Longhai Qiu1,2,3, Zhanbei Zhu2, Feng Peng2, Chi Zhang2, Juning Xie2, Ruixiang Zhou2, Yu Zhang1,2, Mei Li2. 1. The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China. 2. Medical Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China. 3. Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedic Surgery, Institute of Orthopaedics, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong 516001, China.
Abstract
Aseptic loosening is the main factor that leads to the failure of orthopedic implants. Enhancing the early osteointegration of a bone implant can lower the risk of aseptic loosening. Here, a Li-doped surface was constructed on a Ti surface via plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) to improve osteointegration. The prepared Li-doped PEO coating showed a porous morphology and the sustained release of Li ions. In vitro results of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (rBMSC) culture studies suggested that the Li-doped Ti surface significantly favored cell adhesion. Moreover, it was found that the Li-doped surface enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity and extracellular matrix mineralization of rBMSCs. In addition, the surface improved the expression of osteogenesis-related genes. Furthermore, a bone implantation model indicated that the Li-doped Ti surface showed improved osteointegration. The incorporation of Li into a Ti surface is a promising method for orthopedic applications.
Aseptic loosening is the main factor that leads to the failure of orthopedic implants. Enhancing the early osteointegration of a bone implant can lower the risk of aseptic loosening. Here, a Li-doped surface was constructed on a Ti surface via plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) to improve osteointegration. The prepared Li-doped PEO coating showed a porous morphology and the sustained release of Li ions. In vitro results of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (rBMSC) culture studies suggested that the Li-doped Ti surface significantly favored cell adhesion. Moreover, it was found that the Li-doped surface enhanced alkaline phosphatase activity and extracellular matrix mineralization of rBMSCs. In addition, the surface improved the expression of osteogenesis-related genes. Furthermore, a bone implantation model indicated that the Li-doped Ti surface showed improved osteointegration. The incorporation of Li into a Ti surface is a promising method for orthopedic applications.
The
use of orthopedic implants has dramatically increased in the
past few years as a result of population aging and patients’
quest for a better quality of life.[1] Titanium
(Ti) is an inert metal with good biocompatibility, reliable mechanical
properties, and corrosion resistance; thus, it is a commonly used
biological material for orthopedic implants. Ti and its alloys are
widely used as bone plates, bone nets, and scaffolds. For example,
screw-type Ti-based implants have achieved a good clinical result.[2−5] However, the loosening and the failure of implants still occur in
cases of osteoporosis, periodontitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetes.
These were mainly because the inert Ti surface provides inadequate
osseointegration.[6] Studies have shown that
aseptic loosening occurred in 51.9% of patients that failed prosthesis
after total hip arthroplasty.[7] Therefore,
the ability of titanium-based implants for osseointegration has to
be improved. This is a major challenge in the long-term success of
titanium-based implants.[8,9]Surface modification
technologies such as plasma electrolytic oxidation
(PEO), spray coating, and plasma immersion ion implantation have been
applied on Ti surfaces to alter their topological morphology and phase
composition and thus to improve their biological performances.[4,10−12] In particular, PEO has been considered as an economical
and effective electrochemical surface modification method, which can
produce surfaces with porous structures and alterative compositions.[13] By changing the composition of electrolytes,
the PEO coating can be loaded with various bioactive ions such as
argentum (Ag), calcium (Ca), and strontium (Sr).[5,14,15] These bioactive ions play curial roles in
the behavior of cells with bones. For example, Ca participates in
autophagic mTOR and AMPK signaling pathways, thus enhancing the mineralization
of osteoblasts.[16]Lithium (Li) is
a non-essential micronutrient, which has been used
in medicine and the treatment of bipolar disorders for a long time.[17] Li has been also found to have other biological
effects including the inhibition of osteoclast formation and osteolysis,
alleviation of cartilage degeneration, and promotion of cartilage
regeneration.[18,19] Recently, a few studies have
found that Li modulates the glycogen synthase kinase-3β and
the typical Wnt signal of bone-related cells; thus, Li plays an important
role in the balance between bone metabolism and formation.[20,21] Furthermore, Li has been shown to regulate the polarization of macrophages
through the PI3K/AKT signal axis, thus achieving good immune regulation
in the process of bone integration.[22] Meanwhile,
Li also produces anti-inflammatory effects. Its neuroprotective effect
is gradually realized through anti-neuritis. It reduces the levels
of IL-1 β in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of rats and
TNF α in the hippocampus of rats.[23] In addition, Li-doped scaffolds have been reported to support the
regeneration of articular cartilage defects, which stimulated the
secretion of MIR-130A derived from bone marrow stromal cells and promoted
angiogenesis.[24,25] Based on the above-mentioned
research, we have considered that Li most likely has direct effects
on osteogenesis.Here, we prepared Li-containing PEO coatings
for Ti to improve
the osteogenic properties. The osteogenic performances of Li-doped
PEO coatings were studied both in vitro and in vivo.
