Michael C Ryan1, Eunjung Kim2, Xufeng Cao1, Walter Reichard3, Tyler J Ogorek4, Pronay Das1, Colleen B Jonsson3,5, Jerome Baudry6, Donghoon Chung2, Jennifer E Golden1,4. 1. Pharmaceutical Sciences Division, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States. 2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States. 3. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States. 4. Department of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States. 5. College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United States. 6. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama 35899, United States.
Abstract
Venezuelan and eastern equine encephalitis viruses are disease-causing, neuropathic pathogens with no approved treatment options in humans. While expanding the pharmacophoric model of antialphaviral amidines prepared via a quinazolinone rearrangement, we discovered that diamine-treated, 2-dihalomethylquinolinones unexpectedly afforded ring-expanded piperazine-fused benzodiazepinones. Notably, this new chemotype (19 examples) showed potent, submicromolar inhibition of virus-induced cell death, >7-log reduction of viral yield, and tractable structure-activity relationships across both viruses. Antiviral activity was confirmed in primary human neuronal cells. A mechanistic rationale for product formation is proposed, and key structural elements were comparatively modeled between a similarly substituted antiviral amidine and piperazinobenzodiazepinone prototypes to guide future antiviral development.
Venezuelan and eastern equine encephalitis viruses are disease-causing, neuropathic pathogens with no approved treatment options in humans. While expanding the pharmacophoric model of antialphaviral amidines prepared via a quinazolinone rearrangement, we discovered that diamine-treated, 2-dihalomethylquinolinones unexpectedly afforded ring-expanded piperazine-fused benzodiazepinones. Notably, this new chemotype (19 examples) showed potent, submicromolar inhibition of virus-induced cell death, >7-log reduction of viral yield, and tractable structure-activity relationships across both viruses. Antiviral activity was confirmed in primary human neuronal cells. A mechanistic rationale for product formation is proposed, and key structural elements were comparatively modeled between a similarly substituted antiviral amidine and piperazinobenzodiazepinone prototypes to guide future antiviral development.
Venezuelan and eastern equine
encephalitis viruses, VEEV and EEEV, respectively, are neuroinvasive
RNA alphaviruses that are transmitted through the bite of infected
mosquitoes. These pathogens cause significant human disease that ranges
in severity from a febrile, self-resolving flu-like illness to more
debilitating cases characterized by disorientation, seizure, coma,
and death. While the human mortality rate associated with VEE is generally
less than 1%,[1] EEE affects children and
the elderly population more severely[2] and
has an overall case fatality rate of approximately 30–50%.[3] In 2019, 38 cases of EEE were confirmed in the
United States by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, resulting
in 19 fatalities.[4,5]Live, attenuated vaccines
are available for veterinary use and
at-risk lab or military personnel; however, they are considered unacceptable
for broader human use due to high reactogenicity, limited seroconversion,
and narrow viral strain specificity.[6,7] While other
therapeutic modalities[8−10] also have been investigated, treatment options to
date for VEEV and EEEV infection in humans are limited to supportive
care. This scenario, coupled with the bioweapon potential of these
viruses, along with reports that survivors of encephalitis often have
neurological sequelae that results in permanent physical, behavioral,
and cognitive impairment,[11,12] underscores the need
for safe and effective countermeasures.[13,14]Following
the discovery of a novel 2-chloromethylquinazolinone
rearrangement[15] that afforded potent, antialphaviral
benzamidines 1 (Scheme , panel a), we have continued to explore this chemistry
to elucidate the benzamidine pharmacophore and build structure–activity
and structure–property relationships (SAR and SPR, respectively).[16−18] Consequently, we discovered several quinazolinone-based transformations
leading to differentiated, bioactive heterocyclic frameworks.[19,20]
Scheme 1
Structurally Divergent, Bioactive Heterocycles from the Rearrangement
of 2-Substituted Quinazolinones
Reagents and conditions:
(a)
NEt3, CH3CN, μW, 150 °C, 2 h; (b)
K2CO3, CH3CN, 50 °C, 2 h; (c)
KOAc, DMSO, μW, 60 °C, 2 h.
