Kejing Ran1,2, Yizhou Liu3, Haonan Jin1,2, Yanyan Shangguan4, Yao Guang5, Jinsheng Wen4, Guoqiang Yu5, Gerrit van der Laan6, Thorsten Hesjedal7, Shilei Zhang1,2. 1. School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 200031, China. 2. ShanghaiTech Laboratory for Topological Physics, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 200031, China. 3. RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Wako 351-0198, Japan. 4. National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures and Department of Physics, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China and Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing 210093, China. 5. Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. 6. Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom. 7. Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom.
Abstract
A major challenge in topological magnetism lies in the three-dimensional (3D) exploration of their magnetic textures. A recent focus has been the question of how 2D skyrmion sheets vertically stack to form distinct types of 3D topological strings. Being able to manipulate the vertical coupling should therefore provide a route to the engineering of topological states. Here, we present a new type of axially bound magnetic skyrmion string state in which the strings in two distinct materials are glued together across their interface. With quasi-tomographic resonant elastic X-ray scattering, the 3D skyrmion profiles before and after their binding across the interface were unambiguously determined and compared. Their attractive binding is accompanied by repulsive twisting; i.e., the coupled skyrmions mutually affect each other via a compensating twisting. This state exists in chiral magnet-magnetic thin film heterostructures, providing a new arena for the engineering of 3D topological phases.
A major challenge in topological magnetism lies in the three-dimensional (3D) exploration of their magnetic textures. A recent focus has been the question of how 2D skyrmion sheets vertically stack to form distinct types of 3D topological strings. Being able to manipulate the vertical coupling should therefore provide a route to the engineering of topological states. Here, we present a new type of axially bound magnetic skyrmion string state in which the strings in two distinct materials are glued together across their interface. With quasi-tomographic resonant elastic X-ray scattering, the 3D skyrmion profiles before and after their binding across the interface were unambiguously determined and compared. Their attractive binding is accompanied by repulsive twisting; i.e., the coupled skyrmions mutually affect each other via a compensating twisting. This state exists in chiral magnet-magnetic thin film heterostructures, providing a new arena for the engineering of 3D topological phases.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D magnetic structures; magnetic skyrmions; resonant elastic X-ray scattering; topological magnetism
All materials
are composed of
ensembles of particles in the presence of interactions. While attractive
forces pull them together, the presence of repulsive forces is required
for stable energy minima to occur, resulting in finite interparticle
distances. In this Letter, we present an emergent version of this
concept for topologically stabilized quasiparticles. We show that
they can be vertically coupled together via an attractive interaction,
while a repulsive interaction is also required to stabilize the ordered
system.Magnetic skyrmions are local solutions of the nonlinear
two-dimensional
(2D) soliton problem in magnetic systems,[1−9] which induces emergent electromagnetism and extraordinary spin dynamics.[5,9] The skyrmion–skyrmion interaction was subsequently discussed
on the basis of a 2D model, leading to various ordering scenarios,
mimicking the crystallization theory. It was therefore surprising
to find the original 2D skyrmion crystal model being valid without
considering their vertical, i.e., 3D, properties.Although it
was known that skyrmions extend into three dimensions
by forming strings, reminiscent of superconducting vortex tubes,[10−13] the question of how these 2D skyrmion sheets vertically stack to
form 3D strings was not addressed. On the other hand, this question
has become a central topic for topological magnetism, as even in a
uniform, continuous material, skyrmion sheets can stack in a large
variety of different ways[10,12] and exhibit complex
3D excitation dynamics.[14] The different
ways of vertical stacking along z lead to distinct
types of topological phases, featured by either a dSk(z) or χ(z)
profile, where dSk is the 2D skyrmion
diameter and χ(z) is the helicity angle. The
helicity angle is a measure of the tilting of the in-plane component
of the magnetic moments and describes the type of 2D skyrmion (±90°,
left- and right-handed Bloch-type skyrmions; 0° and 180°,
divergent and convergent Néel-type skyrmions).Taking
confined chiral magnets as an example, the breaking of translational
symmetry at the terminating surfaces leads to surface instabilities.
