| Literature DB >> 35456098 |
Tomas Montalvo1,2, Agustin Higueros3, Andrea Valsecchi1, Elisenda Realp1, Cristina Vila3, Alejandro Ortiz3, Víctor Peracho1, Jordi Figuerola2,4.
Abstract
Mosquitoes breeding in urban sewage infrastructure are both a source of nuisance to the local population and a public health risk, given that biting mosquitoes can transmit pathogenic organisms to humans. The increasing presence of the invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus in European cities has further exacerbated the problems already caused by native Culex pipiens. We tested the effectiveness of modifications to sewage structures as an alternative to the use of biocides to prevent mosquito breeding. The placing of a layer of concrete at the bottom of sand sewers to prevent water accumulation completely eliminated mosquito reproduction, and so eliminates the need for biocides in modified structures. Sewer modification is thus a valid low-cost alternative for mosquito control.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes albopictus; Culex pipiens; integrated mosquito management; invasive Aedes; manipulation of mosquito habitat; mosquito control
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456098 PMCID: PMC9025117 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11040423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Results of univariate Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) testing the effect of year (2018 vs. 2020), treatment (control vs. modified) and the two-way interaction (Year*Treatment) on the percentage of visits with water, with mosquito larvae or pupae, and with the BTI application. Sewer identity was included in the models as a random factor.
| Year | Treatment | Year*Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1,37 |
| F1,37 |
| F1,37 |
| |
| Water presence | 90.49 | <0.0001 | 29.34 | <0.0001 | 16.68 | 0.0002 |
| Mosquito presence | 32.35 | <0.0001 | 0.83 | 0.37 | 3.29 | 0.08 |
| BTI application | 141.89 | <0.0001 | 7.74 | 0.009 | 5.92 | 0.02 |
Figure 1Mean number ± s.e. of BTI treatments applied in control and modified sewers in 2018 (before sewer modification) and in 2020 (after sewer modification).
Mean number of sewers, mean ± s.e. (range) number of visits per sewer, visits with water, visits with mosquito larvae or pupae, and BTI application in control and modified sewers before (2018) and after (2020) the modifications.
| 2018 | 2020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Modified | Control | Modified | |
| Number of sand sewers | 20 | 19 | 20 | 19 |
| Number of visits per sewer | 8.85 ± 0.37 (5–10) | 8.79 ± 0.18 (8–10) | 9.15 ± 0.20 (8–10) | 10.58 ± 0.40 (6–13) |
| Number of visits with water | 6.75 ± 0.52 (4–10) | 6.21 ± 0.60 (2–9) | 4.45 ± 0.49 (0–8) | 0.05 ± 0.05 (0–1) |
| Number of visits with mosquito larva or pupa | 1.70 ± 0.27 (0–4) | 1.95 ± 0.37 (0–5) | 0.70 ± 0.19 (0–2) | 0 |
| Mean number of BTI treatments applied | 4.65 ± 0.42 (3–7) | 4.42 ± 0.45 (1–7) | 1.75 ± 0.26 (0–4) | 0 |
| Mean number of | 12.23 ± 2.90 (0–231) | 3.04 ± 0.75 (0–54) | 3.90 ± 2.45 (0–432) | 0 |
| Mean number of | 15.90 ± 4.07 (0–421) | 19.07 ± 4.21 (0–385) | 3.93 ± 1.46 (0–147) | 0 |
Figure 2Sand sewer with accumulated water before the modification (a) and modified sand sewer with its bottom filled with concrete to the level of the base of the discharge pipe (b).