Structurally Divergent, Bioactive Heterocycles from the Rearrangement
of 2-Substituted Quinazolinones
Reagents and conditions:
(a)
NEt3, CH3CN, μW, 150 °C, 2 h; (b)
K2CO3, CH3CN, 50 °C, 2 h; (c)
KOAc, DMSO, μW, 60 °C, 2 h.For
instance, 2-chloroquinazolinones, when treated with 1,2-dimethylethanediamine,
undergo a similar rearrangement to generate benzylguanidines 2 with improved plasma stability compared to the benzamidine
series 1.[19] Herein, we describe
the discovery of piperazine-fused benzodiazepinones 4 that result from the ring expansion of 2-dichloromethylquinazolinones 3 when treated with N,N′-dialkylethane-1,2-diamines
(Scheme , panel b).
Further, we show that these products potently inhibit cellular VEEV
and EEEV replication and provide an opportunity for differentiated
scaffold development from the benzamidine template.As part
of an ongoing medicinal chemistry program aimed at developing
antivirals against VEEV and EEEV, we attempted to prepare fluorobenzamidine 6 from 2-fluorochloromethylquinazolinone 5 (Scheme , path a). We anticipated
that N,N-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine
might displace the chlorine atom of a 2-dihaloalkylquinazolinone,
leading to intramolecular cyclization with subsequent ring-opening
to provide fluorobenzamidine 6. While none of the benzamidines
were observed, we isolated and characterized a small amount (∼5%)
of piperazine-fused benzodiazepinone 7a. The conversion
of 2-dihaloalkylquinazolinones to benzodiazepinones bears some resemblance
to the pioneering work of Dr. Leo Sternbach[21] who is credited with the discovery of benzodiazepines.[22] Specifically relevant is a Roche patent[23] which showed that dichloromethylquinazoline-N-oxides such as 8, when treated with methylamine
(15% in MeOH), afforded bis-methylaminobenzodiazepine-N-oxide 9 (Scheme , path b). Notably, diazepinone 7a contained
benzamidine structural features known to be important for anti-VEEV
activity. When 7a was evaluated in a cell-based cytopathic
effect (CPE) assay employing VEEV TC83, we obtained a remarkable EC50 of 0.041 μM without observable cytotoxicity (CC50 > 30 μM). As such, we set out to improve the transformation
yield and assess the antiviral SAR of the new chemotype for VEEV and
EEEV.
Scheme 2
Discovery of Piperazinobenzodiazepinones and Similarity to
Bis-Methylaminobenzodiazepine-N-oxide Formation
Reagents and conditions: (a)
CH3NH(CH2)2NHCH3, K2CO3, KI, DMF, μW, 150 °C, 2 h; (b) NH2CH3, CH3OH, r.t., 16 h, no yields reported;
PMP = p-methoxyphenyl.
Discovery of Piperazinobenzodiazepinones and Similarity to
Bis-Methylaminobenzodiazepine-N-oxide Formation
Reagents and conditions: (a)
CH3NH(CH2)2NHCH3, K2CO3, KI, DMF, μW, 150 °C, 2 h; (b) NH2CH3, CH3OH, r.t., 16 h, no yields reported;
PMP = p-methoxyphenyl.We
studied the rearrangement using a 2-dichloromethylquinazolinone
because the 2,2-dichloroacetyl chloride required for the quinazolinone
assembly was more economical than 2-fluoro-2-chloroacetyl chloride,
the same products were expected, and chloride as a leaving group was
likely more favorable than the loss of fluoride, possibly improving
the yield. Furthermore, we also knew from the benzamidines’
optimizations that incorporating an amido-N-3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl
group (i.e., amide-PMP group in 6) typically provided
analogs with a better overall profile, and reaction optimization could
then be more easily monitored by 19F NMR. Taking these
considerations into account, reaction optimization with 2-(dichloromethyl)-3-(3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)-6-nitroquinolin-4(3H)-one
was undertaken (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Yield and conversion of the transformation were evaluated as a
function of solvent, reaction time, and the stoichiometry and identity
of the base used. When the reaction was performed in DMSO with 1.5
equiv of diamine at 60 °C for 2 h, yields of the desired product
were inferior (3–15% by 19F NMR), and the most significant
identifiable byproduct, 2-amino-N-(3-fluoro-4-methoxyphenyl)-5-nitro-benzamide,
resulted from starting material fragmentation. However, after screening
a variety of exogenous bases, we found that the desired product was
maximally generated in 36% under these conditions when KOAc was added
(19F NMR analysis). As a result, these conditions were
used to generate a piperazinobenzodiazepinone collection that was
synthesized by the protocols shown in Scheme .
