| Literature DB >> 35454467 |
Krzysztof Adam Ostrowski1, Carlos Chastre2, Kazimierz Furtak1, Seweryn Malazdrewicz3.
Abstract
Fibre-reinforced polymer materials (FRP) are increasingly used to reinforce structural elements. Due to this, it is possible to increase the load-bearing capacity of polymer, wooden, concrete, and metal structures. In this article, the authors collected all the crucial aspects that influence the behaviour of concrete elements reinforced with FRP. The main types of FRP, their characterization, and their impact on the load-carrying capacity of a composite structure are discussed. The most significant aspects, such as type, number of FRP layers including fibre orientation, type of matrix, reinforcement of concrete columns, preparation of a concrete surface, fire-resistance aspects, recommended conditions for the lamination process, FRP laying methods, and design aspects were considered. Attention and special emphasis were focused on the description of the current research results related to various types of concrete reinforced with FRP composites. To understand which aspects should be taken into account when designing concrete reinforcement with composite materials, the main guidelines are presented in tabular form.Entities:
Keywords: AFRP; BFRP; CFRP; FRP; GFRP; cement matrix; compressive strength; concrete; epoxy resin; reinforcement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454467 PMCID: PMC9027662 DOI: 10.3390/ma15082774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Classification of composites regarding their construction, adapted from [11].
Figure 2The idea of FRP composites, adapted from [17].
Figure 3Main type of fibres: (a) carbon fibres; (b) basalt fibres; (c) glass fibres; and (d) aramid fibres.
Properties of the major fibres used in FRP composites, adapted from [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
| Fibre | Type | Young Modulus (GPa) | Tension Strength (MPa) | Ultimate Elongation at Break (%) | Density (kg/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon | High strength | 200–280 | 2500–5500 | 1.5–2.2 | 1800 |
| High modulus | 330–490 | 2100–2800 | 0.7–1.0 | 2000 | |
| Basalt | - | 90–110 | 4000–4840 | 2.25–3.1 | 2600–2800 |
| Glass | S-glass | 86–93 | 4500–4890 | 1.93 | 2460–2490 |
| E-glass | 72.3 | 3345–3400 | 2.12 | 2540–2580 | |
| Aramid | Kevlar 29 | 70–83 | 2900–2920 | 3.50–3.60 | 1440 |
| Kevlar 49 | 124–151.7 | 2758–3010 | 2.4 | 1467 | |
| Kevlar 149 | 179 | 3450 | 1.3–1.6 | 1470 |
Permissible temperatures when using fibres, adapted from [13].
| Temperature Range | Type of Fibre |
|---|---|
| Low temperature (below 100 °C) | All available fibres: natural, glass, carbon, ceramic, boron, organic, metal |
| Raised temperature | Some organic, glass, carbon, ceramic, boron, metal |
| High temperature | Ceramic, metal, carbon |
| Very high temperature | Carbon, ceramic |
Figure 4Stress–strain characteristics for fibre materials and steel, adapted from [33].
Figure 5Different orientations of carbon fibres in composite manufactured from three CFRP laminates, adapted from [36].
Cutting force based on fibre angle, adapted from [34].
| Fiber Angle (°) | Tool Rake Angle | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12° | 18° | |||
| Cutting Force Fc (N) | Resultant Force Ft (N) | Cutting Force Fc (N) | Resultant Force Ft (N) | |
| −75 | 162 | 110 | 170 | 65 |
| −60 | 200 | 155 | 175 | 115 |
| −45 | 160 | 181 | 160 | 170 |
| −30 | 145 | 200 | 145 | 207 |
| −10 | 135 | 210 | 140 | 215 |
| 0 | 145 | 140 | 120 | 125 |
| 10 | 120 | 120 | 105 | 85 |
| 30 | 115 | 40 | 155 | 45 |
| 45 | 140 | 62 | 105 | 85 |
| 60 | 158 | 61 | 215 | 45 |
| 75 | 140 | 60 | 170 | 40 |
| 90 | 315 | 110 | 300 | 98 |
Note: Cutting speed = 1.18 m/min; width of cut = 2.2 mm and depth of cut = 0.25 mm.
