Literature DB >> 35450567

High-Dose Convalescent Plasma for Treatment of Severe COVID-19.

Daniele Focosi, Arturo Casadevall.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  2019 novel coronavirus disease; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus disease; respiratory infections; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; viruses; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35450567      PMCID: PMC9045456          DOI: 10.3201/eid2805.220191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   16.126


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: We commend our colleagues in Brazil for completing a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) against wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (). This RCT had some strengths, including use of high-dose CCP (600 mL CCP for 3 days at a median neutralizing antibody titer of 1:128). The overall results were negative, but the authors caution that this finding probably reflects inclusion of patients late in disease, as evident by enrollment criteria (oxygen saturation <93%, partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen <300, or need for mechanical ventilation), median transfusion at day 9 after symptom onset, 100% seropositivity, and 35% requiring hemodialysis at enrollment. The severity of disease in those patients means that disease was driven by inflammation as opposed to ongoing virus replication. To date, 2 CCP RCTs have shown benefit, 1 that provided outpatient treatment (D. Sullivan, et al., unpub. data, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.10.2126748v1) and 1 that provided inpatient treatment within 3 days of symptom onset (). Hence, we caution against negative conclusions about the efficacy of CCP based on these data. We find it remarkable that despite late CCP use, the authors observed a lower mortality rate among CCP-treated patients (31%) than controls (35%), given that the prevailing view is that this therapy functions as an antiviral and should not be effective in late disease. A similar finding is apparent in most other RCTs of hospitalized patients (). This reduced mortality rate did not reach statistical significance because of the low sample size, which was estimated by assuming a 50% reduction in mortality rate from the intervention, much higher than that assumed in the RCTs of anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (typically in the range of 20%); further, recruitment was halted at 110 out of 120 patients. A recent article suggests that there is a population with high World Health Organization severity scores that benefits from CCP (). We wonder if the authors can reanalyze their data by using the treatment benefit calculator (https://covid-convalescentplasma-tbi-calc.org) () to gain more insight into whether a small subset of patients benefited from CCP.
  4 in total

1.  Convalescent plasma associates with reduced mortality and improved clinical trajectory in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Authors:  Shanna A Arnold Egloff; Angela Junglen; Joseph Sa Restivo; Marjorie Wongskhaluang; Casey Martin; Pratik Doshi; Daniel Schlauch; Gregg Fromell; Lindsay E Sears; Mick Correll; Howard A Burris; Charles F LeMaistre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Development and Validation of a Treatment Benefit Index to Identify Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Who May Benefit From Convalescent Plasma.

Authors:  Hyung Park; Thaddeus Tarpey; Mengling Liu; Keith Goldfeld; Yinxiang Wu; Danni Wu; Yi Li; Jinchun Zhang; Dipyaman Ganguly; Yogiraj Ray; Shekhar Ranjan Paul; Prasun Bhattacharya; Artur Belov; Yin Huang; Carlos Villa; Richard Forshee; Nicole C Verdun; Hyun Ah Yoon; Anup Agarwal; Ventura Alejandro Simonovich; Paula Scibona; Leandro Burgos Pratx; Waldo Belloso; Cristina Avendaño-Solá; Katharine J Bar; Rafael F Duarte; Priscilla Y Hsue; Anne F Luetkemeyer; Geert Meyfroidt; André M Nicola; Aparna Mukherjee; Mila B Ortigoza; Liise-Anne Pirofski; Bart J A Rijnders; Andrea Troxel; Elliott M Antman; Eva Petkova
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04

3.  High-Dose Convalescent Plasma for Treatment of Severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Gil C De Santis; Luciana Correa Oliveira; Pedro M M Garibaldi; Carlos E L Almado; Julio Croda; Ghislaine G A Arcanjo; Érika A F Oliveira; Adriana C Tonacio; Dante M Langhi; José O Bordin; Renato N Gilio; Leonardo C Palma; Elaine V Santos; Simone K Haddad; Benedito P A Prado; Marjorie Cornejo Pontelli; Rogério Gomes; Carlos H Miranda; Maria Auxiliadora Martins; Dimas T Covas; Eurico Arruda; Benedito A L Fonseca; Rodrigo T Calado
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 4.  COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma and Clinical Trials: Understanding Conflicting Outcomes.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Massimo Franchini; Liise-Anne Pirofski; Thierry Burnouf; Nigel Paneth; Michael J Joyner; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 50.129

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  The efficiency of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhenbei Qian; Zhijin Zhang; Haomiao Ma; Shuai Shao; Hanyujie Kang; Zhaohui Tong
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.