Yinghao Meng1,2, Jieyu Yu1, Mengmeng Zhu1, Jian Zhou1, Na Li1, Fang Liu1, Hao Zhang1, Xu Fang1, Jing Li1, Xiaocheng Feng1, Li Wang1, Hui Jiang3, Jianping Lu1, Chengwei Shao4,5, Yun Bian6,7. 1. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Radiology, No. 971 Hospital of Navy, Qingdao, Shandong, China. 3. Department of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. cwshao@sina.com. 5. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. cwshao@sina.com. 6. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. bianyun2012@foxmail.com. 7. Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. bianyun2012@foxmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a radiomics model to predict fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive 152 patients with PDAC who underwent MDCT scan and surgical resection from January 2017 to December 2017 (training set) and from January 2018 to April 2018 (validation set). In the training set, 1409 portal radiomic features were extracted from each patient's preoperative imaging. Optimal features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm, whereupon the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was developed using the radiomics features. The performance of the XGBoost classifier performance was assessed by its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS: The patients were divided into FAP-low (n = 91; 59.87%) and FAP-high (n = 61; 40.13%) groups according to the optimal FAP cutoff (45.71%). Patients in the FAP-low group showed longer survival. The XGBoost classifier comprised 13 selected radiomics features and showed good discrimination in the training set [area under the curve (AUC), 0.97] and the validation set (AUC, 0.75). It also performed well in the calibration test and decision-curve analysis, demonstrating its potential clinical value. CONCLUSIONS: The XGBoost classifier based on CT radiomics in the portal venous phase can non-invasively predict FAP expression and may help to improve clinical decision-making in patients with PDAC.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a radiomics model to predict fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive 152 patients with PDAC who underwent MDCT scan and surgical resection from January 2017 to December 2017 (training set) and from January 2018 to April 2018 (validation set). In the training set, 1409 portal radiomic features were extracted from each patient's preoperative imaging. Optimal features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm, whereupon the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was developed using the radiomics features. The performance of the XGBoost classifier performance was assessed by its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness. RESULTS: The patients were divided into FAP-low (n = 91; 59.87%) and FAP-high (n = 61; 40.13%) groups according to the optimal FAP cutoff (45.71%). Patients in the FAP-low group showed longer survival. The XGBoost classifier comprised 13 selected radiomics features and showed good discrimination in the training set [area under the curve (AUC), 0.97] and the validation set (AUC, 0.75). It also performed well in the calibration test and decision-curve analysis, demonstrating its potential clinical value. CONCLUSIONS: The XGBoost classifier based on CT radiomics in the portal venous phase can non-invasively predict FAP expression and may help to improve clinical decision-making in patients with PDAC.
Authors: Christine Feig; Aarthi Gopinathan; Albrecht Neesse; Derek S Chan; Natalie Cook; David A Tuveson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Steven J Cohen; R Katherine Alpaugh; Irma Palazzo; Neal J Meropol; André Rogatko; Zhiheng Xu; John P Hoffman; Louis M Weiner; Jonathan D Cheng Journal: Pancreas Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Elizabeth J Hamson; Fiona M Keane; Stefan Tholen; Oliver Schilling; Mark D Gorrell Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Albert Lo; Chung-Pin Li; Elizabeth L Buza; Rachel Blomberg; Priya Govindaraju; Diana Avery; James Monslow; Michael Hsiao; Ellen Puré Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-10-05
Authors: John P Neoptolemos; Jörg Kleeff; Patrick Michl; Eithne Costello; William Greenhalf; Daniel H Palmer Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Andrew J Gunderson; Tomoko Yamazaki; Kayla McCarty; Michaela Phillips; Alejandro Alice; Shelly Bambina; Lauren Zebertavage; David Friedman; Benjamin Cottam; Pippa Newell; Michael J Gough; Marka R Crittenden; Pieter Van der Veken; Kristina H Young Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240