Reagents and conditions: (a)
ArNH2, i-Pr2NEt, EDC HCl, HOBt,
DMF, rt, 56–100%; (b) I2, PhNH2, EtOH,
reflux, 17 h, 47%; (c) Br2, AcOH, rt, 4 h, 89%; (d) LiOH,
THF, H2O, 0 °C–rt, 17 h, 82%; (e) Cl2CHCOCl, NEt3, DCM or DMF, 0 °C–rt, 17 h, then
TMSCl, NEt3, rt, 17 h, 18–81%; (f) R3NH(CH2)2NHR4 or other diamine, KOAc,
DMSO, μW, 60 °C, 2 h, 8–66%; (g) For 7n, morpholine, 10 mol % Pd XPhos G3, Cs2CO3,
toluene, reflux, 24 h, 32% (66% brsm); (h) For 7o, 10
mol % Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3, boronic acid, dioxane, H2O, 85 °C, 17 h, 69%.Briefly, aminobenzamides 11a–j were used without purification after being prepared by one
of three
methods. Peptide coupling conditions were used with commercially available
anthranilic acids 10a–c to afford 11a–h. Treatment of 5-fluoroisatoic anhydride 12 with iodine and aniline afforded derivative 11i, while 11j was prepared in a three-step protocol from
methyl 2-amino-5-cyanobenzoate 13. Employing a modified
version of our previously published procedure[24] for quinazolinone core assembly, the 2-dichloromethylquinazolinones 14a–j were constructed using 2,2-dichloroacetyl
chloride to form bis-amides in situ (not shown) that
underwent TMSCl/NEt3-mediated ring-closure in yields ranging
from 18 to 81%.The 2-dichloromethylquinazolinone rearrangement
was carried out
under the optimized conditions involving treatment of 14a–j (1.0 equiv) with diamine (1.5 equiv) and KOAc
(2.0 equiv) in DMSO at 60 °C for 2 h. Structural changes in each
of the three essential components, i.e., anthranilic acid, aniline,
and diamine, were surveyed with selection predominately driven by
a known benzamidine SAR.[15] For example,
our benzamidine-related studies showed that a nitro group at the C5
position (see 6, Scheme ) was critical for retaining substantial antialphavirus
activity. As such, many diazepinones contain this structural feature
at the analogous C8 position of the new core, but other substitutions
were also examined. Improved activity and solubility resulted with
benzamidines bearing an amido-N-4-methoxyphenyl ring,
so analogs with this component were also made (Scheme ).
Scheme 4
Yield of 2-Dichloroquinazolinone Ring
Expansion for Various Piperazinobenzodiazepinones,
Reagents and conditions: (a)
diamine, KOAc, DMSO, 60 °C, 2 h; (b) For 7n, morpholine,
10 mol % Pd XPhos G3, Cs2CO3, toluene, reflux,
24 h; (c) For 7o, 10 mol % Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3, (6-methylpyridin-3-yl)boronic acid,
dioxane, H2O, 85 °C, 17 h.
Isolated yields; ring expansion step performed
on a 0.5 mmol scale, unless noted.
Used bis-HCl diamine salt, 2 equiv of K2CO3 added.
Scale: 0.37 mmol
due to limited starting material.
Scale: 2.2 mmol (1 g) of 2-dichloromethylquinazolinone.
Parenthetical yield for aryl bromide
derivatization.
Major isomer
shown.