Figure 6Stages in the wet lay-up process, adapted from [37].
Figure 7Stages in the dry lay-up process: (a) reinforcing the concrete substrate and (b) applying the FRP reinforcement to the concrete substrate, adapted from [27].
Figure 8Example of the matrix in the laminate: (a) epoxy resin and (b) cement.
Advantages and disadvantages of epoxy resin and cement matrix.
| Matrix | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Epoxy resin |
Very good strength properties Compressive strength of 40–90 MPa Tensile strength of 12–40 MPa Bending strength of 20–60 MPa Minimal shrinkage during curing High chemical resistance to most solutions of inorganic and organic acids, hydroxides, and solutions of inorganic salts High hardness, abrasion, and scratch and impact resistance |
No resistance to UV radiation Low elasticity Low chemical resistance to oxidizing substances, alcohols, hydrocarbons, and ketones Moisture sensitivity during implementation No resistance to high temperatures (plasticization at temperatures from 70 °C) Combustible High cost Low stiffness |
| Cement matrix |
High compressive strength (to 100 MPa) Higher resistance to high temperatures than epoxy resins No plastic behaviour at high temperatures Incombustible Low cost High stiffness |
Low tensile strength (to 10 MPa) Very low cooperation/no cooperation with FRP Low chemical resistance Low bending strength |
Figure 9Types of concrete substrate surface: (a) unprepared, (b) sanded, (c) grinded, and (d) shot blasted.
Figure 10The idea of ultrasonic testing of material, adapted from [47].
Influence of FRP composites on the behaviour of concrete.
| Compressive | Laminate Type | Matrix | FRP Layers | Compressive Strength of Reinforced Specimen in Comparison to the Reference (%) | Reference | Type of Concrete |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64.91 | CFRP | ER | 1 | +33 | [ | High-performance concrete |
| 40.32 | +99 | [ | Fibre-reinforced normal concrete | |||
| 81.04 | CM | +4 | [ | High-performance self-compacting fibre-reinforced concrete | ||
| 31.74 | ER | +128 | [ | Normal concrete | ||
| 33.7 | 2 | +33 | [ | Reinforced normal concrete | ||
| 4 | +71 | |||||
| 136 | 1 | +29 | [ | Ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete | ||
| 5 | +55 | |||||
| 21.18 | 1 | +80 | [ | Lightweight aggregate concrete | ||
| 3 | +155 | |||||
| 38.83 | 1 | +46 | ||||
| 3 | +120 | |||||
| 15.45 | 1 | +236 | ||||
| 3 | +407 | |||||
| 64.4 | 1 | +22 | [ | High-strength concrete | ||
| 2 | +64 | |||||
| 3 | +99 | |||||
| 43.4 | 1 | +20 | [ | Ready-mixed normal concrete | ||
| 3 | +97 | |||||
| BFRP | 1 | +2 | ||||
| 3 | +3 | |||||
| 55.8 | 2 | +0.8 | [ | Normal concrete | ||
| 4 | +38 | |||||
| 6 | +69 | |||||
| 56.27 | 2 | +41 | High-performance concrete | |||
| 76.98 | 4 | +92 | ||||
| 94.57 | 6 | +136 | ||||
| 26.26 | GFRP | 1 | +8 | [ | Low-performance concrete | |
| 2 | +18 | |||||
| 136 | 5 | +35 | [ | Ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete | ||
| 9 | +45 | |||||
| 27.2 | 2 | +220 | [ | Low-performance concrete | ||
| 3 | 370 | |||||
| 44 | AFRP | 1 | +242 | [ | Normal concrete | |
| 69.5 | 1 | +49 | [ | Recycled tyre rubber concrete | ||
| 2 | +109 | |||||
| 63.7 | 3 | +116 | ||||
| 69.5 | 4 | +180 | ||||
| 23.8 | 1 | +99 | ||||
| 23.9 | 2 | +196 | ||||
| 23.8 | 3 | +296 | ||||
| 25.4 | 4 | +335 | ||||
| 7.1 | 1 | +251 | ||||
| 7.2 | 2 | +450 | ||||
| 3 | +719 | |||||
| 7.8 | 4 | +812 | ||||
| 110.3 | 4 | +27 | [ | Ultra-high performance concrete | ||
| 100.2 | 4 | +64 | ||||
| 113.8 | 3 | +16 | [ | Ultra-high performance concrete | ||
| 113.8 | 4 | +39 | ||||
| 113.8 | 6 | +39 | ||||
| 23.1 | 1 | +196 | [ | Low-performance concrete | ||
| 85.7 | 6 | +94 | [ | High-performance concrete |
Note: ER—epoxy resin, CM—cement matrix.
