Literature DB >> 35452110

Fresh Embryo Transfer Cycle Characteristics and Outcomes Following In Vitro Fertilization via Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Among Patients With and Without COVID-19 Vaccination.

Emily Jacobs1, Karen Summers1, Amy Sparks1, Rachel Mejia1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35452110      PMCID: PMC9034396          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Women of reproductive age have been at the forefront of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, citing concerns about the vaccine’s effect on future fertility, current pregnancy, and breastfeeding (among others).[1] As of February 2022, only 57% of pregnant patients were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 prior to becoming pregnant, a rate that lags that of the general population.[2] To date, current literature surrounding COVID-19 vaccination and potential associations with infertility have been performed mainly in frozen embryo transfer cycles or in vitro fertilization cycles (IVF) using intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), both of which do not occur in in vivo conception.[3,4] The aim of this study was to investigate the association of COVID-19 vaccination status with IVF-fresh embryo transfer cycle stimulation characteristics and clinical outcomes.

Methods

The University of Iowa institutional review board approved this retrospective cohort study. Patients undergoing IVF-fresh embryo transfer cycles at a single academic institution from December 14, 2020, to September 30, 2021, were included. All patients gave written informed consent to be included in our IVF institutional research database. Cycle characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. Vaccination status was determined by accessing immunization records in the electronic medical record for each patient. Bivariate analysis was performed using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ2 tests. Generalized estimating equations were used to control for multiple cycles per patient and odds ratios were calculated adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). In addition, subanalysis was performed for (1) exclusion of day 5 morula transfers and (2) standard insemination–only cycles. Additional methods are described in the eAppendix of the Supplement. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp), and a 2-sided P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Study demographics and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1; 142 patients were vaccinated against COVID-19 and 138 patients were unvaccinated. The majority of patients were young, nulliparous, and overweight. As seen in Table 1, the 2 groups were similar at baseline. In the vaccinated group, 127 patients (89.7%) were fully vaccinated and 15 patients (10.6%) were partially vaccinated. The mean (SD) time from last vaccination to oocyte retrieval was 93 (65) days. There was no difference in ovarian reserve (mean [SD] antral follicle count for vaccinated group: 23 [13] vs unvaccinated group: 24 [15]; P = .42) or ovarian response (mean [SD] days of gonadotropin stimulation for vaccinated group: 9.8 [1.6] vs unvaccinated group: 9.6 [1.4]) (Table 1). The mean (SD) number of oocytes retrieved (vaccinated group: 14 [8] vs unvaccinated group: 15 [9]) and mean (SD) number of useable embryos produced (vaccinated group: 4 [3] vs unvaccinated group: 4 [3]) were also similar between groups (Table 2). Vaccinated patients had higher mean (SD) fertilization rates than unvaccinated patients (77.45% [41.45%] vs 68.66% [20.51%]; P = .03). In addition, after controlling for factors that can influence IVF success (age and BMI), there were no significant differences in ongoing clinical pregnancy rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.29) and miscarriage rate (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.62-7.47) in vaccinated vs unvaccinated patients. A subanalysis excluding day 5 morula transfers found no difference in ongoing clinical pregnancy rate (aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.49-1.36) and miscarriage rate (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.32-5.07). Lastly, when comparing standard insemination-only cycles, there was also no difference in ongoing clinical pregnancy (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.47-1.87) or miscarriage rate (aOR, 4.09; 95% CI, 0.35-47.74).
Table 1.

Study Demographics and Clinical Characteristics

CharacteristicVaccinated (n = 142)Unvaccinated (n = 138)
Demographics
Age, mean (SD), y34 (4)33 (4)
BMI, mean (SD)28.08 (7.43)29.28 (7.25)
Weight, mean (SD), kg80.42 (21.36)79.58 (21.31)
Gravida, median (IQR)0 (0-1)1 (0-2)
Para, median (IQR)0 (0-1)0 (0-1)
Vaccination characteristics, No. (%)
Doses of vaccine
Partially vaccinated15 (10.6)NA
Fully vaccinated127 (89.7)NA
Vaccine name, No. (%)
mRNA-1273 (Moderna)70 (49.3)NA
BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)65 (45.8)NA
Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen)7 (4.9)NA
Time between last vaccine dose and retrieval, mean (SD), d93 (65)NA
Cycle characteristics
Cycle No., median (IQR)1 (1-2)1 (1-1)
Protocol, No (%)
Antagonist13 (9.2)7 (5.1)
Dual trigger67 (47.2)64 (46.4)
Long agonist32 (22.5)33 (23.9)
Microdose flare17 (12.0)15 (10.9)
Estrogen prime13 (9.2)19 (13.8)
Diagnosis, No. (%)
AMA19 (13.4)12 (8.7)
DOR20 (14.1)20 (14.5)
Anovulation13 (9.2)16 (11.6)
Male Factor42 (29.6)45 (32.6)
Endometriosis13 (9.2)13 (9.4)
Tubal factor17 (12.0)20 (14.5)
RPL6 (4.2)1 (0.7)
Uterine/cervical1 (0.7)1 (0.7)
Unexplained34 (23.9)33 (23.9)
Antral follicle count, mean (SD)23 (13)24 (15)
Insemination method, No. (%)
Regular66 (46.5)74 (53.6)
ICSI76 (53.5)64 (46.4)
Duration of stimulation, mean (SD)9.8 (1.6)9.6 (1.4)
No. transferred, No. (%)
SET20 (14.1)20 (14.5)
eSET93 (65.5)91 (65.9)
DET29 (20.4)27 (19.6)