Yield of 2-Dichloroquinazolinone Ring
Expansion for Various Piperazinobenzodiazepinones,
Reagents and conditions: (a)
diamine, KOAc, DMSO, 60 °C, 2 h; (b) For 7n, morpholine,
10 mol % Pd XPhos G3, Cs2CO3, toluene, reflux,
24 h; (c) For 7o, 10 mol % Pd(PPh3)4, Cs2CO3, (6-methylpyridin-3-yl)boronic acid,
dioxane, H2O, 85 °C, 17 h.Isolated yields; ring expansion step performed
on a 0.5 mmol scale, unless noted.Used bis-HCl diamine salt, 2 equiv of K2CO3 added.Scale: 0.37 mmol
due to limited starting material.Scale: 2.2 mmol (1 g) of 2-dichloromethylquinazolinone.Parenthetical yield for aryl bromide
derivatization.Major isomer
shown.In general, piperazinobenzodiazepinones
containing a nitro group
and constructed with N,N′-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine
were isolated from the rearrangement reaction in modest yield (8–38%),
most likely due to the increased reactivity of the nitro-containing
substrate (see yields for 7a–e, Scheme ). Accordingly, moving
the nitro group from the C8-position to the C7-position of the piperazinobenzodiazepinone
core resulted in an 18% increase in yield, comparing 7i (38%) to 7e (20%). Notably, the rearrangement step
performed appreciably better for presumably less activated substrates,
including C8-cyano-substituted analogs such as 7k–7m with isolated yields in the 49–66% range. Performing
the rearrangement on a 2.2 mmol (1 g) scale generated 7m in an improved 63% yield. The use of bulkier, unsymmetrical diamines
on the reaction efficiency and regioselectivity was also examined.
Using N,N′-dibenzylethane-1,2-diamine
provided benzodiazepinone 7h in 50% yield. Interestingly,
using unsymmetrical N,N′-benzylmethylethane-1,2-diamine
gave benzodiazepinone 7g in 29% yield as the sole observed
regioisomer. Similarly, N,N′-cyclohexylmethylethane-1,2-diamine
afforded an analogous benzodiazepinone 7f as the only
regioisomer, though only in 8% yield, likely due to the increased
bulkiness of the cyclohexyl group. The assigned regiochemistry of
both 7f and 7g was determined by 2D NOESY
NMR. Additionally, each enantiomer of N,N′-dimethylcylohexyl-1,2-diamine was separately employed in
the reaction, affording benzodiazepinones 7p and 7q in 30 and 34% yields, respectively, and each in 14:1 d.r.,
the latter of which was confirmed by NOESY NMR. Lastly, bromide 7m was derivatized by a Buchwald-Hartwig coupling to afford
morpholine analog 7n (32% yield, 66% brsm), while Suzuki
coupling of 7m gave pyridyl analog 7o (69%
yield).Piperazinobenzodiazepinone formation could result from
several
plausible mechanisms. Considering an SN2 substitution reaction
between a 2-dichloromethylquinazolinone and a nucleophilic diamine,
α-chloroalkylamine A may result (Scheme , path a), facilitated by KOAc.[25−27] In this mechanism, iminium ion B formation from α-chloroalkylamine A may be trapped in an intramolecular fashion by the appended
secondary amine to form aminal C. Ring expansion of the
aminal through neighboring nitrogen atom assistance would then form
zwitterionic spirocyclic iminium ion D, a species that
is similar to those implicated for similar rearrangements. Benzodiazepinone 7 could then be formed through either a synchronous or asynchronous
event involving the amide portion of the structure. Specifically,
the negatively charged quinazolinone nitrogen could promote a second
ring expansion via a 1,2-N-acyl migration to the
iminium ion carbon or by a sequential 6-membered ring-opening to a
7-membered ring-forming process. An intramolecular 7-membered ring
formation involving an NH-amide is precedented in
peptidomimetic syntheses.[28]
Scheme 5
Mechanistic
Rationale for Diazepinone Formation
Attempts to intercept iminium ions via reductive amination were
unsuccessful, but the SN2 mechanisms account for the observed
regiochemical outcomes. Specifically, unsymmetrical diamines yielded
products in which the bulkier group resided on the iminium ion nitrogen
that was further away from the quinazolinone core in intermediate D. Alternatively, we considered a mechanism similar to the
Sternbach rearrangement of 2-chloromethylquinazoline-3-oxides that,
under treatment with an alkyl amine, affords aminodiazepoxides.[29] In our case, nucleophilic addition of the amine
to the N-acyl imine-like carbon of the quinazolinone
core would form E (Scheme , path b). Subsequent ring-opening/ring-forming or
an N-acyl shift would generate a ring-expanded chlorobenzodiazepinone F that would undergo intramolecular chloride displacement
by the tethered amine. At this point, these mechanisms are not differentiated,
and multiple scenarios may be relevant depending on the quinazolinone
substitution and the diamine partner.Two orthogonal antiviral,
cell-based assays using VEEV and EEEV
were implemented to survey the antiviral effects of these compounds
(Table ).[17] Viability of infected Vero 76 cells was measured
as a function of compound concentration in a CPE assay, and the reduction
of viral yield was measured at a concentration of 5 μM for compounds
with submicromolar CPE EC50 values. Several notable outcomes
emerged from these assays. First, data between the VEEV and EEEV CPE
assays were strongly congruent (<2.1-fold difference), revealing
similar SAR across these two alphaviruses in this assay. Second, data
showed that compounds whose viral yield reduction potential was assessed
were consistently better by about 2–4-fold against EEEV compared
to that of VEEV. Third, we observed that several advantageous structural
modifications implemented with the amidine series were also beneficial
on the piperazinobenzodiazepinones in terms of antiviral activity.
