Oxalic acid is an important separation agent in the technology of lanthanides, actinides, and transition metals. Thanks to the low solubility of the oxalate salts, the metal ions can be easily precipitated into crystalline material, which is a convenient precursor for oxide preparation. However, it is difficult to obtain oxalate monocrystals due to the fast precipitation. We have developed a synthetic route for homogeneous precipitation of oxalates based on the thermal decomposition of oxamic acid. This work primarily concerns lanthanide oxalates; however, since no information was found about oxamic acid, a brief characterization was included. The precipitation method was tested on selected elements (Ce, Pr, Gd, Er, and Yb), for which the kinetics was determined at 100 °C. Several scoping tests at 90 °C or using different starting concentrations were performed on Ce and Gd. The reaction products were studied by means of solid-state analysis with focus on the structure and morphology. Well-developed microcrystals were successfully synthesized with the largest size for gadolinium oxalate.
Oxalic acid is an important separation agent in the technology of lanthanides, actinides, and transition metals. Thanks to the low solubility of the oxalate salts, the metal ions can be easily precipitated into crystalline material, which is a convenient precursor for oxide preparation. However, it is difficult to obtain oxalate monocrystals due to the fast precipitation. We have developed a synthetic route for homogeneous precipitation of oxalates based on the thermal decomposition of oxamic acid. This work primarily concerns lanthanide oxalates; however, since no information was found about oxamic acid, a brief characterization was included. The precipitation method was tested on selected elements (Ce, Pr, Gd, Er, and Yb), for which the kinetics was determined at 100 °C. Several scoping tests at 90 °C or using different starting concentrations were performed on Ce and Gd. The reaction products were studied by means of solid-state analysis with focus on the structure and morphology. Well-developed microcrystals were successfully synthesized with the largest size for gadolinium oxalate.
Precipitation reactions
can be divided into two categories: heterogeneous
and homogeneous. Heterogeneous precipitation is performed by the addition
of the precipitating agent directly to the solution of metal ions.
This creates a supersaturation in the solution and results in a rapid
formation of many crystallization nuclei. Homogeneous precipitation,
on the other hand, is performed by slowly generating the precipitating
agent by chemical decomposition of a precursor. The supersaturation
of the solution in this case is low, and the crystallites grow at
much
slower rate, resulting in different crystallization conditions than
during the heterogeneous precipitation.One of the most widely
used precipitating agents is oxalic acid,
which forms insoluble precipitates with most of transition metal ions,
lanthanides, and actinides.[1,2] Indeed, actinide oxalates
have proven useful in lanthanide/actinide separation from their solutions.[1,3,4] Oxalates are simply low-cost but
high-quality precursors for materials with interesting properties,
such as nuclear fuels,[5−8] metal–organic frameworks,[9,10] oxygen conductors,[11] or molecular magnets.[12]In the present work, we aimed on the development of a homogeneous
precipitation of oxalates to achieve slower kinetics of precipitation
and therefore larger crystals than usually obtained. There are only
few attempts described in the literature. Rao et al.[13] reported synthesis of Pu(C2O4)2·6H2O by decomposition (hydrolysis) of diethyl
oxalate in presence of plutonium nitrate at various temperatures (25–77
°C). This technique was later exploited in the works of Pazukhin
et al.[14] and Tamain et al.,[15] both dedicated to actinides. Even if the technique
gave well-developed crystals, its main disadvantage is use of concentrated
acid solutions and organic solvents (alcohol). We have unsuccessfully
tested various basic carboxylic acids or derivates of oxalic acid
(e.g., glyoxylic acid), until effective results were obtained using
oxamic acid.Oxamic acid (also known as 2-amino-2-oxoethanoic
acid or 2-amino-2-oxoacetic
acid) is the simplest known dicarboxylic acid containing an amide
group. It is a very polar molecule, mostly available in a form of
white fine powder, which is insoluble in organic solvents.[16] It melts, while decomposing, at 209 °C.[17] Apart from its biochemical activity,[17−19] the basic physicochemical properties have not been reported. The
structure of crystalline oxamic acid (space group no. 9, Cc) was reported recently showing the importance of the H-bonds.[20] Likewise, the coordination chemistry of oxamic
acid received limited attention. It is mostly focused on the coordination
modes (through carboxylate or amide groups) and spectroscopic data;
for examples of transition metal’s complexes, see refs (21)–[24]; for
lanthanide’s complexes, see refs (25)–[28].In the present
article, we describe the homogenous precipitation
of lanthanide oxalates by oxamic acid decomposition. We have selected
lanthanide’s representatives (Ce, Pr, Gd, Er, and Yb) for clarity.
