| Literature DB >> 35454589 |
Xiangrui Yu1, Changjiao Shang1, Yunjian Cao1, Jingang Cui1, Chaofan Sun1.
Abstract
To reveal the influence of different substituents on the excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) process and photophysical properties of 4'-N, N-dimethylamino-3-hydroxyflavone (DMA3HF), two novel molecules (DMA3HF-CN and DMA3HF-NH2) were designed by introducing the classical electron-withdrawing group cyano (-CN) and electron-donating group amino (-NH2). The three molecules in the acetonitrile phase were systematically researched by applying the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) methods. The excited-state hydrogen bond enhancement mechanism was confirmed, and the hydrogen bond intensity followed the decreasing order of DMA3HF-NH2 > DMA3HF > DMA3HF-CN, which can be explained at the electronic level by natural bond orbital, fuzzy bond order, and frontier molecular orbital analyses. Moreover, we found from the electronic spectra that the fluorescence intensity of the three molecules in keto form is relatively strong. Moreover, the calculated absorption properties indicated that introducing the electron-withdrawing group -CN could significantly improve the absorption of DMA3HF in the ultraviolet band. In summary, the introduction of an electron-donating group -NH2 can promote the ESIPT reaction of DMA3HF, without changing the photophysical properties, while introducing the electron-withdrawing group -CN can greatly improve the absorption of DMA3HF in the ultraviolet band, but hinders the occurrence of the ESIPT reaction.Entities:
Keywords: density functional theory; excited-state intramolecular proton transfer; intramolecular hydrogen bond; photophysical property; substitution effect
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454589 PMCID: PMC9031961 DOI: 10.3390/ma15082896
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Molecular structures of DMA3HF and its derivatives in (a) enol and (b) keto forms.
Calculated fluorescence peaks (nm) of DMA3HF in acetonitrile, obtained via the TD-DFT method with seven different functionals.
| PBEPBE | B3PW91 | Cam-B3LYP | B3LYP | M062x | mPW1PW91 | ωB97XD | Exp a | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| λflu 1 | 532.94 | 456.48 | 396.43 | 458.03 | 396.64 | 441.74 | 388.21 | 510 |
| λflu 2 | 586.30 | 545.90 | 520.40 | 547.40 | 513.09 | 537.39 | 518.42 | 570 |
a Maximum fluorescence peaks in the experiment.
Calculated bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) related to the IHBs of DMA3HF and its derivatives in enol and keto forms in the S0 and S1 states, respectively.
| State | O1-H1 | H1-O2 | ∠(O1-H1⋯O2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMA3HF-enol | S0 | 0.977 | 2.025 | 117.886 |
| S1 | 0.988 | 1.909 | 122.179 | |
| DMA3HF-keto | S0 | 1.936 | 0.988 | 120.425 |
| S1 | 2.009 | 0.981 | 117.761 | |
| DMA3HF-CN-enol | S0 | 0.977 | 2.044 | 117.187 |
| S1 | 0.986 | 1.933 | 121.196 | |
| DMA3HF-CN-keto | S0 | 1.960 | 0.987 | 119.440 |
| S1 | 2.018 | 0.981 | 117.213 | |
| DMA3HF-NH2-enol | S0 | 0.978 | 2.019 | 118.153 |
| S1 | 0.988 | 1.906 | 122.390 | |
| DMA3HF-NH2-keto | S0 | 1.934 | 0.988 | 120.556 |
| S1 | 2.004 | 0.981 | 118.011 |
Figure 2Simulated IR spectra of the three compounds in acetonitrile at the spectral region of the O1–H1 stretching band.
Calculated distribution of NBO charges (a.u.) on the O1 and O2 atoms of DMA3HF, DMA3HF-CN, and DMA3HF-NH2 in the S0 and S1 states.
| DMA3HF | DMA3HF-CN | DMA3HF-NH2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State/Δ | S0 | S1 | Δ | S0 | S1 | Δ | S0 | S1 | Δ |
| O1 | −0.6917 | −0.6580 | −0.0337 | −0.6860 | −0.6540 | −0.0320 | −0.6947 | −0.6639 | −0.0308 |
| O2 | −0.6948 | −0.7646 | +0.0698 | −0.6819 | −0.7413 | +0.0594 | −0.7024 | −0.7741 | +0.0717 |
Δ: Difference in NBO charges between the S0 and S1 states; positive values represent increases and negative values represent decreases (S0→S1).
Obtained fuzzy bond order related to the ESIPT process.
| State | FBO (O1-H1) | FBO (H1⋯O2) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DMA3HF-enol | S0 | 0.75626 | 0.06129 |
| S1 | 0.72953 | 0.07995 | |
| DMA3HF-keto | S0 | 0.08263 | 0.72416 |
| S1 | 0.07044 | 0.74092 | |
| DMA3HF-CN-enol | S0 | 0.75760 | 0.05773 |
| S1 | 0.73284 | 0.07482 | |
| DMA3HF-CN-keto | S0 | 0.07747 | 0.72767 |
| S1 | 0.06834 | 0.73979 | |
| DMA3HF-NH2-enol | S0 | 0.75591 | 0.06242 |
| S1 | 0.72957 | 0.08095 | |
| DMA3HF-NH2-keto | S0 | 0.08309 | 0.72530 |
| S1 | 0.07136 | 0.74132 |
Figure 3RDG scatterplots and IRI maps of DMA3HF and its two derivatives in the S0 and S1 states: (a) the RDG versus sign (λ2)ρ scatterplots of the three compounds; (b) the IRI plane color filling map in the S0 state and IRI isosurface map in the S1 state of the three compounds.