Results and Discussion
PEO is a commonly used surface treatment technology, which improves
the biological performance of a Ti implant.[10,26,27] Recent studies have revealed that Li has
a positive influence on immune regulation for osteointegration and
induces exosome secretion that promotes angiogenesis.[22,24] In this study, we studied the direct influence of Li-doped PEO-coated
Ti on rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs). Surface views
of various prepared samples are shown in Figure a. After PEO treatment, all the samples exhibited
a rough surface with volcanic shapes. Small pores (indicated by red
arrows) with diameters of 0.3–0.6 μm were uniformly distributed
on the surface of the PEO sample. However, large pores (indicated
by yellow arrows) with diameters of 1–2 μm were also
observed in PEO-L1 and PEO-L2 samples. This may be caused by the increase
in conductivity of the electrolyte after introduction of Li ions.
The size of cell is 20–100 μm; therefore, the pores most
likely have minimal influences on the cell behaviors.
Figure 1
Surface views (A) and
XRD patterns (B) of Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and
PEO-L2 samples; red arrows indicate small pores on the PEO-coated
surface, and yellow arrows indicate large pores on the PEO-coated
surfaces; accumulation of released Li ions from PEO-L1 and PEOL-L2
samples immersed in deionized water (C).
Surface views (A) and
XRD patterns (B) of Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and
PEO-L2 samples; red arrows indicate small pores on the PEO-coated
surface, and yellow arrows indicate large pores on the PEO-coated
surfaces; accumulation of released Li ions from PEO-L1 and PEOL-L2
samples immersed in deionized water (C).X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of various prepared samples are
shown in Figure b.
Ti feature peaks were detected only for uncoated Ti samples. All PEO-coated
samples showed similar feature peaks with both anatase (25.37, 37.88,
48.12, and 55.1°) and rutile TiO2 (27.48, 36.13, and
54.37°) detected. The product of the PEO-treated sample is mainly
metal oxides. The temperature near the sample can be over 2000 °C.[28] Anatase TiO2 can be transferred to
rutile TiO2 at 915 °C; thus, both types of TiO2 were detected in the PEO-treated Ti samples. Element Li is
too light to be detected by energy dispersive spectrometry and X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy technologies. Nevertheless, other studies
have shown that elements in the electrolyte are evenly distributed
on PEO coatings.[29,30] Moreover, we investigated the
accumulation of Li ions released from various samples. Significantly,
more Li ions were released from the PEO-L2 sample after incubation
in deionized water for 3 and 7 days, as shown in Figure c. More Li ions in the electrolyte
of PEO-L2 resulted in more Li elements incorporated into the coating;
thus, more Li ions were released from the PEO-L2 sample.The
cytocompatibility of Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 samples was
determined using a standard CCK-8 assay and live/dead staining (Figure ). In general, the
amount of formazan dye generated by dehydrogenases in the viable cell
sample is directly proportional to the number of living cells in the
CCK-8 assay. Our results suggested that there was no significant difference
in the number of viable cells among the four sample groups. The cells
exhibited increased viability in the samples when the incubation time
was increased. The collected live/dead cell staining images indicated
that there were no obvious dead cells (red fluorescence) adhered on
different samples. Typical stem cell forms were found and spread out
in a healthy manner (green fluorescence) on the sample surfaces. Thus,
the use of Li preserved the cytocompatibility of rBMSCs on the titanium
substrate. To further investigate the cytoskeletal organization on
various surfaces, rBMSCs were stained with rhodamine phalloidin and
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The cytoskeletal organization
and cell densities on each sample are shown in Figure . A slight difference after incubation for
1, 4, and 24 h was observed. The rBMSCs on PEO-L2 displayed good adhesion
and high cell density (Figure ) and spreading area (Figure S1). Moreover, the cellular pseudopodia of the rBMSCs on the PEO-L2
coating extended earlier, and their filopodia extensions were more
developed than in other coatings. Furthermore, the mutual cross-linked
cells on the PEO-L2 coating showed that the cells were tightly connected.
