| Literature DB >> 35455053 |
Matthew J Young1,2, Ravi Sachidanandam3, Dale B Hales1,2,4, Laurent Brard2,5, Kathy Robinson2,6, Md Mostafijur Rahman1, Pabitra Khadka1, Kathleen Groesch5,7, Carolyn K J Young1.
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the most common type of gynecologic malignant epithelial tumor, with the death rate from this disease doubling over the past 20 years. Mitochondria provide cancer cells with necessary anabolic building blocks such as amino acids, lipids, and nucleotides, and EC samples have been shown to increase mitochondrial biogenesis. In cancer, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) heteroplasmy studies suggest that heteroplasmic variants encode predicted pathogenic proteins. We investigated the mtDNA genotypes within peri-normal and tumor specimens obtained from three individuals diagnosed with EC. DNA extracts from peri-normal and tumor tissues were used for mtDNA-specific next-generation sequencing and analyses of mtDNA content and topoisomers. The three tumors harbor heteroplasmic somatic mutations, and at least one mutation in each carcinoma is predicted to deleteriously alter a mtDNA-encoded protein. Somatic heteroplasmy linked to two mtDNA tRNA genes was found in separate tumors, and two heteroplasmic non-coding variants were identified in a single EC tumor. While two tumors had altered mtDNA content, all three displayed increased mtDNA catenanes. Our findings support that EC cells require wild-type mtDNA, but heteroplasmic mutations may alter mitochondrial metabolism to help promote cancer cell growth and proliferation.Entities:
Keywords: endometrial cancer; heteroplasmy; homoplasmy; human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) maintenance; mtDNA content; mtDNA copy number; mtDNA topoisomers; next-generation sequencing (NGS); somatic mutations; uterine cancer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35455053 PMCID: PMC9030153 DOI: 10.3390/life12040562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Patient 1 unique tumor mtDNA somatic variants and heteroplasmy levels.
| MtDNA nt change a | Location b | Coverage c | %Variant d | Remarks e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C5899CC | NC5, adjacent OL and | 714 | 26 | Insertion of C, potential effect on DNA rep. initiation? |
| T6481C | 794 | 71 | Missense variant, deleterious (1.0) f; pathogenic (0.56) g; functional impact medium (2.34) h; associated with LAML, BRCA/Breast AdenoCA [ | |
| T9179C | 767 | 69 | Missense variant, deleterious (0.99) f; neutral (0.4) g; functional impact medium (2.91) h; associated with CLL, Panc-AdenoCA [ | |
| G15995A |
| 756 | 64 | Likely pathogenic (MitoTIP80%) i, mitochondrial cytopathy [ |
| C16327T | ATT, CR:HVS1,7S | 489 | 64 | Potential effect on DNA rep. initiation? associated with STAD, CLL, PRAD, Panc-AdenoCA [ |
a Nucleotide (nt) positions are numbered according to the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS) light-strand, NC_012920.1. rCRS nucleotides are listed on the left while variants are listed on the right. b Light-strand origin of mtDNA replication (OL); non-coding region 5 (NC5); tRNA tyrosine (TRNY); tRNA proline (TRNP); The membrane attachment site (ATT) has overlap with the non-coding control region (CR) containing the 7S DNA (7S), and the hypervariable segment 1 (HVS1). See https://www.mitomap.org/foswiki/bin/view/MITOMAP/GenomeLoci (accessed on 1 December 2019). Other gene names are explained in the legend for Figure 1. c NGS coverage at the indicated position. d The percentage of the variant in the plus strand reads, heteroplasmy; 100% represents homoplasmy. e Predictions regarding mutation pathogenicity were done using CAROL (Combined Annotation scoRing toOL), APOGEE (pAthogenicity Prediction thrOugh loGistic modEl trEe), MutationAssessor, or Mitochondrial tRNA Informatics Predictor (MitoTIP). DNA replication (DNA rep.). f The CAROL score combines information from the bioinformatics