| Literature DB >> 35449568 |
Vanessa Giffoni M N P Peixoto1,2, Julianna P Azevedo3, Kleber G Luz4,5, Katie M Almondes1,3.
Abstract
Background: Chikungunya fever is a disabling articular disease caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV). In the past decade it has affected millions of people across America, Africa, Asia, and Europe, turning this infection into a public health concern. The acute phase of chikungunya infection is usually self-limiting, characterized by severe arthralgia, fever, chills, myalgia, headache, and rash. CHIKV neurovirulence is evident and seems to be higher among elders. Considering their susceptibility to cognitive decline and dementia, the aim of our study was to investigate whether CHIKV infection might cause long-term cognitive impairment in aged people.Entities:
Keywords: chikungunya virus; cognition; cognitive decline; cognitive dysfunction; dementia; elderly; elders; older adults
Year: 2022 PMID: 35449568 PMCID: PMC9016789 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.823218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
Demographic and clinical characteristics by groups (CHIK and healthy controls).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 68.08 ± 5.70 | 68.24 ± 6.93 | |||
| Female | 66 (69.5) | 19 (73.1) | 0.127 | 0.722 |
| Male | 29 (30.5) | 7 (26.9) | ||
| Single | 11 (11.6) | 2 (7.7) | ||
| Married | 66 (69.4) | 14 (53.8) | ||
| Divorced | 7 (7.4) | 7 (26.9) | ||
| Widow | 11 (11.6) | 3 (11.5) | ||
| 4–8 years | 2 (2.1) | 1 (3.8) | ||
| 9 years | 6 (6.3) | 0 | ||
| 12 years | 33 (34.7) | 9 (34.6) | ||
| University degree | 43 (45.3) | 13 (50) | ||
| Postgraduation | 11 (11.6) | 3 (11.5) | ||
| Lower than R$1.100 | 1 (1.1) | 0 | ||
| R$ 1.000–1.600 | 5 (5.3) | 0 | ||
| R$ 1.600 e 3.000 | 9 (9.5) | 2 (7.7) | ||
| R$ 3.000 e 5.000 | 14 (14.9) | 3 (12.0) | ||
| R$ 5.000 e 10.000 | 33 (35.1) | 5 (20.0) | ||
| R$ 10.000 e 23.000 | 27 (28.8) | 13 (50) | ||
| Higher than R$ 23.000 | 6 (6.3) | 2 (7.7) | ||
| Retired | 72 (75.8) | 11 (42.3) | ||
| Working | 20 (21) | 14 (53.7) | ||
| Unemployed | 3 (3.2) | 1 (3.8) | ||
| No | 25 (26.3) | 16 (61.5) | 11.305 |
|
| Yes | 70 (73.7) | 10 (38.5) | ||
| No | 56 (58.9) | 16 (61.5) | 0.057 | 0.812 |
| Yes | 39 (41.1) | 10 (38.5) | ||
| No | 74 (77.9) | 23 (88.8) | 1.433 | 0.231 |
| Yes | 21 (22.1) | 3 (11.5) | ||
Values are expressed in mean results (M) ± standard deviation (SD) or number of subjects (n)/frequencies (%). Chi-square (x.
CHIK, individuals with previous chikungunya; HC, healthy controls; R$, Brazilian Reais (currency).
The Brazilian minimum wage is R$1,100.00.
Raw neuropsychological tests results and the respective impairment (tests results < -1.5 SD) by groups (CHIK and healthy controls).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 21.56 ± 3.26 | 24.69 ± 2.54 | −4.51 |
| |
| Deficit (score <25) n (%) | 79 (83.2%) | 13 (50.0%) | 12.316 |
|
| Time 1st sheet | 16.13 ± 3.67 | 14.10 ± 2.15 | 841.000 |
|
| Errors 1st sheet | 0.08 ± 0.37 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1,157.00 | 0.191 |
| Time 2nd sheet | 24.53 ± 6.60 | 20.58 ± 4.65 | 786.500 |
|
| Errors 2nd sheet | 0.05 ± 0.33 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1,196.000 | 0.361 |
| Time 3rd sheet | 38.18 ± 10.50 | 29.63 ± 8.12 | 662.000 |
|
| Errors 3rd sheet | 0.62 ± 1.34 | 0.07 ± 0.27 | 977.000 |
|
| Interference | 2.37 ± 0.52 | 2.09 ± 0.46 | 2.46 |
|
| Animals | 15.88 ± 4.70 | 18.50 ± 6.56 | 956.500 | 0.078 |
| Score | 1.17 ± 1.26 | 1.90 ± 1.70 | 924.000 |
|
| Words | 33.00 ± 11.11 | 40.88 ± 13.88 | 838.000 |
|
| Score | 1.27 ± 1.38 | 2.25 ± 1.67 | −3.032 |
|
| Total Score | 11.59 ± 0.70 | 11.26 ± 0.96 | 991.000 | 0.073 |
| Reading | 27.08 ± 9.04 | 24.19 ± 5.52 | 838.000 |
|
| Counting | 28.50 ± 6.26 | 25.73 ± 5.62 | 860.500 |
|
| Choice | 47.51 ± 10.53 | 41.11 ± 10.64 | 767.500 |
|
| Inhibition | 20.15 ± 8.46 | 17.38 ± 8.59 | 1.475 | 0.143 |
| Flexibility | 43.19 ± 17.67 | 38.11 ± 17.65 | 963.00 | 0.099 |
| Alternance | 70.22 ± 19.61 | 62.73 ± 20.48 | 859.00 |
|
| Deficit alternance (< -1.5 SD) | 24 (25.3) | 5 (19.2) | 0.408 | 0.523 |
| Word total | 34.57 ± 7.89 | 38.11 ± 8.67 | −1.981 |
|
| A7 List | 6.07 ± 2.82 | 7.11 ± 3.32 | 1,024.00 | 0.205 |
| Recognition | 7.05 ± 4.80 | 7.28 ± 4.58 | 1,141.500 | 0.827 |
| Concentrated attention | 74.34 ± 19.01 | 78.80 ± 20.81 | −1.038 | 0.301 |
| Divided attention | 34.95 ± 24.43 | 47.61 ± 24.88 | −1.779 | 0.078 |
| Alternated attention | 56.95 ± 23.49 | 66.00 ± 27.32 | −1.678 | 0.096 |
| General attention | 166.80 ± 56.76 | 188.26 ± 67.47 | −1.639 | 0.104 |
| 15.60 ± 2.49 | 16.23 ± 1.96 | 1,059.500 | 0.259 | |
Values are expressed in mean results (M) ± standard deviation (SD) or number of subjects with scores < -1.5 SD (n)/frequencies (%). t-test (t) or Mann–Whitney (U) for comparisons between means and Chi-square (x.
x.
CHIK, individuals with previous chikungunya; HC, healthy controls; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; PBA, Psychological Battery Tests of Attention.
Estimated coefficients for the logistic regression that models the probability of deficient performance on the MoCA test as a function of chikungunya infection and the participant's age.
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (Intercept) | −5.062 | 2.974 | −1.702 | 0.088 |
| Chikungunya | 1.956 | 0.494 | 3.956 |
|
| Age | 0.069 | 0.043 | 1.614 | 0.106 |
Each coefficient is followed by the respective Wald test and statistics.
Significant results (p < 0.05) shown in the fifth column in bold.
Figure 1Estimated association (or effect) of chikungunya infection and participant's age on the probability of having the performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test considered as impaired.