| Literature DB >> 35455867 |
Reham I Alagal1, Nora A AlFaris1, Jozaa Z AlTamimi1, Naseem M Alshwaiyat2, Aryati Ahmad2,3, Riyadh A Alzaheb4, Nora M AlKehayez1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess differences in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among young men from twelve Middle Eastern and Asian countries who live in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Entities:
Keywords: Asia; Middle East; obesity; overweight; young men
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455867 PMCID: PMC9025629 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10040690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Sociodemographic variables and body mass index of study subjects (n = 3600).
| Variables | Frequencies/Means | %/SD |
|---|---|---|
| Participants’ Nationality | ||
| Saudi | 289 | 8.0% |
| Egyptian | 289 | 8.0% |
| Yemeni | 335 | 9.3% |
| Syrian | 293 | 8.1% |
| Jordanian | 280 | 7.8% |
| Sudanese | 276 | 7.7% |
| Turkish | 203 | 5.6% |
| Pakistani | 306 | 8.5% |
| Afghan | 303 | 8.4% |
| Indian | 297 | 8.3% |
| Bangladeshi | 350 | 9.7% |
| Filipino | 379 | 10.5% |
| Age (years) | 29.6 | 3.2 |
| Residency Duration (years) | 7.2 | 7.0 |
| Household Type | ||
| Non-family household | 2920 | 81.1% |
| Family household | 680 | 18.9% |
| Marital Status | ||
| Single | 1919 | 53.3% |
| Married | 1681 | 46.7% |
| Educational Level | ||
| Low (secondary school or less) | 2284 | 63.4% |
| High (college degree or more) | 1316 | 36.6% |
| Monthly Income | ||
| Low (˂USD 1000) | 2630 | 73.1% |
| High (≥USD 1000) | 970 | 26.9% |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 25.1 | 3.2 |
Figure 1Bar chart illustrating mean body mass index for study participants from different countries. Bars labeled with different letters represent significantly different means (p < 0.05) based on the Tukey post hoc test.
Overweight and obesity prevalence among study participants stratified by their nationality.
| Study | Body Weight Status * | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | Normal | Overweight | Obesity | ||
| All | 3600 (100%) | 31 (0.9%) | 1829 (50.8%) | 1518 (42.2%) | 222 (6.2%) |
| Saudi | 289 (8.0%) | 7 (2.4%) | 135 (46.7%) | 108 (37.4%) | 39 (13.5%) |
| Egyptian | 289 (8.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 94 (32.5%) | 159 (55.0%) | 36 (12.5%) |
| Yemeni | 335 (9.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 194 (57.9%) | 124 (37.0%) | 17 (5.1%) |
| Syrian | 293 (8.1%) | 4 (1.4%) | 138 (47.1%) | 121 (41.3%) | 30 (10.2%) |
| Jordanian | 280 (7.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 124 (44.3%) | 151 (53.9%) | 5 (1.8%) |
| Sudanese | 276 (7.7%) | 1 (0.4%) | 90 (32.6%) | 178 (64.5%) | 7 (2.5%) |
| Turkish | 203 (5.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 116 (57.1%) | 81 (39.9%) | 6 (3.0%) |
| Pakistani | 306 (8.5%) | 1 (0.3%) | 157 (51.3%) | 106 (34.6%) | 42 (13.7%) |
| Afghan | 303 (8.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 131 (43.2%) | 149 (49.2%) | 23 (7.6%) |
| Indian | 297 (8.3%) | 1 (0.3%) | 173 (58.2%) | 113 (38.0%) | 10 (3.4%) |
| Bangladeshi | 350 (9.7%) | 16 (4.6%) | 266 (76.0%) | 65 (18.6%) | 3 (0.9%) |
| Filipino | 379 (10.5%) | 1 (0.3%) | 211 (55.7%) | 163 (43.0%) | 4 (1.1%) |
* There were statistically significant differences (p values ˂ 0.001) in body weight status among participants from different countries.