Consequently, the 2D skyrmion sheets are no longer uniformly aligned
near the surface but exhibit surface twisting with
an exponential χ(z) profile instead.[15] On the other hand, in multilayered thin film
systems that are inherently discontinuous along the depth, dipolar
interactions between the layers encourage a different χ(z) twisting profile (dipolar twist), suggesting
a different vertical interaction scheme.[16,17] Moreover, a modified energy landscape leads to a varying skyrmion
profile as a function of depth (dSk(z)), establishing new types of topological order, such as
chiral bobbers[18−22] and torons.[23] Despite recent advances
in the experimental exploration of the 3D nature of magnetic skyrmions,[22,24−30] a deeper understanding of the “vertical” interactions
in 3D structures on a microscopic level is required before effective
models of skyrmion quasiparticle interactions, e.g., in the context
of the Thiele equation,[31] can be established.[32]From an experimental perspective, a promising
strategy is to design
a materials system in which dissimilar skyrmion phases can be joined
together via the tuning of the experimental measurement parameters.
The observation of the coupling process could offer an unprecedented
clear view of the vertical binding mechanism for topological objects.
Here, we achieved the controlled merging of two distinct skyrmion
species across a materials interface in a chiral magnet-multilayer
heterostructure and were able to gain insight on how skyrmions behave
across the interface. Our findings illustrate how the classical perception
of the formation of ordered materials via the balance of attractive
and repulsive forces is also applicable to the understanding of the
vertical binding of topological objects.
Results and Discussion
For being able to control and observe the vertical stacking of
2D skyrmions, we conceived a model system centered around an interface
between two 3D skyrmion configurations, namely, a dipolar twisted
skyrmion string in a multilayer (ML) system and surface-twisted skyrmion
string in a chiral magnet (which exists at any terminating surface).
In this work, we separate the two skyrmion-harboring materials by
a 3 nm thick Ta spacer, preventing their direct exchange coupling.
This simplifies the system greatly in that the dipolar interaction
is the only vertically binding energy term that has to be considered
here. Figure a shows
the relaxed 3D magnetic structures obtained from micromagnetic simulations[33] for a ML (upper panel) and the chiral magnet
Cu2OSeO3 (bottom panel), for the case of uncoupled,
isolated systems (Supplementary Section S4). The Ta/[CoFeB/MgO/Ta]4 ML has a characteristic planar
correlation length of λh ≈ 200 nm,[17] which can be used as an estimate for the skyrmion
size dSk in the ML. Most importantly,
the presence of interfacial Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction
(DMI) and interlayer dipolar coupling results in a dipolar twist,
exhibiting a hybrid 3D skyrmion string.[16,17,34] As shown in Figure a, the helicity angle undergoes a π-turn from
χ = 180° at the top to χ = 0° at the bottom.
Note that both the top and bottom surfaces exhibit Néel-type
skyrmions.
Figure 1
Skyrmion states in the uncoupled, isolated materials. (a) Depth
dependence of the helicity angle χ in both the multilayer (ML)
(above), reaching from 180° at the top to 0° at the bottom,
and the pristine Cu2OSeO3 crystal (below), reaching
from 180° at the surface to 90° in the bulk. CD-REXS patterns
measured in the skyrmion phase for (b) a Si/ML at the Co L3 edge and (c) pristine Cu2OSeO3 at the Cu L3 edge.
Skyrmion states in the uncoupled, isolated materials. (a) Depth
dependence of the helicity angle χ in both the multilayer (ML)
(above), reaching from 180° at the top to 0° at the bottom,
and the pristine Cu2OSeO3 crystal (below), reaching
from 180° at the surface to 90° in the bulk. CD-REXS patterns
measured in the skyrmion phase for (b) a Si/ML at the Co L3 edge and (c) pristine Cu2OSeO3 at the Cu L3 edge.The other skyrmion string was
chosen to be a surface-twist type
system, which occurs, e.g., in Cu2OSeO3 single
crystals with λh ≈ 60 nm[35,36] (Figure a, below).
