ± 6.25 ABa | 286.1 ± 58.0 Ba | 282.3 ± 10.4 Ba | 3.675 | 0.134 | *** | 0.673 |
| LFPO | 373.1 ± 13.1 Aa | 343.6 ± 9.60 Ba | 321.7 ± 4.04 Ba | 282.7 ± 9.61 Ca | 269.6 ± 5.58 Cb | ||||
| TN (g·kg−1) | |||||||||
| CK | 14.6 ± 0.51 Aa | 13.9 ± 0.21 Aa | 15.4 ± 0.34 Aa | 14.6 ± 2.86 Aa | 16.1 ± 0.29 Aa | 0.182 | 0.331 | * | 0.759 |
| LFPO | 14.5 ± 0.72 BCa | 14.3 ± 0.66 Ca | 16.3 ± 0.44 Aa | 15.6 ± 0.34 ABCa | 16.8 ± 0.49 ABa | ||||
| C/N | |||||||||
| CK | 25.6 ± 0.25 Aa | 24.9 ± 0.11 Aa | 21.7 ± 0.32 Ba | 19.5 ± 0.17 Ca | 18.7 ± 0.36 Da | 0.075 | *** | *** | * |
| LFPO | 25.5 ± 0.41 Aa | 23.9 ± 0.61 Bb | 19.7 ± 0.35 Cb | 18.1 ± 0.26 Db | 16.4 ± 0.78 Eb | ||||
| GI | |||||||||
| CK | 32.3 ± 1.15 Ea | 44.7 ± 0.45 Db | 73.5 ± 0.56 Cb | 101.5 ± 2.76 Bb | 125.4 ± 5.50 Ab | 0.773 | 0.331 | *** | *** |
| LFPO | 33.1 ± 1.05 a | 55.8 ± 0.95 a | 88.2 ± 1.05 a | 136.0 ± 6.45 a | 177.1 ± 9.72 a | ||||
CK: the control group; LFPO: the inoculated group. Capital letters indicate a significant difference between different composting times (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between CK and LFPO (p < 0.05). The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. SEM = standard error of the means. TR: treatment; TI: time; TR × TI: the interaction between treatment and time; *: p < 0.05; ***: p < 0.001.
Variations in the physical and chemical parameters.
| Items | Time (Day) | SEM | Significance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 7 | 20 | 40 | TR | TI | TR × TI | ||
| OM (organic matter, g·kg−1) | |||||||||
| CK | 782.3 ± 17.6 Aa | 736.1 ± 6.0 Ba | 679.2 ± 4.6 Ca | 543.4 ± 10.5 Da | 521.6 ± 3.0 Da | 0.225 | * | *** | *** |
| LFPO | 778.7 ± 17.4 Aa | 665.7 ± 10.7 Bb | 527.3 ± 15.5 Cb | 460.9 ± 16.1 Db | 420.1 ± 10.5 Eb | ||||
| Cellulose (g·kg−1) | |||||||||
| CK | 363.3 ± 15.5 Aa | 353.6 ± 13.2 ABa | 319.6 ± 14.1 Ba | 244.3 ± 10.4 Ca | 193.6 ± 11.0 Da | 2.203 | *** | *** | *** |
| LFPO | 364.0 ± 8.54 Aa | 321.3 ± 14.0 Bb | 235.0 ± 11.5 Cb | 154.3 ± 13.0 Db | 125.0 ± 6.0 Db | ||||
| Hemicellulose (g·kg−1) | |||||||||
| CK | 275.6 ± 17.6 Aa | 232.3 ± 8.50 Ba | 172.5 ± 10.0 Ca | 123.7 ± 10.2 Da | 93.6 ± 10.5 Da | 1.927 | *** | *** | ** |
| LFPO | 278.3 ± 16.5 Aa | 192.3 ± 11.0 Bb | 124.7 ± 3.51 Cb | 71.6 ± 2.31 Db | 53.8 ± 3.02 Db | ||||
| Lignin (g·kg−1) | |||||||||
| CK | 104.6 ± 2.51 Aa | 98.0 ± 6.00 Aa | 89.6 ± 2.08 Ba | 69.0 ± 3.00 Ca | 51.0 ± 8.54 Da | 1.018 | * | *** | 0.787 |
| LFPO | 104.0 ± 2.65 Aa | 89.3 ± 7.64 ABa | 84.3 ± 10.1 Ba | 64.6 ± 2.51 Ca | 44.3 ± 3.21 Da | ||||
CK: the control group; LFPO: the inoculated group. Capital letters indicate a significant difference between different composting times (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between the CK and LFPO (p < 0.05). The values are shown as the mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. SEM = standard error of means. TR: treatment; TI: time; TR × TI: the interaction between treatment and temperature; *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001.
