Ning Zhao1, Jian Guan1, Na Cai1, Ning-Ning Liu1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To assess efficacy of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in combination with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone in patients with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (SNPDR) without macular edema (ME). METHODS: Forty-eight patients with SNPDR without ME (56 eyes) were divided into the PRP group and IVC+PRP group (the pulse group) in this retrospective clinical study. Conbercept was intravitreally administered to patients in the pulse group 1wk before treatment with PRP and followed up for 1, 3, and 6mo. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), center foveal thickness (CFT), visual acuity (VA) improvement, and adverse reactions were compared between groups. RESULTS: In the PRP group, the BCVA reduced at 1 and 3mo before improving at 6mo. In the pulse group, baseline BCVA decreased continuously at 1mo, increased at 3 and 6mo. BCVA in the pulse group was better than that in the PRP group at 1, 3, and 6mo. There was an increase in CFT in the PRP group during follow-up compared with baseline. In the pulse group, CFT was increased at 1mo relative to baseline, steadily decreased to the baseline level at 3 and 6mo. There was a more significant reduction in CFT in the pulse group during follow-up compared with the PRP group. The effective rates of VA in the PRP and the pulse groups were 81.48% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: As PRP pretreatment, a single dose of IVC administration has beneficial effects for preventing PRP-induced foveal thickening and increasing VA in patients with SNPDR without ME. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
AIM: To assess efficacy of intravitreal conbercept (IVC) injection in combination with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs PRP alone in patients with severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (SNPDR) without macular edema (ME). METHODS: Forty-eight patients with SNPDR without ME (56 eyes) were divided into the PRP group and IVC+PRP group (the pulse group) in this retrospective clinical study. Conbercept was intravitreally administered to patients in the pulse group 1wk before treatment with PRP and followed up for 1, 3, and 6mo. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), center foveal thickness (CFT), visual acuity (VA) improvement, and adverse reactions were compared between groups. RESULTS: In the PRP group, the BCVA reduced at 1 and 3mo before improving at 6mo. In the pulse group, baseline BCVA decreased continuously at 1mo, increased at 3 and 6mo. BCVA in the pulse group was better than that in the PRP group at 1, 3, and 6mo. There was an increase in CFT in the PRP group during follow-up compared with baseline. In the pulse group, CFT was increased at 1mo relative to baseline, steadily decreased to the baseline level at 3 and 6mo. There was a more significant reduction in CFT in the pulse group during follow-up compared with the PRP group. The effective rates of VA in the PRP and the pulse groups were 81.48% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: As PRP pretreatment, a single dose of IVC administration has beneficial effects for preventing PRP-induced foveal thickening and increasing VA in patients with SNPDR without ME. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
Entities:
Keywords:
conbercopt; panretinal photocoagulation; severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy
Authors: Roy W Beck; Allison R Edwards; Lloyd P Aiello; Neil M Bressler; Frederick Ferris; Adam R Glassman; Elizabeth Hartnett; Michael S Ip; Judy E Kim; Craig Kollman Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2009-03
Authors: Sharon D Solomon; Emily Chew; Elia J Duh; Lucia Sobrin; Jennifer K Sun; Brian L VanderBeek; Charles C Wykoff; Thomas W Gardner Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 19.112