Ivan Adamec1,2, Anamari Junaković3, Magdalena Krbot Skorić3,4, Mario Habek3,5. 1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. ivan.adamec@yahoo.com. 2. School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. ivan.adamec@yahoo.com. 3. Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. 4. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia. 5. School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tilt table test represents a valuable diagnostic method in assessing patients with transient loss of consciousness and confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. However, the test lacks standardization, and various protocols exist in different centers. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in sensitivity and time-to-syncope of tilt table test with a painful stimulus provocation compared to standard test with no provocation. METHODS: This was a prospective study that included consecutive patients diagnosed with vasovagal syncope who were referred for tilt table testing. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 with pain provocation after the first 10 min of upright position and group 2 with no provocation with further 30 min of tilt in both groups. RESULTS: In group 1, 66 (78.6%) patients developed syncope while in group 2, 35 (44.3%) patients had syncope (p < 0.001). This represents an increase of 34.3% in TTT sensitivity with the application of painful provocation. According to results of the Cox regression, the hazard for developing syncope after the 10th min of the tilt for group 2 was 0.275 of the hazard of group 1 (95% C.I. 0.170-0.444, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain provocation is a useful method for increasing sensitivity and shortening the duration of tilt table testing.
BACKGROUND: Tilt table test represents a valuable diagnostic method in assessing patients with transient loss of consciousness and confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. However, the test lacks standardization, and various protocols exist in different centers. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in sensitivity and time-to-syncope of tilt table test with a painful stimulus provocation compared to standard test with no provocation. METHODS: This was a prospective study that included consecutive patients diagnosed with vasovagal syncope who were referred for tilt table testing. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 with pain provocation after the first 10 min of upright position and group 2 with no provocation with further 30 min of tilt in both groups. RESULTS: In group 1, 66 (78.6%) patients developed syncope while in group 2, 35 (44.3%) patients had syncope (p < 0.001). This represents an increase of 34.3% in TTT sensitivity with the application of painful provocation. According to results of the Cox regression, the hazard for developing syncope after the 10th min of the tilt for group 2 was 0.275 of the hazard of group 1 (95% C.I. 0.170-0.444, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pain provocation is a useful method for increasing sensitivity and shortening the duration of tilt table testing.
Authors: Nynke van Dijk; Kimberly R Boer; Nancy Colman; Annemieke Bakker; Jan Stam; Johannes J M van Grieken; Arthur A M Wilde; Mark Linzer; Johannes B Reitsma; Wouter Wieling Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2007-10-03
Authors: Michele Brignole; Angel Moya; Frederik J de Lange; Jean-Claude Deharo; Perry M Elliott; Alessandra Fanciulli; Artur Fedorowski; Raffaello Furlan; Rose Anne Kenny; Alfonso Martín; Vincent Probst; Matthew J Reed; Ciara P Rice; Richard Sutton; Andrea Ungar; J Gert van Dijk Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Roland D Thijs; Michele Brignole; Cristian Falup-Pecurariu; Alessandra Fanciulli; Roy Freeman; Pietro Guaraldi; Jens Jordan; Mario Habek; Max Hilz; Anne Pavy-Le Traon; Iva Stankovic; Walter Struhal; Richard Sutton; Gregor Wenning; J Gert Van Dijk Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 4.435