Alpha diversity of the microbial structures in compost.
| Community | Treatment | Time (Day) | Coverage | Chao 1 | Ace | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richness | Diversity | ||||||
| Bacterial | CK | 0 | 1.0 | 783.29 ± 3.8 | 892.26 ± 41.8 | 3.20 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 620.12 ± 21.3 | 716.45 ± 31.81 | 1.54 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | ||
| 7 | 1.0 | 404.09 ± 31.1 | 389.50 ± 21.3 | 2.13 ± 0.06 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | ||
| 20 | 1.0 | 476.01 ± 12.7 | 485.06 ± 24.7 | 2.96 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | ||
| 40 | 1.0 | 597.19 ± 14.3 | 659.16 ± 41.2 | 2.89 ± 0.21 | 0.12 ± 0.08 | ||
| LFPO | 0 | 1.0 | 749.29 ± 4.26 | 878.35 ± 34.6 | 3.30 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.12 | |
| 3 | 1.0 | 647.17 ± 6.89 | 759.72 ± 12.9 | 1.51 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.17 | ||
| 7 | 1.0 | 456.72 ± 9.12 | 518.17 ± 14.7 | 1.37 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | ||
| 20 | 1.0 | 596.57 ± 13.2 | 657.00 ± 31.5 | 2.38 ± 0.21 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | ||
| 40 | 1.0 | 652.08 ± 21.1 | 730.58 ± 23.4 | 2.33 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | ||
| Fungal | CK | 0 | 1.0 | 323.25 ± 11.4 | 283.07 ± 25.6 | 4.21 ± 0.22 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 223.44 ± 21.8 | 188.42 ± 32.5 | 3.19 ± 0.09 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | ||
| 7 | 1.0 | 123.74 ± 22.1 | 172.69 ± 26.5 | 3.88 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | ||
| 20 | 1.0 | 197.89 ± 11.6 | 192.20 ± 24.3 | 3.01 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | ||
| 40 | 1.0 | 200.75 ± 27.8 | 219.31 ± 12.5 | 3.13 ± 0.07 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | ||
| LFPO | 0 | 1.0 | 303.05 ± 17.6 | 246.86 ± 21.6 | 4.40 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | |
| 3 | 1.0 | 293.73 ± 24.3 | 221.06 ± 14.3 | 3.87 ± 0.14 | 0.20 ± 0.07 | ||
| 7 | 1.0 | 173.67 ± 3.87 | 185.17 ± 24.3 | 2.88 ± 0.03 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | ||
| 20 | 1.0 | 227.89 ± 9.12 | 203.87 ± 14.5 | 3.41 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | ||
| 40 | 1.0 | 226.25 ± 21.8 | 226.99 ± 25.9 | 3.85 ± 0.03 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | ||
LFPO: inoculation group; CK: control group. The number following LFPO/CK indicates the sampling time (day). The mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. Red line were the Guilds in final composts.
Figure 2The bacterial community structures in cow manure and wheat straw compost with and without inoculation. (a) The bacterial taxa at the genus level; taxa with <1% reads were combined as “others”. (b) Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis of significant bacterial genera between silages without and with inoculation; **, and * represent p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively.
Figure 3The fungal structures during composting. (a) The relative abundance of fungal taxa at the genus level; taxa with <1% reads were combined as “others”. (b) Wilcoxon rank-sum analysis of significant fungal genera between compost without and with inoculation; **, and * represent p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively.
Figure 4Heatmaps of the dynamics of microbial function in the compost with and without inoculation. (a) The bacterial phenotypes based on BugBase. (b) Bacterial function prediction based on FAPROTAX. (c) The fungal trophic mode and functional guild based on FUNGuild. Red line were the Guilds in final composts.
Figure 5Network analysis showing the cooccurrence based on the interaction relationship among dominant genera. The control group (a); LF-N1 and DH-1 inoculation groups (b). Red edges: positive correlation; green edges: negative correlation. The size of the nodes shows the average RA of the taxa.
Figure 6Heatmap showing relationship analysis of physicochemical parameters and the (a) bacterial genera in CK, (b) bacterial genera in LFPO, (c) fungal genera in CK and (d) fungal genera in LFPO. (* 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05, ** 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001). Red lines were the microbial cluster.