The surface-twisted 3D skyrmion string is characterized by an exponential
decay of its χ(z) profile:[15,25,26,37]where χ0 describes the helicity
angle of the very top surface and Lp is
the length scale characterizing the penetration depth of the surface
twisting. Recently, experimental studies uncovered a pronounced, deep-reaching
surface twist effect in Cu2OSeO3 (i.e., χ0 is 180°, while Lp measures
∼50 nm[25,26]), indicating the emergence of
DMI at the surface level. We have included this additional DMI term
in the simulations (Supplementary Section S4), which are able to reproduce the observed enhanced surface twist
phenomenon. As shown in Figure a, the top surface becomes purely Néel-type, whereas
in the bulk, χ returns to 90° which is the expected value
for Bloch-type skyrmions.[25]We first
examine the individual skyrmion string structures in the
two materials separately. Pristine Cu2OSeO3 single
crystals and pristine MLs were synthesized (Supplementary Section S1), and their chiral and topological properties were
characterized by circular dichroism in resonant elastic X-ray scattering
(CD-REXS, Supplementary Sections S2 and S3).[16,17,25,26,38−41] Such element-specific experiments were performed using synchrotron-generated
soft X-rays, tuned to the L2,3 absorption
edges of the 3d magnetic ions,[40] at the
RASOR diffractometer on beamline I10 at the Diamond Light Source (Oxfordshire,
UK). Here, by tuning the photon energy to the Co and Cu L-edges (Co,
774–800 eV; Cu, 925–960 eV), respectively,
CD-REXS is able to selectively target the 3D skyrmion string’s
internal structure in either the ML or the chiral magnet.The
scattering results are best presented as a reciprocal space
map in the q-q plane at q = 0.[36] For
a 2D skyrmion plane, the CD amplitude I as a function
of azimuthal angle Ψ follows I(Ψ) = Y sin(Ψ + χ),[26,40] where Y is a constant for a particular scattering
configuration and photon energy. In other words, the rotation angle
of the extinction vector uniquely reveals the χ value, as illustrated
by the look-up tables in the Supplementary Figures S4 and S5. For three-dimensional systems with nonuniform χ(z), the measured CD-REXS intensity, Im, is thus averaged over all depths with a particular weighing
factor b(z), which is depth-dependent.[22,42]Im can be written aswhere b(z) = e–2 α/Λ(/Λ(ℏω), Λ is the X-ray penetration length
which is a function of photon energy ℏω, and α is the incident angle with respect to the surface normal.
It can be seen from eq that Im(Ψ) also takes a sinusoidal
profile with a half-positive–half-negative CD pattern, from
which one can identify a distinct extinction vector, and an associated
χm value.[26] It is thus
worth emphasizing that the experimental value χm represents
an average over the specific χ(z) configuration.Figure b shows
the CD-REXS pattern measured on the ML sample, using nonmagnetic Si
as a substrate, for skyrmion-stabilizing conditions of 57 K
and 35 mT, and with the energy tuned to the Co L3 edge.[17] First, a ring-like pattern is
observed, suggesting that skyrmions are rather disordered within the
ML, forming a “polycrystalline” arrangement.[17] Second, the observed qh = 0.0047 nm–1 corresponds to a modulation
periodicity of 213 nm. Note that λh is not
an accurate measure of dSk in ML systems
as the skyrmion size is field-dependent. Third, the CD-REXS pattern
shows the characteristic half-positive–half-negative contrast,
and from the orientation of the extinction vector (black arrow in Figure b), χm is found to be 180°. Taking depth averaging of χ(z) into account,[17,26] the measured χm helicity angle is consistent with the dipolar twist model
(Figure a).[17]On the other hand, Figure c shows CD-REXS data in the skyrmion lattice
phase on a pristine,
(001)-oriented Cu2OSeO3 substrate, measured
at 57 K and 33.5 mT. First, the 6-fold-symmetric diffraction
pattern identifies a long-range ordered, hexagonal skyrmion lattice.[35,36] Second, the diffraction wavevector q = 1/λ measures
0.0172 nm–1, yielding a skyrmion lattice
constant of ∼66 nm,[35] which
is approximately the intrinsic skyrmion diameter in this compound.