Calculated topological parameters at BCPs related to the IHBs of the three molecules in enol and keto forms in the S0 and S1 states.
| ∇2 | V(r) γ | G(r) δ | H(r) ε | ELF ζ | EHB η | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMA3HF-enol-S0 | 0.0253 | 0.1026 | −0.0204 | 0.0230 | 0.0027 | 0.0689 | −4.9016 |
| DMA3HF-enol-S1 | 0.0320 | 0.1209 | −0.0270 | 0.0286 | 0.0016 | 0.0950 | −6.3963 |
| DMA3HF-keto-S0 | 0.0310 | 0.1133 | −0.0254 | 0.0268 | 0.0015 | 0.0964 | −6.1732 |
| DMA3HF-keto-S1 | 0.0267 | 0.1009 | −0.0212 | 0.0232 | 0.0020 | 0.0805 | −5.2139 |
| DMA3HF-CN-enol-S0 | 0.0239 | 0.1241 | −0.0222 | 0.0266 | 0.0044 | 0.0439 | −4.5893 |
| DMA3HF-CN-enol-S1 | 0.0304 | 0.1168 | −0.0253 | 0.0272 | 0.0020 | 0.0887 | −6.0393 |
| DMA3HF-CN-keto-S0 | 0.0294 | 0.1095 | −0.0238 | 0.0256 | 0.0018 | 0.0899 | −5.8163 |
| DMA3HF-CN-keto-S1 | 0.0262 | 0.1000 | −0.0207 | 0.0229 | 0.0022 | 0.0781 | −5.1024 |
| DMA3HF-NH2-enol-S0 | 0.0257 | 0.1035 | −0.0207 | 0.0233 | 0.0026 | 0.0704 | −4.9909 |
| DMA3HF-NH2-enol-S1 | 0.0323 | 0.1215 | −0.0272 | 0.0288 | 0.0016 | 0.0959 | −6.4632 |
| DMA3HF-NH2-keto-S0 | 0.0311 | 0.1137 | −0.0255 | 0.0270 | 0.0015 | 0.0969 | −6.1955 |
| DMA3HF-NH2-keto-S1 | 0.0270 | 0.1017 | −0.0214 | 0.0234 | 0.0020 | 0.0817 | −5.2809 |
α: Density of all electrons (a.u.); β: Laplacian of electron density (a.u.); γ: potential energy density (a.u.); δ: Lagrangian kinetic energy (a.u.); ε: energy density (a.u.); ζ: electron localization function (a.u.); η: hydrogen bond energy (kcal/mol), EHB = –223.08ρ(r) + 0.7423.
Figure 4Scanned PECs of the three molecules in the S0 and S1 states.
Figure 5ESIPT reaction energy profiles for DMA3HF and its two derivatives.
Figure 6IRC curves scanned based on the TS structures of the three molecules.
Figure 7Simulated absorption and fluorescence spectra of the three molecules in the enol and keto forms in acetonitrile.
Calculated transition properties of the three compounds in acetonitrile.
| State | Contribution MO a | Strength | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMA3HF | S1 | 506.63 | (68.325%) H→L | 0.5655 |
| S2 | 369.48 | (56.740%) H→L + 1 | 0.1037 | |
| S3 | 366.37 | (67.241%) H-1→L | 0.0431 | |
| S4 | 344.55 | (70.680%) H-2→L | 0.0000 | |
| S5 | 344.03 | (55.193%) H→L + 2 | 0.2958 | |
| S6 | 329.47 | (45.859%) H-3→L | 0.0086 | |
| DMA3HF-CN | S1 | 546.80 | (67.535%) H→L | 0.5329 |
| S2 | 504.39 | (69.415%) H→L + 1 | 0.0359 | |
| S3 | 383.18 | (65.797%) H-1→L | 0.0241 | |
| S4 | 359.31 | (63.652%) H→L + 2 | 0.5336 | |
| S5 | 355.10 | (70.573%) H-2→L | 0.0000 | |
| S6 | 343.13 | (66.814%) H-3→L | 0.0040 | |
| DMA3HF-NH2 | S1 | 504.00 | (68.324%) H→L | 0.5836 |
| S2 | 445.18 | (67.881%) H-1→L | 0.0474 | |
| S3 | 353.16 | (47.579%) H-2→L | 0.3820 | |
| S4 | 343.13 | (69.751%) H-3→L | 0.0051 | |
| S5 | 339.41 | (45.346%) H-2→L | 0.1166 | |
| S6 | 336.45 | (58.989%) H→L + 2 | 0.0147 |
a: Molecular Orbitals; H: the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO); L: the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO).
Calculated fluorescence properties of the three molecules in the enol and keto forms in acetonitrile.
| State | Eflu (eV) | λflu (nm) | Contribution MO a | Strength | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMA3HF-enol | S1 | 2.3264 | 532.94 | H→L (68.670%) | 0.6049 |
| DMA3HF-keto | S1 | 2.1147 | 586.30 | H→L (71.559%) | 0.7774 |
| DMA3HF-CN-enol | S1 | 2.1655 | 572.55 | H→L (68.886%) | 0.5805 |
| DMA3HF-CN-keto | S1 | 2.0561 | 603.01 | H→L (70.403%) | 0.7765 |
| DMA3HF-NH2-enol | S1 | 2.3439 | 528.97 | H→L (68.663%) | 0.6291 |
| DMA3HF-NH2-keto | S1 | 2.1173 | 585.59 | H→L (71.017%) | 0.7374 |
a: Molecular Orbitals; H: the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO); L: the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO).
Figure 8Frontier molecular orbitals and energy gaps of the three compounds.