| Literature DB >> 35453477 |
Abstract
Antioxidative, nutritional, and immune-boosting characteristics of turmeric-camel milk (TCM) and fermented turmeric-camel milk (FTCM) were investigated. A cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression rat model consisting of six experimental groups was carried out to study the effects of TCM and FTCM on weight gain, antioxidant status, immunoglobulin (Igs), pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress biomarkers. TCM or FTCM were orally administrated at 10 or 20 mL Kg-1 rat weight to CYP-immunosuppressed rats for 2 weeks in the presence of negative (NR) and positive (CYP) control groups. The phytochemical analysis and antioxidant capacity results indicated that TCM and FTCM contained considerable phenolic content with super antioxidant activities. CYP injection affected the rats' weight directly during the first week and then, a low weight gain percentage was recorded in treated groups at the end of the experiment. The most efficient treatment for recovering rats' weight was administering TCM and FTCM at 20 mL kg-1. Feed efficiency significantly increased with feeding TCM and FTCM in a dose-dependent manner. A significant improvement was found in WBCs, lymphocytes, and neutrophils count, suggesting that both TCM and FTCM alleviated the CYP-induced immunity suppression in a dose-dependent manner. IgG, IgA, and IgM concentrations in the CYP + TCM at 10 or 20 mL kg-1 and CYP + FTCM at 10 or 20 mL kg-1 groups were increased significantly. Concentrations of IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, and IL-TNF-α in the CYP group were significantly lower than in the NR group. Interestingly, both TCM and FTCM, especially with high doses, significantly enhanced cytokines production. Administrating FTCM was more potent than TCM, indicating that TCM with probiotics fermentation potentiated the immunological activity in immunosuppressed rats. Treated rats with TCM and FTCM can reverse CYP inhibition of antioxidant enzyme activities, significantly increase GSH, CAT, and SOD, and decrease MDA levels in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, these observations indicated that FTCM exhibits better improvements in weight gain, increased immune biomarkers in terms of WBCs, enhanced pro-inflammation and anti-inflammation responses, and accelerated antioxidant activity in immunosuppressed rats compared with TCM. It could be beneficial and profitable for boosting immunity and protecting against oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidative stress; fermented camel milk; immune-boosting; polyphenols; probiotics; turmeric
Year: 2022 PMID: 35453477 PMCID: PMC9027126 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11040792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Total phenolic content, total carotenoids, total flavonoids, total flavonols, and relative potential antioxidant activities of TCM and FTCM (mean ± SE), n = 6.
| Item | TCM | FTCM |
|---|---|---|
| TPC (mg GAE 100 mL−1) | 167.25 ± 3.15 a | 171.21 ± 4.19 a |
| TC (µg 100 mL−1) | 11.28 ± 1.15 a | 11.98 ± 1.93 a |
| TF (mg QE 100 mL−1) | 15.85 ± 1.17 a | 15.98 ± 1.38 a |
| TFL (mg QE 100 mL−1) | 9.25 ± 0.67 a | 10.02 ± 1.12 a |
| DPPH (µmol of TE 100 mL−1) | 215.68 ± 6.35 a | 208.91 ± 7.09 a |
| ABTS (µmol of TE 100 mL−1) | 298.27 ± 9.12 a | 301.28 ± 6.28 a |
| CA (mg 100 mL−1) | 89.37 ± 3.27 a | 92.09 ± 2.24 a |
TCM: Turmeric-camel milk, FTCM: Fermented turmeric-camel milk, TPC: Total phenolic content, GAE: Gallic acid equivalent, TC: Total carotenoids, TF: Total flavonoids, QE: Quercetin equivalent, TFL: Total flavonols, TE: Trolox equivalent, a: There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between any two means within the same row have similar superscripted letters.
Weight gain %, organ’s weight, food intake, feed efficiency of CYP-induced immunosuppression in rats fed different doses of TCM and FTCM (mean ± SE), n = 8.
| Items | Experimental Groups * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR | CYP | CYP + TCM10 | CYP + TCM20 | CYP + FTCM10 | CYP + FTCM20 | |
| Initial BW (g) | 195.33 ± 4.48 | 191.33 ± 3.76 | 181.83 ± 8.99 | 187.00 ± 7.80 | 182.17 ± 4.99 | 180.17 ± 4.41 |
| Final BW (g) | 224.83 ± 3.94 | 182.67 ± 6.19 | 192.00 ± 7.45 | 201.17 ± 7.98 | 193.67 ± 4.74 | 195.83 ± 3.46 |
| BW gain % | 15.19 a ± 0.91 | −4.62 ± 1.94 c | 6.06 ± 2.11 b | 7.83 ± 1.26 b | 6.43 ± 1.80 b | 8.83 ± 1.63 b |
| Liver weight % | 3.12 ± 0.12 a | 2.43 ± 0.23 c | 2.91 ± 0.21 a,b | 3.17 ± 0.26 a | 2.89 ± 0.19 a,b | 3.29 ± 0.26 a |
| Kidneys weight % | 0.84 ± 0.04 a | 0.57 ± 0.00 c | 0.59 ± 0.02 c | 0.68 ± 0.03 b,c | 0.68 ± 0.02 b,c | 0.74 ± 0.05 a,b |
| Spleen weight % | 0.68 ± 0.02 a | 0.36 ± 0.11 b | 0.37 ± 0.06 b | 0.57 ± 0.09 a | 0.37 ± 0.05 b | 0.67 ± 0.09 a |
| Food intake (g day−1) # | 17.28 ± 1.54 a | 11.01 ± 1.15 d | 13.2 ± 1.48 c | 16.85 ± 1.58 b,c | 14.85 ± 1.67 b | 16.91 ± 1.75 c |
| Feed efficiency ## | 0.165 ± 0.017 a | 0.085 ± 0.006 e | 0.125 ± 0.019 d | 0.156 ± 0.016 b,c | 0.135 ± 0.014 a | 0.161 ± 0.011 b,c |
SE: Standard error, *: Experimental groups see materials and methods; Section 2.5, BW: Bodyweight, #: Calculated as gram diet/rate per day, ## Feed efficiency = BW gain/food intake, a,b,c,d,e: There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between any two means within the same row have similar superscripted letters.