Third, from the orientation of the extinction vector in Figure c, χm = 130°
is found. This value is also consistent with the surface twist model
with an exponentially decaying χ(z) profile,
described by eq with
χ0 = 180° and Lp = 48 nm, in agreement with previous reports.[25]Next, the ML and the chiral bulk magnet are joined
together, forming
a single heterostructure; i.e., the Cu2OSeO3 single crystal serves as a substrate for the subsequent thin film
heterostructure growth, following a careful surface treatment (Supplementary Section S1). It is worth noting
that the identical Cu2OSeO3 substrate (Figure c) was used for the
REXS observations before and after the heterostructure was synthesized,
thereby providing a reliable control for the observation of vertical
skyrmion stacking. Figure panels a and b show the standard REXS patterns for the heterostructure
sample at the Cu L3 edge, and specifically the characteristic
magnetic structures in Cu2OSeO3 in the near-interface
region. The four-spot pattern measured at 25 K and 7 mT
(Figure a) suggests
helical order, while the 6-fold-symmetric pattern at 57 K and
33.5 mT (Figure b) reveals the formation of the skyrmion string lattice. In both
states, the real-space periodicity is the same as that measured on
the pristine Cu2OSeO3 substrate (Figure c), indicating that the skyrmion
lattice constant, as well as the skyrmion size, remain unchanged in
the bulk crystal after coupling to the ML. Furthermore, the photon
energy-dependent measurement at a fixed skyrmion lattice wavevector
(Figure c) confirms
that the measured signals are indeed solely from Cu2OSeO3.
Figure 2
REXS patterns for the helical and skyrmion phase in the coupled
Cu2OSeO3/ML skyrmion system. Tuning the photon
energy to the Cu L3 edge, (a) four helical and (b) six
skyrmion diffraction peaks are selectively measured in the Cu2OSeO3 bulk crystal. Note that REXS patterns are
obtained by mapping out the respective (curved) section of reciprocal
space, followed by the calculation of the scattering patterns in,
e.g., the q–q plane at q = 0, as shown in the figures. (c) Photon
energy spectrum of the magnetic peak (circled in (b)) intensity near
the Cu L3 edge (from 929 to 933 eV). Tuning the
photon energy to the Co L3 edge, the selective diffraction
off the ML also reveals (d) four helical and (e) six skyrmion peaks,
demonstrating the imprinting effect. (f) Energy spectrum of the magnetic
peak (circled in (e)) intensity near the Co L3 edge (from
774 to 780 eV). (g) 3D magnetic structure for a coupled chiral
bulk-ML magnet system, obtained from micromagnetic simulations.
REXS patterns for the helical and skyrmion phase in the coupled
Cu2OSeO3/ML skyrmion system. Tuning the photon
energy to the Cu L3 edge, (a) four helical and (b) six
skyrmion diffraction peaks are selectively measured in the Cu2OSeO3 bulk crystal. Note that REXS patterns are
obtained by mapping out the respective (curved) section of reciprocal
space, followed by the calculation of the scattering patterns in,
e.g., the q–q plane at q = 0, as shown in the figures. (c) Photon
energy spectrum of the magnetic peak (circled in (b)) intensity near
the Cu L3 edge (from 929 to 933 eV). Tuning the
photon energy to the Co L3 edge, the selective diffraction
off the ML also reveals (d) four helical and (e) six skyrmion peaks,
demonstrating the imprinting effect. (f) Energy spectrum of the magnetic
peak (circled in (e)) intensity near the Co L3 edge (from
774 to 780 eV). (g) 3D magnetic structure for a coupled chiral
bulk-ML magnet system, obtained from micromagnetic simulations.We then probe the magnetic structures in the ML
for the same measurement
parameters (temperatures and fields) used for obtaining the Cu2OSeO3 data shown in Figures a,b, however, with the photon energy tuned
to the Co L3 edge. First, in Figure d, the REXS result from the ML in the helical
state of Cu2OSeO3 is shown. Strikingly, the
ring-shaped scattering pattern characteristic for the uncoupled ML
(Figure b) has drastically
changed and now exhibits four well-defined diffraction spots. The q is identical to that of uncoupled
Cu2OSeO3 (Figure a); i.e., q in the ML increases by more than 3 times. A straightforward
interpretation is that the magnetic coupling across the interface
“imprints” the helical order from the Cu2OSeO3 onto the ML. Consequently, the periodicity of the
initial stripe domains in the ML shrink from ∼200 to ∼60 nm
and are now locked along particular azimuthal directions, as governed
by the anisotropy of the chiral magnet. Second, in the skyrmion lattice
phase of Cu2OSeO3 (Figure e), the ML shows a 6-fold-symmetric magnetic
diffraction pattern identical to that of the uncoupled Cu2OSeO3 bulk crystal (Figure b), however, with reduced scattering intensity. This
6-fold pattern is characteristic for a hexagonal packing of the skyrmion
lattice. The reduced intensity can, in principle, have two origins.