Oxalates of the lighter lanthanides are somehow described as the P21/c structure of Ln2(C2O4)3·10H2O, while
isomorphism is foreseen toward heavier lanthanides.[29] However, the amount and bonding of water molecules may
vary.[1,29,30]
Experimental
Part
For the experiment, we used Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (Acros Organics, 99.5%), Pr(NO3)3·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%), Gd(NO3)3·6H2O (Alfa Aesar, 99.9%), Er(NO3)3·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%),
Yb(NO3)3·6H2O (Sigma-Aldrich,
99.9%), and oxamic acid (Acros Organics,
98%). A series of experiments was performed to investigate the behavior
of various lanthanides ions with oxamic acid. In a 50 mL round bottom
flask, 25 mL of 0.2 M clear solution (5 mmol) of oxamic acid was heated
to 40 °C to increase the dissolution of oxamic acid and was mixed
with 10 mL of 0.2 M solution (2 mmol) of Ln(NO3). Ce, Pr,
Gd, Er, and Yb were chosen as representants of lighter and heavier
lanthanides. When mixing the solutions, no precipitate was formed,
and clear solution was obtained. The solution was mixed with a magnetic
stirrer at 500 rpm. The solution was heated to 100 °C and kept
at this temperature for 2 h. In order to prevent the solvent from
evaporating, a glass air condenser was attached to the flask. After
the reaction was finished, the obtained precipitate was washed twice
with distilled water and centrifugated for 5 min at 5000 rpm. The
precipitate was dried overnight in an oven at 40 °C.
Kinetic Studies
We investigated the reaction kinetics
of the precipitate formation during the experiment. Every 30 min,
5 mL of solution was transferred into a test tube and centrifugated
for 2 min at 5000 rpm. We took 4 mL of this solution and added 1.2
mmol H2C2O4·2H2O
for quantitative separation of unreacted lanthanides. The concentration
of Ln3+ ions in the solution was calculated from the mass
of the precipitate. The kinetic studies were performed for Ce, Pr,
and Gd samples.Optical micrographs were received on Leica DM4000
m equipped with a Leica DFC295 camera. The morphology of the precipitates
was observed using scanning electron microscopes JEOL JSM-6510. The
samples were coated with a thin Au/Pd conductive layer. Powder X-ray
diffraction (XRD) was measured on a PANalytical X’Pert PRO
diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation) calibrated on a LaB6 (NIST) standard. The pattern was treated using JANA2006 software.
The UV–vis absorption spectra were obtained on a Unicam 340
spectrometer or on a Varian 4000 spectrometer equipped with an integration
sphere. Thermogravimetric analysis was performed on a SETYS Evolution
thermogravimeter from SETARAM. The sample was heated from room temperature,
with a 20 min delay at 40 °C for drying, with a slope of 3 K/min
to 800 °C in a 100 μL alumina crucible.
Results and Discussion
Oxamic
Acid and Its Affinity to Lanthanides
Because
very limited information is known about oxamic acid, we performed
a set of basic characterization to facilitate the manipulation and
further reactions with it. The solubility at 25 °C was estimated
to be 8.50 ± 0.06 g per 100 g of water. We have found that water
solutions heated over 40 °C are unstable and slowly lead to decomposition
(see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). The pKA of oxamic acid was determined
to be 3.18 (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). Heating the oxamic acid in solution causes it to decompose into
ammonium oxalate; for the mechanism, see Figure . Whole dedicated work can be found in the
thesis of Zakharanka.[30]
Figure 1
Mechanism of oxamic acid
hydrolysis, in principle, known as acid-catalyzed
hydrolysis of amides.