For instance, an N-4-methoxyphenyl amide substituent,
in combination with a nitro group present at R1, resulted
in potent inhibition of CPE caused by either VEEV or EEEV (Table , entries 1 and 2,
EC50 = 27–48 nM). Potency was eroded when the 4-methoxyphenyl
substituent was exchanged for a fluorine or hydrogen atom at that para-position or if the methoxy group was migrated to the
3-position (entries 3–5), though the compounds still retained
submicromolar activity. Substitution of one or more of the ring-fused
piperazine nitrogen atoms with nonmethyl groups such as a benzyl or
cyclohexyl moiety produced inferior results, with the N,N′-dibenzyl derivative 7h faring the worst (analogs 7f–h). Changing the piperazine ring to
bicyclic, ring-fused variants (7p–q) while incorporating the N-methylpiperazine substitutions
provided hit-like potencies in the range of 5 μM, suggesting
that structural modifications may be permissible in this region.
Table 1
Survey of Piperazinobenzodiazepinones
on VEEV and EEEV Cytopathic Effect and Viral Yield Reduction
VEEV
INH9813
EEEV
V105
entry
compd
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
R7
CPEa EC50 (μM)
viral yield rednb
CPEa EC50 (μM)
viral yield
rednb
CC50 (μM)c
1
7a
NO2
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
OCH3
0.041 ± 0.9
5.5 ± 1.2
0.033 ± 0.002
7.9 ± 0.5
>30
2
7b
NO2
H
H
CH3
CH3
F
OCH3
0.048 ± 0.004
3.7 ± 1.1
0.027 ± 0.003
7.7 ± 0.8
>30
3
7c
NO2
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
F
0.15 ± 0.01
2.9 ± 0.9
0.11 ± 0.004
6.1 ± 1.8
>30
4
7d
NO2
H
H
CH3
CH3
OCH3
H
0.53 ± 0.03
2.4 ± 0.4
0.50 ± 0.03
5.7 ± 1.8
>30
5
7e
NO2
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
H
0.12 ± 0.02
2.6 ± 0.7
0.059 ± 0.01
5.7 ± 1.4
>30
6
7f
NO2
H
H
CH3
Cy
H
OCH3
7.0 ± 0.8
6.2 ± 0.2
>30
7
7g
NO2
H
H
CH3
Bn
H
OCH3
3.0 ± 0.1
3.2 ± 0.2
>30
8
7h
NO2
H
H
Bn
Bn
H
OCH3
19.8 ± 3.5
13.8 ± 1.5
>30
9
7i
H
NO2
H
CH3
CH3
H
H
>30
>30
>30
10
7j
F
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
H
>30
>30
>30
11
7k
CN
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
H
7.0 ± 1.1
4.4 ± 0.2
>30
12
7l
CN
H
H
CH3
CH3
H
OCH3
4.2 ± 0.4
2.5 ± 0.1
>30
13
7m
CN
H
Br
CH3
CH3
F
OCH3
4.1 ± 0.1
3.2 ± 0.1
>30
14
7n
CN
H
morpholine
CH3
CH3
F
OCH3
2.5 ± 0.3
2.5 ± 0.9
1.9 ± 0.1
4.0 ± 1.1
>30
15
7o
CN
H
6-CH3-3-pyridyl
CH3
CH3
F
OCH3
0.24 ± 0.03
5.2 ± 1.8
0.16 ± 0.003
6.9 ± 1.3
23.3
16
ent-7od
CN
H
6-CH3-3-pyridyl
CH3
CH3
F
OCH3
0.50 ± 0.27
6.1 ± 0.7
0.30 ± 0.06
5.2 ± 2.2
>30
17
ent-′7od
CN
H
6-CH3-3-pyridyl
CH3
CH3
F
OCH3
0.33 ± 0.03
2.7 ± 0.6
0.26 ± 0.03
5.9 ± 0.8
>30
18
7p
see structure at top of table
(major isomer shown)
4.7 ± 0.3
4.5 ± 0.3
>30
19
7q
see structure
at top of table
(major isomer shown)
5.6 ± 0.8
3.8 ± 0.4
>30
CPE assay, V/EEEV
MOI = 0.05, Vero
76 cells, assessed at 48 h; data averaged from at least 3 replicates
(n ≥ 3, mean ± SD).
