| Literature DB >> 35454234 |
Andrzej Żmuda1, Urszula Lisiecka1, Katarzyna Dudek2, Roman Dąbrowski3, Bolesław Gąsiorek1, Stanisław Winiarczyk1, Krzysztof Kostro1.
Abstract
Aleutian disease (AD) is a chronic disease of mink caused by the Aleutian Mink Disease Virus (AMDV) that results in dysfunction of the immune system. The prevalence of asymptomatic AMDV infections suggests a necessity to explore their effects on the cellular mechanisms of non-specific immunity in farmed mink. The study evaluated the phagocytic activity and oxygen metabolism of peripheral blood granulocytes and monocytes in mink with chronic subclinical AMDV infection. Moreover, the intensity of inflammatory processes was assessed based on the serum amyloid A (SAA) concentration. The analyses involved 24 brown mink females aged 12-24 months. The experimental group (group I) consisted of mink with chronic subclinical AMDV infections, and the control group (group II) included healthy animals. The statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U rank test. Phagocytic activity of granulocytes and monocytes was carried out using flow cytometry, and SAA concentration was determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Compared with the control group, there was a significant decrease in the phagocytic activity and oxygen metabolism of granulocytes and monocytes in the AMDV-infected mink (p < 0.05). Additionally, it was found that the mean SAA value was significantly higher in the group infected with AMDV than in the control group (p < 0.05). The obtained data indicate that monitoring the serum SAA levels in mink with asymptomatic inflammation may help assess the health of mink and detect asymptomatic inflammation caused by AMDV infection.Entities:
Keywords: Aleutian disease (AD); oxidative burst; phagocytosis; serum amyloid A (SAA)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454234 PMCID: PMC9030866 DOI: 10.3390/ani12080987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
The age and weight of animals included in the study.
| Group I | Group II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Age (Months) | Body Weight (kg) | Age (Months) | Body Weight (kg) |
| 1 | 24 | 1.8 | 12 | 1.9 |
| 2 | 24 | 1.9 | 12 | 1.8 |
| 3 | 12 | 1.8 | 24 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 12 | 1.7 | 24 | 1.8 |
| 5 | 24 | 1.9 | 12 | 1.7 |
| 6 | 24 | 1.8 | 24 | 1.9 |
| 7 | 12 | 1.7 | 12 | 2.0 |
| 8 | 24 | 1.9 | 24 | 1.7 |
| 9 | 12 | 1.8 | 12 | 1.9 |
| 10 | 12 | 1.7 | 12 | 1.9 |
| 11 | 24 | 1.8 | 24 | 1.8 |
| 12 | 24 | 1.8 | 24 | 2.1 |
Figure 1Cytometric analysis of the phagocytic activity of granulocytes and monocytes in the peripheral blood of mink with subclinical AMDV infection and the control group (x ± SE). (A) % of granulocytes performing phagocytosis; (B) MFI of granulocytes performing phagocytosis; (C) % of monocytes performing phagocytosis; (D) MFI of monocytes performing phagocytosis. Group I—mink with subclinical AMDV infection, Group II—mink without subclinical AMDV infection, *—statistically significant difference between the groups at p < 0.05.
Descriptive statistics of variables (full sample n = 24).
| Descriptive Statistics | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Health Status | Mean | MED | SD | SE | Min | Max | |
| SAA concentration | AMDV-infected | 203.2 | 191.7 | 91.5 | 26.4 | 70.3 | 335.9 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 14.2 | 13.5 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 8.7 | 22.4 | ||
| % phagocytic granulocytes AMDV | AMDV-infected | 50.5 | 52.7 | 12.2 | 3.2 | 29.6 | 68.4 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 84.8 | 83.1 | 7.2 | 2.1 | 74.2 | 95.6 | ||
| % phagocytic monocytes AMDV | AMDV-infected | 70.6 | 72.2 | 10.2 | 2.9 | 48.6 | 84.2 | =0.955206 |
| healthy | 70.8 | 72.5 | 11.3 | 3.3 | 52.5 | 89.7 | ||
| MFI phagocytic granulocytes AMDV | AMDV-infected | 71.9 | 69.5 | 21.8 | 6.3 | 38.7 | 121.8 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 565.2 | 559.2 | 73.8 | 21.3 | 456.8 | 687.7 | ||
| MFI phagocytic monocytes AMDV | AMDV-infected | 299.7 | 313.8 | 67.9 | 19.6 | 159.4 | 389.6 | =0.00003 |
| healthy | 469.3 | 485.4 | 89.5 | 25.8 | 264 | 612.8 | ||
| % granulocytes performing oxidative burst AMDV minks | AMDV-infected | 70.11 | 71.55 | 7.77 | 2.24 | 56.9 | 79.2 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 90.6 | 91.2 | 6.1 | 1.7 | 78.9 | 98.2 | ||
| % monocytes performing oxidative burst AMDV minks | AMDV-infected | 45.6 | 45.4 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 38.1 | 55.4 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 68.6 | 70.8 | 11.3 | 3.3 | 54.3 | 82.8 | ||
| MFI granulocytes performing oxidative burst AMDV minks | AMDV-infected | 181.7 | 195.2 | 52.3 | 15.1 | 89.4 | 252.5 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 379.4 | 391.9 | 44.4 | 12.8 | 300.1 | 435.6 | ||
| MFI monocytes performing oxidative burst AMDV minks | AMDV-infected | 117.2 | 112.4 | 16.6 | 4.8 | 93.1 | 144.1 | <0.00001 |
| healthy | 224.4 | 217.2 | 33.8 | 9.7 | 189.6 | 287.4 | ||
Figure 2Oxygen metabolism in granulocytes and monocytes in the peripheral blood after PMA activation in mink with subclinical AMDV infection and the control group (x ± SE). (A) % of granulocytes performing oxidative burst; (B) MFI of granulocytes performing oxidative burst; (C) % of monocytes performing oxidative burst; (D) MFI of monocytes performing oxidative burst. Group I—mink with subclinical AMDV infection, Group II—mink without subclinical AMDV infection, *—statistically significant difference between the group at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Mean values of the serum SAA level in the peripheral blood of mink with subclinical AMDV and the control group (x ± SE). Group I—mink with subclinical AMDV infection, Group II—mink without subclinical AMDV infection, *—statistically significant difference between the groups at p < 0.05.