Moreover, the cells cultured on PEO-L2 showed significantly higher
expression of genes, including vinculin and paxillin, than the other
three samples (Figure S2), which indicated
that PEO-L2 was more beneficial for the recruitment of BMSCs. Our
results validated that the introduction of Li into the PEO coating
provided a more suitable environment for rBMSC adhesion and growth.
This confirms the good biocompatibility of Li to osteogenesis-related
cells, which is consistent with previous research studies.[31,32]
Figure 2
Live/dead
staining of rBMSCs cultured on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2
samples for 3 days. CCK8 assay for the proliferation of BMSCs cultured
on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 samples for 1, 3, and 5 days.
Figure 3
Cytoskeleton staining of rBMSCs cultured on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1,
and
PEO-L2 samples for 1, 4, and 12 h. The F-actin and nucleus were stained
by rhodamine phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue), respectively.
Live/dead
staining of rBMSCs cultured on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2
samples for 3 days. CCK8 assay for the proliferation of BMSCs cultured
on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 samples for 1, 3, and 5 days.Cytoskeleton staining of rBMSCs cultured on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1,
and
PEO-L2 samples for 1, 4, and 12 h. The F-actin and nucleus were stained
by rhodamine phalloidin (red) and DAPI (blue), respectively.Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a byproduct of osteoblast
activity,
which has been considered to be an early indicator of osteogenic differentiation;
thus, an elevated ALP is an indication of active bone formation.[33,34] Therefore, the ALP activity was measured at 7 and 14 days to investigate
the osteogenic differentiation potential of rBMSCs that were cultured
on the samples. An ALP staining kit that provided a quick and easy
method to stain ALP in stem cells was used with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
phosphate (BCIP) as the substrate, and ALP staining is based on the
ability of ALP to hydrolyze the phosphate group on BCIP to produce
blue-colored intermediates, which are then oxidized by nitro blue
tetrazolium (NBT) to form an insoluble dark- or purple–blue
NBT formazan.[35] As shown in Figure A, the PEO coating with Li
displayed denser and deeper ALP positive staining after 7 and 14 days
of induction. The staining results for Ti and PEO groups were similar.
Meanwhile, para-nitrophenyl phosphate (p-NPP) is also a commonly used phosphatase chromogenic substrate,
which can be catalyzed by ALP to generate yellow p-NP under alkaline conditions. Based on this, the level of ALP activity
can be quantitatively calculated by colorimetric analysis using a p-NP standard curve alignment. Our quantitative results
of ALP activity levels (U/mg) revealed that coatings with Li were
favorable for elevating the ALP activity at days 7 and 14 compared
to the other two groups (p < 0.01, Figure B). The activity levels showed
the trend of Ti < PEO < PEO-L1 < PEO-L2. As the final stage
of osteogenic differentiation, matrix mineralization was mainly mediated
by osteoblasts that secrete mineral precursors, including calcium-
and phosphate-rich materials.[36] When the
rBMSCs were cultured with ascorbic acid, phosphate, and dexamethasone
for 14 days, extracellular calcified nodules formed on the sample
surfaces. These were visualized by alizarin red (AR) S staining. Using
a stereomicroscope, we confirmed that a calcium matrix was successfully
deposited on the PEO-modified surface. This was pronounced in the
PEO-L2 group, while the trends among the four groups were consistent
with ALP results. The relative quantitation results in Figure C showed that the formation
of mineralized nodules is 1.2 times greater in PEO-L2 than in the
Ti and PEO groups. These results revealed that Li-incorporated samples
were beneficial for osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs especially
PEO-L2. Although previous studies have shown that Li therapy enhances
bone anabolism and increases bone mineral density in mice,[37] our material preparation was simple and more
suitable for orthopedics. The local release of Li from the surface
coating could promote osteogenic differentiation of stem cells and
accelerate bone repair while reducing the side effects of systemic
Li use.
