| Literature DB >> 35453405 |
Fatima Faheem1, Zhi Wei Liu2, Roshina Rabail1, Iahtisham-Ul Haq3, Maryam Gul1, Marcin Bryła4, Marek Roszko4, Marek Kieliszek5, Ahmad Din1, Rana Muhammad Aadil1.
Abstract
The food industry is growing vastly, with an increasing number of food products and the demand of consumers to have safe and pathogen-free food with an extended shelf life for consumption. It is critical to have food safe from pathogenic bacteria, fungi, and unpleasant odors or tastes so that the food may not cause any health risks to consumers. Currently, the direction of food industry has been shifting from synthetically produced preservatives to natural preservatives to lower the unnecessary chemical burden on health. Many new technologies are working on natural prevention tools against food degradation. Lemongrass is one such natural preservative that possesses significant antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. The essential oil of lemongrass contains a series of terpenes that are responsible for these activities. These properties make lemongrass acceptable in the food industry and may fulfill consumer demands. This article provides detailed information about the role of lemongrass and its essential oil in food preservation. The outcomes of the research on lemongrass offer room for its new technological applications in food preservation.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; antioxidant; food preservative; lemongrass; novelties
Year: 2022 PMID: 35453405 PMCID: PMC9031912 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11040720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Bioactive components extracted from LEO.
Antimicrobial and antifungal activity of lemongrass in a food.
| Component | Food Item | Investigated | Outcomes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEO | Laboratory cultures | The extract showed antimicrobial activity against all tested foodborne pathogens, including | [ | |
| Fresh cabbage and radish sprouts | Higher antimicrobial efficacy | [ | ||
| Oats | Strongest inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth and sporulation at a concentration of 500 µL/L | [ | ||
| Bread |
| The growth of | [ | |
| LEO + citrus extract+ lactic acid | Red pepper |
| A relatively stronger inhibition effect started in the first days of storage and significantly reduced the bacterial growth from day 7 | [ |
|
| A strong bactericidal effect from the first day of storage, with a total inhibition on day 5 of storage | |||
| Cranberries |
| A linear strong inhibition activity from the first day of storage till day 10, and then after, a total inhibition was obtained from day 10 to the end of storage time | ||
|
| An immediate inhibition effect ( | |||
|
| Significantly inhibited activity from day 1, with complete inhibition on day 14 | |||
| Pre-cut/pre-fried Potatoes |
| Inhibitory effects ( | ||
| LEO | Salmon |
| Lemongrass was effective by showing lower minimum bactericidal concentration and minimum inhibitory concentration | [ |
| Peanuts | Lemongrass was found to be effective in inhibiting the growth of | [ | ||
| Yogurt | 74 spoilage yeast isolates | Its antifungal activity resulted in the complete growth inhibition of | [ | |
| Camel burger | Total bacterial count | Decreased the count of bacteria | [ | |
| LEO + chitosan | Guava, mango and papaya | Combinations of chitosan (2.5, 5 or 7.5 mg/mL) and LEO (0.15, 0.3, 0.6 or 1.25 μL/mL) inhibited the mycelial growth of all tested fungal species | [ | |
| Lemongrass and lemon basil essential oil | Chicken fillets | Bacterial growth | A combination of lemongrass and lemon basil essential oils at the optimal ratio of 1:1% | [ |
| 1% lemongrass and oregano 1:1 and citrus extract | Orange juice |
| Significantly reduced the concentration of | [ |
|
| ||||
|
| Significantly decreased ( | |||
| Hydro-ethanolic extract of lemongrass | Chicken breast |
| The presence of coagulase-positive | [ |
| Lemongrass essential 25% | Sea bass slices | The film showed activity against these microorganisms | [ | |
| Microencapsulated LEO | Coalho cheese | Total coliform | Microencapsulated LEO was efficient during storage. There was a reduction in the amount of this microorganism for 21 days | [ |
|
| Absence of | |||
| d-limonene, | Curry paste | Bacterial growth | Effective against bacterial growth | [ |
Figure 2Effect of lemongrass essential oil on the bacterial cell.
Figure 3Effect of lemongrass essential oil on a fungal cell.