tools PolyPhen-2 [42] and SIFT [43] to predict the effect of non-synonymous coding variants (https://www.sanger.ac.uk/tool/carol/; accessed on 1 March 2022). The CAROL scores range between 0 and 1, with scores > 0.98 considered deleterious. g The APOGEE score was determined using the MitImpact 3D bioinformatics resource at https://mitimpact.css-mendel.it/ (accessed on 1 March 2022) [36,37]. APOGEE is a Logistic Model Tree (LMT)-based consensus classifier, a machine learning technique that consists of a combination of decision trees and logistic regressions at the leaves. APOGEE handles neutral and pathogenic pathogenicity classes. Mutations are considered as instances of several different predictors (e.g., PolyPhen2, MutationAssessor, and PROVEAN). Once the class is defined, a bootstrap strategy is implemented that randomly selects 70% of the pathogenic mutations, and the same number of neutral mutations are considered. For 100 iterations, the algorithm is run to sample the training set, estimate the LMT, and predict the pathogenicity of the mutations stored in the dataset. An estimate of the variant’s pathogenicity is given during each iteration and values are summarized by calculating a probability mean. A variant is deemed harmful if the mean of being harmful on 100 runs is >0.5. h MutationAssessor predicts the potentially deleterious impact of a DNA mutation that changes a protein’s amino acid residue. To make this prediction, multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins are grouped into families and subfamilies. Using the conservation pattern information generated from the alignments, MutationAssessor generates a functional impact (FI) score to rate a mutation as either having a predicted functional impact on the encoded protein (high or medium) or not (low or neutral, non-functional substitution). FI scores are listed within brackets in the table. i MitoTIP scoring, an in silico tool embedded into Mitomaster for predicting pathogenicity of novel mitochondrial tRNA variants [38]. Each possible nt change was scored, and the scores have been interpreted within quartiles: (1) likely pathogenic (>75–100%), (2) possibly pathogenic (>50–75%), (3) possibly benign (>25–50%), and (4) likely benign (0–25%).
Figure 1Summary of somatic mtDNA mutations and heteroplasmy identified in endometrial cancer patients. Variants for patients 1, 2, and 3 are indicated on the outside of the map by P1, P2, and P3, respectively, and the percentage heteroplasmy for each mutation is reported within brackets. The 13 genes encoding polypeptides of the mitochondrial OXPHOS machinery are highlighted in orange, OXPHOS complex I genes (NADH dehydrogenase, ND1, ND2, ND3, ND4L, ND4, ND5, and ND6); purple, OXPHOS complex III gene (cytochrome bc1 complex, CYB); green, OXPHOS complex IV genes (cytochrome c oxidase, COX1, COX2, and COX3); red, OXPHOS complex V genes (ATP synthase, ATP6 and ATP8). The small 12S (RNR1) and large 16S (RNR2) ribosomal RNA genes are colored light blue, and the mtDNA control region (CR) is colored gray. The 22 tRNA genes are indicated by their respective single letter code of the amino acid residue inside the circular map.
Patient 2 unique tumor mtDNA somatic variants and heteroplasmy levels.
| MtDNA nt Change a | Location | Coverage | %Variant | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G12007A | 424 | 75 | Synonymous variant; significantly associated with SZ + BD b [ | |
| T13490C | 516 | 94 | Missense variant, deleterious (1.0) c; pathogenic (0.63) d; Functional impact medium (3.425) e; associated with CLL, RCC [ |
a Row headings are as defined in the footnote for Table 1 and gene names are explained in the Figure 1 legend. b Schizophrenia (SZ) + bipolar disorder (BD). c The CAROL and d APOGEE scores were determined as described in Table 1 footnotes. e MutationAssessor predicts the potentially deleterious impact of a DNA mutation that changes a protein’s amino acid residue (see Table 1 footnote).