First, as the interaction between the two 3D skyrmion strings is primarily
due to the dipolar interaction, the ML layer closest to the interface
encounters a stronger attraction from the chiral magnet than the layers
further away from the interface. This may result in partial vertical
binding; i.e., the imprinting effect from the Cu2OSeO3 is gradually decreasing with distance from the interface.
Second, due to the large difference in their undisturbed skyrmion
sizes, perfect vertical stacking may not occur over a large lateral
area, but instead only across limited-size domains. Note, however,
that both effects should result in a larger diffuse scattering background,
which is not observed in Figure e.The energy scan for fixed qh (Figure f) further supports
the finding that the measured magnetically ordered patterns (Figure d,e) are indeed from
the ML. By comparing with the uncoupled case (Figure b), it is clear that by stacking two independent
skyrmion strings on top of each other (across an interface), the bottom
surface of the dipolar-twisted skyrmion adapts a size compatible with
the one of the chiral magnet. Moreover, the two skyrmion string species
are locally glued together, forming a single, continuous 3D string.
This attractive feature is accompanied by a shrinking of the size
of the skyrmions, which subsequently assemble into a long-range ordered
lattices—a phenomenon not commonly observed in MLs. Next, we
carried out micromagnetic simulations of the vertical binding phenomenon
(Figure g; Supplementary Section S4). The simulation results
were obtained using realistic materials parameters for the ML,[17] and they reveal attractive type vertical binding
across the interface, in agreement with our REXS observations.In order to fully analyze the detailed 3D χ(z) profile of the bound skyrmion string, a systematic CD-REXS study
was performed. First, the vertically averaged helicity angle χm of the bound state was measured. Figure panels a and b show the CD-REXS patterns
and extinction vectors for the heterostructure sample, probing Cu2OSeO3 (at the Cu L3 edge) and the ML
(at the Co L3 edge), respectively. Surprisingly, as shown
in Figure a, after
binding the two skyrmion species together, χm undergoes
a fundamental change from 130° (Figure c) to 43° at the near-surface region
of the chiral magnet. This immediately suggests that the average skyrmion
type drastically changes from a convergent swirl to a divergent vortex
(look-up tables in Supplementary Figures S4 and S5). At the same time (Figure b), the average helicity angle of the ML also takes
the value of 43°, indicating that the two contacting 2D skyrmion
sheets are seamlessly fused together.
Figure 3
Depth-resolved CD-REXS of the Cu2OSeO3/ML
heterostructure sample. CD-REXS patterns measured in the skyrmion
lattice phase of Cu2OSeO3 at the (a) Cu and
(b) Co L3 edges. For the purpose of this work, we define
the circular dichroism signal (the CD-REXS signal) as the difference
in diffraction intensity for the same skyrmion peak at the same geometrical
condition, obtained using left- and right-circularly polarized soft
X-rays. (c) CD-REXS pattern for different incident photon energies
across the Cu L3 absorption edge. Note that by using CD-REXS,
the helicity angle χ of a 2D skyrmion can be unambiguously determined.[17,25,26,39] (d) For comparison, χ was measured
as a function of photon energy for the pristine Cu2OSeO3 substrate. The red curve represents the best fit to the experimental
data points (blue dots), using the depth dependence of χ(z) shown in (e). (f,g) χ(ℏω) and χ(z) for the Cu2OSeO3/ML heterostructure sample.
Note that the surface twist penetration depth Lp is different for the two samples.
Depth-resolved CD-REXS of the Cu2OSeO3/ML
heterostructure sample. CD-REXS patterns measured in the skyrmion
lattice phase of Cu2OSeO3 at the (a) Cu and
(b) Co L3 edges. For the purpose of this work, we define
the circular dichroism signal (the CD-REXS signal) as the difference
in diffraction intensity for the same skyrmion peak at the same geometrical
condition, obtained using left- and right-circularly polarized soft
X-rays. (c) CD-REXS pattern for different incident photon energies
across the Cu L3 absorption edge. Note that by using CD-REXS,
the helicity angle χ of a 2D skyrmion can be unambiguously determined.[17,25,26,39] (d) For comparison, χ was measured
as a function of photon energy for the pristine Cu2OSeO3 substrate. The red curve represents the best fit to the experimental
data points (blue dots), using the depth dependence of χ(z) shown in (e). (f,g) χ(ℏω) and χ(z) for the Cu2OSeO3/ML heterostructure sample.