Matrix of post hoc association coefficients for different pairs of participant subgroups based on their nationality.
| Study Participants | Saudi | Egyptian | Yemeni | Syrian | Jordanian | Sudanese | Turkish | Pakistani | Afghan | Indian | Bangladeshi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.000 * | ||||||||||
|
|
| 1.000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
| 1.000 | ||||||||
|
| 0.434 |
|
| 1.000 | |||||||
|
|
|
| 1.000 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.000 | ||||||
|
|
| 0.446 |
|
| 1.000 | ||||||
|
| 0.121 |
| 0.125 |
| 1.000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.000 | ||||||
|
|
|
| 0.522 |
|
|
| 0.830 |
| 1.000 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.000 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.300 |
| 0.137 |
|
* Association coefficients were determined using the Chi-squared test when body weight status was categorized into underweight, normal weight, overweight and obesity. Differences were considered statistically significant at p value < 0.05 and significant values are presented in Bold type. ** Association coefficients were determined using the Chi-squared test when body weight status was categorized into non-overweight/non-obese and overweight/obese. Differences were considered statistically significant at p value < 0.05 and significant values are presented in Bold type.
Risk of overweight and obesity among study participants for sociodemographic variables.
| Variables | Unadjusted Odds Ratio * | 95% CI | Adjusted Odds Ratio ** | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants’ Nationality | ||||||
| Bangladeshi | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Saudi | 4.29 | 3.02–6.10 | ˂ | 3.90 | 2.54–5.98 | ˂ |
| Egyptian | 8.60 | 5.99–12.35 | ˂ | 7.37 | 4.98–10.90 | ˂ |
| Yemeni | 3.01 | 2.14–4.24 | ˂ | 2.76 | 1.92–3.96 | ˂ |
| Syrian | 4.41 | 3.11–6.26 | ˂ | 3.72 | 2.50–5.53 | ˂ |
| Jordanian | 5.22 | 3.66–7.44 | ˂ | 4.15 | 2.78–6.20 | ˂ |
| Sudanese | 8.43 | 5.85–12.14 | ˂ | 7.59 | 5.24–10.98 | ˂ |
| Turkish | 3.11 | 2.12–4.57 | ˂ | 2.43 | 1.63–3.61 | ˂ |
| Pakistani | 3.89 | 2.75–5.50 | ˂ | 3.82 | 2.68–5.44 | ˂ |
| Afghan | 5.45 | 3.84–7.72 | ˂ | 5.42 | 3.80–7.73 | ˂ |
| Indian | 2.93 | 2.06–4.17 | ˂ | 2.85 | 1.99–4.07 | ˂ |
| Filipino | 3.27 | 2.34–4.56 | ˂ | 3.22 | 2.21–4.68 | ˂ |
| Age (years) | 1.10 | 1.08–1.12 | ˂ | 1.07 | 1.04–1.10 | ˂ |
| Residency Duration (years) | 1.02 | 1.01–1.03 | ˂ | 1.05 | 1.03–1.08 | ˂ |
| Household Type | ||||||
| Non-family household | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Family household | 1.40 | 1.18–1.66 | ˂ | 0.87 | 0.69–1.11 | 0.262 |
| Marital Status | ||||||
| Single | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| Married | 1.32 | 1.16–1.50 | ˂ | 1.04 | 0.87–1.23 | 0.689 |
| Educational Level | ||||||
| Low (secondary school or less) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| High (college degree or more) | 1.53 | 1.34–1.76 | ˂ | 1.22 | 0.99–1.51 | 0.061 |
| Monthly Income | ||||||
| Low (˂USD 1000) | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||
| High (≥USD 1000) | 1.57 | 1.35–1.82 | ˂ | 1.21 | 0.99–1.48 | 0.067 |
* Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to test differences between overweight/obese versus non-overweight/ non-obese (reference group). Differences were considered statistically significant at p value < 0.05, and significant values are presented in Bold type. ** Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to test differences between overweight/obese versus non-overweight/ non-obese (reference group) after adjusting for the following sociodemographic variables: nationality, age, residency duration, household type, marital status, educational level, and monthly income. Differences were considered statistically significant at p value < 0.05, and significant values are presented in Bold type.