Figure 4
Representative ALP staining and ARS staining images of rBMSCs cultured
on different samples (A). Quantitative analysis of the ALP activity
(B) and ECM mineralization (C).
Representative ALP staining and ARS staining images of rBMSCs cultured
on different samples (A). Quantitative analysis of the ALP activity
(B) and ECM mineralization (C).The expression of osteogenic-related markers in rBMSCs after incubation
on different samples for 7 and 14 days was detected by real-time polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The results were calculated by normalizing
to a housekeeping gene and expressing as relative levels to the Ti
group (Figure ). The
tested genes included two early osteoblast markers [runt-related transcription
factor 2 (Runx2) and ALP] and two late markers [osteocalcin (OCN)
and collagen I (COL I)]. Runx2 is the main transcription factor. The
activation of Runx2 commits cells to osteogenic lineage.[38] In addition, Runx2 combines with a core-binding
factor subunit to form a heterodimer. This regulated OCN, OPN, bone
sialoprotein, and many others. Runx2 deletion in vivo could result in complete osteoblast absence.[39] Therefore, Runx2 expression during early skeletal development
is essential for osteoblast differentiation. Meanwhile, COL I and
OCN are the two most abundant proteins during bone growth.[40] As shown in Figure , the cells cultured on PEO-L2 samples showed
the highest expression of Runx2, COL I, and OCN compared with other
groups at day 14. The relative expression levels of COL I and OCN
in the PEO-L2 group were 6.2- and 1.8-fold higher than those in the
control group (Ti), respectively. These data implied that the enhanced
osteogenic differentiation was due to the regulatory effects of released
Li on osteogenesis-related genes. In addition, Li has been reported
to modulate intracellular signaling pathways that are related to bone
repair, such as glycogen synthase kinase-3β and wnt/β-catenin
signaling.[21,37,41,42]
Figure 5
Relative mRNA expression of osteogenesis markers
Runx2, ALP, OPN,
and OCN of the rBMSCs cultured on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 samples
with osteogenic differentiation for 7 and 14 days.
Relative mRNA expression of osteogenesis markers
Runx2, ALP, OPN,
and OCN of the rBMSCs cultured on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 samples
with osteogenic differentiation for 7 and 14 days.Our in vitro experiments confirmed that
osteogenic
induction was dependent on Li doping. To further examine the osteointegration
capacity in vivo, a bone-implant model was used.
Li-coated pillars were employed as implants in rat femurs. At week
8 post implantation with the coated pillars, the bone tissues with
implants were harvested. The bone around implants was stained red
through Van Gieson’s (VG) staining for undecalcified sections.
As shown in Figure , there were only a few new bone tissues surrounding the Ti implant.