Abbreviations: AMA, advanced maternal age; BMI, body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; DET, double embryo transfer; DOR, diminished ovarian reserve; eSET, elective single embryo transfer (at least 1 additional embryo available to cryopreserve); ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; RPL, recurrent pregnancy loss; SET, single embryo transfer (no embryos available to cryopreserve).

Table 2.

Cycle Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients

Cycle characteristicsMean (SD)Mean difference (95% CI)P value
Vaccinated (n = 142)Unvaccinated (n = 138)
No. of oocytes retrieved14 (8)15 (9)–1 (–3 to 1).33
No. of oocytes inseminated12 (7)13 (8)–1 (–3 to 1).31
No. of 2PN9 (8)8 (5)1 (–1 to 2).34
Fertilization rate
No. of 2PN/No. of oocytes inseminated77.45 (41.54)68.86 (20.51)8.78 (1.02 to 16.56).03
Blastulation rate
No. of blastocysts/No. of 2PN (%)44.37 (25.55)46.79 (26.54)2.42 (–3.71 to 8.55).44
No. of blastocysts per retrieval4 (3)4 (3)0 (–1 to 1).83
No. of embryos cryopreserved3 (3)3 (3)0 (–1 to 1).73
Clinical outcomes Vaccinated Unvaccinated OR (95% CI) a aOR (95% CI) a
Full sample, No.142138NANA
Ongoing clinical pregnancy, No. (%)65 (45.8)74 (53.6)0.73 (0.45 to 1.18)0.79 (0.48 to 1.29)
Miscarriage, No. (%)8/73 (11.0)4/78 (5.1)2.28 (0.66 to 7.87)2.15 (0.62 to 7.47)
Subsample excluding day 5 morula transfers, No.130125NANA
Ongoing clinical pregnancy65 (50.0)71 (56.8)0.76 (0.46 to 1.25)0.82 (0.49 to 1.36)
Miscarriage5/70 (7.1)4/75 (5.3)1.37 (0.35 to 5.26)1.28 (0.32 to 5.07)
Subsample with only standard insemination cycles, No.6674NANA
Ongoing clinical pregnancy34 (51.5)41 (55.4)0.86 (0.44 to 1.67)0.94 (0.47 to 1.87)
Miscarriage3/37 (8.1)1/42 (2.4)3.62 (0.36 to 36.39)4.09 (0.35 to 47.74)

Abbreviations: aOR, odds ratios adjusted for age and body mass index; NA, not applicable; OR, unadjusted odds ratio; 2PN, 2 pronuclear.

Generalized estimating equations used to control for multiple cycles per patient.

Abbreviations: AMA, advanced maternal age; BMI, body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; DET, double embryo transfer; DOR, diminished ovarian reserve; eSET, elective single embryo transfer (at least 1 additional embryo available to cryopreserve); ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; RPL, recurrent pregnancy loss; SET, single embryo transfer (no embryos available to cryopreserve). Abbreviations: aOR, odds ratios adjusted for age and body mass index; NA, not applicable; OR, unadjusted odds ratio; 2PN, 2 pronuclear. Generalized estimating equations used to control for multiple cycles per patient.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to evaluate the association of COVID-19 vaccination status with IVF-fresh embryo transfer cycles (including a high proportion of standard insemination cycles). We found no evidence to suggest that COVID-19 vaccination negatively affects cycle stimulation characteristics, embryological variables, or clinical outcomes in IVF. Current and emerging scientific evidence continues to support that COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective and has no impact on fertility. The results of this study can be used to provide reassuring data to patients planning on pregnancy considering COVID-19 vaccination.
  3 in total

1.  In Vitro Fertilization and Early Pregnancy Outcomes After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination.

Authors:  Devora Aharon; Matthew Lederman; Atoosa Ghofranian; Carlos Hernandez-Nieto; Chelsea Canon; William Hanley; Dmitry Gounko; Joseph A Lee; Daniel Stein; Erkan Buyuk; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Does mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine influence patients' performance during IVF-ET cycle?

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Meirav Noach-Hirsh; Aliza Segev-Zahav; Jigal Haas; Ravit Nahum; Adva Aizer
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Vaccination hesitancy among women of reproductive age in resource-challenged settings: a cause for public health concern.

Authors:  Grant Murewanhema
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-04-07
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have no effect on endometrial receptivity after euploid embryo transfer.

Authors:  Pedro Brandão; Antonio Pellicer; Marcos Meseguer; José Remohí; Nicolás Garrido; Juan Antonio García-Velasco
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 4.567

Review 2.  The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Zaçe; E La Gatta; L Petrella; M L Di Pietro
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.