| Literature DB >> 35455378 |
Olivia Cabanillas-Bernal1, Karla Cervantes-Luevano1, Gonzalo Isai Flores-Acosta1, Johanna Bernáldez-Sarabia1, Alexei F Licea-Navarro1.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the largest pandemic of this century, and all aspects of this virus are being studied. The efforts to mitigate the negative effects associated with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have culminated in the development of several vaccines that are effective and safe for use to the general population. However, one aspect that remains relatively underexplored is the efficacy of different vaccines technologies (mRNA and Adenovirus) in providing passive immunity to infants through breastmilk of vaccinated mothers, and whether the antibodies passed through breast milk are functional. In this study, using a Micro-neutralization assay, we evaluate the presence of neutralizing antibodies in breast milk of lactating mothers vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 with the Pfizer-BioNtech, Johnson & Johnson (J&J)/Janssen, and CanSino Biologics vaccines. Our results show the greatest neutralizing effect in breast milk from mothers vaccinated with Pfizer, followed by mothers vaccinated with J&J. CanSino vaccinations yielded the breast milk with the least neutralizing effects. The results found in this study relating to the neutralizing capacity of breast milk against SARS-CoV-2 highlight the importance of corresponding health authorities recommending vaccination to lactating mothers and of the continuance of breastfeeding to infants due to the potential health benefits.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; breast milk; neutralizing antibodies; vaccines
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455378 PMCID: PMC9029061 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10040629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Neutralizing Antibodies Titer for all breast milk samples.
| Sample | Neutralizing Antibodies Titer | COVID-19 Positive Diagnostic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vaccine | |||||
| No Vaccine | Pfizer | J&J | CanSino | ||
| M1 | 80 | ||||
| M2 | 20 | ||||
| M3 | 10 | ||||
| M4 | 20 | ||||
| M5 | 10 | ||||
| M6 | 20 | + | |||
| M7 | 20 | ||||
| M8 | 80 | ||||
| M9 | 20 | ||||
| M10 | 10 | ||||
| M11 | 20 | ||||
| M12 | 20 | ||||
| M13 | 40 | + | |||
| M14 | 40 | ||||
| M15 | 40 | ||||
| M16 | 40 | + | |||
| M17 | 80 | ||||
| M18 | 160 | ||||
| M19 | 80 | + | |||
| M20 | 80 | + | |||
| M21 | 20 | ||||
| M22 | 80 | ||||
| M23 | 40 | ||||
| M24 | 40 | ||||
| M25 | 20 | ||||
| M26 | 80 | ||||
| M27 | 40 | ||||
| M28 | 40 | ||||
| M29 | 40 | + | |||
| M30 | 20 | + | |||
| M31 | 40 | ||||
| M32 | 80 | + | |||
| M33 | 40 | ||||
| M34 | 20 | ||||
| M35 | 20 | ||||
| M36 | 20 | ||||
| M37 | 20 | ||||
| M38 | 20 | ||||
| Mean | 20 | 63 | 39 | 21 | |
| % Samples with NAbs | 73% | 65% | 14% | ||
If the patient was previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, it is marked with +.
Figure 1Box plot of the Log10NT50 of the breast milk from mother with different vaccination profiles. All groups were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test with multiple comparisons. Significant differences (star) were observed in the Log10NT50 between Pfizer, CanSino (p-value 0.0006), and the control (p-value 0.01). In addition, significant differences (asterisk) were also observed between J&J, CanSino (p-value 0.002), and the control group (p-value 0.01). For each vaccination Log10NT50 profile the maximum, median, and minimum values are shown.
Figure 2Histogram of the Log10NT50 of the breast milk from mother with different vaccination profiles. The figure displays how only Pfizer and J&J groups had Log10NT50 over 2, and that the control (no vaccine) and CanSino groups had lower Log10NT50.