| Literature DB >> 35449087 |
Bethelihem Tigabu Tarekegn1, Nega Tezera Assimamaw2, Kendalem Asmare Atalell2, Selam Fisiha Kassa2, Addis Bilal Muhye2, Masresha Asmare Techane2, Tewodros Getaneh Alemu2, Chalachew Adugna Wubneh2, Getaneh Mulualem Belay2, Tadesse Tarik Tamir2, Destaye Guadie Kassie2, Amare Wondim2, Bewuketu Terefe3, Mohammed Seid Ali2, Beletech Fentie2, Almaz Tefera Gonete2, Berhan Tekeba2, Bogale Kassahun Desta2, Melkamu Tilahun Dessie2, Amare Demsie Ayele2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence on double and triple burdens of malnutrition at household level among child-mother pairs is a key towards addressing the problem of malnutrition. In Ethiopia, studies on double and triple burdens of malnutrition are scarce. Even though there is a study on double burden of malnutrition at national level in Ethiopia, it doesn't assess the triple burdens at all and a few forms of double burden of malnutrition. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of double and triple burdens of malnutrition among child-mother pairs in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Associated Factors; Double Burden; Ethiopia; Hotspot; Malnutrition; Spatial Distribution; Survey Regression; Triple Burden; Under Five Children
Year: 2022 PMID: 35449087 PMCID: PMC9027462 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-022-00528-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nutr ISSN: 2055-0928
Fig. 1Clusters included Ethiopian DHS-2016
Prevalence of nutritional status of children and mothers/caregivers (n = 7,624)
| Indicator | Weighted Percent [95% CI] |
|---|---|
| Child Stunting | 40.9 [38.78, 42.95] |
| Child Wasting | 25.4 [23.78, 27.08] |
| Child underweight | 9.4 [8.27, 10.51] |
| Child anemia | 57.4 [54.8, 59.8] |
| Maternal Overweight/Obesity | 5.8 [4.94, 6.59] |
The coexistence of various forms of malnutrition (n = 7,624)
| Co-existence of malnutrition | Weighted Percent [95%CI] |
|---|---|
| OM/AC | 3.1 [2.61, 3.69] |
| OM/SC | 1.6 [1.18,1.99] |
| OM/WC | 0.8 [0.49, 1.04] |
| OM/UC | 0.3 [0.07, 0.45] |
Weighted prevalence of DBM and TBM by socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants
| Variables | DBM [95%CI] | TBM [95%CI] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toilet facility | Un Improved | 1.9 [1.27, 2.46] | 1.1 [0.62, 1.53] |
| Improved | 2.9 [1.81, 3.98] | 1.8 [0.97, 2.71] | |
| Open Field | 1.5 [0.70, 2.22] | 1.2 [0.48, 1.96] | |
| Mother’s Age | 15–24 | 1.1 [0.29, 1.83] | 0.9 [0.16, 1.55] |
| 25–29 | 1.5 [0.87, 2.17] | 1.1 [0.52, 1.63] | |
| 30–34 | 2.7 [1.45, 4.03] | 1.8 [0.69, 2.86] | |
| 35–49 | 1.9 [1.10, 2.73] | 1.1 [0.44, 1.77] | |
| HH size | 2–4 | 1.6 [0.65, 2.50] | 1.3 [0.42, 2.24] |
| 5–7 | 1.8 [1.16, 2.39] | 1.1 [0.57, 1.54] | |
| 8 + | 2.1 [0.95, 3.29] | 1.4 [0.42, 2.31] | |
| Residence | Urban | 3.6 [2.40, 4.88] | 1.6 [0.76, 2.39] |
| Rural | 1.6 [1.14, 2.06] | 1.2 [0.76, 1.56] | |
| Education Mother’s | No Formal Education | 1.8 [1.24, 2.41] | 1.2 [0.76, 1.73] |
| Primary | 1.8 [1.01, 2.60] | 1.2 [0.47, 1.93] | |
| Secondary/Higher | 1.7 [0.55, 2.79] | 0.7 [0.21, 1.16] | |
| Time to water source (in minutes) | On Premise | 2.8 [1.77, 3.85] | 1.7 [0.80, 2.61] |
| < = 30 | 1.9 [1.26, 2.51] | 1.2 [0.68, 1.77] | |
| 31–60 | 1.2 [0.47, 1.83] | 1.0 [0.32, 1.61] | |
| > = 61 | 1.9 [0.84, 3.03] | 1.2 [0.35, 2.00] | |
| Media exposure | No | 1.7 [1.18, 2.14] | 1.2 [0.79, 1.66] |
| Yes | 2.5 [1.32, 3.70] | 1.1 [0.43, 1.72] | |
| Wealth index | Poorest | 1.8 [0.77, 2.80] | 1.5 [0.47, 2.43] |
| Poorer | 2.2 [1.04, 3.35] | 1.6 [0.50, 2.64] | |