Patient 3 unique tumor mtDNA somatic variants and heteroplasmy levels.
| MtDNA nt Change a | Location b | Coverage | %Variant | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G10401A | 556 | 66 | Missense variant, deleterious (0.99) c; neutral (0.31) d; associated with THCA, HCC, Ovary-AdenoCA [ | |
| A10411T |
| 540 | 63 | Assoc. w/cardiomyopathy [ |
| G10644A | 658 | 67 | Missense variant, neutral (0.45) c; neutral (0.3) d; conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity (NC_012920.1(MT-ND4L):m.10644G>A) f; associated with PRDA [ |
a Row headings are as defined in the footnote for Table 1. b tRNA arginine (TRNR); other gene names and abbreviations are explained in the legend for Figure 1 and Table 1 footnote. c The CAROL and d APOGEE scores were determined as described in Table 1 footnotes. e MitoTIP scoring (see Table 1 footnote for explanation). f Conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity listed in ClinVar.
Figure 2mtDNA copy number is altered in patient 2 and 3 tumors relative to peri-normal controls. BamHI (B) or BamHI and PvuII (B/P) digested tissue-extracted DNA samples were analyzed using Southern blotting and non-radioactive probe hybridization. The blots were simultaneously probed with the digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled 18S nDNA probe (2.2 kb band) and the mtDNA-specific probe (16.6 kb band). As previously described, bands were quantitated using the open-source image-processing package Fiji [32,34]. As the patient 1 A14260G SNP removes the BamHI cut site, PvuII and BamHI double digests were used to cut both the 18S and mtDNA loci. On the left-hand side blot, patient 1 samples digested with only BamHI are shown alongside patient 2 and 3 samples, but as the mtDNA banding patterns are different from the other samples, they were not used to quantitate mtDNA content. As the BamHI/PvuII digested patient 1 peri-normal DNA extract contained the highest average mtDNA to nDNA values, this sample was set to 100%, and the others were normalized to it. N, peri-normal; T, tumor; P1, patient 1; P2, patient 2; P3, patient 3. Significant differences between normal and tumor mtDNA contents were determined using t-tests, n = 4 for each sample set (see the graph below the blots; a representative blot is shown for each patient with n = 2 lanes shown for each sample, N and T); ****, p < 0.0001; **, p < 0.01; ns, not significantly different.
Figure 3Endometrial cancer tumors have altered mtDNA topoisomers. Tissue-extracted DNA samples were digested with BglII to fragment nDNA (but not mtDNA). (A) One microgram of each DNA sample was loaded into each lane of a 0.4% TBE gel, and one-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis (1D-AGE) was used to separate the various mtDNA topoisomers. Each lane of ethidium bromide-stained DNA signal was selected and quantitated as a percentage of the total size of all measured lanes using the open-source image-processing package Fiji, as previously described [32,34]. The percent values are reported below each lane. Note the average of all lanes is 14.3%, and the percent coefficient of variation (%CV) is 8.5% indicating that similar levels of DNA extract were loaded into each lane. (B) The blot was probed using the DIG-labeled mtDNA-specific probe. An SJCRH30 whole-cell DNA extract served as a control (C) to identify mtDNA topoisomers including catenanes (Cat.), the replication intermediate (Rep. intermed.), relaxed circles, and linear molecules. Note linear mtDNA and relaxed circles represent 1n mtDNA chromosomes, while species that migrate above the relaxed circles are >1n. Catenated species (Cat.) include mtDNA well species (WS), high-molecular-weight catenanes (HMWC), mid-range MW catenanes (MMWC), low MW catenanes (LMWC), and the smear of the signal down the lane from WS to LMWC. Catenanes are emphasized by the black vertical lines next to the tumor (T) extracted DNA samples for patients 1, 2, and 3, P1, P2, and P3, respectively. Topoisomer species seen in peri-normal tissue (N) but not in endometrial cancer (EC) tumors are emphasized with #, while those seen in T, but not N tissues are emphasized with *. (C). The levels of catenated species were quantitated using the open-source image-processing package Fiji. Each lane of catenane signal on the blot was quantitated as a percentage of the total size of all measured lanes. The data are presented as the mean values ± errors as standard deviations (SDs). Mean, and SD values were calculated from the n = 3 sets of N and T DNA extracts from P1, P2, and P3. The difference between normal and tumor tissue catenane levels was determined using a student’s t-test. The p-value of 0.0383 is considered significant (p < 0.05).