Mechanism of oxamic acid
hydrolysis, in principle, known as acid-catalyzed
hydrolysis of amides.This reaction basically
makes oxalic acid free for reaction with
lanthanide ions to form an insoluble salt. When mixing the oxamic
acid solution and lanthanide salt, no precipitate was formed; moreover,
no observable interaction was found using UV/vis spectroscopy. Figure shows the UV/Vis
spectra of pure oxamic–lanthanide nitrate solutions and their
corresponding mixtures.
Figure 2
UV/vis spectra of oxamic acid [bottom graph,
(a)]. Lanthanide nitrate
solutions and their equimolar mixtures (a) and detailed views of Pr(III)
and Er(III) spectra in a mixture with oxamic acid (b,c).
UV/vis spectra of oxamic acid [bottom graph,
(a)]. Lanthanide nitrate
solutions and their equimolar mixtures (a) and detailed views of Pr(III)
and Er(III) spectra in a mixture with oxamic acid (b,c).Very limited change in the absorption peak positions or intensity
was observed during the interaction of oxamic acid and selected lanthanide
ions in solution. The spectra of the mixtures are basically a sum
of the oxamic acid and lanthanides. A slight shift (∼2 nm)
was found between the spectrum of Er(III) solution before and after
oxamic acid addition (Figure c). A similar shift (∼5 nm) was also found for the
uranyl ion and urea (containing the −NH2 group as
well);[31] however, it was not as strong
in our case. Moreover, this shift was not observed in the case of
Er(III) (Figure c).
Therefore, we assume that oxamic acid coordination had limited impact
on the electronic structure of the ions; however, a deeper coordination
study would be necessary to confirm and describe the behavior.
Kinetics
of Oxalate Precipitation
We have performed
the homogenous precipitation of oxalate salts on selected lanthanides
(Ce, Pr, Gd, Er, and Yb) to have a general impression. The Ln2(C2O4)3·nH2O precipitation kinetics at 100 °C is plotted in Figure as a residual concentration
of Ln(III) ions in the solution. The time of complete precipitation
at 100 °C is in the range of hours, which is convenient for the
laboratory practice. The first-order kinetics fits well the oxalate
precipitation. It was found that the heavier the lanthanide, the slower
is the precipitation at the same temperature. The kinetic constants
(k in min–1) at 100 °C decrease
with the atomic number of the lanthanide as follows: k = −0.0002x + 0.0181 (Rsq = 0.784), where x is the atomic number
of the lanthanide.
Figure 3
Kinetics of homogeneous oxalate precipitation expressed
by the
residual contractions of lanthanide ions in the solution. Tests were
performed at 100 °C. The data were fitted by exponential fit c = a·e–, where c stands for the concentration in
mmol/L, a is a pre-exponential factor, k is the kinetic constant, and t is time. R-square factors and the 95% confidence bands are presented
(in red).
Kinetics of homogeneous oxalate precipitation expressed
by the
residual contractions of lanthanide ions in the solution. Tests were
performed at 100 °C. The data were fitted by exponential fit c = a·e–, where c stands for the concentration in
mmol/L, a is a pre-exponential factor, k is the kinetic constant, and t is time. R-square factors and the 95% confidence bands are presented
(in red).The precipitation could be slowed
down more by decreasing the temperature. Figure shows the Ce(III)
precipitation kinetics (in a similar way as Figure ) for 90 and 100 °C. The first-order
kinetic constants are k(100 °C) = 0.0214 min–1 (Rsq = 0.983) and k(90 °C) = 0.01 min–1 (Rsq = 0.959). Thus, the precipitation is about 2.15 times
slower at 90 °C compared to 100 °C.
