| Literature DB >> 35454188 |
Żaneta Steiner-Bogdaszewska1, Katarzyna Tajchman2, Piotr Domaradzki3, Mariusz Florek3.
Abstract
There are few studies on the composition of fatty acids and how they change the bone marrow fat of young animals depending on nutrition. Therefore, the proximate and fatty acid composition of metatarsal bone marrow from fawns of farm fallow deer after a summer of grazing and the winter feeding was compared. Due to the size and nature of the data, parametric or nonparametric tests were used. Fatty acid composition was determined by gas chromatographic analysis. After the winter feeding, bone marrow contained more fat (83.11% vs. 75.09%, p < 0.05) and less fat free dry matter (5.61% vs. 13.76%, p < 0.05) compared to the pasture period. Moreover, there was a significantly higher amount of saturated fatty acids (23.34% vs. 21.60%, p < 0.001), more trans fatty acids (2.99% vs. 2.34%, p < 0.005), and conjugated linoleic acid isomers (1.04% vs. 0.83%, p < 0.01), compared to post winter feeding, which in turn contained significantly more total cis-monounsaturated fatty acids (54.65% vs. 58.90%, p < 0.001). The percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids (including n-3 and n-6) was not affected by feeding season. In conclusion, it was shown that young male farm fallow deer were better nourished after the winter period, during which they were kept in properly prepared rooms and fed fodder prepared by people.Entities:
Keywords: Dama dama; bone marrow; fatty acid; pasture period; winter nutrition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454188 PMCID: PMC9031054 DOI: 10.3390/ani12080941
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Body weight, composition, and fatty acid percentages of bone marrow of fallow deer, depending on diet.
| Variable | Pasture | Indoor | Statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | M | SD | Test | ||
| Body weight (kg) | 32.17 | 3.10 | 41.57 | 4.31 | 0.001 | t |
| Bone marrow composition (%) | ||||||
| Fat | 75.09 | 6.60 | 83.11 | 5.32 | 0.034 | t |
| Moisture | 11.15 | 1.53 | 11.24 | 1.45 | 0.914 | t |
| FFM | 13.76 | 6.48 | 5.61 | 3.69 | 0.016 | t |
| Fatty acid percentage (%) | ||||||
| C14:0 | 2.59 | 0.34 | 2.68 | 0.37 | 0.637 | t |
| C16:0 | 17.44 | 0.58 | 15.95 | 0.53 | <0.001 | t |
| C18:0 | 3.18 | 0.32 | 2.80 | 0.26 | 0.039 | K-S |
| ∑SFA | 23.34 | 0.87 | 21.60 | 0.61 | 0.001 | t |
| C15:0 | 1.06 | 0.07 | 0.98 | 0.09 | 0.140 | t |
| ∑OCFA | 11.42 | 1.80 | 10.03 | 0.61 | 0.079 | t |
| C18:0 | 1.33 | 0.23 | 1.32 | 0.21 | 0.938 | t |
| ∑BCFA | 3.70 | 0.39 | 3.48 | 0.18 | >0.100 | K-S |
| C14:1 | 1.72 | 0.18 | 1.96 | 0.27 | 0.101 | t |
| C15:1 | 8.14 | 1.70 | 6.67 | 0.51 | 0.052 | t |
| C16:1 | 11.84 | 0.80 | 13.26 | 0.89 | 0.012 | t |
| C17:1 | 1.45 | 0.10 | 1.61 | 0.10 | 0.020 | t |
| C18:1 | 37.74 | 1.67 | 39.14 | 0.76 | 0.070 | t |
| C18:1 | 1.77 | 0.12 | 2.75 | 0.26 | < 0.001 | t |
| ∑MUFA | 54.65 | 1.33 | 58.90 | 0.95 | <0.001 | t |
| C18:2 | 1.44 | 0.11 | 1.46 | 0.09 | 0.776 | t |
| CLA | 1.04 | 0.13 | 0.83 | 0.10 | 0.008 | t |
| ∑PUFA | 3.88 | 0.43 | 3.63 | 0.29 | 0.243 | t |
|
∑ | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.92 | 0.10 | >0.100 | K-S |
|
∑ | 1.65 | 0.15 | 1.66 | 0.13 | 0.831 | t |
| ∑MUFA | 1.60 | 0.20 | 1.21 | 0.08 | <0.005 | K-S |
| ΣC18:2 | 1.07 | 0.12 | 0.77 | 0.05 | <0.001 | t |
| ∑TFA | 2.99 | 0.34 | 2.34 | 0.07 | <0.005 | K-S |
|
| 1.71 | 0.21 | 1.81 | 0.18 | 0.379 | t |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.834 | t |
M—mean; SD—standard deviation; K-S—Kolmogorov–Smirnov test; t—Student’s t-test; FFM—fat-free dry mass; SFA—sum of saturated fatty acids; OCFA—odd-chain fatty acids; BCFA—branched-chain fatty acids; MUFA cis—sum of cis monounsaturated fatty acids; LA—linoleic acid 18:2 n-6; PUFA—sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids; MUFA trans—sum of trans monounsaturated fatty acids; TFA—sum of trans fatty acids; CLA—sum of conjugated linoleic acid isomers.
Eigenvalues and the proportion of variation (%) explained by the principal components.
| Component | Eigenvalue | Proportion | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.56 | 50.34 | 50.34 |
| 2 | 5.42 | 31.88 | 82.22 |
| 3 | 1.31 | 7.73 | 89.95 |
| 4 | 0.63 | 3.72 | 93.67 |
| 5 | 0.40 | 2.34 | 96.01 |
| 6 | 0.29 | 1.73 | 97.74 |
| 7 | 0.17 | 1.02 | 98.76 |
| 8 | 0.13 | 0.76 | 99.52 |
| 9 | 0.05 | 0.30 | 99.82 |
| 10 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 99.94 |
| 11 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 99.99 |
| 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 100.00 |
Correlations between the principal components and the original variables.
| Variable | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | 0.847 | −0.073 | 0.398 |
| Fat (%) | 0.621 | 0.460 | 0.264 |
| FFM (%) | −0.695 | −0.560 | −0.252 |
| SFA | −0.829 | −0.013 | 0.471 |
| C16:0 | −0.830 | −0.273 | 0.412 |
| MUFA | 0.922 | 0.343 | 0.019 |
| C16:1 | 0.764 | −0.339 | −0.402 |
| C18:1 | 0.910 | 0.218 | 0.142 |
| C18:1 | 0.496 | 0.732 | 0.339 |
| C15:1 | −0.491 | −0.755 | −0.326 |
| MUFA | −0.882 | 0.429 | 0.035 |
| C18:1 | −0.875 | 0.372 | 0.119 |
| C18:2 | −0.919 | 0.093 | −0.191 |
| TFA | −0.913 | 0.334 | −0.063 |
| PUFA | −0.454 | 0.855 | −0.156 |
| −0.353 | 0.882 | −0.038 | |
| −0.112 | 0.836 | −0.330 | |
| PUFA/SFA | −0.017 | 0.885 | −0.442 |
Figure 1Projection of variables in a two-factor plane (PC1 × PC2); Fat (%)—fat content; TFA—trans fatty acids; FFM (%)—fat-free dry matter.
Figure 2Projection of cases depending on the fallow deer diet (Pasture vs. Indoor) in the a two-factor plane (PC1 × PC2).