Note that the surface twist penetration depth Lp is different for the two samples.Next, the 3D χ(z) profile of the bound state
is quantitatively measured using depth-dependent CD-REXS. Equation suggests that by
varying the photon energy ℏω, b(z) can be adjusted, leading to a different
χm that effectively probes a different volume of
the sample.[25] By systematically probing
χm(ℏω), the actual
depth dependence χ(z) can be reconstructed,
analogous to the concept of tomography. Figure c shows the Im pattern obtained at different photon energies across the Cu L3 edge for the heterostructure sample. The amplitude of the
CD signal is governed by Y,[40] which varies with the cross-section of the X-ray absorption, therefore
being energy-dependent across the L3 edge. Nevertheless,
this does not affect the accuracy of the measured χm, as it only depends on the rotation angle of the extinction vector.[26] It is thus clear that the extinction vector
undergoes a gradual rotation upon varying the photon energy, indicative
of the underlying 3D χ(z) profile.Figure d shows
the measured χm as a function of ℏω (blue dots) for the pristine Cu2OSeO3 substrate.
The measured data are analyzed using a self-consistent fitting algorithm
by assuming a 3D χ(z) structure, inserting
it into eq , and iteratively
optimizing χ(z) until a good agreement between
model and data is reached. Figure e shows the best-fit model for χ(z) that is used to produce the red curve in Figure d. As expected, the pristine Cu2OSeO3 crystal shows the surface twist effect with χ0 = 180° convergent skyrmions on the very top surface,
undergoing an exponential decay (Lp =
48 nm) while approaching to the bulk value of 90° (Bloch-type
skyrmion).Figure panels
f and g show the measured χm and the analyzed χ(z) profile for the Cu2OSeO3/ML heterostructure
sample, respectively. A remarkable feature is that the detailed depth-dependent
twisting behavior is very different from that of the pristine Cu2OSeO3 crystal (Figure d,e). First, the top surface vortex orientation
has been turned around (χ0 = 19°), and χ
gradually recovers to standard Bloch-type skyrmion behavior toward
the bulk. Second, the helicity modification effect reaches Lp ≈ 100 nm, much deeper than the
intrinsic surface twist effect[15,25,26,37] and also twice as deep as the
helicity angle twist in pristine Cu2OSeO3. It
is thus clear that near the interface, the intrinsically convergent
skyrmion swirls in the surface region of Cu2OSeO3 become oppositely rotated, while the intrinsically divergent skyrmion
swirl at the ML bottom surface is also turned in the opposite orientation,
resulting in an intermediate helicity for both. Unfortunately, due
to the suppressed CD-REXS signal from the ML, the reconstruction of
the 3D χ(z) profile was not clear enough to
be accessible. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that although an
attractive force locks the two distinct skyrmions in position, there
exists a more subtle repelling force due to the opposite helicity
rotation, leading to significantly modified skyrmion helicity angles
in both skyrmion systems near the interface. The vertical bindinging
process for skyrmions is illustrated in Figure .
Figure 4
Glueing of skyrmion strings across an interface.
(a) Sketch of
two unperturbed skyrmion strings as they are characteristic for their
respective host materials. Resulting from the dipolar coupling, the
cores of the skyrmions attract each other. Due to their topological
nature, skyrmions can deform without “breaking” (i.e.,
maintaining their winding number), adapting their size and shape to
a changing environment. (b) Therefore, the bottom skyrmion surface
in the ML shrinks and is glued onto the top skyrmion surface of the
chiral magnet. (b) However, in between, where the moments rotate differently
in skyrmion systems with different helicity angles, the coupling is
repulsive with the rotation of the two systems mutually canceling
each other to some degree. Note that the skyrmion size in the Cu2OSeO3 bulk crystal is not noticeably changing due
to its larger overall stray field. The connection of a divergent and
a convergent vortex will result in a repulsive force due to their
opposite internal structures. The consequence of this repulsion is
the “neutralization” effect in their helicity angles;
i.e., both 3D skyrmion strings have to modify their χ(z) profiles to make the connection work. (c) Finally, glued
3D string structures are stabilized near the interface with adaptable
size and compatible helicity angles, forming a continuous skyrmion
string.