mtDNA heteroplasmy identified in uterine tumors from Ju et al. 2014 [13]. Only tumor tissue samples that had read counts >100 (variant or WT) and matched normal tissue WT read counts > 100 were analyzed. (The matched normal levels of mtDNA heteroplasmy were all less than 0.4%.)
| Sample Index | MtDNA nt Change a | Location b | %Variant | Remarks c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5128 | T5506C | 91 | Missense, neutral (0.77) d; neutral (0.45) e; Uterus-AdenoCA [ | |
| 5139 | T11875C | 92 | Synonymous, UCEC, Eso-AdenoCA [ | |
| 5139 | G13531A | 93 | Missense, neutral (0.52) d; neutral (0.29) e; UCEC, Panc-Endorine, Soft Tissue-Liposarc, HCC [ | |
| 5150 | G4308A |
| 46 | Confirmed pathogenic (MitoTIP82.1%) f, UCEC, Breast AdenoCA, Kidney-ChRCC [ |
| 5155 | G14410A | 35 | Synonymous, UCEC [ | |
| 5157 | C14112T | 96 | Synonymous, UCEC/Uterus-AdenoCA [ | |
| 5160 | T152C | ATT, CR: HVS2, 7S, OH | 88 | LGG, LUAD/ Lung-AdenoCA, SARC, SKCM, THCA, BLCA/ Bladder-TCC, BRCA/Breast-AdenoCA, ESCA, PRAD/Prost-AdenoCA, STAD, UCEC, Lymph-CLL, Panc-AdenoCA, Soft Tissue-Liposarc, skin melanoma [ |
| 5160 | G1642A |
| 80 | Possibly pathogenic (MitoTIP74.3%) f, HNSC, UCEC, Head-SCC, Panc-AdenoCA, Thy-AdenoCA, HCC [ |
| 5160 | G13417A | 51 | Nonsense mutation, LUAD, UCEC, HNSC [ | |
| 5161 | G5560A |
| 12 | Possibly pathogenic (MitoTIP62.3%) f, THCA/Thy-AdenoCA, Kidney-ChRCC, Ovary-AdenoCA [ |
| 5163 | T9062C | 14 | Missense, neutral (0.92) d; neutral (0.25) e; UCEC/Uterus-AdenoCA [ | |
| 5165 | G529A | CR: HVS3, TFH | 99 | |
| 5165 | G2553A |
| 17 | UCEC, Panc-AdenoCA, Prost-AdenoCA [ |
| 5165 | G5753A | OL | 98 | HCC, Uterus-AdenoCA [ |
| 5165 | G14453A | 98 | Missense, deleterious (1.0) d; pathogenic (0.81) e; Kidney-ChRCC, Ovary-AdenoCA, CNS-Medullo, HCC, Biliary-AdenoCA [ | |
| 5167 | T14325C | 94 | Missense, neutral (0.56) d; pathogenic (0.54) e; UCEC [ |
a Row headings are as defined in the footnote for Table 1. b tRNA isoleucine (TRNI); tRNA valine (TRNV); tRNA tryptophan (TRNW); TFH, mtTF1/TFAM binding site; other gene names and abbreviations are explained in the legend for Figure 1 and Table 1 footnote. c UCEC, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma; AdenoCA, adenocarcinoma; Eso, esophageal; Panc, pancreas; Liposarc, liposarcoma; ChRCC, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; LGG, brain lower-grade glioma; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; SARC, Sarcoma; SKCM, skin cutaneous melanoma; THCA, thyroid carcinoma; Thy, thyroid; BLCA, bladder urothelial carcinoma; TCC, transitional cell carcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; ESCA, esophageal carcinoma; PRAD, prostate adenocarcinoma; Prost, prostate; HNSC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; CNS-Medullo, central nervous system medulloblastoma. d The CAROL and e APOGEE scores were determined as described in the Table 1 footnotes. f MitoTIP scoring (see Table 1 footnote for explanation).