Figure 4
Kinetics of oxalate precipitation
for Ce(III) at 90 and 100 °C
with the exponential fits and 95% confidence bands (in red); c = 0.057e–0.010 for
90 C (Rsq = 0.96) and c = 0.58e–0.021 for 100 C (Rsq = 0.98).
Kinetics of oxalate precipitation
for Ce(III) at 90 and 100 °C
with the exponential fits and 95% confidence bands (in red); c = 0.057e–0.010 for
90 C (Rsq = 0.96) and c = 0.58e–0.021 for 100 C (Rsq = 0.98).
Morphology of the Precipitates
The morphology and composition
of the precipitates were studied
using various techniques of solid-state analysis. Figure shows the optical microscopy
of the precipitates obtained at 100 °C with a starting concentration
of Ce(III) 0.15 mol/L. The morphology was dependent on the lanthanide
used; Ce(III) formed mostly needles, while other lanthanides formed
regular crystals, occasionally prolonged. Interestingly, the size
of the crystals was also linked with the lanthanide. Having equal
precipitation conditions, we found the largest crystals for gadolinium,
while the smallest for the heaviest ytterbium. The cerium(III) oxalate
was up to 50 μm long and 20 μm wide. The other lanthanide
oxalates having a similar morphology were up 50 μm in diameter
for gadolinium, otherwise considerably smaller.
Figure 5
Optical micrographs of
oxalate precipitates obtained at 100 °C
and a 0.15 M starting concentration.
Optical micrographs of
oxalate precipitates obtained at 100 °C
and a 0.15 M starting concentration.Apart from the temperature, other possible modification of the
synthetic path was to reduce substantially the concentration. We performed
such a study on Ce(III); the initial concentration of Ce(III) was
decreased from 0.06 to 0.01 M, maintaining the other conditions equal.
A lower concentration of metal led to smaller shape anisotropy of
the crystals and better homogeneity of the size (see Figure ). To see the capabilities
of the technique to produce lanthanide–oxalate single crystals,
we performed an additional test. As Gd(III) gave the largest crystals,
we increased the concentration to 0.5 M and decreased temperature
to 90 °C. The size of the crystals is smaller than reported for
the diethyl oxalate decomposition method;[15] however, it meets the requirement for single crystal X-ray diffraction
and requires a considerably simpler synthetic approach Figure . A larger parametrical study
would be necessary to further asses the shape and size of the crystals
depending on various conditions; however, such a study would be beyond
the scope of the present work.
Figure 6
Cerium(III) oxalate crystals obtained
at 100 °C. Smaller particles
having lower shape anisotropy were obtained from diluted solutions, c(Ce) = 0.01 M (a), while larger crystals were precipitated
from more concentrated solution, c(Ce) = 0.06 M (b).
Figure 7
Optical micrographs of Gd(III) oxalate formed at 90 °C
using
0.5 M starting solution.
Cerium(III) oxalate crystals obtained
at 100 °C. Smaller particles
having lower shape anisotropy were obtained from diluted solutions, c(Ce) = 0.01 M (a), while larger crystals were precipitated
from more concentrated solution, c(Ce) = 0.06 M (b).Optical micrographs of Gd(III) oxalate formed at 90 °C
using
0.5 M starting solution.
Composition and Structure
of the Oxalates
The structure
of the precipitates was examined by X-ray powder diffraction. In the
case of lighter lanthanides (Ce, Pr, and Gd), the composition and
structure were easily determined (see Figure ). All three oxalates belong to the typical
Ln2(C2O4)3·10H2O composition with the P21/c structure.[29] The lattice parameters a, b, and c decreased
with the ionic radius of heavier lanthanides (Figure d or see Table S1). The amounts of water molecules in the structures were confirmed
using thermogravimetric measurements (Figure ). The situation concerning the heavier oxalates
of Er(III) and (Yb) was rather complicated. None of the ICSD[32] data record fit exactly our measurements, (see
Figures S3 and S4 in the Supporting Information). Indeed, the erbium oxalate was reported as a hexahydrate[33] or trihydrate,[34] similar
as ytterbium being a penta or hexahydrate.[35] These uncertainties in the crystalline water content played an important
role in precluding the structure determination in our case. Figure shows that the dehydration
of cerium oxalate is a one-step process, but from gadolinium oxalate
toward heavier lanthanides, the dehydration was a multistep process.
