| Literature DB >> 35455452 |
Shabaaz J P Begum1, S Pratibha2, Janhvi M Rawat1, Divya Venugopal1, Prashant Sahu3, Abhilash Gowda4, Kamal A Qureshi5, Mariusz Jaremko6.
Abstract
Nanoparticles (NPs) are elements derived from a cluster of atoms with one or more dimensions in the nanometer scale in the range of 1-100 nm. The bio nanofabrication of metallic NPs is now an important dynamic area of research, with major significance in applied research. Biogenic synthesis of NPs is more desirable than physical and chemical synthesis due to its eco-friendliness, non-toxicity, lower energy consumption, and multifunctional nature. Plants outperform microorganisms as reducing agents as they contain large secondary biomolecules that accelerate the reduction and stability of the NPs. The produced NPs can then be studied spectroscopically (UV-Visible, XRD, Raman, IR, etc.) and microscopically (SEM, TEM, AFM, etc.). The biological reduction of a metallic ion or its oxide to a nanoparticle is quick, simple, and may be scaled up at room temperature and pressure. The rise in multi-drug resistant (MDR) microbes due to the immoderate use of antibiotics in non-infected patients is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in humans. The contemporary development of a new class of antibiotics with different mechanisms of action to kill microbes is crucial. Metals and their oxides are extremely toxic to microbes at unprecedentedly low concentrations. In addition, prevailing infections in plants and animals are raising significant concerns across the globe. NPs' wide range of bioactivity makes them ideal antimicrobial agents in agricultural and medical fields. The present review outlines the synthesis of metallic NPs from botanicals, which enables the metals to be in a stabilized form even after ionization. It also presents a valuable database on the biofunctionalization of synthesized NPs for further drug development.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; biofunctional; metallic nanoparticles; plant-mediated green synthesis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455452 PMCID: PMC9024851 DOI: 10.3390/ph15040455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Various approaches for the synthesis of NPs.
Figure 2Biological reduction of NPs.
An overview of techniques to characterize physicochemical properties of NPs.
| Techniques | Instruments | Mass Number | Number | Size Distribution | Agglomeration State | Shape | Surface Area | Chemical Composition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spectroscopy | UV visible Spectroscopy | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| X-ray Diffraction | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| FT-IR spectroscopy | ✓ | |||||||
| RAMAN spectroscopy | ✓ | |||||||
| Atomic absorption/optical emission spectroscopy | ✓ | |||||||
| Mass spectroscopy | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| X-ray photoelectron | ✓ | |||||||
| Dynamic light Scattering | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Zeta potential | ✓ | |||||||
| Microscopy techniques | Scanning electron Microscopy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Transmission electron microscopy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Scanning probe microscopy | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Bio-reduction of gold NPs and their bioactivity.
| Sr.No. | Botanical Names of Plants | Part Used | Size Range (nm) | Characterization Tools | Bio-Functionalization | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Leaf | 40–80 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, TEM, HRTEM |
Antimicrobial Anticancer | [ |
|
|
| Bark | 10–60 | XRD, FT-IR, UV-Vis, TEM |
Antibacterial Anticancer | [ |
|
|
| Flower | 5–21 | XRD, UV-Vis, FT-IR, TEM |
Anticancer | [ |
|
|
| Fruit | 50 | XRD, FT-IR, TEM, UV-Vis |
Anticancer Antibacterial Insecticidal | [ |
|
| Flower | 5–20 | XRD, SEM, FT-IR, UV-Vis, TEM |
Chemocatalytic | [ | |
|
| Seed | 45–75 | UV-Vis, EDX XRD, FT-IR, AFM, FESEM |
Antifungal | [ | |
|
| Fruit | 10 ± 5 | UV-Vis, EDX, XRD, FT-IR, SEM |
Antimicrobial | [ | |
|
| Liquid endosperm | 0.22 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, AFM, TEM, HRTEM |
Cytotoxicity | [ | |
|
| Bark | 20–30 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, TEM |
MTT assay | [ | |
|
| Root | 12.17–38.26 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, FT-IR, FE-SEM, TEM |
NR | [ | |
|
| Aerial and submerged parts | 2–40 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDAX, FT-IR, SEM, HR-SEM, TEM |
NR | [ | |
|
| Leaf | 70 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, HRTEM |
Antibacterial | [ | |
|
| Flower | 20–30 | UV-Vis, HRTEM |
Antimicrobial | [ | |
|
|
| Root | UV-Vis EDX XRD, FT-IR, FESEM |
Antioxidant | [ |
Note: NR = Not reported.