The bone tissues were not bound tightly to Ti. By contrast, completed
new bone circles were formed in Li-incorporated pillars. The new bones
in PEO-L1 and PEO-L2 groups were more connected and thicker than those
in other groups. The bone-implant contact ratio revealed the same
trend (Figure S3). The special markers
(OCN and OPN) of osseointegration were immunohistochemically stained
on decalcified histological sections. After 8 weeks, larger stained
areas and deeper positive staining were observed around the coated
implants than the uncoated Ti implant. Notably, PEO-L1 and PEO-L2
groups exhibited most OCN and OPN expression around the implants during
bone reconstitution. OPN is not only an important bone matrix protein
and closely related to bone formation and development[43−45] but also plays an important regulatory role in vascular remodeling.[46,47] Our Li-incorporated implants also enhanced the expression of the
pro-angiogenic factor (VEGF), which contributed to the construction
of a pro-angiogenic biochemical microenvironment.[24] Therefore, our results confirmed that the release of Li
ions from the implants effectively promoted the osseointegration in vivo.
Figure 6
Representative VG staining images of undecalcified femur
sections
with Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 pillars at an implantation time of
8 weeks. Representative immunohistochemical images of OPN, OCN, and
VEGF staining of decalcified sections after 8 weeks. The asterisk
symbols show implants.
Representative VG staining images of undecalcified femur
sections
with Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 pillars at an implantation time of
8 weeks. Representative immunohistochemical images of OPN, OCN, and
VEGF staining of decalcified sections after 8 weeks. The asterisk
symbols show implants.
Conclusions
We introduced Li into Ti surfaces via PEO treatment. The modified
Ti implants showed sustained release of Li ions. Li-doped Ti surfaces
favored osteogenesis differentiation behaviors of rBSMCs. The in vivo
experiments also demonstrated that the developed implant provided
superior osteointegration than uncoated Ti. Our findings suggest that
the Li-modified surface on Ti is a promising strategy for orthopedic
implants.
Materials and Methods
Synthesis
and Characterization of Li-Doped
PEO Coating on Ti
Ti specimens were cut into 10 × 10
× 1 mm and ϕ 2 mm × 8 mm for in vitro and in vivo assays, respectively. The PEO process
was conducted in electrolyte solution containing 0.05 M NaSiO3, 0.1 M KOH, and X M LiCH3COO
(X = 0, 0.01, and 0.05) at a current of 0.8 A for
3 min. The obtained samples were denoted as Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2,
respectively. Afterward, all samples were sterilized using ethylene
oxide for 6 h at 55 °C.The surface views and surface phase
compositions were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (S-3400N,
Hitachi, Japan) and XRD (d8 ADVANCE, Bruker, Germany), respectively.
Ion Release
The samples were immersed
in 10 mL of deionized water. Liquid samples were collected after 1,
3, 5, and 7 days. To each collected sample, 10 mL of deionized water
was added. The Li ion concentration was determined using inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (iCAP RQ, Thermo Fisher
Scientific, USA).
Cell Culture
rBMSCs
were purchased
from Cyagen Biosciences. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s
modified Eagle’s medium/F12 medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin
at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere of 5% CO2. The culture
medium was exchanged every 48 h.
Cell
Adhesion
rBMSCs (2 × 103 cells/well) were
seeded on Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 samples
in 24-well plates. After 1, 4, and 12 h of incubation, the samples
were washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and then permeabilized
with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 2 min. The actin cytoskeleton of the cells
was stained with phalloidin rhodamine (Sigma, USA) for 1 h. The nuclei
were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma, USA) for 15 min. Finally, the
samples were imaged using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX 71,
Olympus, Japan).
Cell Proliferation and
Viability
The rBMSCs (1 × 104 cells/well)
were cultured on
different samples. Cell proliferation was analyzed using a CCK-8 (DOJINDO,
Japan) assay after 1, 3, and 5 days of incubation according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance of the culture
medium was measured at 450 nm by using a microplate reader. Cell viability
was detected by live/dead staining after 24 h. Briefly, the samples
were washed using PBS. Live and dead cells on the samples were stained
with calcein-AM (2 μM) and propidium iodide (PI, 5 μM),
respectively, for 15 min at 37 °C. Finally, the cell viability
was then observed by fluorescence microscopy.