Effect of TCM and FTCM on WBCs, Lymphocytes, and Neutrophils in CYP-induced immunosuppression in rats (mean ± SE). n = 6.
| Hematological Parameters | Experimental Groups * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR | CYP | CYP + TCM10 | CYP + TCM20 | CYP + FTCM10 | CYP + FTCM20 | |
| WBCs [109 L−1] | 8.82 ± 0.07 b | 5.90 ± 0.17 e | 7.50 ± 0.10 d | 9.43 ± 0.20 a | 8.15 ± 0.15 c | 9.57 ± 0.18 a |
| Lymphocytes [109 L−1] | 7.47 ± 0.07 b | 4.82 ± 0.20 e | 6.50 ± 0.14 d | 7.84 ± 0.07 a | 7.01 ± 0.09 c | 7.94 ± 0.12 a |
| Neutrophils [109 L−1] | 1.03 ± 0.03 b | 0.95 ± 0.07 b,c | 0.80 ± 0.04 c | 1.39 ± 0.13 a | 0.89 ± 0.04 b,c | 1.49 ± 0.04 a |
SE: Standard error, *: Experimental groups see materials and methods; Section 2.5, WBCs: White blood cells, a,b,c,d,e: There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) between any two means within the same row have similar superscripted letters.
Figure 1Effects of TCM and FTCM administration on serum IgG (A), IgA (B), and IgM (C) concentrations in CYP-immunosuppressed rats. Results are presented as (mean ± SE, n = 8). Bars marked with different letters (a, b, c, and d) indicated statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Effect of TCM and FTCM administration on pro-inflammation and anti-inflammation cytokines in CYP-induced immunosuppression in rats (mean ± SE), n = 8.
| Cytokines | Experimental Groups * | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR | CYP | CYP + TCM10 | CYP + TCM20 | CYP + FTCM10 | CYP + FTCM20 | |
| IL-1 β (ng mL−1) | 58.73 ± 4.62 b,c | 33.60 ± 4.78 d | 49.78 ± 4.32 c | 69.70 ± 6.53 b | 66.35 ± 3.44 b | 93.63 ± 2.27 a |
| IL-6 (ng mL−1) | 196.00 ± 3.58 c | 126.67 ± 6.67 d | 212.67 ± 9.09 b,c | 244.00 ± 4.38 a,b | 223.33 ± 5.70 b,c | 268.00 ± 22.41 a |
| IL-10 (ng mL−1) | 33.72 ± 3.72 a,b | 19.94 ± 2.60 c | 27.41 ± 2.69 b,c | 38.89 ± 2.32 a | 33.89 ± 3.55 a,b | 42.64 ± 4.14 a |
| IL-13 (ng mL−1) | 79.27 ± 1.82 c | 52.48 ± 0.47 e | 66.07 ± 1.48 d | 91.98 ± 1.35 b | 78.17 ± 1.04 c | 95.93 ± 1.61 a |
| IL-TNF-α (ng mL−1) | 95.93 ± 1.61 a | 12.41 ± 1.03 d | 15.91 ± 1.97 c,d | 15.91 ± 1.97 c,d | 21.12 ± 2.56 b,c | 29.65 ± 2.83 a |
*: Experimental groups see materials and methods; Section 2.5, a,b,c,d,e: No significant difference (p > 0.05) between any two means within the same row have similar superscripted letters.
Effects of oral administration of TCM and FTCM on antioxidant biomarkers in CYP-induced immunosuppression in rats (mean ± SE), n = 8.
| Experimental Groups * | Antioxidant Biomarkers | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH (µg dL−1) | CAT (U L−1) | SOD (U L−1) | MDA (µ mol mL−1) | |
| NR | 75.02 ± 7.43 a,b | 85.44 ± 11.96 b | 117.08 ± 3.66 b | 25.50 ± 2.25 b |
| CYP | 49.40 ± 4.14 d | 59.29 ± 6.20 d | 72.98 ± 0.94 d | 47.36 ± 4.04 a |
| CYP + TCM10 | 60.49 ± 2.32 c | 75.32 ± 9.73 b,c | 98.24 ± 1.27 c | 29.46 ± 3.26 b |
| CYP + TCM20 | 74.82 ± 10.18 a,b | 97.38 ± 9.13 b | 118.96 ± 1.77 b | 23.57 ± 3.09 b,c |
| CYP + FTCM10 | 71.64 ± 6.98 a,b | 72.22 ± 9.12 b,c | 118.70 ± 1.46 b | 28.60 ± 2.85 b |
| CYP + FTCM20 | 86.32 ± 8.98 a | 112.62 ± 11.56 a | 137.30 ± 1.67 a | 22.32 ± 3.56 b,c |
*: Experimental groups see materials and methods; Section 2.5, GSH: Reduced glutathione, CAT: Catalase, SOD: Superoxide dismutase, MDA: Malonaldehyde, a,b,c,d: No significant difference (p > 0.05) between any two means within the same column with similar superscripted letters.