Glueing of skyrmion strings across an interface.
(a) Sketch of
two unperturbed skyrmion strings as they are characteristic for their
respective host materials. Resulting from the dipolar coupling, the
cores of the skyrmions attract each other. Due to their topological
nature, skyrmions can deform without “breaking” (i.e.,
maintaining their winding number), adapting their size and shape to
a changing environment. (b) Therefore, the bottom skyrmion surface
in the ML shrinks and is glued onto the top skyrmion surface of the
chiral magnet. (b) However, in between, where the moments rotate differently
in skyrmion systems with different helicity angles, the coupling is
repulsive with the rotation of the two systems mutually canceling
each other to some degree. Note that the skyrmion size in the Cu2OSeO3 bulk crystal is not noticeably changing due
to its larger overall stray field. The connection of a divergent and
a convergent vortex will result in a repulsive force due to their
opposite internal structures. The consequence of this repulsion is
the “neutralization” effect in their helicity angles;
i.e., both 3D skyrmion strings have to modify their χ(z) profiles to make the connection work. (c) Finally, glued
3D string structures are stabilized near the interface with adaptable
size and compatible helicity angles, forming a continuous skyrmion
string.In summary, we have unambiguously
observed the glueing of two distinct
types of skyrmion strings. The vertical binding of the two skyrmion
surfaces is a combination of attractive and repulsive interactions,
akin to the general concept particles assembling into ordered structures.
Although the observed coupling across the interface is relying on
the dipole–dipole interaction, the skyrmion glueing process
will also be observable for systems coupled via the direct exchange
interaction as the primary terms in their Hamiltonians share strong
similarities.[43] An example of the latter
are the uniform 3D tube structures found in chiral bulk crystals,
which are composed of straightly stacked 2D skyrmions.[44] Our findings unravel the microscopic details
of topological 3D quasiparticle interaction, and they also demonstrate
a new route toward creating and engineering new types of 3D topological
phases, as the skyrmion glueing concept can be generally applied to
a wide variety of materials species. It is intriguing to note that
during the glueing process, the disordered, large-diameter ML skyrmions
are compressed down to the dimensions of chiral magnet skyrmions,
while also inheriting their lattice order. Further, the modification
of the χ(z) skyrmion twist will change how
an applied torque will drive the bound skyrmion system, resulting
in different current–velocity relationships and skyrmion Hall
angles.[32,45] From this perspective, the glueing effect
offers an effective strategy for the manipulation of the dynamic skyrmion
properties, enabling applications.
Authors: Wanjun Jiang; Pramey Upadhyaya; Wei Zhang; Guoqiang Yu; M Benjamin Jungfleisch; Frank Y Fradin; John E Pearson; Yaroslav Tserkovnyak; Kang L Wang; Olle Heinonen; Suzanne G E te Velthuis; Axel Hoffmann Journal: Science Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kejing Ran; Yizhou Liu; Yao Guang; David M Burn; Gerrit van der Laan; Thorsten Hesjedal; Haifeng Du; Guoqiang Yu; Shilei Zhang Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Shilei Zhang; Gerrit van der Laan; Jan Müller; Lukas Heinen; Markus Garst; Andreas Bauer; Helmuth Berger; Christian Pfleiderer; Thorsten Hesjedal Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A O Leonov; Y Togawa; T L Monchesky; A N Bogdanov; J Kishine; Y Kousaka; M Miyagawa; T Koyama; J Akimitsu; Ts Koyama; K Harada; S Mori; D McGrouther; R Lamb; M Krajnak; S McVitie; R L Stamps; K Inoue Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Jean-Yves Chauleau; William Legrand; Nicolas Reyren; Davide Maccariello; Sophie Collin; Horia Popescu; Karim Bouzehouane; Vincent Cros; Nicolas Jaouen; Albert Fert Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: S Seki; M Suzuki; M Ishibashi; R Takagi; N D Khanh; Y Shiota; K Shibata; W Koshibae; Y Tokura; T Ono Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 43.841