Viral yield reduction (Vero 76 cells)
at 5 μM compound concentration calculated based on the averaged
log10 transformed viral titer of the mock-treated group
divided by that of the compound-treated group at 18 h postinfection
(n = 4, mean ± SD).
Vero 76 cells, assessed 72 h post-treatment.
The (R)- or (S)-stereochemistry is unassigned, but each enantiomer was
isolated in >99% ee by chiral HPLC.
CPE assay, V/EEEV
MOI = 0.05, Vero
76 cells, assessed at 48 h; data averaged from at least 3 replicates
(n ≥ 3, mean ± SD).Viral yield reduction (Vero 76 cells)
at 5 μM compound concentration calculated based on the averaged
log10 transformed viral titer of the mock-treated group
divided by that of the compound-treated group at 18 h postinfection
(n = 4, mean ± SD).Vero 76 cells, assessed 72 h post-treatment.The (R)- or (S)-stereochemistry is unassigned, but each enantiomer was
isolated in >99% ee by chiral HPLC.Relocating the R1 nitro group to the R2 position
(entry 9, 7i) or replacing it with a fluorine atom (entry
10, 7j) was not tolerated (EC50 > 30 μM).
In fact, a limitation of the amidine series was the need for a C5-nitro
group (see Scheme , compound 6) to achieve exceptional potency in antiviral
assays, and despite a survey of many isosteres in that series, only
the C5 substitution with a nitrile moiety afforded analogs with low
micromolar potency. Analogously, substituting the diazepinone C8 nitro
group with a nitrile functionality resulted in a 100- and 75-fold
loss in antiviral activity for VEEV and EEEV, respectively (cf., 7a versus 7l); however, the retention of low
micromolar activity in these assays provided hope that structural
changes made elsewhere on the scaffold may remedy these losses. From
a design standpoint, substitution at R3 of the diazepinone
core (see general structure of 7, Table ) seemed reasonable as a hydrogen bond acceptor
in that region may mimic the tertiary amine of the cyclic amidine
structures, a pharmacophoric element that improved potency for that
series.The scaffold was equipped with an aryl bromide at R3 for the purposes of coupling, and then, we explored the effect
of
installing a morpholine or pyridyl moiety off that position of the
diazepinone core. While the morpholine modification did not appreciably
improve potency, the augmentation was not deleterious, and for EEEV,
it resulted in a promising 4-fold reduction of viral yield (entry
14).The pyridyl analog 7o gratifyingly exhibited
substantially
improved CPE activity (EC50 = 0.16–0.24 μM)
and robust reduction of viral replication, especially in the case
of EEEV. Cytotoxicity was not observed for compounds tested up to
30 μM with the exception of racemic 7o which showed
some liability at 23 μM. Nonetheless, the selectivity indices
(CC50/EC50 = 97–146) for 7o reflect a solid margin from which to optimize.To determine
if antiviral activity was influenced by enantiomeric
identity, racemic 7o was subjected to chiral separation,
yielding ent-7o and ent′-7o in high enantiopurity (>99% ee). No significant
difference was observed in the CPE assay between the enantiomers ent-7o and ent′-7o for VEEV or EEEV (entries 16 and 17, Table ), and reduction in viral titer was notably
different only for VEEV (entry 17). While the antiviral activity of
the compounds was evaluated in a Vero 76 cell line that is well established
for these viruses, antiviral activity and sensitivity to the enantiomeric
identity of 7o in primary human neuronal cells were also
evaluated. As such, selected compounds, 7a, 7b, 7o, and the corresponding 7o enantiomers, ent- and ent′-7o, were
assayed for reduction of viral yield for both VEEV and EEEV in human
brain primary neuronal cells (HNC001). Following treatment in neuronal
cells, infectious viral titers were measured in a tissue culture infectious
dose assay (TCID50) using VERO 76 cells (Figure ). At a compound concentration
of 5 μM, all of the compounds reduced viral titer to the limits
of detection of the assay for both VEEV and EEEV compared to virus-only
