| Literature DB >> 35455313 |
Baozeng Sun1, Junqi Zhang1, Jiawei Wang1, Yang Liu1,2, Hao Sun1,3, Zhenhua Lu1,4, Longyu Chen1, Xushen Ding1, Jingyu Pan1, Chenchen Hu1, Shuya Yang1, Dongbo Jiang1, Kun Yang1.
Abstract
MHC-I antigen processes and presentation trigger host-specific anti-viral cellular responses during infection, in which epitope-recognizing cytotoxic T lymphocytes eliminate infected cells and contribute to viral clearance through a cytolytic killing effect. In this study, Hantaan virus (HTNV) GP-derived 9-mer dominant epitopes were obtained with high affinity to major HLA-I and H-2 superfamilies. Further immunogenicity and conservation analyses selected 11 promising candidates, and molecule docking (MD) was then simulated with the corresponding MHC-I alleles. Two-way hierarchical clustering revealed the interactions between GP peptides and MHC-I haplotypes. Briefly, epitope hotspots sharing good affinity to a wide spectrum of MHC-I molecules highlighted the biomedical practice for vaccination, and haplotype clusters represented the similarities among individuals during T-cell response establishment. Cross-validation proved the patterns observed through both MD simulation and public data integration. Lastly, 148 HTNV variants yielded six types of major amino acid residue replacements involving four in nine hotspots, which minimally influenced the general potential of MHC-I superfamily presentation. Altogether, our work comprehensively evaluates the pan-MHC-I immunoreactivity of HTNV GP through a state-of-the-art workflow in light of comparative immunology, acknowledges present discoveries, and offers guidance for ongoing HTNV vaccine pursuit.Entities:
Keywords: Hantaan virus (HTNV); comparative immunology; glycoprotein (GP); immunoreactivity; pan-MHC-I
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455313 PMCID: PMC9030823 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10040564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Numbers of HLA-1-dominant epitopes of HTNV GP.
| MHC-I Haplotypes | Prediction Tools | GP Epitopes | GP (Short-Listed) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLA-A1 | IEDB | 32 | 32 |
| NetMHCpan | 32 | ||
| Rankpep | 0 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 32 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 10 | ||
| HLA-A2 | IEDB | 38 | 41 |
| NetMHCpan | 40 | ||
| Rankpep | 25 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 28 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 20 | ||
| HLA-A3 | IEDB | 52 | 57 |
| NetMHCpan | 53 | ||
| Rankpep | 35 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 51 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 37 | ||
| HLA-A24 | IEDB | 30 | 32 |
| NetMHCpan | 30 | ||
| Rankpep | 16 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 24 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 16 | ||
| HLA-B7 | IEDB | 40 | 41 |
| NetMHCpan | 41 | ||
| Rankpep | 27 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 35 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 25 | ||
| HLA-B8 | IEDB | 11 | 11 |
| NetMHCpan | 11 | ||
| Rankpep | 0 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 9 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 5 | ||
| HLA-B15 | IEDB | 31 | 33 |
| NetMHCpan | 32 | ||
| Rankpep | 3 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 26 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 21 | ||
| HLA-B44 | IEDB | 26 | 26 |
| NetMHCpan | 26 | ||
| Rankpep | 4 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 23 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 17 | ||
| HLA-B58 | IEDB | 24 | 25 |
| NetMHCpan | 24 | ||
| Rankpep | 19 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 18 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 17 |
(GP epitopes are those ranking in the top 2% of each algorithm result; GP (Short-listed) are those that appeared in at least three prediction algorithm results).
Numbers of murine MHC-I-dominant epitopes of HTNV GP.
| MHC-I Haplotypes | Prediction Tools | GP Epitopes | GP (Short-Listed) |
|---|---|---|---|
| H2-Db | IEDB | 17 | 18 |
| NetMHCpan | 17 | ||
| Rankpep | 7 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 12 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 14 | ||
| H2-Dd | IEDB | 10 | 12 |
| NetMHCpan | 10 | ||
| Rankpep | 8 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 7 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | NA | ||
| H2-Kb | IEDB | 15 | 15 |
| NetMHCpan | 15 | ||
| Rankpep | 8 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 11 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | NA | ||
| H2-Kd | IEDB | 16 | 17 |
| NetMHCpan | 16 | ||
| Rankpep | 10 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 9 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 13 | ||
| H2-Kk | IEDB | 12 | 15 |
| NetMHCpan | 12 | ||
| Rankpep | 5 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 8 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 8 | ||
| H2-Ld | IEDB | 12 | 15 |
| NetMHCpan | 13 | ||
| Rankpep | 7 | ||
| SMMPMBEC | 7 | ||
| SYFPEITHI | 6 |
(GP epitopes are those ranking in the top 2% of each algorithm result; GP (Short-listed) are those that appeared in at least three prediction algorithm results).
Conservation of MHC-I-restricted dominant epitopes of HTNV GPs.
| MHC-I | Interspecies- | Interspecies- | Interspecies+ | Interspecies+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H2-Db | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| H2-Dd | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| H2-Kb | 12 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| H2-Kd | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| H2-Kk | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| H2-Ld | 10 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| HLA-A1 | 22 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| HLA-A2 | 34 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| HLA-A3 | 40 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| HLA-A24 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 6 |
| HLA-B7 | 27 | 10 | 1 | 3 |
| HLA-B8 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| HLA-B15 | 21 | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| HLA-B44 | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| HLA-B58 | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
Figure 1Interaction between HTNV GP 9-mer peptides and pan-MHC-I supertypes. Red represents strong affinity; blue represents weak affinity.
Figure 2Docking models of selective epitopes with corresponding MHC-I alleles across species. The docking model of each epitope indicates a lower score from left to right. The upper images represent HLA-I-favored binding while the lower images refer to H2 preference.
Figure 3High-affinity segment alignment in HTNV variants. (A) Four WebLogo plots with high-frequency mutation sites. (B) High-frequency mutation sites and mutation frequency in 148 mutant strains. (C) Heatmap of binding affinity differences before and after aa214–aa230 variation. (Red indicates that the mutation causes a decrease in affinity, and blue indicates that the mutation causes an increase in affinity.) (D) Scatterplot of binding affinity differences before and after aa214–aa230 variation. (Each point in the scatter plot represents a nonapeptide epitope, and the point in the gray area indicates that the affinity ranking of this epitope is in the top 2%. The closer the point is to the straight line y = x, the closer the affinity between HTNV strain 76-118 and the variants).
Epitopes that generated changes and their HLA molecules.
| Amino Acid Number | KT885048.1 | Variants | Dominant in KT885048.1 | Dominant in Variants | HLA-I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 214–222 | AVKGNTYKI | AVKGNTYKL | No | Yes | HLA-B07:02 |
| No | Yes | HLA-B08:01 | |||
| No | Yes | HLA-B15:01 | |||
| No | Yes | HLA-A30:02 | |||
| 218–226 | NTYKIFEQV | NTYKLFEQV | Yes | No | HLA-A32:01 |
| 221–229 | KIFEQVKKS | KLFEQVKKS | No | Yes | HLA-A02:01 |
| No | Yes | HLA-A02:03 | |||
| No | Yes | HLA-A02:06 |
Figure 4Histogram of three HLA-A2-restricted epitope ELISpot assays. The results are shown as the average of spot-forming units (SFUs) per 106 splenocytes. The ordinate represents the difference between the experimental and the control groups (ΔSUFs/106 splenocytes) and the abscissa represents the different peptides for stimulation. Peptides pool refers to the stimulation after mixing the three peptides. (**, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001).