| Medium | 0.7 [0.00, 1.39] | 0.7 [0.00, 1.38] | |
| Richer | 1.5 [0.53, 2.37] | 0.7 [0.01, 1.33] | |
| Richest | 3.5 [2.11, 4.78] | 1.7 [0.84, 2.49] | |
| Marital status | Currently in union | 1.8 [1.32, 2.17] | 1.2 [0.82, 1.54] |
| Never/formerly in union | 2.9 [0.46, 5.39] | 1.5 [0.00, 3.46] | |
| Child sex | Male | 2.1 [1.42, 2.81] | 1.5 [0.85, 2.13] |
| Female | 1.5 [0.95, 2.00] | 0.9 [0.47, 1.32] | |
| Birth weight | Large | 1.3 [0.70, 1.94] | 1.0 [0.45, 1.54] |
| Average | 1.9 [1.26, 2.62] | 1.0 [0.51, 1.53] | |
| Small | 2.3 [1.37, 3.13] | 1.8 [0.97, 2.62] | |
| Child age (months) | 6–12 | 0.6 [0.00, 1.22] | 0.6 [0.00, 1.21] |
| 13–23 | 1.5 [0.45, 2.57] | 1.1 [0.14, 2.12] | |
| 24–35 | 2.2 [1.12, 3.22] | 1.7 [0.78, 2.63] | |
| 36–47 | 2.7 [1.57, 3.83] | 1.6 [0.70, 2.54] | |
| 48–59 | 1.7 [0.86, 2.47] | 0.8 [0.18, 1.38] | |
Fig. 2Pattern analysis (Geospatial Clustering and Hot Spot Detection) of double burden of malnutrition (DBM) among child-mother/caregiver pairs in Ethiopia
Fig. 3Pattern analysis (Geospatial Clustering and Hot Spot Detection) of triple burden of malnutrition (TBM) among child-mother/caregiver pairs in Ethiopia
Fig. 4Spatial distribution for DBM via IDW interpolation
Fig. 5Spatial distribution for TBM via IDW interpolation
Associated factors of DBM among child-mother pairs in Ethiopia
| Variables | Coefficients | S.E | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toilet Facility | Open field | -0.52 | 0.457 | 0.2526 |
| Unimproved | 0.01 | 0.348 | 0.9738 | |
| Mother’s Age | 25–29 | 0.01 | 0.493 | 0.9775 |
| 30–34 | 0.51 | 0.500 | 0.3114 | |
| 35–49 | 0.27 | 0.618 | 0.6583 | |
| HH size | 5–7 | 0.01 | 0.450 | 0.9858 |
| 8 + | 0.14 | 0.529 | 0.7977 | |
| Residence | Rural | -0.26 | 0.507 | 0.6062 |
| Education | Primary | 0.57 | 0.564 | 0.3085 |
| No Formal | 0.58 | 0.653 | 0.3774 | |
| Time To Water | < = 30 min | 0.28 | 0.542 | 0.6071 |
| 31–60 min | -0.02 | 0.585 | 0.9694 | |
| Media Exposure | Yes | 0.46 | 0.388 | 0.2389 |
| Wealth Index | Poorer | -0.39 | 0.549 | 0.4738 |
| Middle | -1.48 | 0.700 | ||
| Richer | -1.08 | 0.635 | 0.0909 | |
| Richest | -0.18 | 0.665 | 0.7868 | |
| Marital status | Never In Union/divorced/ widowed/separated | 0.79 | 0.511 | 0.1230 |
| Child sex | Female | -0.35 | 0.323 | 0.2837 |
| Birth Weight | Average | -1.33 | 0.564 | |
| Small | 0.07 | 0.337 | 0.8316 | |
| Child Age | 13–23 | 1.28 | 0.877 | 0.1446 |
| 24–35 | 1.62 | 0.799 | ||
| 36–47 | 1.33 | 0.779 | 0.0885 | |
| 48–59 | 1.37 | 0.791 | 0.0830 | |
Associated factors of TBM among child-mother pairs in Ethiopia
| Variables | Coefficients | S.E | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toilet Facility | Open field | -0.57 | 0.491 | 0.2450 |
| Unimproved | -0.25 | 0.419 | 0.5469 | |
| Mother’s Age | 25–29 | 0.16 | 0.473 | 0.7328 |
| 30–34 | 0.39 | 0.506 | 0.4458 | |
| 35–49 | 0.10 | 0.797 | 0.8959 | |
| HH size | 5–7 | -0.38 | 0.484 | 0.4272 |
| 8 + | -0.34 | 0.607 | 0.5790 | |
| Educ | Primary | 0.81 | 0.619 | 0.1886 |
| No Formal | 0.85 | 0.733 | 0.2455 | |
| Distance to water source | < = 30 min | |||
| 31–60 min | ||||
| Poorer | -0.68 | 0.726 | 0.3437 | |
| Wealth Index | Middle | -1.13 | 0.792 | 0.1524 |
| Richer | -1.53 | 0.809 | 0.0587 | |
| Richest | -1.31 | 0.788 | 0.0987 | |
| Child sex | Female | -0.47 | 0.468 | 0.3193 |
| Birth Weight | Average | |||
| Small | -0.35 | 0.393 | 0.3681 | |
| Child Age | 13–23 | 0.92 | 0.961 | 0.3414 |
| 24–35 | 1.32 | 0.847 | 0.1186 | |
| 36–47 | 0.64 | 0.847 | 0.4481 | |
| 48–59 | 0.64 | 0.892 | 0.4761 | |
| Marital | Never In Union/divorced/ widowed/separated | 0.62 | 0.610 | 0.3103 |