Combination of LEO with different coating materials for food preservation.
| Coating Material | Test/Target Component | Procedure | Result | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEO + clove oil + | Wheat/ | Lemongrass and clove oil are encapsulated into nanoparticles that are made up of silica against | It was revealed that the nanoparticles with lemongrass and clove oil were effective against this fungus up to three times. | [ |
| LEO + cinnamon oil + gum arabic + sodium | Guava/ | Five formulations were made to analyze the storage activity of guava. | This coating revealed the lower activity of polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase and greater radical scavenging activity. | [ |
| LEO + cellulose acetate | Cellulose acetate/ | Cellulose acetate combined with LEO made nanocapsules with the help of the solvent/anti-solvent method. | The nano-capsules exhibited good antimicrobial properties against | [ |
| LEO loaded on a cellulose nanofiber-polyethylene glycol composite | Cellulose acetate/ | Cellulose nanofiber and polyethylene glycol composites were made through melting and mixing processes. | The results showed the total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, free radical scavenging, and antibacterial activity against | [ |
| Lemongrass- and clove oil-based non-ionic nanoemulsion | Tomato seeds and seedlings/ | A nanoemulsion was made as an oil-in-water emulsion that contained LEO and clove oil. | Results revealed the disruption of the membrane of the fungal species.This nano-formulation lessened the wilting of tomatoes that occurred due to | [ |
| LEO + plant-based emulsifier | Iceberg leaves/ | The microemulsion was formed between LEO and a plant-based emulsifier to improve the miscibility of oil in water. | The concentration of 0.5% microemulsion was effective in lessening the browning of iceberg leaves due to | [ |
| LEO + β- cyclodextrin + PVA starch | Aquatic products/ | A coating was prepared in which LEO was implanted into β-cyclodextrin by the co-precipitation method. | The incorporation of PVA-starch films into LMO/β-CD revealed effective antioxidant activity and antimicrobial activity against | [ |
| LEO + chitosan-based edible coating. | Eggs/shelf life | Hen eggs were coated with LEO at different concentrations (0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4% and 0.5%) and with 1.5 % chitosan. | LEO with 0.4% concentration and a 1.5% chitosan edible coating was effective in increasing the shelf life of hen eggs for 8 weeks. | [ |
| LEO + alginate-based film | Trehalose, capsule and Tween/ | An encapsulating agent, such as trehalose, capsule, and tween 20, was used with LEO. | This experiment revealed that the microencapsulation was effective against microbes. | [ |
| LEO microcapsules + alginate-based film | Fresh fatty foods/ | LEO microcapsules were prepared by the emulsification-separation method using sodium caseinate as wall material. | LEO with concentrations of 1250, 2500, and 5000 ppm inhibited the growth of | [ |
| LEO + gum arabic + maize starch + glycerol | Pomegranate/ | The study involved gum arabic maize starch with 0.5–1.5% concentration each, 2–4% LEO, and 0.5–1% glycerol. | The formulation with 0.5% gum arabic, 0.5% maize starch, 3% LEO, and 1.5% glycerol was more effective in post-harvest treatment for “Wonderful” pomegranate. | [ |
| LEO + chitosan-based films | Food packaging/ | In this study, 1.5 g chitosan, 100 mL of water, and acetic acid (1.5 mL) were dissolved. | The integration of 9% LEO in chitosan film was the most efficient ( | [ |
| LEO + flaxseed meal protein (FMP) film | FMP film was formed with 5g FMP, 2 g fructose, and 0.03 g ferulic acid. | The study showed a reduction in counts of | [ | |
| LEO with sodium alginate and chitosan-based coatings | Fruit (pomegranate)/ | The coating was prepared by adding 1 g of soluble chitosan powder dissolved in water to | This coating was effective in reducing the decay severity of the fruit and inhibiting the germination of spores. | [ |
| LEO with sago starch as edible film | Overall anti-microbial effect studied | The coating was prepared by adding starch (3% to 10% | The results of the study showed that 4% sago starch and 5% | [ |
| LEO + chitosan emulsion | LEO was homogenized with a chitosan solution and Tween 20 by dynamic high-pressure processing or high-shear mixing. | The results showed that dynamic high-pressure coating was most effective in reducing the growth of | [ |