ALP Activity
Assay
The rBMSCs (5
× 103) were seeded on different samples in 24-well
plates. After 24 h, osteogenic differentiation of cells was induced
by culture medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL ascorbic acid,
10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 10 nM dexamethasone. At days 7
and 14, the cells were stained using the BCIP/NBT ALP Chromogenic
Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Intracellular ALP catalyzes the
BCIP/NBT substrate to form an insoluble formazan. The level of enzyme
activity was determined by the substrate color. Meanwhile, after osteogenic
induction, the intracellular total protein concentration was measured
using the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Thermo Fisher Scientific,
USA). The intracellular ALP was measured using the ALP assay kit (Beyotime
Biotechnology, China). The enzyme activity (U/mg) was then calculated
by normalizing ALP to the protein content.
Extracellular
Matrix Mineralization Assay
The cells were cultured on different
samples, and osteoblast growth
was induced for 14 days as described above. The resulting cells were
then stained with AR (40 mM). The staining images of extracellular
matrix mineralization (ECM) were observed using a phase-contrast inverted
optical microscope (Olympus, Japan). For quantitative analysis, the
bonded dye was quantified by dissolving in 10% cetylpyridinium chloride
(Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and the OD620 values were measured
using a microplate reader.
Real-Time Polymerase Chain
Reaction
The rBMSCs (1 × 105) were seeded
on different samples
for 24 h and then cultured with osteogenic differentiation medium
for 7 and 14 days. Total RNA was extracted by using the TRIzol reagent
(Invitrogen, USA). Then, 500 ng of total RNA was used to synthesize
complementary DNA (cDNA) by using EasyScript All-in-One First-Strand
cDNA Synthesis SuperMix for qPCR (Trans, China). Finally, PerfectStart
Green qPCR SuperMix (Trans, China) was applied to quantitatively analyze
osteogenesis-related genes, including ALP, Runx2, COL-I, and OCN.
GAPDH was the housekeeping gene. All the primer sequences used in
this study are presented in Table S1.
Bone Implantation
Twenty male Sprague-Dawley
rats weighing 240–250 g were purchased from the Medical Experimental
Animal Center of Guangdong Province. The animals were randomly divided
into Ti, PEO, PEO-L1, and PEO-L2 groups. All the procedures in the
animal experiments were approved by the Guidelines for Care and Use
of Laboratory Animals of South China University of Technology and
the Animal Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s
Hospital (KY-Z-2021-381-01). Before surgery, animals were shaved,
and the surgical site was disinfected. After anesthetization, an incision
was made around the knee, which exposed the lateral femoral condyle.
A 2 mm-diameter hole was made by using a drill through the lateral
femoral condyles (Figure S4). The cylinder
sample (2 mm in diameter, 5 mm in length) was pressed fit into the
hole, and then, the wound was disinfected and gently closed. 8 weeks
after surgery, all animals were sacrificed by an overdose of pentobarbitone.
The femurs with implants were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde.
After gradient dehydration and embedding in polymethylmethacrylate,
tissues were cut into sections by using a saw microtome (EXAKT Apparatebau,
Germany). Then, VG staining was performed on the sections polished
to about 50 μm, and the representative pictures were acquired
using a microscope (Olympus, Japan). The osseous tissues were decalcified
in EDTA decalcifying solution for 4 weeks, and then, the implants
were removed gently from the femurs. The decalcified femurs were then
dehydrated, embedded, and then cut into 5 μm-thick slices. Afterward,
the obtained sections were dewaxed in xylene and hydrated in gradient
ethanol. Through antigen retrieval and blocking, the sections were
incubated with primary antibodies (VEGF, OCN, OPN; Servicebio, China)
and the goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (InvivoGen, USA).
Finally, the positive protein expression was detected by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine
solution (Dako, Denmark) and the hematoxylin counterstaining process
and examined using a microscope.
Statistical
Analysis
Mean ±
standard deviation is presented from repeated independent experiments.
Differences among groups were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance
followed by the SNK test using SPSS20.0 software. Statistical significance
was confirmed when the P-value is less than 0.05
(*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Authors: Jeffrey J Cherian; Julio J Jauregui; Samik Banerjee; Todd Pierce; Michael A Mont Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 4.176