controls after 18 h (Figure A). Racemate 7o and its enantiomers were assessed
in the same cell line at 1 μM concentration to see if the antiviral
activity could be better differentiated; however, we observed no significant
difference in activity among these compounds even at the lower concentration
(Figure B). Importantly,
these results suggest that, barring a racemization event happening
during the assay assessment, the stereocenter of 7o does
not significantly influence the degree of antiviral activity observed
for VEEV or EEEV. Moreover, we also show that substantial reduction
in VEEV and EEEV titers is achieved in a primary human neuronal cell
line even at a concentration of 1 μM.
Figure 1
Selected 7o compounds showing reduction of EEEV and
VEEV titers in a TCID50 assay using human brain primary
neuronal cells at 5 μM (panel A) or 1 μM (panel B) after
18 h. Each experiment was done in triplicate, and averaged data is
plotted (n = 3, mean ± SD). The graphs were
generated using GraphPad Prism V.9.3.1.
Selected 7o compounds showing reduction of EEEV and
VEEV titers in a TCID50 assay using human brain primary
neuronal cells at 5 μM (panel A) or 1 μM (panel B) after
18 h. Each experiment was done in triplicate, and averaged data is
plotted (n = 3, mean ± SD). The graphs were
generated using GraphPad Prism V.9.3.1.Selected compounds were also profiled for kinetic aqueous solubility
and stability in mouse liver microsomes (MLMs) to gauge prospects
for eventual in vivo evaluation and optimization
(Table ). The nitro
group containing analogs 7a,b showed limited
aqueous solubility and a short MLM half-life (∼10 min), while
improved solubility and stability were observed for the nitrile-containing
analog 7o. Mouse plasma stability for 7o was found to be robust (T1/2 > 289
min,
CD-1 strain). Nonetheless, future optimization efforts will focus
on refining solubility and microsomal stability as the series is advanced.
Table 2
Solubility and Mouse Microsomal Stability
Data
entry
compd
solubilitya (μM)
MLMbT1/2 (min)
1
7a
0.7
10
2
7b
0.5
10
3
7o
2.0
45
Kinetic solubility in aqueous PBS
buffer, pH 7.4.
MLM = CD-1
mouse liver microsomal
stability.
Kinetic solubility in aqueous PBS
buffer, pH 7.4.MLM = CD-1
mouse liver microsomal
stability.Given the observed
SAR congruency between the older benzamidine
series and the piperazinobenzodiazepinone scaffold, we wanted to better
visualize shared or differentiated structural features in three-dimensional
space, as these pharmacophoric details may guide future optimization.
Benzodiazepinone 7o, though not the most potent analog
from the survey, retained significant CPE assay potency and robustly
attenuated viral replication for both VEEV and EEEV in Vero 76 and
human neuronal cells while also bearing an aryl nitrile moiety in
place of the potential toxophoric aryl nitro group. This was significant
as the benzamidine series did not reflect a similar tolerance, and
notably, the presence of the pyridyl appendage of 7o was
required to achieve desirable potency. A potent benchmark benzamidine,
BDGR-4 (Figure A),
was independently compared in silico to each enantiomer
of benzodiazepinone 7o using the program Molecular Operating
Environment (MOE).[30] Interestingly, alignment
of benzamidine BDGR-4 (gray-colored carbon atoms) with either isomer
of 7o (shown only for the (R)-isomer
of 7o as cyan-colored carbon atoms, Figure B) showed exceptional overlap
in which the amidine portion of BDGR-4 assumed a similar spatial arrangement
as the piperazine of the benzodiazepinone structure. These results,
in which the best scored alignments were redundant for each enantiomer
of 7o, corroborate the lack of differentiation in antiviral
activity observed for ent-7o and ent′-7o in neuronal cells. Further,
this model suggests that the required pyridyl appendage of 7o may engage the target with binding interactions that are differentiated
from those that are possible for benzamidine BDGR-4.