Moreover, based on the thermogravimetry measurements, we observed
the Er(III) and Yb(III) oxalates as pentahydrates. It seems that the
water molecules, which are not participating in the coordination polyhedra,
are loosely bound in the lattice for heavier lanthanides (Er and Yb),
and therefore, the total number of water molecules per unit might
fluctuate easily.
Figure 8
X-ray powder diffraction of the Ce(III) (a), Pr(III) (b),
and Gd(III)
(c) oxlate decahydrate having a typical C/2m structure. Imeas stands for
measure intensity, Icalc for calculated,
and Idiff for the difference curve (Icalc – Imeas). The lattice parameter for all three Ln(III) oxalate decahydrates
is given in (d); fitting parameters are as follows: Ce(III) oxalate Rwp = 7.03, GOF = 1.79; Pr(III) oxalate Rwp = 7.26, GOF = 1.81; and Gd(III) oxalate Rwp = 7.46, GOF = 2.11.
Figure 9
Decomposition
of hydrated lanthanide oxalates Ln3(C2O4)3·nH2O by thermogravimetric
measurements under air.
X-ray powder diffraction of the Ce(III) (a), Pr(III) (b),
and Gd(III)
(c) oxlate decahydrate having a typical C/2m structure. Imeas stands for
measure intensity, Icalc for calculated,
and Idiff for the difference curve (Icalc – Imeas). The lattice parameter for all three Ln(III) oxalate decahydrates
is given in (d); fitting parameters are as follows: Ce(III) oxalate Rwp = 7.03, GOF = 1.79; Pr(III) oxalate Rwp = 7.26, GOF = 1.81; and Gd(III) oxalate Rwp = 7.46, GOF = 2.11.Decomposition
of hydrated lanthanide oxalates Ln3(C2O4)3·nH2O by thermogravimetric
measurements under air.This fact also corresponds
to the electron microscopy observations,
which were performed in vacuum. The cerium oxalate decahydrate remained
intact during the SEM observation (see Figure ), but one can see cracks on the surface
of both erbium and ytterbium oxalates (Figures S5 and S6 in the Supporting Information), implying the dehydration
of the crystals only under vacuum. Unfortunately, precise structure
determination of Er(III) and Yb(III) oxalates would be beyond the
scope of the present work. However, we believe that the synthetic
route described in this article will help to unravel the question
about the structure of oxalates in the future.
Conclusions
In the present work, we focused on the development of homogeneous
precipitation of lanthanide oxalates Ln2(C2O4)3·nH2O. Homogeneous
precipitation has the advantage of equal distribution of the precipitation
agent throughout the reactant mixture and slower precipitation caused
by the in situ generation of the precipitation agent. We have developed
a laboratory-convenient way of homogeneous precipitation of oxalates
by thermal decomposition of oxamic acid. The precipitation was described
for selected lanthanides by means of pseudo first-order kinetics.
It was found that the precipitation was naturally slower for heavier
lanthanides and lower temperatures. Interestingly, the precipitates
showed maximum size for Gd2(C2O4)3·10H2O and minimum for heavy lanthanides [Yb2(C2O4)3·7H2O]. Cerium oxalate had a significantly different morphology than
the others, and it formed mainly needles instead of compact microcrystals.
It was proved that by slowing down the precipitation (from 100 to
90 °C) and increasing the starting concentration, the crystal
grew even more (up to ∼80 μm). Our work showed the gaps
in the structure determination and behavior of heavy lanthanide oxalates,
which is most probably linked with the loosely bound crystalline water.