Technological, material, and environmental parameters and their major influence on the efficiency of reinforcing concrete structures with FRP laminates.
| Parameter | Importance |
|---|---|
| Type of FRP | As fibre strength increases, the load-bearing capacity of a reinforced concrete structure increases. |
| Number of FRP layers | As the number of FRP laminates increases, the load-bearing capacity of a reinforced concrete structure increases. |
| Direction of fibres | Arranging fibres parallel to the tensile stresses increases the load capacity of the composite structure. |
| Different fibres used in the laminates | Combining different FRP fibres in multilayer laminates is possible and does not adversely affect the structure. |
| Matrix | The use of resins is recommended (especially epoxy resins). In the case of reinforcing low-performance concrete, cement mortar could be used, but the load-bearing efficiency, due to adhesion properties, in this case, is low. |
| Lamination process | The high quality of carried out work, including the correct reinforcement of the concrete substrate, accurate venting of the resin, and the correct adhesion of the laminate to the concrete surface guarantees good performance of the structure in accordance with the reinforcement design. |
| Type of concrete | As the strength of the concrete increases, the reinforcement efficiency decreases. It is recommended that concretes with low compressive strength should be reinforced with resin. Especially, concrete elements with low compressive strength may be reinforced with the use of composite meshes and a cement mortar (or matrix). |
| Type of concrete surface | The sandblasting, grinding, and shot blasting of concrete surfaces affect the load-bearing capacity of a reinforced element in comparison to an unprepared concrete surface at the level of several percentages. It has been noted in the literature that the connection between the FRP and the grinded concrete surface was the most favourable. |
| Preparation of concrete substrate | The concrete substrate must be clean, completely dry, and free from dirt and cement milk. It is widely recommended to prepare the concrete surface using mechanical treatment as it improves the adhesion of FRP to the concrete substrate. Epoxy resin has a greater possibility of penetrating into the concrete, thus, increasing the total contact area. The best results can be achieved by using a grinded concrete surface. |
| Geometry of elements for retrofitting | FRP laminate creates a coating that adjusts and adheres to the existing geometry of the element being reinforced. Due to this, most concrete elements, considering their shape, can be reinforced by this method. It is especially useful in strengthening objects that are several dozen or more years old. However, the trend in designing structures already using laminates is beginning to become noticeable. |
| Performance conditions | The lamination process should take place under positive temperature conditions and with low humidity. |
| Temperature | The temperature during the lamination process should be between +10 °C to +40 °C. As the ambient temperature rises, the use time of the resin and the inorganic matrix is shortened due to their accelerated fixation. |
| Insolation | High insolation, dark surfaces that do not reflect radiation and excessive heating of the structure may affect the achievement of the glass transition zone by the organic matrix, beyond which the matrix begins to deteriorate. |
| Humidity | The humidity of concrete substrate should be not more than 5% by weight. High humidity has a negative effect on the penetration depth of resin and cement mortar. |
| Design of new elements | By appropriate selection of FRP laminates, it is possible to make slender elements with smaller cross-sections. Advanced software allows to accurately determine the number of laminate layers. Numerous experimental studies are also helpful. |
| Fire protection | In the case of FRP laminates with epoxy resin, it is recommended to protect them against high temperatures by using insulation or cement matrix to confine the composite structure. FRP laminates with cement matrix do not need additional fire protection if the cement matrix has an appropriate width. |
Reduction factors and long-term stress limitation factors.
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ACI 440.1R-15 [ | 0.95 | 0.75 | 0.85 |
|
| |||
| ACI 440.1R-15 [ | 0.55 | 0.20 | 0.30 |