Figure 2
A. Structure of the benzamidine
V/EEEV inhibitor, BDGR-4. B. Superimposed
structures of BDGR-4 (gray structure) and (R)-7o (cyan structure) using a flexible align MOE program.
A. Structure of the benzamidine
V/EEEV inhibitor, BDGR-4. B. Superimposed
structures of BDGR-4 (gray structure) and (R)-7o (cyan structure) using a flexible align MOE program.In the course of exploring a quinazolinone rearrangement
that has
historically afforded benzamidines or derivatives thereof, we discovered
that 2-dichloroquinazolin-4-ones, when treated with N,N′-dialkylethane-1,2-diamines, undergo ring expansion to form
a new class of piperazine-fused benzodiazepinones. Furthermore, the
analogs generated from this effort show remarkable cellular antiviral
activity in two orthogonal antiviral assays against encephalitic alphaviruses,
VEEV and EEEV, and without significant cytotoxic liability. The transformation
led to modest yields of analogs with nitro-group substituted cores
but significantly improved to a suitable range of 49–66% yield
when nitrile-group variants were generated. This yield enhancement
was also notable given that submicromolar antiviral CPE inhibition
and good viral yield reduction were achieved with the nitrile analogs,
a milestone not met with the analogously substituted, nitrile-containing
benzamidines. Additionally, we observed that several piperazinobenzodiazepinones
were effective in significantly reducing both VEEV and EEEV titers
in human primary neuronal cells. Preliminary solubility and mouse
microsomal stability were determined to be modest, though nitrile
compound 7o was comparatively better than two nitro-containing
analogs. Last, we analyzed in silico the energy-minimized
structures of a leading benzamidine, BDGR-4, and an optimized piperazinobenzodiazepinone 7o. This exercise revealed relatively congruent, low-energy
conformations that either enantiomer of 7o can adopt
a three-dimensional structural arrangement like that of benzamidine
BDGR-4 and that the pyridyl appendage of this new benzodiazepinone
class may offer an advantage in exploiting new target interactions.
Work is ongoing to explore this aspect of the transformation. Ultimately,
the discovery and development of these piperazinobenzodiazepinones
represent another important milestone in expanding a sparsely stocked
pipeline of small molecules that inhibit encephalitic alphaviruses.
Authors: Chad E Schroeder; Sarah A Neuenswander; Tuanli Yao; Jeffrey Aubé; Jennifer E Golden Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Gang Yan; Bereket L Zekarias; Xiaoyu Li; Victor A Jaffett; Ilia A Guzei; Jennifer E Golden Journal: Chemistry Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: George R Painter; Richard A Bowen; Gregory R Bluemling; John DeBergh; Vindhya Edpuganti; Prabhakar R Gruddanti; David B Guthrie; Michael Hager; Damien L Kuiper; Mark A Lockwood; Deborah G Mitchell; Michael G Natchus; Zachary M Sticher; Alexander A Kolykhalov Journal: Antiviral Res Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 5.970
Authors: Lauren E Williamson; Theron Gilliland; Pramod K Yadav; Elad Binshtein; Robin Bombardi; Nurgun Kose; Rachel S Nargi; Rachel E Sutton; Clarissa L Durie; Erica Armstrong; Robert H Carnahan; Lauren M Walker; Arthur S Kim; Julie M Fox; Michael S Diamond; Melanie D Ohi; William B Klimstra; James E Crowe Journal: Cell Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Amanda L Phelps; Lyn M O'Brien; David O Ulaeto; Frederick W Holtsberg; Grant C Liao; Robin Douglas; M Javad Aman; Pamela J Glass; Crystal L Moyer; Jane Ennis; Larry Zeitlin; Les P Nagata; Wei-Gang Hu Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 5.048