Bio-reduction of silver NPs and their bioactivity.
| Sr.No. | Botanical Names of Plants | Part Used | Size Range (nm) | Characterization Tools | Bio-Functionalization | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Flower | 38–82 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Leaf | 4–50 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, TEM |
Antibacterial | [ |
|
| Leaf | 20–80 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, AFM, FT-IR, SEM |
Antibacterial | [ | |
|
|
| Fruit | 30–90 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, FT-IR, SEM |
Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Unripe fruits | 32–38 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, FT-IR, SEM, TEM |
Anti-diabetic Antibacterial Anti-inflammatory | [ |
|
|
| Leaf | 11–15 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, SEM, TEM |
Antioxidant antibacterial | [ |
|
| Leaf | 28.8 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, FT-IR, TEM |
Antioxidant Anti-cancer Anti-larvicidal | [ | |
|
|
| Latex | 100–300 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDAX, FT-IR, FESEM, TEM |
Cytotoxic | [ |
|
| Coir | 23 ± 2 | UV-Vis, XRD, GC-MS, TEM |
Larvicidal | [ | |
|
| Seed | 13.09 | UV-Vis, XRD, PDS, SEM, TEM |
Antimicrobial | [ | |
|
| Leaf | 30–60 | UV-Vis, EDS, FT-IR, SEM |
Pesticidal | [ | |
|
| flower | Nanoclusters | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, EDS, SEM |
Antibacterial Antifungal | [ | |
|
| Root | ~16.7 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, SEM, TEM |
Protein binding Antioxidant Anticancer | [ | |
|
| Leaf | 50 | UV-Vis, XRD, SEM |
Antimicrobial | [ | |
|
| Leaf | 5–30 | UV-Vis, IR, EDS, CV, NTA, ZP, FT-IR, TEM |
Antimicrobial | [ |
Bio-reduction of platinum group NPs and their bioactivity.
| Sr. No. | Botanical Names of Plants | Part Used | Size Range (nm) | Characterization Tools | Bio-Functionalization | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platinum NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Leaves | 2–12 | UV-Vis, XRS, FT-IR, HRTEM |
NR | [ |
|
| Leaves | 35 | UV-Vis, RS, PSD, DLS, EDAX, XRD, FT-IR, SEM |
NR | [ | |
| Palladium NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Leaves | 2–12 | UV-Vis |
Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Leaves | 35 | UV-Vis, RS, PSD, DLS, EDAX, XRD, FT-IR, SEM |
Antibacterial Antioxidant Anticancer | [ |
Note: NR = Not reported.
Bio-reduction of other metal oxides NPs and their bioactivity.
| Sr. No. | Botanical Names of Plants | Part Used | Size Range (nm) | Characterization Tools | Bio-Functionalization | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zinc oxide NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Extract | 25–90 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Cytotoxic Cytotoxic Antibacterial Antifungal Antioxidant | [ |
|
| Extract | 40.5–124 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Antibacterial | [ | |
|
|
| Extract | 32.98–81.84 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Cytotoxic Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Extract | 17–20 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Cytotoxic | [ |
|
|
| Extract | 70–75 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Antibacterial Antioxidant Anticancer | [ |
|
|
| Extract | 31.2 | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Antifungal Antibacterial Cytotoxic | [ |
|
|
| Flower | ~8–~14 | UV-Vis, EDX XRD, FT-IR, FESEM, TEM |
Antibacterial Cytotoxic | [ |
|
|
| Leaves | 8–20 | UV-Vis, EDX, XRD, FT-IR, GC-MS, SEM TEM |
Antibacterial Cytotoxic | [ |
|
|
| Fruit | 50–400 | XRD, EDX, DLS, FT-IR, SEM |
Antibacterial Antioxidant Cytotoxic | [ |
|
|
| Bark | 20 | UV-Vis, DLS, ZP, FTIR, SEM, TEM |
Antimicrobial | [ |
| Magnesium oxide NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Fruit | 27 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, FT-IR, SEM |
Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Whole plant | 50–400 nm | UV-Vis, XRD, PL, FTIR, EDS, FESEM |
Antioxidant | [ |
| Copper oxide NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Extract | 20–30 nm | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Extract | 35–95 nm | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Antifungal | [ |
|
|
| Leaves | 28 ± 4 | UV-Vis, XRD, FT-IR, FESEM |
Antifungal | [ |
|
|
| Leaves | 5–10 | UV-Vis, PXRD, SEM TEM |
Antibacterial | [ |
| Titanium dioxide NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Extract | 15–20 nm | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Anticancer Cytotoxic Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Fruit peel | 20–50 nm | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Anticancer Cytotoxic Antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Fruit peel | 31.5 nm | UV–Vis, XRD, |
Larvicidal antibacterial | [ |
|
|
| Leaves | 32.58 | XRD, EDX, FT-IR, FESEM |
Antibacterial Antioxidant | [ |
|
|
| Leaves | 93.33 | UV-Vis, XRD, EDX, FTIR, SEM |
Antibacterial | [ |
| Samarium NPs | ||||||
|
|
| leaves | 10 | UV-Vis |
Antitumor | [ |
| Neodymium NPs | ||||||
|
|
| Leaves | 10 | UV-Vis, RS, PSD, DLS, EDAX, XRD, FT-IR, SEM |
NR | [ |
Note: NR = Not reported.
Figure 3Schematic diagram of the mechanism of action of NPs against microorganisms.